Charting Civil Society

Similar documents
Contracts and Grants between Nonprofits and Government

Insights Into The Kansas City Nonprofit Sector

The Economic Impacts of Idaho s Nonprofit Organizations

SUMMARY OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR IN PINELLAS COUNTY

The Nonprofit Research Collaborative. November 2010 Fundraising Survey

Nonprofit Sector: Orange County

National Study of Nonprofit-Government Contracts and Grants 2013: State Profiles

2015 TRENDS STUDY Results of the First National Benchmark Survey of Family Foundations

Winter 2018 Nonprofit Fundraising Study (NFS)

Foundations: A Potential Source of Funding For Charities? Highlights

2001 Rural Development Philanthropy Baseline Survey ~ Updated on June 18, 2002

2013 Lien Conference on Public Administration Singapore

the artist as philanthropist strengthening the next generation of artist-endowed foundations study report supplement 2013 Executive Summary

PACIFIC NORTHWEST NONPROFIT SURVEY. M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust Nonprofit Support Organizations Aggregated Results 2013

2015 Lasting Change. Organizational Effectiveness Program. Outcomes and impact of organizational effectiveness grants one year after completion

CHARTER SCHOOL LEGAL ISSUES: Friends Of Organizations

Omaha Gives 2014 Evaluation Report

Social Enterprise. Taking the Pulse of the Small Charity Sector. Income. Maximising Assets. Resilience. Mission. Based. Innovation. Economy.

PACIFIC NORTHWEST NONPROFIT SURVEY. M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust Nonprofit Support Organizations Aggregated Results 2013

The Ford Foundation EQUIVALENCY AFFIDAVIT PACKET FOR NON-U.S. GRANT APPLICANTS

Individual Giving Survey 2014

Highlights 2016 Gifts to Charitable Organizations

ICT SECTOR REGIONAL REPORT

Are physicians ready for macra/qpp?

FY 2017 Year In Review

Final Report No. 101 April Trends in Skilled Nursing Facility and Swing Bed Use in Rural Areas Following the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003

AND RECEIVED BY THE NSF OFFICE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

Economic Contributions of the Louisiana Nonprofit Sector: Size and Scope

Grants Program. Project Areas NOT Considered for Funding Religious organizations for religious purposes Political parties or campaigns

TAKE A GLIMPSE INSIDE...

Association of Fundraising Professionals State of Fundraising 2005 Report

RESILIENCE AND VULNERABILITY The State of the Nonprofit Sector in Los Angeles 2009

BLOOMINGTON NONPROFITS: SCOPE AND DIMENSIONS

Services that help donors give their support more generously

Coalition for New Philanthropy

Minnesota Nonprofit Economy Report

THE INDIANA NONPROFIT SECTOR: A PROFILE

Licensed Nurses in Florida: Trends and Longitudinal Analysis

501c3 Tax Exemption Services

UK GIVING 2012/13. an update. March Registered charity number

Volunteers and Donors in Arts and Culture Organizations in Canada in 2013

Frequently Asked Questions

2018 Guthrie County Community Foundation An Affiliate of the Community Foundation of Greater Des Moines GRANTING PROGRAM

Vital Signs: Arts Funding in the Current Economy

Voluntary Sector. Community Snapshot. Introduction

2017 Annual Giving Report

Simplifying Federal Student Aid

Welcome to the Foundation Center s. Grantseeking Basics

Grant Writing Workshop August Presented by: Sarah Thompson Executive Officer Into Our Hands Community Foundation

Operating in Uncertain Times

Weathering the Storm: Challenges and Opportunities Facing Colorado Nonprofits During Recession 2009 Update

Nonprofit organizations use direct mail, online

Model Community Health Needs Assessment and Implementation Strategy Summaries

Montgomery County has over 5,100 nonprofits serving area residents. These include

OPERATING PRINCIPLES. Strengthening Nonprofit Organizations. Approaching Grants as Investments. Leveraging Resources

An overview of the NFP Sector

The IRS Form 990, Schedule H Community Benefit and Catholic Health Care Governance Leaders

Overview of Nonprofit Sector in the United States

Mental Health Services Provided in Specialty Mental Health Organizations, 2004

GRANTMAKING GUIDELINES

Multi Year Community Grants Information Session March, 2017

2014 Giving Report. A Look at Fidelity Charitable Donors and How They Give. REPORT SPOTLIGHT How Donors Approach Philanthropy as a Family

Individual Giving Survey 2012 Media Briefing

KEY FACTS ON CORPORATE FOUNDATIONS

Community Care Statistics : Referrals, Assessments and Packages of Care for Adults, England

