Medical Orders for Life- Sustaining Treatment

Similar documents
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Upgrading Voter Registration in Florida

CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW BY STATE

Building Blocks to Health Workforce Planning: Data Collection and Analysis

Governor s Office of Electronic Health Information (GOEHI) The National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare

Patient-Centered Specialty Practice Readiness Assessment

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

Role of State Legislators

Advanced Nurse Practitioner Supervision Policy

BEST PRACTICES IN LIFESPAN RESPITE SYSTEMS: LESSONS LEARNED & FUTURE DIRECTIONS

National Association For Regulatory Administration

The Affordable Care Act and Its Potential to Reduce Health Disparities Cara V. James, Ph.D.

Policies for TANF Families Served Under the CCDF Child Care Subsidy Program

SEASON FINAL REGISTRATION REPORTS

BUFFALO S SHIPPING POST Serving Napa Valley Since 1992

Cesarean Delivery Model Meeting the challenge to reduce rates of Cesarean delivery

131,,000 homeless veterans on any given night 300,000 homeless veterans during the year 23% of the total number of homeless people are veterans

Developmental screening, referral and linkage to services: Lessons from ABCD

Poverty and Health. Frank Belmonte, D.O., MPH Vice President Pediatric Population Health and Care Modeling

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

Practice Advancement Initiative (PAI) Using the ASHP PAI Ambulatory Care Self-Assessment Survey

The Value and Use of CME in Medical Licensure

National Provider Identifier (NPI)

Nursing. Programs. Workforce Development _AACN_TitleVIII_Brochure.indd 1

NCHIP and NICS Act Grants Overview and Current Status

The 2015 National Workforce Survey Maryland LPN Data June 17, 2016

The Legacy of Sidney Katz: Setting the Stage for Systematic Research in Long Term Care. Vincent Mor, Ph.D. Brown University

Prescription Monitoring Program:

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

NCCP. National Continued Competency Program Overview

vv POLST for Hospice Providers

RECOUNT RULES & VOTING SYSTEMS

NEWS RELEASE. Air Force JROTC Distinguished Unit Award. MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. Unit OK at Union High School, Tulsa OK, has been

United States Property & Fiscal Officer (USPFO)

POLST Discussions Doing it Better. Clinical Update in Geriatric Medicine. Judith S. Black, MD, MHA. POLST Overview. Faculty Disclosure PART I

Value based care: A system overhaul

Medicaid Managed Care 2012 Fiscal Analysts Seminar August 30, 2012

Pain Advocacy: A Social Work Perspective THANK YOU! First Things First. Incidence of Pain

National School Safety Conference Reno, Nevada / June 24 29, 2018

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Tagalicod, Robert Anthony, and Jessica Kahn HIT Policy Committee January 10, 2012

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Readiness Kit

The Use of NHSN in HAI Surveillance and Prevention

Award Cash Management $ervice (ACM$) National Science Foundation Regional Grants Conference. June 23 24, 2014

Nursing. Workforce Development. Programs

Preventive Controls for Animal Food Inspections and Compliance

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS. Panelist: Dr. Donna Peebles Associate Director

National Perspective No Wrong Door System. Administration for Community Living Center for Medicare and Medicaid Veterans Health Administration

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

Counterdrug(CD) Information Brief LTC TACKETT

Revised 2/27/17. POLST For General Providers

SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION STATUS REPORT NO. 2

IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF CARE IN SOUTH CAROLINA S MEDICAID PROGRAM

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Program (IAP)

SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

MEMORANDUM Texas Department of Human Services * Long Term Care/Policy

DoD-State Liaison Update NCSL August 2015

NCQA PCMH Recognition: 2017 Standards Preview. Tricia Barrett Vice President, Product Design and Support January 25, 2017

Vizient/AACN Nurse Residency Program TM. Jayne Willingham, MN, RN, CPHQ Senior Director Nursing Leadership

