Valley Regional Transit Strategic Plan

Similar documents
Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 71 Public Transportation. (a) Applicability. The United States Congress revised 49

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

MID-HUDSON VALLEY TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAMS GRANT APPLICATION.

Overview of Presentation

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TOLEDO OH - MI URBANIZED AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM & NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Part I. Federal Section 5310 Program

DRAFT JARC FUNDING APPLICATION January 29, 2013

DRAFT FUNDING APPLICATION October 20, 2010

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

CITY OF TUCSON (GRANTEE) PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (PAG) (METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION)

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

Proposal For Nye County (Pahrump) Public Transportation (Transit) System 2015

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

Metro REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JUNE 18, 2014

A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS FOUR AND SIX COMMUTER SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES

Appendix B. FAQ Brochure LOCHSTP Plan Outline Transportation Service Survey Project Prioritization Criteria

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

The Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects

Questions & Answers. Elderly Individuals & Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310), JARC & New Freedom Programs Last Updated April 29, 2009

APPENDIX G: FUNDING STRATEGIES

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2006 through 2010 TOLEDO OH - MI URBANIZED AREA JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS AND COMPETITIVE APPLICATION

MAP-21: An Analysis. The Trust Fund

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

Federal Transit Administration: Section Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities. Call for Projects.

Stimulus Funding and Transportation

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

Sources of Funding for Transit in Urban Areas in Texas Final report PRC

ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES PROGRAM GUIDANCE AND APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

FORMULA GRANTS 5307 Urbanized Area 5337 State of Good Repair 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Board of Directors Committee Meeting

9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs

Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zo~-.,. Los Angeles, CA g0012-2g52 rnetro.net

2017 CALL FOR PROJECTS & FUNDING APPLICATION

Addendum to the Coordinated Community Transportation Plan for Southwest New Hampshire (RCC Regions 5 and 6)

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX B

The Money Issue: Financing and Funding Tribal Transit. Community Transportation EXPO Tampa, Florida June 3, 2015

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

Future Trends & Themes Summary. Presented to Executive Steering Committee: April 12, 2017

Section Policies and purposes

Isothermal Region: McDowell, Polk and Rutherford Counties Locally Coordinated Human Service Transportation Plan

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

State Management Plan For The Administration Of The Section Nonurbanized Area Formula Grant Program And Rural Transportation Assistance Program

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

Expanding Mobility Through FTA New Initiatives and New Staff

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects

Please complete your phone connection now:

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration. Professional Development Workshop 05 June 2012

SECTION 5310 FUNDING APPLICATION Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

2007 SOLICITATION FOR FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT FUNDING

Appendix E Federal and State Funding Categories

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Legislative Priorities

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration. FTA Update. GAMPO Meeting November 30, 2010

MDOT OFFICE OF PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION UPDATE Annual Transit Meeting

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

The application deadline is 2:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 6, 2010.

APTA Recommendations on Federal Public Transportation Authorizing Law

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES

2019 Section 5310 Application

2018 and 2020 Regional Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) Grant Application

LIBERTY COUNTY TRANSIT PLAN

Project Selection Advisory Council

Sources of Funding Transit in Texas Final Report PRC

Program Management Plan FTA Section 5310

SOUTH FLORIDA COMMUTER SERVICES CONTRACT SCOPE OF SERVICES

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Unified Planning Work Program Fiscal Year 2016 (July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016)

Making the MOST. of MAP-21. A Guide to the 2012 Federal Transportation Law And How to Use it for Positive Change in Your Community

PUBLIC NOTICE. All documents must be signed by persons with signature authority and their legal counsel.

Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Transit. State Management Plan

BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT MAJOR SERVICE CHANGE TO 595 EXPRESS SUNRISE - FORT LAUDERDALE. A Title VI Service Equity Analysis

NEW FREEDOM- Project Conditions (5310 Grant Funds)

Counting for Dollars: Tulsa County, Oklahoma

APPENDIX A-5 Transit Program of Projects March 2014 Update

5316 JARC 5317 New Freedom 5310 AMHTA 2010 $107, $63, $67, $236,250

ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2016 SIOUX CITY TRANSIT SYSTEM

Program Management Plan

Corridor Management Committee. September 5, 2012

Texas Department of Transportation

FTA and Tribal Transit Program Past, Present, and Future

Grant Program Guidelines

JOB ACCESS - REVERSE COMMUTE NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM

Program Design Improvements

Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation

ANNUAL TRANSIT PROVIDER MEETING FY 2017 GENERAL SESSION, SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

Appendix H Illinois DOT: Inventory of Services

Yale University 2017 Transportation Survey Report February 2018

Regional Transit System Plan. Regional Task Force Meeting No. 1

Brownfields Conference Oklahoma City, OK May 22, What is FHWA?

