REGION III REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM GUIDANCE FOR LIMITED JONES ACT WAIVERS DURING POLLUTION RESPONSE ACTIONS

Similar documents
By the Capes -- A Primer on U.S. Coastwise Laws

APPENDIX A ABBREVIATIONS & DEFINITIONS

LETTER OF AGREEMENT ON LIMITED USE OF DISPERSANTS AND CHEMICAL AGENTS DURING OIL DISCHARGES OCCURRING IN COASTAL WATERS

SUMMARY: The Captain of the Port of New Orleans (COTP New. Orleans), under the authority of the Magnuson Act,, established

REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION OF MARINE CASUALTIES WHERE THE UNITED STATES IS A SUBSTANTIALLY INTERESTED STATE (SIS)

Pacific States/British Columbia Oil Spill Task Force. Mutual Aid Agreement

NRT. Scientific Support Coordinator (SSC) during an Emergency Response: The Role of the SSC. Guidance Document. September 27, 2007

Marine Emergency Preparedness and Response. Canadian Coast Guard Presentation at the First Nations and Oil Pipeline Development Summit

CANADA-UNITED STATES JOINT MARINE POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN (JCP)

Safety Zones, Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf in the. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish safety zones

TRIPR FLAMMABLE LIQUID UNIT TRAINS

Vessel Response Plan Program Overview

USCG Roles Before, During & After a CSZ Event

United States Coast Guard

MODEL OPERATING PROCEDURES GUIDE FOR COMBINED MARITIME COUNTER DRUG OPERATIONS

Contingency Planning, Emergency Management & Marine Transportation Policy Leader

Safety Zone; MODU KULLUK; Kiliuda Bay, Kodiak Island, AK to. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety

FUTURE U.S. NAVY AND USCG OPERATIONS IN THE ARCTIC


U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Toledo 2014 PREP FSE

arine MNews Salvage & Spill Response: Unresolved Issues Hamper Progress Maritime Security Workboats: Stack Emissions: Pollution Response:

Marine Protection Rules Part 130B Oil Transfer Site Marine Oil Spill Contingency Plans

Tribal Engagement and the Region 10 Regional Response Team and Northwest Area Committee

Mississippi Emergency Support Function #10 Oil and Hazardous Materials

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. The United States Coast Guard's Program for Identifying High Interest Vessels

U. S. Coast Guard Sector

States Pacific Command (USPACOM). Its secondary mission is to transfer the ammunition at sea using the Modular Cargo Delivery System (MCDS).

Caspian Sea Plan Concerning Regional Co-operation in Combating Oil Pollution in Cases of Emergency

Pacific States/British Columbia Oil Spill Task Force

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Alternative Planning Criteria (APC) Plans in Alaska

FOSC-R Training. Outline Part I

SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE FY16 HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS U.S. COAST GUARD As of June 22, 2015

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Subj: STABILITY RELATED REVIEW PERFORMED BY THE AMERICAN BUREAU Of SHIPPING FOR U.S. FLAG VESSELS

Salvage and Marine Firefighting Requirements; Vessel Response Plans for Oil, (33 Code of Federal Regulations Part 155), December 31, 2008

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

Ministry of Ocean Economy, Marine Resources, Fisheries and Shipping

Salvage and Marine Firefighting Requirements; Vessel Response Plans for Oil, (33 Code of Federal Regulations Part 155), December 31, 2008

Chapter 5 DOMESTIC OPERATIONS

December 21, 2004 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE NSPD-41 HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE HSPD-13

federal register Department of Transportation Part X Friday December 27, 1996 Coast Guard

Overview of USCG Response Program EPA OSC Conference 2012 LCDR Shaun Edwards

MARINE SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Transboundary Spill Preparedness & Response

Nontank Vessel Response Plans (NTVRP) Frequently Asked Questions December 2, 2013 (Updated January 27, 2014)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA MCO 5802.