The State of the Ohio Nonprofit Sector. September Proctor s Linking Mission to Money 471 Highgate Avenue Worthington, OH 43085

Common Errors on the T3010 related to fundraising costs. Know how to avoid them

Resources Guide. Helpful Grant-Related Links. Advocacy & Policy Communication Evaluation Fiscal Sponsorship Sustainability

will now display archived data going back to January This will Interested in seeing how your organization is trending against The

An Overview of Nonprofit Organizations in the United States. Hilary Binder-Aviles Senior Consultant

Florida s Financially-Based Economic Development Tools & Return on Investment

Family and Community Support Services (FCSS) Program Review

The Funding Pie. Establishing a diverse and well-rounded revenue strategy for your nonprofit organization LANO ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES

Afoundation is a nongovernment, nonprofit organization established to aid

Request for Proposals. Safety-Net Services: Food and Shelter

Current Trends in Philanthropy and Charitable Giving. Eric Javier and Sevil Miyhandar, CCS Fundraising January 26, 2018

Glossary of Nonprofit Terms

California Community Clinics

Winning Home, Inc. Grant Application General Guidelines GRANT PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES

Vitalization of Community-Bases Civil Societies. Cleveland Foundation India Pierce Lee April 5, 2012

Report on Weingart Foundation s Grantmaking to Nonprofit Organizations Based in the Inland Empire. Executive Summary November, 2013

Proposals Received and Grants Funded

ENTREPRENEURSHIP & ACCELERATION

Working Paper Series

Measuring Civil Society and Volunteering: New Findings from Implementation of the UN Nonprofit Handbook

It s a typical day in your hometown. Your alarm wakes you from a restful

CONDUCTED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE INDIANA UNIVERSITY LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY

2017 Competitive Grants Program Guidelines

MORE THAN GRANTMAKING

INDIVIDUAL GIVING SURVEY (IGS) 2016

U.S. Research and Development Funding and Performance: Fact Sheet

Who Is Eligible Matching Gift Program: All full- and part-time employees that have been with the company for at least six months are eligible.

THE UTILIZATION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANTS IN CALIFORNIA S LICENSED COMMUNITY CLINICS

Decrease in Hospital Uncompensated Care in Michigan, 2015

Hospital Financial Analysis

2011 GivingFirst Report of Online Giving

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. Trends in Spending by the Department of Defense for Operation and Maintenance

ASKING MATTERS: CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING IN CANADA

Community Health Centers: Growing Importance in a Changing Health Care System

The size and structure of the adult social care sector and workforce in England, 2014

Transcription:

Charting Civil Society A series by the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy THE URBAN INSTITUTE No. 24, February 2010 Grassroots Civil Society The Scope and Dimensions of Small Public Charities Elizabeth T. Boris and Katie L. Roeger The organizations of civil society permeate communities. Among the approximately 1.5 million nonprofits documented by the National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS), nearly 925,000 are registered public charities of every kind around the United States. Many of these nonprofits are very small. 1 In 2007, only about 37 percent of public charities met the IRS threshold for filing the annual Form 990 or 990EZ by having $25,000 or more in gross receipts. We focus here on the 3 in 10 public charities that meet the filing threshold and have less than $100,000 in revenues, expenses, and assets. These organizations are the sources of community support and social interaction the stuff of civil society. They have modest resources but engage their communities in myriad activities. Many provide programs that forge the connections and trust that are the bedrocks of our civic culture. These small organizations are below the radar in most analyses of the nonprofit sector. Research and media reports usually focus on the larger nonprofits with household names American Red Cross, Habitat for Humanity, American Cancer Society. Yet the smaller organizations include parent and teacher groups, sports teams and clubs, animal protection groups, scholarship funds, community service clubs, community arts groups, preschools and day cares, fairs and recreation groups, professional associations and business groups, and many more. We discuss data from the NCCS files and summarize the highlights of extensive data analysis, thereby opening the door to further and deeper research on small public charities. We found that small public charities have different revenue profiles than the broader group of public charities and, not unexpectedly, they grew more quickly in number but experienced lower rates of financial growth from 1997 to 2007. They also have a slightly different mix of organizational types than public charities overall. Finally, we see that over the decade organizations that started small mostly grew out of the category, although almost 17 percent dissolved. All of these were more than replaced by new small organizations, revealing the dynamic cycle of creation and change that is the hallmark of the nonprofit sector. Definitions The technical IRS term for the organizations we focus on in this report is public charity. This term is not commonly used except to differentiate the IRS categories. In this report we refer to nonprofits in the following categories: Nonprofit organizations are all categories of 501(c) organizations including public charities, associations, congregations, and foundations. 501(c)(3) organizations include all organizations eligible for taxdeductible contributions, including public charities and private foundations.