College Profiles - Navy/Marine ROTC

Driving Change with the Health Care Spending Benchmark

Prescription Monitoring Programs - Legislative Trends and Model Law Revision

Higher Education Employment Report

Summary of 2011 National Radon Action Month Results

2012 Federation of State Medical Boards

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality /Survey & Certification

Patient Centered Medical Home Foundation for Accountable Care

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice manaement

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services practice management

FIELD BY FIELD INSTRUCTIONS

State Partnership Performance Measures

Home Health Agency (HHA) Medicare Margins: 2007 to 2011 Issue Brief July 7, 2009

Assuring Better Child Health and Development Initiative (ABCD)

Subcontracting Tools. First Wednesday Virtual Learning Series 2018

How Technology-Based-Startups Support U.S. Economic Growth

Webinar Host Illinois Public Health Institute. Health System Assessment Retreat

NSF Award Cash Management $ervice (ACM$) and Financial Update. June 1, 2015

Rebates & Incentives - WTF. Lee Guthman February 28, 2012

Site-Less CRO Model and esource: Framework for Action

The Current State of CMS Payfor-Performance. HFMA FL Annual Spring Conference May 22, 2017

ACRP AMBASSADOR PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Options Counseling in and NWD/ADRC System National, State & Local Perspectives

Cynthia Ann LaSala, MS, RN Nursing Practice Specialist Phillips 20 Medicine Advisor, Patient Care Services Ethics in Clinical Practice Committee

Current and Emerging Rural Issues in Medicare

The Next Wave in Balancing Long- Term Care Services and Supports:

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,

Summary of 2010 National Radon Action Month Results

RESOURCES FREQUENTLY ASKED CLINICAL QUESTIONS FOR PROVIDERS

2017 STSW Survey. Survey invitations were sent to 401 STSW members and conference registrants. 181 social workers responded.

Advancing Health Equity and Improving Health for All through a Systems Approach Presentation to the Public Health Association of Nebraska

Safe Staffing- Safe Work

Framework for Post-Acute Care: Current and Future Issues for Providers

Advancing Self-Direction for People with Head Injuries

Medicaid Reform: The Opportunities for Home and Community Based Providers. All Rights Reserved

HealthStream Regulatory Script

Care Provider Demographic Information Update

A National Role Delineation Study of the Pediatric Emergency Nurse. Executive Summary

The MetLife Market Survey of Nursing Home & Home Care Costs September 2004

Name: Suzette Sova MA, LPC, NCC Title: Marketing MHFA and Having Successful Instructors

FHWA Office of Innovative Program Delivery Mission

Transcription:

Medical Orders for Life- Sustaining Treatment PILOT PROGRAM CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONNECTICUT MOLST TASK FORCE OBJECTIVES 1. Define MOLST & historical development in United States and in CT 2. Define CT MOLST goals & aims 3. Describe process for completing MOLST 4. Differentiate between MOLST & Living Will 5. Identify specific considerations for those with racial, ethnic, linguistic, & cultural differences as well as those with disabilities 6. Describe CT s MOLST Pilot Program 1

MOLST MEDICAL ORDERS FOR LIFE SUSTAINING TREATMENTS A process resulting from conversations between a person & health clinician that serves as medical orders for preferences regarding life-sustaining interventions near the end-of-life. MOLST Documents End-of-Life Conversations 2

DEFINITION OF CT MOLST Special Act No. 14-5, State of Connecticut - 2014 Medical order for life-sustaining treatment a written medical order by a physician (MD/DO), advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) or physician assistant (PA) to effectuate a patient s request for life-sustaining treatment when the patient has been determined by a physician to be approaching the end stage of a serious, life limiting illness or is in a condition of advanced, chronic progressive frailty; 3

