Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting

Similar documents
Table of Contents for CCC Toolkit

Community-Based Care Coordination Maturity Assessment

ALLIED PHYSICIAN IPA ADVANTAGE HEALTH NETWORK IPA ARROYO VISTA MEDICAL IPA GREATER ORANGE MEDICAL GROUP IPA GREATER SAN GABRIEL VALLEY PHYSICIANS IPA

Accountable Care Atlas

National Health Regulatory Authority Kingdom of Bahrain

Occupation Description: Responsible for providing nursing care to residents.

Community-based Care Coordination (CCC) Maturity Assessment RidgePointe Healthcare District

Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QPS) Ratchada Prakongsai Senior Manager

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION II: CLINICAL SYSTEMS REVIEW

Implementation Guide Version 4.0 Tools

Root Cause Analysis (Part I) event/rca_assisttool.doc

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY & PROCEDURE PATIENT SAFETY PLAN

EHR Systems: Risk Management Strategies. July 2013

Improving Clinical Flow ECHO Collaborative Change Package

OPERATIONS MANUAL CARE CONNECTIONS PROGRAM LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES

CPC+ CHANGE PACKAGE January 2017

UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER PATIENT SAFETY PLAN

Proposed Standards Revisions Related to Pain Assessment and Management

A Case Review Process for NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts

3/30/2015. Objectives. Cooking Up a QAPI: Recipe for Success Under the new COPs Part 1

2017 Good Catch Program: Blueprint Companion Guide

Sunnybrook Policy: Disclosure of Adverse Medical Events and Unanticipated Outcomes of Care

3. Does the institution have a dedicated hospital-wide committee geared towards the improvement of laboratory test stewardship? a. Yes b.

GOALS. I. Monitoring the quality of health care for safety, effectiveness and efficiency and seek opportunities for improvement

Outcome-Based Pathways Unilateral Total Hip Replacement And Unilateral Total Knee Replacement

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

Schedule 3. Services Schedule. Occupational Therapy

MEDS TO BEDS AND CARE MANAGEMENT MEDICATION ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT: FOR HOSPITAL TEAM AND PHARMACISTS

20 STEPS FROM STUDY IDEA INCEPTION TO PUBLISHING RESEARCH/ Evidence-Based Practice

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Military Health System (MHS) Patient Safety Program (PSP) (MHSPSP)

Schedule 3. Services Schedule. Social Work

Safe Transitions Best Practice Measures for

UPMC POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

Prepared Jointly by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy

Response to Safety Events Just Culture HR Policy 5.24 Page 1 of 10

The 10 Building Blocks of Primary Care Building Blocks of Primary Care Assessment (BBPCA)

N C MPASS. Clinical Self-Scheduling. Version 6.8

Privacy and Security Training for Connecting Ontario. PACE Cardiology April, 2017

UPMC POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

Merced College Registered Nursing 34: Advanced Medical/Surgical Nursing and Pediatric Nursing

E.H.R. s and Improving Patient Safety - What Has Been the Real Impact?

APPENDIX 8-2 CHECKLISTS TO ASSIST IN PREVENTING MEDICATION ERRORS

Compliance and Enforcement Standards Pursuant to the Nova Scotia Day Care Act and Regulations

Hospital Readmissions Survival Guide

Security Risk Analysis and 365 Days of Meaningful Use. Rodney Gauna & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Comment Template for Care Coordination Standards

ED0028 Adverse event, critical incident, serious issue, and near miss procedure

Page 1 of 5 Version No: 6 Authorised by: General Counsel

CHAPTER 12 -QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

Fundamentals of Self-Limiting Conditions Prescribing for Manitoba Pharmacists. Ronald F. Guse Registrar College of Pharmacists of Manitoba (CPhM)

Select the correct response and jot down your rationale for choosing the answer.

Peer Review in Group Practices

Accident Investigation: Root Cause Analysis

QAPI Quality Assurance Process Improvement

Western State Hospital

Transitional Care Management Services: New Codes, New Requirements

PI Team: N/A. Medical Staff Officervices Printed copies are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy for the latest version.