Safety Zone, Barrel Recovery, Lake Superior; Duluth, MN. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone

RE: Petition to withdraw Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR), docket number USCG

Vessel Traffic Service Act (623/2005)

Caribbean Regional Response Team. Regional Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan December 2014 (Revised February 2016)

Small Entity Compliance Guide. Standards for Living Organisms in Ships' Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters

Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources Marine Notice No. 18 of 2005

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Calumet Harbor, Illinois and Indiana

LOUISIANA MARITIME ASSOCIATION

Assessment of Oil Spill Response and Cleanup Activities in the Great Lakes

PACIFIC STATES BRITISH COLUMBIA OIL SPILL TASK FORCE

Presentation 8 UNITED STATES COAST GUARD RADM STEVEN H. RATTI, COMMANDER, FIFTH COAST GUARD DISTRICT

Scott Vaughan, Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development Jim McKenzie, Principal Office of the Auditor General

Subj: NAVY DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES PROGRAM

Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund Disbursements for FY 2016

4XXX Oil and Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Operations That May Affect National Historic Properties

The American Merchant Marine The Missing Link in Cargo Security

DHS Publishes Semiannual Regulatory Agenda

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Marine Sanitation Devices for Vessels Owned or Operated by the Department of Defense

PIPES Act of 2006 Redline of 49 USC CHAPTER SAFETY 49 USC CHAPTER SAFETY 01/19/04 CHAPTER SAFETY

u.s. Department o~. COMDTPUB P NVIC FEBRUARY 2005 NAVIGATION AND VESSEL INSPECTION CIRCULAR NO

Checklist of requirements for licensing under Section 31 of the Trade Regulation Code (GewO)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L))

PUBLIC NOTICE. Attn: Mr. Christopher Layton 1200 Duck Road Duck, North Carolina CB&I 4038 Masonboro Loop Road Wilmington, North Carolina 28409

AAPA EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SEMINAR. Port Security: A-Z. Napa, California May 8, 2008

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Commandant WATCHKEEPING AND WORK-HOUR LIMITATIONS ON TOWING VESSELS, OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSELS (OSV) & CREW BOATS UTLIZING A TWO WATCH SYSTEM

National Oil Spill Contingency Plan Operations

Central Authorities Local Authorites

PUBLIC NOTICE. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

CITY OF COLUMBIA. Columbia Police Department. Proposed Police Emergency Vehicle Operation and Motor Vehicle Pursuit Policy

TEXAS MARITIME UPDATE

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

Florida Clean Marina and Clean Vessel Act Programs

IAP COVER SHEET 1. Incident Name: 2. Operational Period (Date/ Time)

CEMP Criteria for Ambulatory Surgery Centers Emergency Management

Anchorage Grounds; Galveston Harbor, Bolivar Roads Channel, Galveston, Texas

Emergency Management. 1 of 8 Updated: June 20, 2014 Hospice with Residential Facilities

Kanawha Putnam Emergency Management Plan Functional Annex. (completed by plan authors) Local / County Office of Emergency Management

Federal official predesignated to coordinate and direct federal responses

Safety Zone; Unexploded Ordnance Detonation, Gulf of Mexico, Pensacola, FL

Host Nation Support UNCLASSIFIED. Army Regulation Manpower and Equipment Control

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

TITLE II--TRANSPORTATION OF ESPECIALLY HAZARDOUS CARGO

Figure 2-1 Call-Down Sequence for Spill Reporting 2-2 Figure 2-2 Initial Spill Report Form 2-5

Waiver to Space Exploration Technologies Corporation of Acceptable Risk Limit for Launch

SUMMARY: By this direct final rule, the Coast Guard is removing. the regulation for the safety zone at Snake Island, also known as

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 1 REGULATIONS ON VESSELS OWNED OR OPERATED

SECTION 5 REFINERY EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATIONS

Security Zones; Naval Base Point Loma; Naval Mine Anti Submarine. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is increasing a portion of an existing

Alabama State Port Authority Hurricane Preparedness & Recovery

Safety Zone; Navy Underwater Detonation (UNDET) Exercise, Apra Outer Harbor, GU

EPIC seeks documents concerning the Nationwide Automatic Identification System ("NAIS").