MOLST & POLST HISTORY National POLST: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment MOLST (Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) POLST Started in Oregon 1991 States Nationally Involved: 3 mature CA, OR, WV 19 endorsed CA, OR, WV, PA, GA, CO, HI, ID, IA, LA, ME, MT, NC, NY, TN, UT, VA, WA, WI, 25 developing AL, AZ, CT, DE, FL, IL, IN, KS, KY, MI, MN, MS, MO, NW, NH, NJ,NM, NV, ND, RI, SC, TX, OK, OH, WY 2 + DC with Contracts AL, AR, DC 3 not conform to National POLST Paradigm MD, MA, VT CT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY DPH planning for MOLST was stimulated by documentation of underutilization of hospice services Connecticut ranks 50 th in the United States in the use of hospice care Patients as well as practitioners may be confused by the meaning of terms such as Advance Directives, living wills, and DNR orders A clearly-articulated MOLST will decrease ambiguity when caring for patients at the end of life 4

CT HISTORY At Request of CT DPH Commisioner MOLST work group formed in 2012 CT DPH created MOLST Task Force with representatives from stakeholder groups in 2013 DPH Exploratory Committee formed in March 2012 DPH created MOLST Task Force with representatives from stakeholder groups in 2013 First legislative proposal submitted in 2013 Raised concerns based on problems with POLST in some other states Did not pass out of committee First legislative proposal submitted in 2013 Raised concerns based on problems with POLST in some other states Did not pass out of committee Second proposal submitted in 2014 by DPH Second proposal submitted in 2014 by DPH Legislation for pilot passed 2014 67of Public Act 14-231 Legislation for pilot passed 2014 67 of Public Act 14-231 MOLST Advisory Committee formed in 2014 MOLST Advisory Committee formed in 2014 INTENDED MOLST OUTCOMES 1.Documentation of preferences on a statewide CT DPH approved MOLST form preferences to be honored 2.Translation of the conversation(s) into medical orders that will be 3.Transferrable with the patient across healthcare settings 5

CT MOLST GOALS 1. Encourage discussion; 2. Respect patient autonomy; 3. Ensure patient s choices about life-sustaining interventions & end of life care options are documented as standardized medical orders that are portable & respected across health care settings. MOLST ELIGIBILITY 1.Approaching end stage serious, life limiting illness 2.In a condition of advanced chronic progressive frailty. If the patient is incapable of making healthcare decisions a legally authorized representative may do so in the best interest of the patient. 6

Legally authorized representatives mean: 1. Parent or 2. Guardian or 3. Health Care Representative Fill out completely, but decisions do not need to be reached in all sections If a section was not discussed check did not discuss or decision not reached check undecided The form must be signed by all 3 parties for it to be valid 1. The patient or legally authorized representative 2. MD/DO, APRN or PA 3. One witness 7

MOLST FORM SECTIONS THIS IS A VOLUNTARY FORM AND IS A REFLECTION OF THE DISCUSSION Top of First Page 1. Patient Information 2. Diagnosis 3. Goals of Care - Full treatment for all and every problem; - Partial treatment for some problems; - Only treatments that enhance comfort but have no curative value will manage symptoms, e.g., pain; no life support interventions. Section A CPR or No CPR MOLST FORM SECTIONS THIS IS A VOLUNTARY FORM AND IS A REFLECTION OF THE DISCUSSION Section B Decisions about: Hospitalization Mechanical /invasive intubation & ventilation Non-invasive ventilation Section C For some options the patient may decide on a defined trial period Other Treatment Options - any other interventions are recorded, e.g., vasopressor medications or antibiotics, etc. Section D Names & signatures of patient or legally authorized representative, physician (MD/DO), APRN or PA who completed the form and witness (required by law). Interpreter name or ID number and/or service (as appropriate) Section E Review & revisions of the MOLST form are documented 8