Toward the Electronic Patient Record:

SASKATCHEWAN ASSOCIATIO

Hospital Readmissions

NURSE PRACTITIONER STANDARDS FOR PRACTICE

Medicine Reconciliation FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS NATIONAL MEDICATION SAFETY PROGRAMME

Medicaid Managed Specialty Supports and Services Concurrent 1915(b)/(c) Waiver Program FY 17 Attachment P7.9.1

Objectives. Key Elements. ICAHN Targeted Focus Areas: Staff Competency and Education Quality Processes and Risk Management 5/20/2014

Comprehensive Community Services (CCS) File Review Checklist Comprehensive

Patient-Centered Connected Care 2015 Recognition Program Overview. All materials 2016, National Committee for Quality Assurance

Efficacy of Tympanostomy Tubes for Children with Recurrent Acute Otitis Media Randomization Phase

Root Cause Analysis LITE (RCA Lite)

Unit 2 Clinical Governance & Risk Management Awareness

Directing and Controlling

Clinical Nurse Leader (CNL ) Certification Exam. Subdomain Weights for the CNL Certification Examination Blueprint (effective February 2012)

The Monthly Publication of the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization

Payment Reforms to Improve Care for Patients with Serious Illness

North Carolina Board of Nursing

Risk Management in the ASC

Quick Guide to A3 Problem Solving

Ethics for Professionals Counselors

MEDICAL STAFF BYLAWS MCLAREN GREATER LANSING HOSPITAL

Tips for PCMH Application Submission

Patient Blood Management Certification Program. Review Process Guide. For Organizations

NZWCS Venous Ulcer Clinical Pathway

Model Of Care: Care Coordination Interdisciplinary Care Team (ICT)

MEDICAL RECORDS (HEALTH INFORMATION) SERVICES

Medicaid RAC Audit Results

12.01 Safety Management Plan UWHC Administrative Policies

Quality Impact Assessment Policy

Chapter 17 EMS Quality Assurance Program February 2009

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Committee on Interdisciplinary Practice Policy and Procedures

Compliance Program Updated August 2017

BAY-ARENAC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AUTHORITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

An RHC Patient Centered Medical Home Experience

ETHICAL BEHAVIOR AND CONSUMER RIGHTS (EBR)

Coordinated Care Initiative DRAFT Assessment and Care Coordination Standards November 20, 2012

CIO Legislative Brief

CHAPTER 9 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT HOSPITAL

MEDICAL RECORDS (HEALTH INFORMATION) SERVICES

This chapter is aimed at site managers or others considering introducing COPE at a facility.

INSERT ORGANIZATION NAME

Transcription:

Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting This tool provides an overview of patient care coordination (CC) variances, suggestions for documenting and reporting on variances, and policies and procedures for variance reporting. Time needed: 15 hours to review tool; set up documentation form, tracking mechanism, and reporting structure; establish policy and procedures for use; and introduce CC variance Suggested other tools: Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting Log Template; Patient Care Coordination Variance Reports Template; Workflow and Process Analysis/ Redesign/ Optimization for CCC tool suite Table of Contents How to Use... 1 Overview of Patient Care CoordinationVariance Reporting... 2 Types of Patient Care Coordination Variances... 2 Variance Log / Checklist... 3 Documentation, Tracking, Analysis, and Reporting on Variances... 5 Workflow for Documenting, Tracking, Analysis, and Reporting on Variances... 6 Variance Reports... 7 Individual Variance Report... 8 Policy and Procedures for Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting... 8 Introducing Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting... 9 How to Use 1. Distinguish between a patient care coordination variance report, an (administrative) issues management program, and a risk management program. 2. Review the types of patient care coordination variances that may occur or be identified through a community-based care coordination (CCC) program. 3. Review the suggestions for documenting, tracking, analysis, and reporting on variances. Make modifications to suit the needs of the CCC program. 4. Draft policy and procedures for using the Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting tool. 5. Introduce the policy and procedures for Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting to the CCC steering committee, physician champion and others as applicable to obtain feedback and make adjustments. Distribute the tool and policy/procedures for use to those who may be documenting variances, aiding in addressing variances, and receiving variance reports. Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting - 1