Transcription:

REGION III REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM GUIDANCE FOR LIMITED JONES ACT WAIVERS DURING POLLUTION RESPONSE ACTIONS Introduction Federal On-Scene Coordinators (FOSC) and Unified Commands (UC) responding to pollution or the threat of pollution in the ocean and coastal water environment have been challenged to locate suitable vessels or barges to support their response activities. It remains the intent and desire for the FOSC/UC to find and use United States-flagged vessels or barges to support the collection and storage of oil or hazardous substances from the environment, serve as the reception vessel for lightered cargo, support vessel salvage operations, or other needed services of the response. In some responses the FOSC/UC has been unable to identify suitable U.S.-flagged vessels to serve in these capacities. In an effort to protect lives, the environment, and minimize adverse economic impacts, the FOSC/UC has no choice but to use foreign assets when U.S. assets are not available. This document provides Region III Regional Response Team (RRT) with guidance and decision-making tools to support and assist FOSC/UC actions when they are pursuing the use of foreign-flag vessels to mitigate pollution or the threat of pollution when the Jones Act is applicable. The information contained within this document was developed strictly to identify issues and provide consistent viewpoints and procedures to assist the FOSC/UC and alleviate potential barriers that may inhibit the decision process. This is a planning and preparedness effort and we encourage Area Committee members to incorporate concepts and information from this document into their respective Area Contingency Plans (ACP). It is structured in four sections. Section I defines the purpose, authority, and scope of the process; Section II contains a decision tree for supporting a request for a limited waiver under the Jones Act; Section III contains a decision checklist for Limited Jones Act Waivers; and Section IV contains a sample Limited Jones Act Waiver letter. Last Revised: May 6, 2002 1

Section I Purpose The purpose of this guidance is solely to support and enhance the FOSC/UC s ability to quickly determine the best course of action to obtain a waiver when addressing the use of foreign-flag vessels or barges to support pollution response activities when suitable U.S. flag vessels or barges cannot be located or obligated to assist and support removal/ salvage operations to mitigate pollution or the threat of pollution. This guidance outlines the decision-making process, identifies issues, suggests procedures, and provides checklists to help standardize the waiver process. This guidance is a planning and preparedness tool that can be taken in part or in whole and incorporated into various ACP s. As mentioned earlier, the use of vessels to support the mitigation of a pollution event is an FOSC/UC decision and no RRT concurrence or consultation is necessary. However, the RRT recognizes that in some instances the physical securing of suitable vessels or barges to support various phases of an FOSC/UC response to significant oil spill or hazardous substance incidents is an increasing challenge. These guidelines were developed to allow the FOSC and their Commonwealth/State SOSC partners, within the UC, to employ concepts or tools from this guidance to help or assist in the obtainment of suitable vessel or barge assets to: Prevent or substantially reduce a hazard to human life; Minimize the environmental impact of spilled oil; Take full advantage of available vessel or barge resources to assist in the containment, collection, or storage of a pollutant, the removal of a stricken vessel s cargo, support salvage operations, or other support deemed necessary in an effort to enhance the efficiency of the overall removal operation when suitable U.S. resources are not available; or Reduce or eliminate economic or aesthetic losses, which would otherwise presumably occur without the use of available resources. Legal Background There are two issues that an FOSC/UC must address when engaged in pollution response or salvage actions where suitable U.S.- flagged vessels or barges cannot be identified or are not available to support the response and a waiver to use foreign-flag vessels or barges is needed. Merchandise Coastwise Law: Title 46, United States Code Appendix, 883 (46 U.S.C. App. 883, the merchandise coastwise law often called the Jones Act ), provides in part, that no merchandise shall be transported between points in the United States embraced within the coastwise laws, either directly Last Revised: May 6, 2002 2

or via a foreign port, or for any part of the transportation, in any vessel other than one that is coastwise-qualified (i.e., U.S.-built, owned, and documented). Pursuant to Title 19, United States Code, 1401 (c) (19 U.S.C. 1401 (c)), the word merchandise is defined as goods, wares, and chattels of every description, and includes merchandise the importation of which is prohibited. The Jones Act generally applies to points in the territorial sea, defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline, in cases where the baseline and the coastline differ. It should be noted that 46 U.S.C. App. 883 is applicable to Puerto Rico pursuant to 48 U.S.C. 744 and 46 U.S.C. 877. Jones Act provisions are not applicable in the waters surrounding the United States Territory of the Virgin Islands. Salvage Operations: Title 46, United States Code Appendix, 316 (d) (46 U.S.C. App. 316 (d)), in pertinent part, prohibits the engagement of a foreign vessel in salvaging operations on the Atlantic or Pacific Coast of the United States, or in territorial waters of the United States on the Gulf of Mexico, except when authorized by treaty or when the Commissioner of Customs, after investigation, authorizes the use of a foreign vessel or vessels in the salvaging operations. Scope of Process In regard to the administration of the above-cited salvage statute, it has been the position of the Customs Service that it is not applicable to the waters of Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands. (See Customs memorandum 216.132, dated June 3, 1974; 107038, dated March 8, 1985; 110319, dated July 14, 1989; and 110391, dated May 3, 1990, the latter two of which were in response to prior inquiries from the U.S. Coast Guard regarding the use of non-coastwise-qualified jack-up barges in Puerto Rico.) This guidance addresses the process that provides the FOSC/UC with procedures to pursue a Limited Jones Act Waiver when suitable U.S. vessel or barge resources are not available. MARAD Involvement: The Maritime Administration (MARAD) must be consulted during the search for suitable U.S.-flagged vessels or barges to support the response operation. It is extremely important that MARAD has the opportunity to assist the FOSC/UC in identifying and locating suitable U.S.-flagged vessels or barges. This interaction should be documented because it will be needed to support a Limited Jones Act Waiver request (MARAD Primary and Secondary contacts are located on Page 14 in this document). Last Revised: May 6, 2002 3