AFTER COMPLETION OF MOLST FORM 1. Medical provider will write specific orders based on the MOLST 2. Original & additional copy to the patient 3. Copy filed in the patient s medical record 4. Agreement to Participate in the Pilot Program filed in the provider s medical record 1. Goals of Care 2. Diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options 3. Values, preferences, beliefs MOLST CONVERSATIONS 4. Choices regarding life-sustaining interventions as options within the context of one s current health 5. Benefits, risks, burdens of each option Reach informed, shared decisions & document them on the form 9

MOLST AND ADVANCED CARE PLANNING Step 1 Complete Advance Directive (> age 18) Step 2 Update Advance Directive periodically Step 3 Diagnosed w/serious life limiting illness or chronic progressive frailty (any age) Step 4 Complete MOLST when eligible Step 5 End of Life wishes honored DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MOLST & THE LIVING WILL MOLST 1. Choices are discussed with a medical clinician; 2. Form is completed after a shared decisionmaking conversation; 3. Requires clinician's, patient s (or legally authorized representative s) signature & witness signature; 4. Used by persons whose health status includes an end stage serious life-limiting illness or an advanced chronic progressive disease with accompanying medical frailty; 5. Form includes medical orders LIVING WILL (type of advance directive) 1. Choices need not be discussed with anyone; 2. Can list preferences for any aspect of health care including life support; preferences are only triggered when one lacks decisional capacity & is either in a terminal condition or permanently unconscious; 3. Requires declarant s signature & two witnesses; 4. Anyone > 18 years of age regardless of health status can complete living will 10

SOME SUGGESTED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS 1. We have been talking about your medical problems. Tell me your understanding of these problems, specifically the illness causing them, and where you feel you are now with your illness. 2. I can share with you where I think you are now. Would you like more information about what may be ahead of you? 3. Have you thought about how you would like to be treated if you may be close to the end of your life? 4. We often refer to goals of care that are related to different categories of treatment. Would you like me to explain these categories? Completing a MOLST form is voluntary; POINTS TO CONFIRM WITH PATIENT CONSIDERING MOLST Decisions documented on a MOLST form may be changed or completely revoked at any time by the patient or the patient s legally authorized representative Knowing the patient s preferences & values for end of life care in advance helps other health professionals design an appropriate plan of care when situations arise requiring decisions about options. 11

Decisions on a MOLST form are considered medical orders and will be followed by health professionals wherever the patient resides unless a new discussion or conversation is documented. MOLST is a CT Department of Public Health Initiative and is endorsed by the Connecticut General Assembly MOLST is not a substitute for a Living Will or Appointment of a Health Care Representative a Living Will can only be completed by a patient capable of making health care decisions whereas a patient s legally authorized representative may complete a MOLST on the patient s behalf. A Legally authorized representative ought to be aware of choices a patient may have documented in a Living Will. DPH s Special Emphasis on: MOLST & UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS A DPH PRIORITY Groups described as: having health disparities, socially disadvantaged, vulnerable or at risk have historically experienced barriers to health care services. Health disparity groups as those based on: race, ethnicity, age, gender, socioeconomic position, immigrant status, sexual minority status, language, disability, homelessness, mental illness, geographical area of residence Specifically, health disparities refer to those avoidable differences in health that result from cumulative social disadvantage. 12

MOLST & UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS Evidenced-Based Reality: Members of certain groups have had limited access to quality health care. 1. Recognizing whether someone is approaching the end stages of serious life-limiting illness may be complicated if the person has been undertreated over time for chronic conditions 2. Acknowledging biases about someone s potential to understand and tolerate treatment can also complicate determinations regarding the end stages of illness MOLST & UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS Guidelines for end of life conversations: Do not rush end of life conversations Be sensitive to potential cultural & linguistic barriers Recognize & respect cultural & faith-based values as they may impact personal & family beliefs as reflected in goals of care & decision making 13