Transcription:

Valley Regional Transit Strategic Plan 2013-18 Background Valley Regional Transit Voters in Ada and Canyon counties approved the formation of a Regional Public Transit Authority (RPTA) in each of their respective counties in 1998. The Treasure Valley Regional Public Transportation Authority was formed on January 21, 1999 when the Boards of the Ada and Canyon RPTAs formally voted to merge the two organizations. Valley Regional Transit (VRT) was adopted as the official name of the authority in 2004. Idaho Code (ICC 40-2104) defines the purpose of RPTAs: This authority is under the supervision of and directly responsible to local governments, and shall provide public transportation services, encourage private transportation programs and coordinate both public and private transportation programs, services and support functions. The new state code did not provide a funding source to pay for public transportation services. The VRT Board of Directors is made up of 28 appointed representatives from incorporated cities, counties, and highway districts in Ada and Canyon counties, plus one representative from each of the following: Capital City Development Corporation (CCDC), Boise State University, Meridian Development Corporation, and Idaho Transportation Department (ex-officio). VRT is funded through a combination of federal transit funds, local general fund contributions from each of the jurisdictions within the authority s boundaries, and farebox and advertising revenues. Regional Coordination Regional coordination and mobility management practices, in one form or another, have been encouraged at the federal, state and local levels for the past two decades. The previous strategic planning efforts established the framework for VRT s coordination and mobility management activities. The economic downturn that began in September 2008 has made the management and effective allocation of transportation resources more important than ever. The ever-changing federal funding picture also supports the importance of regional coordination and mobility management. In fact, the future of federal funding for transportation will be tied directly to demonstrated performance in such areas as community livability, providing transportation choices, improving access to affordable housing, and enhancing economic competitiveness. Valleyconnect is VRT s short-term and long-term plan detailing what VRT must do to meet the transportation needs in the Treasure Valley. Valleyconnect also serves as the region s human service coordination plan. Attached is a graphic that provides an overview of the products and services within the valleyconnect plan (Attachment 1). 1

Funding Support VRT relies on a combination of federal and local funding sources to support the regional authority administration and the transportation options that VRT funds directly. There has been a recent shift in federal funding policies to support regional coordination, mobility management and community sustainability. Attached is a matrix of federal funding programs (Attachment 2). VRT has been in a good position to increase federal funding streams in the last few years as a result of its strategic planning efforts and the emphasis on coordination, mobility management, asset management, and community livability. Local sources of funding primarily come from jurisdictions general funds. There are two funding sources for VRT s administrative support: monies from each jurisdiction based on a per capita assessment and from special members through a negotiated contribution amount. The local funding for service options and operations is collected from those jurisdictions where services are operated. The trend of local support has been steady even during the economic downturn. VRT completed a series of transportation service adjustments to account for flat revenues the last few years and minimize service changes. Strategic Plan Context VRT adopted its first five-year strategic plan in December 2002. This plan defined a course that led to effective and efficient public transportation services throughout the Treasure Valley. The 2008-13 Strategic Plan was adopted in 2007. The strategic plan has had two updates in the last five years. The updates are done in two-year increments to accommodate the ever-changing environment from which VRT must operate. The Executive Board and the Regional Coordination Council (RCC) served as the steering committees for the latest five-year strategic plan (2013-2018). VRT conducted a series of workshops with the Executive Board, the Regional Coordination Council, and VRT staff. The workshop included a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis. Input received from the workshop sessions supports the need for VRT to focus on securing a stable funding source as a single priority. The foundation established for this priority in previous strategic plans centered on building core competencies for the authority. The idea of building core competencies center around the following elements: 1. Demonstrating leadership 2. Establishing a vision 3. Developing partnerships 4. Exhibiting high performance 5. Communicating effectively 6. Meeting the identified needs When people try to determine whether they are going to support a tax increase, they usually ask themselves the following five questions: 2