Limited Jones Act Waiver Process: The request for a limited waiver should be forwarded to U.S. Customs via the Fifth Coast Guard District Chief, Marine Safety Division (refer to the attached checklist). The Maintenance and Logistics Command Atlantic (MLCA) Legal Department can assist in developing the waiver request and is also available to liaison with the U.S. Customs staff in support of the request. It is important to note that waivers can only be granted considering the following: The navigation laws administered by the U.S. Customs Service (including the Jones Act) can only be waived under the authority provided by the Act of December 27, 1950 (64 Stat. 1120; note proceeding 46 U.S.C. App. 1). This statute provides that the head of each department or agency responsible for the administration of the navigation and vessel inspection laws is directed to waive compliance with such laws upon the request of the Secretary of Defense and the head of such department or agency is authorized to waive compliance with such laws either upon his own initiative or upon the written recommendation of the head of any government agency whenever he deems that such action is in the interest of national defense. The only provision to obtain a Limited Jones Act Waiver is by receiving a national defense waiver from the U.S. Customs/Department of Treasury. The criteria in support of this provision shall be documented within any requested forwarded by the FOSC/UC. Waiver Request Criteria: The following issues should be addressed and documented within the Limited Jones Act Waiver requested forwarded by the FOSC/UC: Background synopsis of the incident focusing on the operational need for support vessel or barge use; The inability of the FOSC/UC working through its own sources and through MARAD to identify suitable U.S.-flagged vessels to support the operation; The specific extent that you intend to employ foreign-flagged vessels or barges to mitigate the incident; The threat to national defense should the waiver not be granted (such as., block of significant channel, military base, or transportation route.); The request should begin with the following language or similar wording; This requests an expedited limited waiver of the provisions of 46 U.S.C. App. 883 on the basis of National Defense to allow for the use of. Last Revised: May 6, 2002 4

Section II Decision Tree for Requesting Limited Jones Act Waiver The decision tree for supporting a request for a Limited Jones Act Waiver is as follows. The flowchart follows the various steps and decision-making an FOSC/UC needs to request a waiver. The steps address the following high points in the process: Search for suitable U.S.-flagged vessels to support operations; Consult with MARAD to assist in the identification and location of suitable U.S.-flagged vessels to support operations; FOSC/UC makes determination, in consultation with MARAD, that no suitable U.S.-flagged vessels or barges are available within response windows to properly mitigate the event; FOSC/UC determines that the failure to respond quickly within designated response windows would result in a threat to the national defense of the U.S. and states why this is so; FOSC/UC identifies suitable foreign-flagged vessels available to support response operations; Verbal contact is initiated with the U.S. Customs Service to discuss the waiver request; and FOSC/UC forwards a Limited Jones Act Waiver request through the Fifth Coast Guard District Chief, Marine Safety Division to the U.S. Customs Service/Dept of the Treasury. Last Revised: May 6, 2002 5