CHARTING CIVIL SOCIETY A series by the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy Public charities are 501(c)(3) organizations, excluding private foundations. They are tax exempt and eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions. Registered public charities are public charities that sought and obtained tax-exempt status with the IRS. 990 N filers are the smallest public charities required to register and annually file Form 990-N with the IRS because they have less than $25,000 in gross receipts. Reporting public charities are charities required to report annually to the IRS on Form 990 or 990-EZ because they have gross receipts (revenues) of $25,000 or more. Small public charities are the focus of this report; they are reporting public charities with $25,000 or more in gross receipts and less than $100,000 in each financial category, revenues, expenses, and assets. Number of Small Public Charities The number of small public charities has grown steadily from 1997 to 2007, the latest year for which IRS data are available; except for a loss of about 2,000 organizations in the year 2000. In 1997, there were 63,493 organizations and in 2007 there were 104,536, an increase of almost 65 percent. This compares to increases of 57 percent among all reporting public charities and 59 percent of all the larger registered public charities. These small organizations represent about 30 percent of reporting public charities, but they account for a minute proportion of the resources (less than 1 percent). Types of Small Public Charities Almost 30 percent of small public charities are human services organizations, and about a quarter are education related. The arts make up the third largest category, with about 13 percent. The proportion of small public charities across the major types arts and culture, education, environment and animals, health, human services, inter-national and foreign affairs, public and societal benefit, religionrelated, and others has been relatively unchanged over the past decade. The same is true for all reporting public charities. Although the proportions are similar, the small public charities average a lower percentage of health and human services organizations and a higher percentage of education and arts organizations than the reporting sector as a whole. If we look at all registered public charities, which include TABLE 1. Number of Public Charities by Year, 1997 2007 Number of small Number of reporting Number of registered Year public charities public charities public charities 1997 63,493 218,112 581,733 1998 64,376 227,339 606,632 1999 72,234 248,869 645,091 2000 69,847 250,586 658,008 2001 74,187 264,076 719,730 2002 79,397 277,546 750,870 2003 83,475 288,283 791,556 2004 89,388 301,916 831,007 2005 93,823 313,692 856,067 2006 98,869 326,950 912,429 2007 104,536 343,277 924,796 Source: The Urban Institute, National Center for Charitable Statistics, Core Files (Public Charities, 1997 2007); Internal Revenue Service Business Master File, Exempt Organizations (1997 2008). Notes: Small is defined as having less than $100,000 in total revenue, less than $100,000 in total assets, and less than $100,000 in expenses. The number of small public charities is included in the total number of public charities reporting. 2

A series by the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy CHARTING CIVIL SOCIETY FIGURE 1. Percentage of Small Public Charities by Type, 2007 Arts and culture 13.1% Public and societal benefit 10.8% Small nonprofits represent less than 1 percent of the revenues, expenses, and assets of all filing public charities. Although their numbers increased from 1997 to 2007, their revenues and expenses (in inflationadjusted dollars) increased at less than half the pace of other reporting public charities. However, there does not appear to be any systematic difference between these rates of growth. In 2007, the 104,536 small public charities had $4.75 billion in revenues, $4.36 billion in expenses, and $2.93 billion in assets, compared with 63,493 small public chari- Religionrelated 7.8% Health 7.2% Environment and animal-related 4.8% International and foreign affairs 1.8% Other 0.5% Education 24.7% Human services 29.3% N = 104,536 Source: The Urban Institute, National Center for Charitable Statistics, Core Files (Public Charities, 2007). the smallest organizations, there is a similar consistency, but the proportion of religious organizations is almost three times as large in most years. Over the 1997 2007 period, there has been differential growth by types of organizations. Environmental organizations, for example, grew by almost 109 percent at one extreme, while health organizations grew by only 38 percent. Religion-related groups posted a strong growth rate at almost 88 percent. The number of health and human services groups increased more slowly in the first half of the period and accelerated in the second half, international organizations did the reverse. Finances TABLE 2. Change in the Number of Small Public Charities by Organization Type, 1997 2007 1997 2002 2002 2007 1997 2007 Type of organization (%) (%) (%) Arts and culture 24.1 26.3 56.7 Education 34.1 32.2 77.3 Environment and animal-related 47.2 41.8 108.6 Health 10.8 24.7 38.1 Human services 17.8 33.1 56.8 International and foreign affairs 55.0 25.0 93.8 Public and societal benefit 19.7 29.9 55.4 Religion-related 39.3 34.8 87.9 Other 18.6 196.9 141.7 All small public charities 25.0 31.7 64.6 Note: All figures are in percents. 3