Do I trust them? Do they do a good job? Do they understand my needs? Do they have a plan? Do they ask my opinion? Finally, these core competencies come through in the following areas: Vision, Stewardship, and Partnership. 3

Vision, Mission, and Guiding Principles The input from the strategic plan workshop sessions was reviewed and discussed in a joint meeting of the Executive Board and the RCC. The Vision describes the future world in which VRT will operate. The Mission defines VRT s unique purpose and answers the questions, Who are we? and What do we do? The Guiding Principles are threads woven into all aspects of the strategic plan. Vision We envision a region with adequate and secure funding to support public transportation options designed to meet the needs of citizens and businesses and to support livable, healthy, and sustainable communities. Mission Valley Regional Transit s mission is to develop and manage transportation resources and to coordinate the effective and efficient delivery of safe transportation options to the region s citizens. Guiding Principles Develop community benefit in an overall, not just a public transportation, focused manner by enhancing the ability of citizens to make a number of choices for transportation and by providing alternative transportation for those who have no choice. Maximize public investment in transportation options throughout the region to assure that resources are utilized efficiently and effectively. Provide connectivity to create ease of services between people, places and modes, by assuring that reasonable ways to connect between different providers and different modes are not only available, but are truly easy to understand and easy to use. Develop geographic reach to assure that the geographic locations and concerns of stakeholders, both rural and urban, are thoughtfully integrated into planning and delivery of transportation options to the greatest degree possible. Assure quality customer service by placing the customer as the focal point of our processes and assure that the ease of use, flexibility of service, and satisfaction are of paramount concern to VRT, providers, and other partners. Be action oriented by providing the appropriate sense of urgency not only to the matter of immediate improvements, but also to the longer range planning effort for the ultimate goal of enhanced livability for the citizens of the region. Work as a team in collaboration with our partners, stakeholders, and the public by demonstrating our willingness to improve how we work together for the benefit of our constituents. 4

Communicate openly and directly and constantly in an honest manner on all things, always encouraging positive communication and creating an environment where everyone s contribution to the region is acknowledged and respected. 5

Priority, Goals, and Strategies The priority, goals, strategies, and objectives define the general actions to be taken in order for VRT to be successful in the future. These are defined from the high-level view (priority) down to the very specific (objectives). Priorities set the focus. Goals set the target. Strategies state how the goals will be achieved. Objectives state what we will do now. Action plans tie back to how resources will be deployed and accountability for results. Priorities Priority 1 Secure a stable funding source to build a regional public transportation system in Ada and Canyon counties. Priority 2 Expand the public understanding of how a fully implemented regional public transportation system will increase access to transportation for all Ada and Canyon county citizens. Goal 1 Demonstrate responsible stewardship of public funds Strategies a. Enhance the coordination of transportation resources b. Improve service quality and ridership c. Increase access to existing and new transportation options Objective 1: Complete implementation of regional rideline one-stop shop customer information center Objective 2: Complete existing capital infrastructure projects Objective 3: Complete technology investments to enhance coordination opportunities and to improve customer experience of public transportation options Objective 4: Complete a regional performance measurement system within and between the region s service providers and across transportation options Goal 2 Build community partnerships and support for valleyconnect Strategies a. Develop targeted communication strategies b. Grow partners through program coordination and land use/transportation system integration c. Create and implement comprehensive education/outreach programs 6

Objective 1: Develop and implement a comprehensive public outreach and education program to enhance awareness and positive image of public transportation in the region Objective 2: Seek out and leverage community partnerships to increase program coordination and leveraging of financial resources for expanding transportation options Objective 3: Develop and implement public information standards to ensure high quality customer services and accessibility for persons with disabilities and persons with limited English proficiency Objective 4: Complete an analysis on VRT branding strategies within the context of VRT s mobility management and regional service coordination mission Goal 3 Improve the Authority s capacity Strategies a. Address gaps in transportation options b. Secure stable funding source c. Prepare for future improvements d. Enhance the responsiveness of the regional Authority to changes in the political/policy environment. Objective 1: Develop and implement a comprehensive project management and tracking system Objective 2: Implement an employee classification and performance evaluation system Objective 3: Complete a detailed analysis to update information on funding options to be considered in future funding requests Objective 4: Develop a comprehensive outreach and education plan to build coalitions that support building financial capacity through local dedicated funding for public transportation 7