LIMITED JONES ACT WAIVER DECISION TREE Last Revised: May 6, 2002 6

LIMITED JONES ACT WAIVER DECISION TREE (CONTINUED) Last Revised: May 6, 2002 7

Section III Decision checklist for Jones Act Limited Waivers follows. The checklist is separated into six steps. Step 1 - Spill, Pollutant, and Environmental Background Information Step 2 - Identification of U.S.-flagged Vessels or Barges to Support Response Activities Step 3 - Maritime Administration (MARAD) Consultation Step 4 - National Defense Determination Step 5 - Identification of Foreign-Flagged Vessels or Barges to Support Response Activities Step 6 - Limited Jones Act Waiver Request Each step allows the user to address and check-off each of the issues presented within the Limited Jones Act Waiver Decision Tree. Additionally, the checklist provides points of contact and other amplifying information to streamline the process for the FOSC and UC. NOTE: This checklist is designed as a job aid or tool to assist the FOSC/UC through the waiver process. The information provided within the checklist was intended to provide a sufficient background on the subject so the checklist would be helpful when separated from other portions of this guidance document. This tool was developed to help quicken an FOSC/UC s efforts and not hinder the process. There may be portions of the checklist that are not applicable to a specific incident or the user may not need to complete each portion of the checklist to sufficiently meet the objectives of the waiver process. Last Revised: May 6, 2002 8

Limited Jones Act Waiver Operational Checklist Step 1: Spill, Pollutant, and Environment Background Information General Information: A. Name of Incident:... B. Unified Command Location:... C. Responsible Party (if known):... D. Date and Time of the Incident:... E. Type of Incident: (check all that apply) G Vessel Grounding G Vessel Fire G Facility Incident G Tank Truck Incident G Transfer Operation (Vessel, Facility, Truck, or Pipeline) G Explosion G Vehicle Accident G Blowout G Pipeline G Mystery G Pollution Involved or Threatened G Other:... F. Spill Location:... G. Distance and Direction to nearest human use areas (e.g., schools, hospitals, recreation areas, surface water intakes, public wells, channels, harbors, etc.): Area Distance Direction Pollutant/Oil Information: H. Product(s) Released: G Heavy Crude G Bunker C/#6 Fuel Oil G Medium Crude G Diesel/#2 Fuel Oil G Jet Fuels G Gasoline Last Revised: May 6, 2002 9

G Other (please specify):... I. Product Details: Product Name:... Viscosity:... API Gravity:... Pour Point:... J. Percent Evaporation in: 24 Hours:... 48 Hours:... K. Estimated Volume of Released oil: gals:... bbls:... L. Estimated Volume of oil potentially released: gals:... bbls:... M. Release Status: G Continuous G Intermittent One Time Only, Now Stopped? G Yes G No If Continuous or Intermittent, Specify Rate of Release:... gals/bbls per hour N. Estimated Surface Area Covered:... acres/sqft Cargo Information: O. Cargo Type: G Bulk Oil G Bulk Liquid Hazardous Substance G Dry Bulk G Containerized G Other (please specify):... P. Product Details: Product Name:... Last Revised: May 6, 2002 10

Q. Estimated Volume of Cargo Released or Threatened to Release:... (units) R. Estimated Volume of Cargo Potentially Released:... (units) S. Release Status: G Continuous G Intermittent One Time Only, Now Stopped? G Yes G No If Continuous or Intermittent, Specify Rate of Release:... units per hour T. Estimated Surface Area Covered:... acres/sqft Environment Information: U. Current Weather: G Clear G Partly Cloudy G Overcast G Rain/Snow/Fog G Inversion 24 - Hour Projection:... 48 - Hour Projection:... Wind Speed: Surface Forecasted Current Wind Speed (mph): Direction (from): 24-Hour Projection (mph): Direction (from): 48-Hour Projection (mph): Direction (from): Note: Any information from visual overflights of the slick, including estimations of slick thickness, should be included here. All additional available information pertaining to physical characterization of spilled oil should be included here. Last Revised: May 6, 2002 11