CHARTING CIVIL SOCIETY A series by the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy TABLE 3. Change in Number and Finances of Small Public Charities and Other Reporting Public Charities, 1997 2007 Small Public Charities Other Reporting Public Charities Total Total Total Total Total Total Number revenue expenses assets Number revenue expenses assets Year (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) 1997 2002 25.0 9.9 11.2 15.8 28.2 14.6 22.4 12.0 2002 2007 31.7 13.9 12.4 13.9 20.5 33.6 23.3 36.5 1997 2007 64.6 25.2 25.0 31.9 54.4 53.1 51.0 52.8 Notes: All figures are in percent. All financial amounts were converted to 2007 dollars before comparison. ties in 1997 with $3.79 billion in revenues, $3.49 billion in expenses, and $2.23 billion in assets (in 2007 dollars). Between 1997 and 2007, revenues grew by 25 percent, expenses by 25 percent, and assets by 32 percent. The average organization in 1997, however, had higher revenues, expenses, and assets than in 2007. Compared to the finances of the average reporting charity in 2007, which had about $4 million in revenues, the small nonprofits averaged $45,000, underlining the modest resources available to these organizations. Sources of Revenue Small public charities have very different revenue patterns than the reporting public charity sector as a whole. These organizations are more likely to raise money from members and community events than from government sources. They are much less reliant on fee-for-service income (20 percent vs. 70 percent for reporting public charities in 2007) and much more reliant on contributions (more than 50 percent vs. 20 percent of their income in 2007). Government grants and investment income are minor sources for small public charities, but dues income (8 percent) and other revenues (more than 16 percent) are more important for small public charities than they are for the sector as a whole. These patterns are remarkably stable, with only a slight decline in fee-forservice and slight increase in private contributions from 1997 to 2007. Survival of Small Public Charities Finally, we trace the creation and growth patterns of small public charities. As table 6 TABLE 4. Finances of Small Public Charities by Year, 1997 2007 Total revenue Total expenses Total assets (in billions of (in billions (in billions of Year Number 2007 dollars) of 2007 dollars) 2007 dollars) 1997 63,493 3.79 3.49 2.23 1998 64,376 3.82 3.49 2.27 1999 72,234 4.16 3.79 2.46 2000 69,847 3.92 3.55 2.40 2001 74,187 4.01 3.68 2.47 2002 79,397 4.17 3.88 2.58 2003 83,475 4.27 4.00 2.62 2004 89,388 4.47 4.17 2.72 2005 93,823 4.55 4.21 2.78 2006 98,869 4.64 4.27 2.85 2007 104,536 4.75 4.36 2.93 4

A series by the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy CHARTING CIVIL SOCIETY TABLE 5. Sources of Revenue for Small Public Charities by Year, 1997 2007 Total revenue Percent of Total Revenue (in billions Government Private Fee-for- Investment Other Year Number of 2007 dollars) grants contributions service income Dues revenue 1997 63,493 3.79 3.5 46.2 23.5 1.6 8.4 16.8 1998 64,376 3.82 2.8 47.2 23.0 1.6 8.4 17.0 1999 72,234 4.16 2.6 48.0 22.5 1.5 8.4 17.0 2000 69,847 3.92 2.6 48.4 22.0 1.5 8.4 17.1 2001 74,187 4.01 2.6 49.3 21.5 1.2 8.2 17.1 2002 79,397 4.17 3.3 49.7 21.5 0.1 8.2 17.2 2003 83,475 4.27 3.0 49.8 21.5 0.0 8.2 17.4 2004 89,388 4.47 2.6 50.4 21.3 0.2 8.2 17.3 2005 93,823 4.55 2.3 51.0 21.2 0.4 8.0 17.1 2006 98,869 4.64 2.1 52.1 20.7 0.5 7.9 16.8 2007 104,536 4.75 1.7 52.7 20.3 0.7 7.9 16.8 Notes: The value of government grants is an estimate. Fee-for-service includes revenue from both individuals and the government. Other revenue includes net income from special events and activities, gross profit from sale of inventory, and other revenue. FIGURE 2. Sources of Revenue for Small Public Charities and Other Reporting Public Charities, 2007 Small Public Charities Other Reporting Public Charities Private contributions 52.7% Fee-forservice 20.3% Fee-forservice 67.1% Other revenue 16.8% Dues 7.9% Government Investment grants income 1.7% 0.7% Private contributions 14.2% Investment income 7.9% Government grants 7.9% Dues 0.6% Other revenue 2.1% N = 104,536 N = 238,741 Source: The Urban Institute, National Center for Charitable Statistics, Core Files (Public Charities, 2007). Notes: The value of government grants is an estimate. Fee-for-service includes revenue from both individuals and the government. Other revenue includes net income from special events and activities, gross profit from sale of inventory, and other revenue. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. 5

