Data Elements: Bridging Clinical & Research Data

Similar documents
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Quality Data Model (QDM) Style Guide. QDM (version MAT) for Meaningful Use Stage 2

Copyright All Rights Reserved.

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

Meaningful Use Stage 1 Guide for 2013

2015 HCPro, a division of BLR. All rights reserved. These materials may not be duplicated without express written permission.

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

HIE Data: Value Proposition for Payers and Providers

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data Capture: Hopes, Fears, and Dreams

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

PDUFA IV Information Technology Plan. Armando Oliva, M.D. Deputy Director for Bioinformatics Office of Critical Path Programs FDA

Carolinas Collaborative Data Dictionary

Deriving Value from a Health Information Exchange. HIMSS17 DA-CH Community Conference Healthix I New York I February 20, 2017

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Consolidated Health Informatics (CHI) Briefing to HITSP Panel

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 1 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Guide 2: Updated August 2011

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

IMPROVING MEDICATION RECONCILIATION WITH STANDARDS

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Population Health Management Tools to Improve Care for Individuals and Populations of Patients

CHCANYS NYS HCCN ecw Webinar

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

emeasures: Everything You Want To Know

Note: Every encounter type must have at least one value designated under the MU Details frame.

Ambulatory Interoperability - Proposed Final Criteria - Feb Either HL7 v2.4 or HL7 v2.5.1, LOINC

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Figure 1: Heat map showing zip codes and countries of residence for patients in STARR

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

HL7 RCRIM Regulated Product Submissions

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Healthcare Analytics & Managing Population Health

Harnessing Interoperable Health IT and the Data Dividend to Transform Care

Meaningful use glossary and requirements table

Now We are Getting to the Hard Parts: An Analysis Files Perspective

Challenges for National Large Laboratories to Ensure Implementation of ELR Meaningful Use

Our Journey In Health IT And Health Information Exchange Working Towards Ubiquitous, Computable Care. Review Data Systems For Monitoring HIV Care

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Supporting Public Health and Surveillance State Level Perspective

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 2 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

HSX Meaningful Use Support of Transitions of Care

Trillium Bridge: An update

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Clinical Data acquisition and management. David A. Dorr, MD, MS Data after Dark 1/2016 OHSU

EHR and Meaningful Use: How it Impacts the Coder. What you get may not be what you expect Patricia S. Wilson, RT (R), CPC, PMP

Quality Data Model December 2012

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Overview of Current and Future Coding. PSTAC May 18, 2010 Presentation Prepared by: Shelly Spiro

A complete step by step guide on how to achieve Meaningful Use Core Set Measures in Medgen EHR.

Results will be used for public reporting by MDH and MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

RE: Request for Comments Regarding Meaningful Use Stage 2

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals Q Update from 2013 HIE Survey Participants

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR

HIDD 101 HOSPITAL INPATIENT AND DISCHARGE DATA IN NEW MEXICO

The History of Meaningful Use

Re: HHS-OS HIT Policy Committee: Request for Comment Regarding Stage 3 Definition of Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs)

HL7 standards pave the way to meaningful use

Electronic Clinical Quality Measures (ecqms) for Hospitals: What You Need to Know

Standardized Terminologies Used in the Learning Health System

PROGRAM INTERCHANGE Japan

PBGH Response to CMMI Request for Information on Advanced Primary Care Model Concepts

This document contains material provided by the American Academy of Ophthalmology about the IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

May 7, Submitted electronically via:

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Russell B Leftwich, MD

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Analytics Data Dictionary

Jason C. Goldwater, MA, MPA Senior Director

Meaningful Use Key Dates

Health Current: Roadmap Practice Transformation using Information & Data

MEANINGFUL USE TRAINING SCENARIOS GUIDE

ASCs and Meaningful Use. Patrick Doyle, Vice President Sales Jessica McBrayer, RN, Business Analyst Ron Pelletier, Vice President Market Strategy

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

SNOMED CT AND 3M HDD: THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

ecw Integration PIX, XACML, CCD with Basic Clinical Event Notifications Project Scope Definition

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

Breaking HIE Barriers

Stage 1. Meaningful Use 2014 Edition User Manual

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

The results will also be used for public reporting for MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

Transcription:

Data Elements: Bridging Clinical & Research Data HCS Research Collaboratory Grand Rounds December 6, 2013 Rachel Richesson, PhD Associate Professor Duke University School of Nursing

Outline Definitions and sources for data elements Approaches to data standards for: clinical data research data Challenges Role of patient registries Role of The Collaboratory. (?)