VRT Organizational Overview A key to successfully implementing a strategic plan has, at the foundation, a clear division of duties and understanding of each group s unique role in the implementation process. The VRT Board of Directors voted to change the governance structure of the Authority in August 2011. The governance change maintained the existing Board structure and established an 11-member Executive Board elected from the full Board. The full Board meets twice a year to conduct the governance business of the organization. The Executive Board meets monthly to execute the actions of the full board. Valley Regional Transit Board The VRT Board establishes policy and guides the strategic priorities and goals for the agency. Board members include representatives from Ada and Canyon counties and the incorporated cities and highway districts. In addition, there are representatives from Capital City Development Corporation, Boise State University, Meridian Development Corporation, and Idaho Transportation Department (exofficio). Executive Board The Executive Board is a standing committee of the VRT Board. It reviews matters related to budget, finance, operations, governmental, and legislative actions of VRT. The Executive Board focuses on the internal and operational issues of the agency and works closely with the executive director in the management of VRT. Members of the Executive Board are the Board chair, past-chair, chair-elect, vice-chair, secretary/treasurer, and five at-large member representing Ada County and Canyon County, as well as a representative from Boise State University. Regional Coordination Council The Regional Coordination Council (RCC) is a standing committee of the Valley Regional Transit Board. It was developed to provide a forum for transportation and human service staff to share information and to collaborate on mobility issues. Members of the Council provide advice to VRT on its transportation programs and disseminate mobility information to their stakeholders. The RCC is charged with oversight of updates to the Transportation Service Coordination Plan. Members also provide input and guidance on the Local Mobility Management Network (District 3C). Community Resource Group This is an ad hoc database of stakeholders and other interested parties who provide public input, guidance, and wisdom for public transportation-related issues. Its volunteer membership includes urban and rural riders, senior citizens, persons with disabilities, social service providers, educators, students, employers, and representatives from the chambers of commerce. 8

Technical Resource Group This is an ad hoc group database of technical staff from the local jurisdictions and other transportation agencies brought together as needed to support VRT staff and to provide input and guidance on a variety of technical issues that are of interest to the jurisdictions within VRT s boundary. Staff Support Attached is a functional organizational chart showing the staff support for the various functions under VRT. Staff is responsible to follow the governance/policy direction of the Board through effective management activities (Attachment 3). 9

Regional Transportation Products and Services An Integrated, Collaborative Solution For Regional Transportation Attachment 1 Traditional Public Transportation o Express Commuter Service o Local Fixed Line Service o Local Flex Route Service o Paratransit ACCESS o TVT Medicaid Trans Service o BSU Shuttle RIDELINE.ORG Trip Reservations Travel Training Call Center Websites Employer Outreach Marketing Ridematch Pass/Contract/Sales Outlets Information Outlets Ambassador Program Eligibility Assessment Community Transportation o Vehicle Sharing o Volunteer Driver o Ride Reimbursement o Demand Response o Car Sharing Commuter Services o ACHD Commuteride o Canyon Vanpool o Job Access Vanpool o Carpooling o Telecommuting 10