Overview of Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting A patient care coordination (CC) variance is a deviation from a standard of practice or a specific care plan. Tracking patient care coordination variances can help a care coordinator (CC) identify patterns that may lead to improvements. A variance might be considered similar to a health care incident, or even a sentinel event depending on its severity. Variance is the more commonly used term when associated with care coordination, case management, utilization review or other processes that are proximate to but not direct patient care. A patient CC variance may be related to an action or outcome. A variance in an action can include: Something performed that was not intended to be performed (e.g., patient was required to have a repeat diagnostic test because the results of the first were not provided to the intended recipient) Something performed at the wrong time (e.g., a patient transportation company came a day earlier than requested) Something that was not performed that should have been performed (e.g., Mealson-Wheels did not supply food for an entire day) A variance in an outcome is a result of an action that is different than expected. An outcome may or may not be directly related to a variance in action. An outcome can be positive or negative, although usually it is the negative, or adverse, outcome that rises to the level of a trackable outcome variance. Administrative issues that might be logged, investigated, resolved, and reported upon for quality improvement are similar to patient care variances, but are associated with program administration and are not specific to a patient s care coordination needs or direct patient care. For example, a CC may consistently not have time to document care coordination activities, or may have lost a mobile computer device. Most health care organizations have an issues management program in which to make such reports and have them addressed. A variance reporting system for the CCC program may be patterned after an issues management system. Risk management also has characteristics that are similar to variance reporting and issues management but are focused on reducing the likelihood of economic, reputational, or litigious harm, often as a result of patient care incidents and sentinel events. Variances in care coordination or administrative issues associated with the CCC program may occasionally rise to such a level that they should be reported to a risk manager. Any time a variance could result in material harm to an organization it is appropriate for the CC to consult with the risk manager. A risk manager may also work with the CC as the CCC program is initiated to ensure that appropriate controls are in place and variance reporting and issues logging take place as applicable. Types of Patient Care Coordination Variances Patient care coordination variances may include five general types 1 and within each general type there may be a variety of specific types. Review the checklist below; it provides a number of examples in each specific type. Add, modify, combine, or delete specific types of variances as applicable to the nature of the CCC program. Within each general type there are both action and outcome variances. Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting - 2

Although the specific types of variations are listed in the general sequence as they may be encountered from the start of recruiting a patient into a CCC program, many of the types that apply in the early stages of the program may apply throughout a patient s participation in the CCC program. For example, the fact that a patient is a poor historian may be recognized during the recruitment visit and this is repeatedly confirmed throughout provision of CCC services. Consideration might be given as to whether poor historian should be further qualified in an attempt to determine root cause, or whether it is documented the first time it is observed and not thereafter except in an unusual circumstance. There is value to maintaining consistency in documenting variances as frequency of occurrence can highlight the need for further investigation and quality improvement initiatives. Decisions about how variance logging should be performed should be described in policy and procedures so consistency can be maintained. Once satisfied with the types of variances on the checklist, the checklist becomes a Variance Log. Use it to log actual variances. Over time, refine the variation types where it may be appropriate to combine, split, delete, or add to the types. This checklist is set up to log variances on a quarterly basis by simply recording a hash mark for each variance. A database may also be established to log a patient identifier instead of a hash mark for ease of reference. (See Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting Log Template for a fillable form.) Variance Log / Checklist VARIANCE LOG Variance # and Type of Patient Care Coordination Variances Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 A. Patient-related 1. Declines data sharing 2. Does not keep appointments 3. Is a poor historian 4. Is not comprehending the CCC program 5. Language barrier 6. Withholds pertinent information 7. Forgetful (e.g., forgets glasses, keys, wallet) 8. Refuses provider appointments 9. Health literacy poor 10. Computer literacy poor 11. Unable to take medications as instructed 12. Refuses to take medications as instructed 13. Refuses community services (e.g., transportation, support groups, medication reminder aids, ADL help) 14. Refuses to maintain a health diary or PHR 15. Abusive, threatening or other behavioral issues 16. Medical complication occurs (e.g., pressure ulcers, wound infection) 17. Adverse reaction to medication 18. Medical event occurs (e.g., condition worsens, new condition occurs) 19. Other (specify): B. Family/caregiver-related 1. Language barrier 2. Health literacy poor 3. Computer literacy poor 4. Unable to provide care 5. Refuses communications 6. Desires second opinion Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting - 3