Definitions Data element a representation of a clinical concept that represents a patient state or attribute e.g., diagnosis, diabetes, clinical visit, lab value, gender encoded using standardized terminologies Value set a list of numerical values and the individual descriptions from standard vocabularies used to define the clinical concepts Value sets define clinical concepts unambiguously. ONC Definitions: http://www.healthit.gov/policy researchers implementers/clinical quality measures

Examples Data element name Value set Diagnosis _a ICD 9CM Diagnosis_b SNOMED CT Diagnosis of diabetes_a 249.xx, 250.xx, 357.2, 362.01 06, 366.41 Diagnosis of diabetes_b Yes/no Diagnosis of diabetes_c New/old.. Race American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander White Route of substance administration Chew; Diffusion, extracorporeal; Diffusion, hemodialysis;..; Dissolve, oral; Dissolve, sublingual; Implantation; Infusion; Inhalation; Injection;. (>100 codes in HL7 set!)

Data element name Diabetes Management Method Value set Diet/exercise only; pills; insulin Laboratory test completed LOINC HbA1c value Most Recent HbA1c Value ABO GROUP TYPE Location of Pain Assistive devices A, B, AB and O Face, Forearm, Hand, Leg, Arms, Trunk, Cane, walker,.

Sources of Data Elements NCI cadsr CDISC SHARE NINDS CDE Projects NIH Data Element Portal (NLM) PhenX PROMIS Research oriented PROMIS LOINC USHIK (AHRQ) NLM Value Set Authority Center Clinically oriented

Approaches to Clinical Data Standards Informatics Focus on models and semantics Safety, scalability National plan Incentives for EHR adoption Incremental standards

9

National Standards Strategy Meaningful Use Objectives E Rx Certification Criteria Capability to E Rx must be included Standards NCPDP SCRIPT 8.1/10.6 must be used Provide Patient Summary Record Capability to electronically transmit a patient summary record must be included Continuity of Care Document (CCD) or Continuity of Care Record (CCR) must be used plus vocabulary standards Electronically Submit Data to Immunization Registries Capability to electronically transmit immunization data must be included HL7 2.5.1 or HL7 2.3.1 and CVX Code Set

Codes and Meaning Numbness of left arm and right leg Numbness (44077006) Left (7771000) Arm (40983000) Right (24028007) Leg (30021000) Numbness of right arm and left leg Example from Stan Huff s informative presentation of CEM, available at: http://informatics.mayo.edu/recordings/cem/clinicalelementmodel.swf

Application Context: Different Information Models Date 28 Jul 2008 Finding Hypertension Date 28 Jul 2008 Hypertension Observed

Terminology Information Model Interactions Date 28 Jul 2008 Finding Family History of Hypertension Date Finding Subject 28 Jul 2008 38341003 hypertensive disorder Father Date Finding Subject 28 Jul 2008 160357008 FH: Hypertension : 408732007 subject relationship context = 66839005 father Father

Challenge Need standards for: information model controlled terminology * AND * Interaction (specifications for use) See HL7 s TermInfo group

Solution: Clinical Element Models Standard models of clinically relevant and related concepts and relationships (from data & terminology) Retain computable meaning for data exchange Support use of data in decision support logic A global modeling effort as a whole detailed clinical data models instances of data Reference standard

Source: http://www.iom.edu/~/media/files/activity%20files/quality/vs RT/Data%20Quality%20Workshop/Presentations/Chute.pdf

http://www.clinicalelement.com

http://informatics.mayo.edu/sharp/index.php/main_page

More Models Models of Use Supports Data Capture Application System Level Models of Meaning Support Decision Support Truth Semantics Extensive work here by Alan Rector, MD, Prof. of Medical Informatics, Univ. of Manchester.