GRANT FUNDING SOURCES Attachment 2 NAME NUMBER AREA DISTRIBUTOR VRT PARTICIPATION DESCRIPTION USAGE * FEDERAL / LOCAL Fixed Guideway Modernization 5309 (b)(2) Federal Formula Grants for Other than Urbanized Areas 5311 Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 5316 Metropolitan & Statewide Planning Urbanized Area Formula Program 5307 Rural Modernization of existing rail systems and new fixed guideway systems Capital 80/20 Operating 50/50 Maintenance 80/20 Capital 80/20 Administration 80/20 Planning 80/20 Rural ITD Applied Operating (50%) 50/50 Small Urban ITD Received Address transportation challenges faced by welfare recipients and low-income persons seeking to obtain and Capital (80%) 80/20 Large Urban VRT Received maintain employment. Administration (10%) 100/0 Planning (10%) 100/0 5303 MPO ITD 5304 State ITD 5305 Planning ITD Small Urban Large Urban ITD VRT VRT Supporting public transportation in rural areas with population of less than 50,000. Supports cooperative, continuous, and comprehensive planning for making transportation investment decisions. Rural ITD Applied Operating (50%) 50/50 Small Urban ITD Received Overcome existing barriers facing Americans with New Freedom Program 5317 disabilities seeking integration into the work force and Capital (80%) 80/20 Large Urban VRT Received society. Administration (10%) 100/0 Planning (10%) 100/0 Rural Transit Assistance Program 5311 (b) (3) Rural ITD Training, technical assistance, research, and related support services in rural areas. Training 100/0 Capital 80/20 Assisting private nonprofit groups in meeting Transportation for Elderly Persons and Persons with 5310 ITD transportation needs of the elderly and persons with Planning (10%) 100/0 Disabilities disabilities. Administration (10%) 100/0 Received Received Supporting public transportation in areas with population of more than 50,000. Planning 80/20 Operating (SU) 50/50 Operating (LU) 0/100 Maintenance 80/20 Capital 80/20 Planning 80/20 Administration 80/20 System Enhancements (1%) 80/20 11 * Maximun percentage of funding that can be spent in this category.

GRANT FUNDING SOURCES Attachment 2 NAME NUMBER AREA DISTRIBUTOR VRT PARTICIPATION DESCRIPTION USAGE * FEDERAL / LOCAL Alternatives Analysis 5339 Federal Assist in financing the evaluation of reasonable alternatives and general options in a particular, broadlydefined travel corridor. Planning 80/20 Bus and Bus Facilities 5309 Federal Received New and replacement buses and facilities. Capital 80/20 Bus and Bus Facilities 5318 Federal Applied New and replacement buses and facilities. Capital 80/20 Clean Fuels Grant Program 5308 Federal New and replacement buses and facilities. Capital 80/20 Major Capital Investments (New Starts & Small Starts) 5309 (b)(1) Federal Construction of new or extensions to existing fixed guideway systems (New Starts). Capital projects less than $75 million and total capital cost less than $250 million (Small Starts). Capital 80/20 National Research & Technology Program 5314 Federal Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks Program 5320 Federal TIGER (USDOT) Federal Applied TIGGER Program Federal Applied Transit Cooperative Research Program (5313) 5313 Federal University Transportation Centers Program TEA-21 5505 Federal Develop innovative products and services assisting transit agencies in better meeting the needs of their customers. Address the challenge of increasing vehicle congestion in and around our national parks and other federal lands. Fosters innovative, multi-modal and multi-jurisdictional transportation projects that promise significant economic and environmental benefits to an entire metropolitan area, a region, or the nation. Implement new strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and/or reduce energy use within transit operations. Research program for best practices, transit security guidelines, testing prototypes, and new planning and management tools. Awarded to non-profit institutions of higher learning, focuses on knowledge transfer (national, state, and local) and building transportation workforce. Research Planning 100/0 Capital 100/0 Planning 100/0 Capital 100/0 Capital 100/0 Research 100/0 Research Veterans Transportation and Community Living Improve transportation options and mobility for Capital 80/20 Federal Received Initiative Grant Program America's veterans, service members, and their families. Outreach 100/0 Urban Any Federal-aid highway, including the NHS, bridge Surface Transportation Program STP COMPASS Received projects on any public road, transit capital projects, and Capital 93/7 Small Urban intracity and intercity bus terminals and facilities 12 * Maximun percentage of funding that can be spent in this category.

VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Board Executive Board Board Attachment 3 Third Party Board Legal Services Executive Board Director Board Relations Business Board Development Policy Development Finance/ Board Administration Service Board Planning Development Board Capital Infrastructure Building Board Transit Centers Bus Stops Transportation Board Services Community Relations Board & Marketing Budget/Finance Grants Procurement IT Board Reporting Risk Management Standing Committees Regional Coordination Council Service Coordination Networking Mobility Board Management Route Planning Transportation System Integration rideline Board Customer Information Board ACCESS Eligibility Oversight 13 valleyride Board Boar goride Service Operations Customer Service Marketing Board Implementation Service Contract Development and Oversight Community Relations Media Relations Board Marketing Standards and Planning