Step 2: Identification of U.S.-Flagged Vessels or Barges to Support Response Activities Resource Information: A. Vessel(s) and/or barge(s) are needed to: (check all that apply) G Collect, contain, or store pollutants G Support lightering of cargo G Other:... B. What types of vessels or barges are needed:... C. What is the response window or target to obtain the needed resource(s)? Resource Type:... hrs/days/week Resource Type:... hrs/days/week Resource Type:... hrs/days/week D. Does Jones Act provisions apply within the area of operations? G Yes G No (If answer is no there is no reason to continue with this checklist.) Merchandise Coastwise Law: Title 46, United States Code Appendix, 883 (46 U.S.C. App. 883, the merchandise coastwise law often called the Jones Act ), provides in part, that no merchandise shall be transported between points in the United States embraced within the coastwise laws, either directly or via a foreign port, or for any part of the transportation, in any vessel other than one that is coastwise-qualified (i.e., U.S.- built, owned, and documented). Pursuant to Title 19, United States Code, 1401 (c) (19 U.S.C. 1401 (c)), the word merchandise is defined as goods, wares, and chattels of every description, and includes merchandise the importation of which is prohibited. The Jones Act generally applies to points in the territorial sea, defined as the belt, three nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of the territorial sea baseline, in cases where the baseline and the coastline differ. It should be noted that 46 U.S.C. App. 883 is applicable to Puerto Rico pursuant to 48 U.S.C. 744 and 46 U.S.C. 877. Jones Act provisions are not applicable in the waters surrounding the United States Territory of the Virgin Islands. E. Has the Unified Command been able to identify suitable U.S.-flagged vessels or barges to support the response within response windows? G Yes (If yes, there is no reason to continue with this checklist.) G No (If no, proceed to Step 3.) Last Revised: May 6, 2002 12

Step 3: Maritime Administration (MARAD) Consultation MARAD Consultation to Identify U.S.-Flagged Vessels or Barges: A. Contact MARAD to gain their assistance to identify U.S.-flagged vessels and/or barges that may be suitable to support response needs. The MARAD contacts are as follows: Primary Contact: MARAD Headquarters 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Room 7219 Washington, D.C. 20590 Tel: (202) 366-5807 Fax: (202) 366-5063 Deputy Director for National Security Issues: (202) 366-5400 Secondary Contact: MARAD South Atlantic Region/Operations Division 7737 Hampton Blvd. Building 4D, Room 211 Norfolk, VA 23505 Tel: (757) 441-6393 Fax: (757) 440-0812 24-Hour Point of Contact: Mr. Jeff McMahon Ship Operations and Maintenance Officer MARAD South Atlantic Region Home: (757) 546-2497 Cell: (757) 287-8471 B. Did MARAD or assets within the Unified Command identify suitable vessels and/or barges to adequately support response operations within available response windows? G Yes (If yes, there is no need to continue with the checklist) G No (If no, proceed to Step 4) Last Revised: May 6, 2002 13

Step 4: National Defense Determination Unified Command National Defense Determination: A. The only provision to obtain a Limited Jones Act Waiver is by receiving a national defense waiver from the U.S. Customs Service/Department of the Treasury. This waiver process is supported in accordance with the following provision. The navigation laws administered by the U.S. Customs Service (including the Jones Act) can only be waived under the authority provided by the Act of December 27, 1950 (64 Stat. 1120; note preceding 46 U.S.C. App. 1). This statute provides that the head of each department or agency responsible for the administration of the navigation and vessel inspection laws is directed to waive compliance with such laws upon the request of the Secretary of Defense and the head of such department or agency is authorized to waive compliance with such laws either upon his own initiative or upon the written recommendation of the head of any government agency whenever he deems that such action is in the interest of national defense. B. Has the FOSC/Unified Command determined that a failure to receive suitable vessel and/or barge resources within the acceptable response window or time frame would be a threat to the national defense of the U.S.? G Yes (If yes, explain why below) G No (If no, waiver is not possible) C. Threat to National Defense is:... Last Revised: May 6, 2002 14

Step 5: Identification of Foreign-Flagged Vessels or Barges to Support Response Activities Identification of Foreign-Flagged Resources: A. Has the Unified Command been able to identify suitable Foreign-flagged vessels or barges to support the response within response windows and criteria outlined in Step 2 above? G Yes (If yes, proceed to Step 6.) G No (If no, waiver process is delayed, UC needs to continue pursuit of both U.S. and Foreign resources.) B. What vessels and/or barges have been identified? Vsl/Barge:... Flag:... Purpose:... Vsl/Barge:... Flag:... Purpose:... Vsl/Barge:... Flag:... Purpose:... Vsl/Barge:... Flag:... Purpose:... Vsl/Barge:... Flag:... Purpose:... Last Revised: May 6, 2002 15