Harmonized through BRIDG Model** Controlled Terminology (NCI EVS) Glossary Critical Path Initiative esubmissions (ectd+data) Analysis and Reporting Protocol Study Design Eligibility Registration Schedule (PR Model) Case Report Forms (CRF) (CDASH) Study Data Lab Data (LAB and PGx) Tabulated CRF data (SDTM) Study Data Lab Data Study Design Analysis Datasets (ADaM) * *Transport: CDISC ODM, SASXPT and/or HL7 ** CDISC, ISO/CEN, HL7 Standard (JIC)

FDA Goal (CDER) Standardize efficacy data elements in 57 therapeutic areas FDA will likely require submission using these standards http://www.fda.gov/drugs/developmentapprovalprocess/formssubmissionrequirements/electronicsubmissions/ucm269946.htm

http://c path.org/

National Electronic Data Stores Growing

Office Based Adoption of Basic EHRs (Percent) 44% of office based providers implemented a "basic EHR by 2012. Hospital Adoption of Basic EHRs (Percent) 40% of non federal acute care hospitals implemented "basic EHR by 2012.

44% percent of office based providers implemented at least a "basic EHR system by 2012. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, Health IT Dashboard. Updated 7/26/2013.

Growing National Resources from HITECH Basic EHR Functions Type of Data patient demographics patient problem lists electronic lists of patient medications taken clinical notes orders for prescriptions laboratory results viewing imaging results viewing patient demographics* patient problems* medications* clinical data (narrative) medications* lab results* images *uses controlled vocabulary/coding system

The Path to Critical Mass Today, distributed queries are generally limited to Organizations with large IT & research budgets Some exceptions (e.g., NYC PCIP, MDPHNet) Missing: Primary Care, FQHCs, CAHs, HIEs, etc In other words, most places where clinical care is delivered and recorded Path to critical mass depends on Query Health Standards Health IT vendor participation Health IT vendors Allscripts Amazing Charts AZZLY Cerner dbmotion ClinicalWorks Epic erecords IBEZA InterSystems Medicity Microsoft National Health Data Systems NextGen RelayHealth Siemens Check back more to come at QueryHealth.org 32

ONC Query Health RecapInitiative

The NLM maintains the data element catalog value sets with the Value Set Authority Center (VSAC): https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/

Data Elements Catalog N=1953 Hosted by the NLM https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/

Data Elem Count Ethnicity 93 ONC Administrative Sex 93 Payer 93 Race 93 birth date 82 Office Visit 47 Face to Face Interaction 44 Home Healthcare Services 25 Medical Reason 25 Preventive Care Services Established Office Visit, 18 + 22 Preventive Care Services Initial Office Visit, 18 + 22 Emergency Department Visit 20 Palliative Care 17 Annual Wellness Visit 16 Outpatient Consultation 14 Patient Refusal 13 Principal Diagnosis 13 Patient Reason 12 Inpatient Encounter 11

Value Sets Future Directions Quality assurance of value sets: Are they valid? Complete? Consistent? Metrics? NLM: Bodenreider, Winnenberg (papers 2012 13) Can they support decision support? Can they support research? PCOR? How can we manage growth?

An evaluation of the NQF Quality Data Model for representing Electronic Health Record driven phenotyping algorithms. Thompson WK, Rasmussen LV, Pacheco JA, Peissig PL, Denny JC, Kho AN, Miller A, Pathak J. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:911 20. Epub 2012 Nov 3.

An evaluation of the NQF Quality Data Model for representing Electronic Health Record driven phenotyping algorithms. Thompson WK, Rasmussen LV, Pacheco JA, Peissig PL, Denny JC, Kho AN, Miller A, Pathak J. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:911 20. Epub 2012 Nov 3.

BRIDGING Clinical vs. Research Worlds Computable Phenotypes ICD and other coding systems Limited set of data elements Appropriateness for various research questions More (and better ) data elements (& Value Sets) Good design and QA practices Multi stakeholder engagement Uniform adoption in EHRs? Standardize or harmonize? Who is in charge?

What could drive this? Business cases for EHR derived data to support research uses Routine

Patient Registries Natural history of disease Effectiveness Safety Quality AHRQ: Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes Chronic Disease Management CHF Report on Registries in Chronic Disease Management: http://www.chcf.org/publications/2004/02/using computerized registries in chronic disease care

Future. Registries

Registries Research Quality Improvement

Acknowledgements W. Ed Hammond, PhD Meredith Nahm, PhD Michelle Smerek Members of the Phenotype, Data Standards, and Data Quality Core of The Collaboratory Bron Kisler & Becky Kush (CDISC) The HSC Collaboratory (NIH Common Fund, # 5U54AT007748 02) Thanks to Renee Pridgen (DCRI) for slide support.

Future. The Collaboratory (?) EHR Vendors Standard data elements Public, Providers, Patients, and Advocacy Organizations Registries