CHARTING CIVIL SOCIETY A series by the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy TABLE 6. Distribution of Public Charities by Size, 1997 2007 Size of organization 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Small Newly registered and small 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 First time filing and small 5.4 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.7 4.1 3.9 3.8 4.3 Still small 21.8 22.7 23.1 21.5 21.7 22.0 22.8 22.9 23.6 23.9 23.6 Was large but now small 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total small organizations 29.1 28.3 29.0 27.9 28.1 28.6 29.0 29.6 29.9 30.2 30.5 Large Was small but now large 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.8 Newly registered and large 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 First time filing and large 3.9 2.9 3.0 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.6 Still large 63.7 65.0 64.3 65.5 65.3 64.9 65.2 64.5 64.4 63.9 63.3 Total large organizations 70.9 71.7 71.0 72.1 71.9 71.4 71.0 70.4 70.1 69.8 69.5 Total organizations that filed 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Note: All figures are in percent. Percentages may not sum to totals shown because of rounding. reveals, between 21 and 24 percent of charities were small in every year of the 1997 2007 period and 63 to 66 percent of charities were large in every year. Roughly 5 to 7 percent of the organizations were new and small in any one year (almost 20,000 in 2007), and either they were newly created and filed a Form 990 the same year or they had been created earlier and first reported to the IRS in a particular year. In addition, between 3 and 5 percent were new and large or newly reporting and large (almost 13,000 in 2007). There were also large charities that became small (1 to 1.5 percent per year) and small charities that became large (2.4 to 2.9 percent per year). If we consider the 63,493 organizations that reported in 1997, we find that one year later, only 81 percent still fall into the small category. Each year the number diminishes until, by 2007, there are only 21,500 of the original group in the pool of small organizations. More than 18,100 of the originally small organizations became larger by 2007. Roughly 13,300 organizations fell below the $25,000 filing threshold. Nearly 10,600 of the original group of small public charities did not survive the 10-year period. We feel there is a need for additional investigation into the causes and outcomes of these patterns. The influx of new organizations and turnover of old ones is a source of dynamism. What is remarkable is that with so many new organizations being created each year the overall patterns are so stable. This appearance of stability invites research that delves more deeply into finer categories of organizations and regional analyses topics that we will take up in the future. Note 1. Data on these very small organizations are available for the first time as a result of the Pension Protection Act s requirement that nonprofits with revenues less than $25,000 file a new form, the 990-N, also known as E-postcard, annually. Katie Roeger has drafted the first analysis of these data, newly available to NCCS. About the Authors Elizabeth T. Boris, director of Urban Institute s Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy, is a national expert on the charitable sector. She is also coeditor of Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict (UI Press, 2006). Katie L. Roeger is assistant director of the National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS), a program in the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute. She manages the NCCS national database on nonprofits and provides statistical support for surveys and other research studies. 6

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 Nonprofit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Permit No. 8098 Easton, MD Address Service Requested For more information, call Public Affairs: 202-261-5709 or visit our web site, http://www.urban.org. To order additional copies of this publication, call: 202-261-5687 or visit our online bookstore: http://www.uipress.org. The Urban Institute s Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy conducts research on the nonprofit sector to inform decisionmakers in government, nonprofits, foundations, and business. Our mission is to create an objective picture of the nonprofit sector, advance transparency and accountability, and assess consequences of public policies on the sector through rigorous research. We facilitate dialogue on pressing issues by hosting policy briefings and by disseminating findings widely. Our publications are available on the Urban Institute web site, at http://cnp.urban.org. Through the National Center for Charitable Statistics (NCCS), we create and maintain the National Nonprofit Data System, a research-quality data source on the nonprofit sector. NCCS translates data on the sector s size, scope, and financial trends into accessible information for local, state, and national policymakers and provides data and technical assistance to scholars and the public. NCCS databases can be accessed at http://www.nccs.urban.org. The Urban Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan policy research and educational organization that examines the social, economic, and governance problems facing the nation. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 Copyright 2010 Phone: 202-833-7200 Fax: 202-467-5775 E-mail: pubs@urban.org Copyright February 2010. The Urban Institute. All rights reserved. Permission is granted for reproduction of this file, with attribution to the Urban Institute.