VARIANCE LOG Variance # and Type of Patient Care Coordination Variances Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 7. Not accessible 8. Cannot afford medication or necessary medical equipment 9. Abusive, threatening or other behavioral issues 10. Other (specify): C. Institution- or CCC program related 1. Capacity issues; lack of timely appointments; no open access 2. Data sharing issues; lack of technology, HIPAA concerns 3. Long wait times 4. Lost records, requisitions for tests or reports 5. Appointment cancellations; frequent re-bookings 6. Experience of care unsatisfactory to patient 7. Poor contact with care coordinator 8. Lack of specialty provider in community 9. Prolonged turnaround time for referrals/consults 10. Prolonged turnaround time for diagnostic tests 11. Shortage of supplies 12. No hospice services available 13. No home health services available 14. No nursing home beds available 15. Pharmacist not available 24x7 16. Therapists not available on weekends 17. Other (specify): E. Practitioner-related 1. Delay in communicating care plan 2. Miscommunication with care coordinator 3. Miscommunication with interdisciplinary team 8. Practitioner not communicating with patient 9. Practitioner not communicating with family 10. Medication error 11. Non-compliance with formulary 12. Refusal to use patient agenda, health diary, or PHR 13. Patient teaching not done/incomplete 14. Delay in scheduling diagnostic tests 15. Wrong diagnostic tests ordered 16. Lack of follow up with patient or family 17. Delay in processing forms 18. Delay in arranging for referrals 19. Failure to inform patient or family/caregiver of critical health-related information 20. Failure to inform patient or family/caregiver of financial obligations 21. Other (specify): E. Community resources-related 1. No <insert type > service available 2. Frequent lack of capacity for <insert type > service 3. Services are late 4. Experience with service unsatisfactory to patient Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting - 4

VARIANCE LOG Variance # and Type of Patient Care Coordination Variances Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 5. Services are not affordable/no financial assistance available 6. Incorrect service is provided 7. Abusive, threatening or other behavioral issues from staff 8. Other (specify): Documentation, Tracking, Analysis, and Reporting on Variances The following workflow (see diagram on next page) depicts the steps and decision-making involved in documenting, tracking, analyzing, and reporting on patient care coordination variances: 1. Record the variance on the Variance Log immediately when a variance occurs. 2. Determine if variance is significant. o It is not significant if there is an adequate workaround such as heightened monitoring and/or follow up, it is unlikely to recur, or its recurrence will not cause harm or materially impact the CCC program. If the variance is patient- or family/caregiver-related, use professional judgment whether or not to document the occurrence in the patient s health record. o It is significant if there have been repeated occurrences for this patient/familycaregiver, institution, practitioner, or community service for which workarounds are not acceptable. 3. Determine if a significant variance also presents a potential material harm (economic, reputational, or litigious) to the patient, institution, practitioner or CCC program. o If so, or if uncertain, engage the risk manager. o If not, proceed to take corrective action. A corrective action plan should be developed, implemented (and documented in the patient s health record), and tracked until the variance has been corrected (with the outcome documented in the patient s health record). o Variances that are significant (both those which do and do not pose material harm) should be documented on a Variance Report (see below) in addition to the patient s health record and Variance Log. 4. Periodically analyze the Variance Log and Variance Report(s) monthly or quarterly depending on the number, types, and nature of variances. o If a significant variance occurs only one time and is able to be readily corrected, it may not need an action plan for improvement. o For significant variances that recur, or non-significant variances that recur to the point of potentially hindering the CCC program (e.g., takes too much time, draws too many resources, begins to impact patient experience of care), engage the CCC Steering Committee and/or Quality Improvement (QI) Committee in developing and implementing an action plan for improvement. Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting - 5

o Because the community is involved in the CCC program, steps for improvement are very likely to draw from several members of the community. The action plan for improvement can also benefit from an analysis of the corrective action plans developed for each significant variance addressed throughout the period. This analysis may reveal patterns that can help avoid or more quickly mitigate a situation. o Revise the CCC program in accordance with the action plan for improvement, implement the improvement, maintain it, and report back to the CCC Steering Committee and/or QI Committee on the status of the improvement, celebrating success and taking corrective action as needed for further improvement. Workflow for Documenting, Tracking, Analysis, and Reporting Variances Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting - 6