Step 6: Limited Jones Act Waiver Request Communications with U.S. Customs Service: A. Has the FOSC/UC working through the Coast Guard District Marine Safety and Legal staffs verbally communicated with the U.S. Customs Service? G Yes (If, yes, proceed) G No (If no, please make contact use District to do this for the FOSC/UC) B. U.S. Custom Service Contacts: Primary Contact: Entry Procedures/Carrier Rulings Branch (202) 927-2320 (24 Hours) Department of the Treasury U.S. Customs Service Office of Regulations and Rulings 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Ronald Reagan Building - 3rd Floor Washington, D.C. 20229 International Trade Compliance Division Main Tel: (202) 927-0760 Fax: (202) 927-1876/1879 U.S. Custom Service 24-Hour Communications Center Signal Number: (407) 975-1926 Waiver Request: A. The following information should be addressed and documented by the FOSC/UC. This information should be forwarded to the applicable Coast Guard District Marine Safety staff who will consult with the District legal staff on the development of the waiver request. Background synopsis of the incident focusing on the operational need for support vessel or barge use. The inability of the FOSC/UC working through its own sources and through MARAD to identify suitable U.S.-flagged vessels to support the operation within a specific response window. The specific extent that you intend to employ Foreign-flagged vessels or barges to mitigate the incident. Last Revised: May 6, 2002 16

The threat to national defense should the waiver not be granted (e.g., block of significant channel, military base, transportation route, etc.). B. Fifth Coast Guard District contact: Marine Safety Division: Tel - (757) 398-6585 Fax - (757) 398-6503 24 Hr.- (757) 398-6231 Commander, D5 (mr) Fifth Coast Guard District, Atlantic Area Federal Building 431 Crawford Street Portsmouth, VA 23704-5004 C. Eighth Coast Guard District contact: Marine Safety Division: Tel - (504) 589-6271 Fax - (504) 589-2077 24 Hr.- (504) 589-6225 Commander (mor) Eighth Coast Guard District Hale Boggs Federal Building, Room 1328 501 Magazine Street New Orleans, LA 70130-3396 D. Ninth Coast Guard District contact: Marine Safety Division: Tel - (216) 902-6045 Fax - (216) 902-6059 24 Hr.- (219) 902-6117 Commander (M) Ninth Coast Guard District 1240 East 9 th Street Cleveland, OH 44199-2060 E. The cognizant Coast Guard District Marine Safety and Legal Departments will draft the waiver request and forward the same to the U.S. Customs Service. The request will contain the following language: The request should begin with the following language or similar wording: This requests an expedited limited waiver of the provisions of 46 U.S.C. App. 883 on the basis of National Defense to allow for the use of. Last Revised: May 6, 2002 17

A sample waiver request letter is provided within Section IV of the guidance document. Last Revised: May 6, 2002 18

Section IV Limited Jones Act Waiver Request Sample Letter The following document is a sample waiver letter that can be used as a tool to complete the final step of the proceeding checklist. The letter should at a minimum include the following criteria specified within the Waiver Request portion of Step 6. Background synopsis of the incident focusing on the operational need for support vessel or barge use. The inability of the FOSC/UC working through its own sources and through MARAD to identify suitable U.S.-flagged vessels or barges to support the operation within a specific response window. The specific extent that you intend to employ Foreign-flagged vessels or barges to mitigate the incident. The threat to national defense should the waiver not be granted (e.g., block of significant channel, military base, transportation route, etc.). Last Revised: May 6, 2002 19

Office of Regulations and Ruling U.S. Customs Service Attn: Entry Procedures and Carriers Branch 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20229 Dear : RE: REQUEST FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE WAIVER This requests an expedited limited waiver of the provisions of 46 U.S.C. App. 883 on the basis of National Defense to allow for the use of foreign-flagged vessels in the response to the grounding of the M/V... Provide a synopsis of the situation:......... Explain the inability of the Unified Command, with the assistance of the Maritime Administration to identify suitable U.S.-flagged vessels to support the operation within a specific response window:......... Accordingly I request a limited National Defense waiver to allow foreign-flag vessels to augment U.S.-barges to effect the immediate and efficient removal of the vessel s cargo of to refloat the vessel and alleviate the threat to the channel. The advent of worsening weather along with the progressing damage on board the vessel makes the probability of the vessel breaking apart and blocking the navigable channel of harbor high. This would prohibit the passage of U.S. Coast Guard and other U.S. military vessels entering and departing the harbor to fulfill their national defense obligations. Sincerely, Copy: USCG MSO MARAD, Washington, D.C. Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Chief, Marine Safety Division Fifth Coast Guard District By direction of the District Commander Last Revised: May 6, 2002 20