The Swedish Armed Forces Operational Challenges for Command and Control

Similar documents
MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Wildland Fire Assistance

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Coalition Operations With the Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System (CENTRIXS) Brad Carter Debora Harlor

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

A Computer-Based System to Analyze and Assess Flight Safety of Military Aircraft

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

CIMIC Messenger. VIKING 11 - THE premier Multinational and Comprehensive exercise in the world - The CCOE Information Leaflet. Inside this issue:

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION and MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND CORROSION PROGRAM

A Military C2 Professional s Thoughts on Visualization

An Overview of Romanian Command and Control Systems

~ NATO STANDARDIZATION ~ 60 YEARS of NORMATIVE SUCCESS. NATO Standardization Agency

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

at the Missile Defense Agency

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Test and Evaluation Strategies for Network-Enabled Systems

Expeditionary Basecamp Passive

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

C-Band Working Group Update. Steve O'Neal AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 2/20/13

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

US Army TARDEC Ground Vehicle Mobility: Dynamics Modeling, Simulation, & Research

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Partnership to Establish the Republic of Uzbekistan Special Center for Modeling and Simulation (SCMS) and National M&S Infrastructure


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAINING TRANSFORMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Drinking Water Operator Certification and Certificate to Operate Criteria/Requirements for US Navy Overseas Drinking Water Systems

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

NORAD CONUS Fighter Basing

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

United States Joint Forces Command Joint Frequency Management Office

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

COURSE CATALOGUE. Joint Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defence Centre of Excellence VYSKOV, CZECH REPUBLIC JCBRN COE

Lessons Learned from the MSG- 128 Study on Incremental Implementation of NATO Mission Training through Distributed Simulation Operations

The Landscape of the DoD Civilian Workforce

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Transcription:

The Swedish Armed Forces Operational Challenges for Command and Control Major Ulf Jinnestrand Swedish Armed Forces Headquarters

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE FEB 2010 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE The Swedish Armed Forces Operational Challenges for Command and Control 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Swedish Armed Forces Headquarters 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADA564685. 2010 Coalition Battle Management Language Workshop (Atelier 2010 sur le langage de gestion du champ de bataille pour les operations en coalition). RTO-MP-MSG-079 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT SAR a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 18 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

The Swedish Armed Forces

SwAF Transformation issues & goals (1) Changing Security Environment Globalization, dynamic global environment. New challenges & threats. Dramatically changed Security Policy EU member & NATO partner From isolation to participation Defending Sweden abroad Key issues From large National, Territorial force -> Interoperable, Deployable Force -> Contracted Expeditionary Force Challenge - transforming the Manning system Swe Lead nation for EU NBG 11 + NBG 14

SwAF Transformation issues & goals (2) Background Society and Technology changing Changing Societies and rapidly developing Technology Sweden Advanced parts of the SwAF, for example data-links within the Air Force since 1970-ies Defence-, IT- and Telecomm industry Key issues Joint Force Networked Force New strategies for: Procurement Research & Development

Command Control Interoperability Board Overall - Building interoperability capacity through permissions, authorisation, processes, materiel, methods, exercises and more New interoperable capabilities within the C4I area as Link 16, Link 11, Link 22, Beyond Line of Sight, Have Quick, Battleforce Email, Identification Friend or Fool

Multinational Experimentation (MNE) Series MN LOE 1: November 2001 (AUS, DEU, GBR, USA) Technical Distributed Collaboration (South Pacific Vignettes) MN LOE 2: February 2003 (added CAN and NATO) Multinational Information Sharing (Pacific Rim Vignettes) MNE 3: February 2004 (added FRA) Effects-Based Planning (Afghanistan Scenario) MNE 4: February / March 2006 (added FIN and SWE) Effects-Based Operations(Afghanistan Scenario) MNE 5: Spring 2008/Spring 2009 Comprehensive Approach (African Scenario) + Effects-Based Approach to Multinational Operations (military portion) MNE 5 Partners Canada Finland France Germany Sweden United Kingdom United States NATO ACT MNE 5 Participants Australia Austria Denmark Spain MNE 5 Observers Czech Republic Greece Hungary Japan Poland South Korea Singapore European Union

C2 and Training interoperability Exercise Management System (EXONAUT) National simulation systems (TYR, JCATS, GESI, TCT) P 2 S N Common Operational Picture (SITAWARE) Information Management Portal (SHAREPOINT) Voice IP VTC Air & Combat operations simulation (ASCOT) Exercise Control Web Email POT Radio and Voice simulation (PLEXCOM) S Y S T E M S F E D E R A T I O N Voice IP VTC Tactical Situaiton Awareness (SLB) Training Audience Web Email POT Map Tool ( Arc Explorer, Google Earth)