Variance Reports There are several ways to create variance reports. Some CCC programs use a combination of reporting tools and others prefer to use just one. The following are some suggested approaches: Aggregated report on all variances for all patients. If there is a relatively small number of patients in the CCC program or few variances for each patient, this is essentially an expansion of the Variance Log. It helps track programmatic variances. Document the type of variance by recording the variance reference number from the Variance Log. Provide a brief description of the variance, the patient s identification, whether or not it is a significant variance, who reported it, when it was reported, the date of the actual event (this may be different than the actual occurrence and if there is often a delay in reporting by a certain person or institution this could be a variance worth addressing for quality improvement), what intervention is planned (and updated with actual intervention if different than planned), date to follow up (and date actually followed up if different), whether escalation is necessary (add to whom and when escalation was performed), and the date resolved and outcome as applicable. An example is provided below. Note that where there may be multiple follow-ups necessary, additional rows can be used. Var # A12 Description Pt ID Signif? Report by Will not take X as claims drowsiness Report Event Intervention 12345 Yes CC 2/4 2/4 Ask PCP for alternative medication Call Pt to check on response to F/U Escalate? Resolved / Outcome 2/6 No 2/7 new Rx 2/11 No No more drowsiness Aggregated report on all variances for each patient. If a patient will be followed in the CCC program for a relatively lengthy period of time with the potential for many variances, the type of report described below helps track patient-specific needs. Patient Name: Pt ID: Start CCC: D/C: Var # Description Signif? Report by Report Event Intervention to F/U Escalate? Resolved / Outcome Individual report on each variance for each patient (see example below). This is a comprehensive description of a variance that occurred with respect to a specific patient with detailed information about the nature of the variance, how it occurred, what actions were taken, and a description of the outcome. While the content includes the same information as on the report forms above, the individual form allows for much more description and can be processed by various individuals. (Note: It is important to protect the confidentiality of this form. If it resides on a computer, the file should be encrypted. If it resides in a paper file, the file cabinet should be locked and located in a secure area. Copies made for discussion purposes should be numbered, accounted for after use, and shredded.) If such a form were to be completed for every variance for every patient, it would likely to become a burdensome process. In addition, using an individual patient report is not conducive Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting - 7

to analysis across the CCC program. However, much like an incident report or sentinel event report, it is advisable to create such a report for any very significant variance, especially where multiple team members and resources must be involved in corrective action and/or where there is potential material harm (and escalated to a risk manager). Individual Variance Report Patient Name Pt ID Start CCC Discharged Primary Care Provider Contact Notified Variance Type # Description of Variance reported: Reported by: of event: Comprehensive description of variance event: Persons (and dates) notified of variance event Patient: Family/caregiver: Primary care provider: Risk manager: Other: Corrective action plan Interventions planned and dates: Interventions implemented and dates: Follow up performed and dates: Escalation performed To whom: : Follow up performed and dates: Resolution and outcome How resolved: deemed resolved: Person(s) involved in resolution: Person reporting resolution: Other: Follow up quality improvement planned How: When to be initiated: Who to initiate: Action plan: of implementation: (See Patient Care Coordination Variance Reports Template for fillable forms.) Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting - 8

Policy and Procedures for Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting Policies are statements that establish goals for the organization with respect to various important organizational elements. They provide guidance in making decisions about actions and create mechanisms for detecting, resolving, and preventing policy violations. A policy may be simple: All patient care coordination variances should be documented in a manner that supports individual follow up to resolution and analysis for quality improvement. Outcomes of analyses of variance reports should be reported to the Community-based Care Coordination (CCC) Steering Committee and Quality Improvement Committee as applicable. Procedures describe how to carry out policies. They provide the workflow descriptions, forms and formats for processing the operations associated with their respective policies. This Tool is essentially a procedure that can be modified based on the specific CCC program decisions. All policies and procedures should carry a date of creation, revision dates, title of person responsible for maintenance of the policy and procedures, and executive sign off as the policy is approved. Introducing Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting The policy and procedures for patient care coordination variance reporting will likely go through a process of review and refinement, initially by the care coordinator, with the CCC physician champion, and then with the CCC Steering Committee and potentially the QI Committee. Once it is finalized, however, the organization supporting the CCC program should formally introduce it to all stakeholders. These would include all provider institutions, individual practitioners, and community resource organizations. It is advisable to use the CCC Steering Committee to help in the introduction to their respective stakeholders. Copies should be available to all stakeholders and the CC should be available to respond to questions, take comments, and document recommendations for future revisions. References 1 The five general types of patient care coordination variances are similar to those adopted by case managers, as described in the Case Manager s Survival Guide: Winning Strategies for Clinical Practice, Second Edition (2003), written by T.G. Cesta and H. A. Tahan, and published by Mosby, Inc. Copyright 2014 Stratis Health and KHA REACH. Updated 12/19/2014 Section 4.8 Implement Patient Care Coordination Variance Reporting - 9