MOLST CONCERNS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES MOLST is not intended for those with significant disabilities who have the potential to live with the assistance of life-supporting technologies or medical interventions such as feeding tubes & ventilators. Persons ought not to be steered away from interventions that can make lives easier, improve health, or sustain life because one thinks the patient is suffering or has a poor quality of life. These subjective determinations are determined by the patient. MOLST CONCERNS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES For people with long term, relatively stable or slowly progressive disabilities who already use life-supporting technologies, consider: Is the person approaching the end stages of a terminal illness, as opposed to simply losing some functional capacities for which compensatory adjustments could be made? Is the person experiencing a significant decline/deterioration in health (e.g. frequent aspiration pneumonias, fevers of unknown origin) such that medical or surgical intervention will not significantly impact the process of decline? 14

MOLST PILOT PROGRAM MOLST Pilot Participants UCONN Health Hartford HealthCare at Home Windham/Willimantic Apple Rehabilitation icare Middlesex Hospital St Vincent s Hospital St Francis Hospital Bridgeport Hospital MOLST PILOT PROGRAM 1. Patient must: 1. be informed 2. agree to participate 3. have the MOLST conversation & complete the form 4. sign an Agreement to Participate (filed in provider s office) 2. Site must: Collect Data Send to DPH 15

PARTICIPANTS IN THE MOLST PILOT PROGRAM 1. Patients 2. Primary Care & Other Providers 3. Hospitals 4. Extended or Long Term Care Facilities 5. Home Health Agencies 6. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 7. Hospice Agencies PILOT PROGRAM PHASES Education First: 1. Administrative & clinical persons in designated regions 2. Public 3. Educational Tools Developed by the CT MOLST Task Force & Connecticut Coalition to Improve End of Life Care 4. Formation of DPH MOLST Website April 16, 2015 Pilot Program Launch April 15, 2017 Pilot Program Ends & Data Analysis Begins 16

MOLST DATA ELEMENTS (13) ONE FORM/MOLST 1. A Consecutive Assigned Number 2. Clinician Type 3. YES MOLST 4. NO MOLST 5. Triggering Diagnosis 6. Actual Diagnosis 7. Sex 8. Age 9. Pilot Location 10.Clinical Site 11.Race 12.Ethnicity 13.Disability Question ALL INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON LINE www.ct.gov/dph Click on - Featured Links Click on - Medical Orders for Life-sustaining Treatment 17

MOLST is: a) Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment TRUE b) a document to replace a Do Not Resuscitate order FALSE c) Mandatory Obligations to provide Life-Sustaining Treatment to all persons in cardiac arrest FALSE When discussing MOLST with those who have pre-existing disabilities, which would be considered best practice: a) Do not rush the conversation TRUE b) Provide gentle suggestions to steer towards choosing limitations on life-sustaining care FALSE c) Cultural & linguistic barriers are not usually of concern FALSE 18

MOLST in CT: a)designed after the national POLST paradigm TRUE b)developed due to the low use of living wills in CT FALSE c) Signed into law by the Governor of CT FALSE The goal of MOLST is to: a) ensure patient autonomy through discussions with health care providers TRUE b) substitute MOLST for an existing living will FALSE c) limit medically futile aggressive care FALSE 19

The process of advanced care planning using the MOLST is to: a)have an end-of-life conversation with health care provider to establish options for treatments that coincide with stated goals of care TRUE b) Complete the MOLST form and bring it to a health care provider FALSE c) Discuss end-of-life care preferences with physician and ask him/her to record them in the medical record FALSE A MOLST form & a living will: a) are two different documents TRUE b) are the same documents FALSE c) can be used interchangeably as they contain the same information FALSE 20

Conditions for eligibility for a MOLST are: a) end-stage serious life-limiting illnesses or conditions of advanced chronic progressive frailty - TRUE b) early stages of all potentially terminal cancers FALSE c) any condition the patient reports FALSE A legally authorized representative is: a) Parent, guardian, or health care representative TRUE b) Next-of-kin or conservator FALSE c) Spouse, next-of-kin or health care agent FALSE 21

QUESTIONS? 22