The VIKING concept The premier Multinational and Comprehensive Approach exercise in the world Washington Summit NATO 50th Anniversary VIKING concept demonstration 1999 a Swedish / U.S. initiative (MoU since 1998) Executed in VIKING 99, 01, 03, 05, 08 Based on the Persistent Partner Simulation Network Concept Political impact & flagship for the Swedish Armed Forces Important in building Partnership Capacity before deployment in operations Provides a wider Network building MAIN PARTNERS 1999-2008: Folke Bernadotte Academy UNITED STATES J OINT FORCES COMMAND U S J F C O M

The VIKING 08 The fifth VIKING Computer Assisted Command Post Exercise based on the Partner Training & Simulation Network Concept 2 000 participants from 31 nations and 47 organizations Main Training Audience on Land, Maritime, Air and Infooperations Component Command level NATO procedures Crises Response scenario (BOGALAND) including NATO- and EU-led operations

VIKING 11 Execution 4-15 April 2011 Force HQ concept (mission tailored) Swedish main Training Audience one of our readiness HQ s Downsize Exercise Control few to train many Increase Concept Development & Experimentation Develop and increase Comprehensive Approach Civilian Partner (Folke Bernadotte Academy) to co-chair Increase Partner support through planning phase Core Planning Team to be formed at the Joint Training Centre Increase participation from Central Asia Open for identified Partners (by SWE&US), not only PfP like NATO contact nations, African Union and EASBRIG Increase the use of designed ADL support

The Swedish Joint National Training Capability Demonstration " For distributed training, connect training facilities at various sites. Aiming to create a system available for joint exercises on a daily basis". Joint level constructive simulator. Wargaming for Combined Jo1nt Operations and Other Operations Than War D CATS MRM Multi Resolution Layer whk:h connect the aggregated model and the high resolution models ASCOT Advanced Simulation Combat Operations Trainer. Battle Management and C 2 Live Virtual Constructive Synthetic environment generation for Air, Ground and Maritime domains. Google Earth Pro Adapter Scenario Viewer and Common Operational Picture through Google Earth. ~...,., :r "0 l) ~... l!l 01 < (j) ;.; ',.. "'., z 0 l: <... 0 Distributed Mission Operators Control System, Prototype concept for Exercise Control Demo C2 ADS Command & Control Air Defence System Site: A1r Defence School, Uppsala GBAD RBS 70 Ground Based Air Defence Surface to Air Missile simulator Site: Air Defence Combat Training Centre, Halmstad PLEXComm PlEXComm Suite is a high fidelity radio simulation T3SIM Virtual Fighter/attack aircraft simulator. Live S~e: Swedish Defence Research Agency & Air Force Alf Combat Simulation Centre, Kista.

ITEC 08 Federation Design EXONAUT CATS FIREX CATS TYR CATS MRM CATS TCT CATS C2 TACSI Demo-C2 Air Defence System Air Defence Trainer RBS 70 VBS2 TVT HLA IEEE 1516 P2SN FOM (RPR FOM v2.0) prti 1516 ManPack Pitch Recorder GEadapter FS2HLA GESI P2SN Bridge OneSAF Objective System ASCOT Google Earth Pro Microsoft Flight Simulator JCATS 12

SITAWARE

Google Earth (2)

ICC/ITC Flames

SW AF NATIONAL TRAINING CAPABILITY

Distributed, Mixed (LVC) Missile Test Scenario Configuration overview FMV T&E Range (Karlsborg) FMV T&E Range (VIdsel) Target Router VPN Encrypllon F,..t\1 T&E Range (Linkoping) FlSC (Kisla) -ll>-- FMV SMARTLab (Stockholm) VoiP --Auc:lo-- Nf2EN- National Test, Training & Experimentation Network RouterE VPN. ncryp!ion VPN Router Encryption

List of Ten Command & Control challenges : 1. To meet Warfighters operational requirements of tomorrow 2. Mission rehearsal and planning 3. Available in Theatre 4. Mobile platforms 5. Interoperability and Standardised languages 6. Federations and integration of training and C2 systems 7. Information sharing alliance and partners 8. A Comprehensive Approach Civilian dimension 9. Persistent low-cost concept Multinational Capabilities 10. Multilevel security