managing or activities.

Similar documents
General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Document Development and Change Control

Study Start-Up SS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR PRE-STUDY SITE VISIT (PSSV)

The GCP Perspective on Study Monitoring

Standard Operating Procedures

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE ON SOPs: Preparing, Maintaining and Training

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

Trial Management: Trial Master Files and Investigator Site Files

Document Title: Site Selection and Initiation for RFL Sponsored Studies Document Number: 026

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

ACTIONS/PSOP/001 Version 1.0 Page 2 of 6

4.2. Clinical Trial Monitor (or Monitor): The person responsible for monitoring the data on behalf of the sponsor or contract research organization.

Study Monitoring Plan Template

Document Title: Research Database Application (ReDA) Document Number: 043

Initially Submitted on 11/24/2009 Final Submission By Test6 CA on 11/24/2009 1:51 PM Approval By student13 student13 on 11/24/2009 1:52 PM Attendees

Document Title: File Notes. Document Number: 024

Document Title: Research Database Application (ReDA) Document Number: 043

Site Closedown Checklist for UoL Sponsored CTIMP Studies

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR PHLEBOTOMY ROOM SOPs: Preparing, Maintaining and Training

Hertfordshire Hospitals R&D Consortium Incorporating West Herts Hospitals NHS Trust and East & North Herts NHS Trust

Document Number: 006. Version: 1. Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Heidi Saunders, Senior Portfolio Coordinator

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

GCP: Investigator Responsibilities. Susan Tebbs Nicola Kaganson

SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAM POLICY

Investigator-Initiated Studies: When you re the Sponsor. Cheri Robert & Tammy Mah-Fraser

GCP INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

Effective Date: April 2014 Revision: September 29, Executive Chair, Co-Chairs, NSHA REB Members, REB Office Personnel, Researchers.

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

Documenting the Story of a Clinical Trial: Concept to CAPA. Lori T. Gilmartin Gilmartin Consulting LLC

Standard Operating Procedure. Essential Documents: Setting Up a Trial Master File. SOP effective: 19 February 2016 Review date: 19 February 2018

SOP-QA-28 V2. Approver: Prof Maggie Cruickshank, R&D Director Approver: Prof Steve Heys, Head of School

Unofficial copy not valid

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Document Title: Version Control of Study Documents. Document Number: 023

16 STUDY OVERSIGHT Clinical Quality Management Plans

Trial set-up, conduct and Trial Master File for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs

Good Documentation Practices. Human Subject Research. for

VCU Clinical Research Quality Assurance Assessment

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

AN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDY TASKS AND ACTIVITIES

Document Title: Document Number:

SOP: New Revised Reviewed Effective Date: 08 October Approved by : Supervisor/Manager Risk/Ethics Sr. Mgmt Committees Board/Councils

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

MHRA Findings Dissemination Joint Office Launch Jan Presented by: Carolyn Maloney UHL R&D Manager

Regulatory Binder Checklist for FDA-Regulated Sponsor/Sponsor-Investigator Studies

20 STEPS FROM STUDY IDEA INCEPTION TO PUBLISHING RESEARCH/ Evidence-Based Practice

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

SOP MONITORING & OVERSIGHT OF RESEARCH ACTIVITY. Contact Jess Bisset, Research Operations Manager x20227

PLATELET-ORIENTED INHIBITION ISCHEMIC STROKE (POINT) MONITORING PLAN IN NEW TIA AND MINOR. Version 2.0 Updated 11 May 2017

Standard Operating Procedure CPFT/SOP006 GCP Training Procedure for Clinical Trial Staff

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 715. Principles of Clinical Research Laboratory Practice

Standard Operating Procedure INVESTIGATOR OVERSIGHT OF RESEARCH. Chief and Principal Investigators of research sponsored and/or hosted by UHBristol

TITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18

LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH SERVICE Human Subject Protection Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

ETHICS COMMITTEE: ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS K.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Joint R&D Support Office SOP S-2011 UHL

Effective Date: 11/09 Policy Chronicle:

Version Number: 004 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

Document Title: Study Data SOP (CRFs and Source Data)

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

EMA Inspection Site perspective

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Reporting Serious Breaches in Clinical Research

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Building Quality into Clinical Trials. Amy C. Hoeper, MSN, RN, CCRC, Quality Manager Cincinnati Children s Gamble Program for Clinical Studies

Investigator Site File Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Conducting Monitoring Visits for Investigator-Initiated Trials (IITs)

Monitoring Clinical Trials

Self-Monitoring Tool

Record or Document Type Retention Period Relevant Legal Citation(s) IRB Records: Training Records;

Good Clinical Practice. Lisa de Blieck MPA CCRC Clinical Trials Coordination Center

Document Title: Investigator Site File. Document Number: 019

MARKEY CANCER CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP No.: MCCCRO-D

Ethics Committee Composition Roles & Responsibilities. Dr Girish Dayma Dr Sanjay Juvekar KEM Hospital Research Centre Pune

DANA-FARBER / HARVARD CANCER CENTER POLICIES FOR HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH TITLE:

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Data and Safety Monitoring Plan

11/18/2016. UC Irvine s Clinical Research Coordinator Certification Preparation Series PI Roles and Responsibilities SESSION 4

Essential Documents It s Not Just a Binder!

36 th Annual Meeting Preconference Workshop P4 Handout

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 710. Good Clinical Practice AUDIT AND INSPECTION. NNUH UEA Joint Research Office. Acting Research Services Manager

Auditing of Clinical Trials

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Clinical Trial Readiness Checklist October 2014

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 325

EMA & FDA Inspections: Site perspective. Shandukani Research Centre

COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK

European Medicines Agency Inspections ANNEX V TO PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA: PHASE I UNITS

Setting up a CITI account for users not enrolled at or employed by Georgia Tech. Georgia Institute of Technology December 2016

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Roles & Responsibilities of Investigator & IRB

WIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)

Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance

Governance %%.4- r2&% Queen s University Belfast. Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance. r2.aoc7. Research and Enterprise

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Research Adverse Event and Safety Reporting Procedures Outcome Statement: Title:

Transcription:

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Clinical Research Monitoring TITLE: Site Initiation Visit TITLE: Site Initiation Visit 1. PURPOSE SOP Number: Version: 1.0 MICHR CRM MON 002 Effective Date: 19Dec2013 1.1 This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) describes the procedures, process, and responsibilities for conducting a Site Initiation Visit (SIV) for clinical trials monitored by MICHR, unless otherwise specified in the Monitoring Plan by the study team. The procedures outlined in this document are in place to ensure uniformity and consistency in monitoring procedures, regardless of the location or individual monitor, and to ensure the rights and welfare of human research participants engaged in studies monitored by MICHR are protected. 2. SCOPE 2.1 The procedures described in this document outline the process of f conducting SIVs, which are separate in scope from Interim Monitoring Visits andd Study Close Out visit are detailed throughout. 2.2 This SOP applies to all qualified colleagues or contractors of MICHR involved in managing or conducting SIV activities. Visits. The purpose, procedures, and documentation for this type of monitoring 3. POLICY This SOP supports the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or other State, local, and institutional regulatory requirements for human subject research nvolving investigational agents and devices. 4. DEFINITIONS Blinding: A procedure in which one or more parties to the trial are kept unaware of subject treatment assignment(s). Monitoring Plan: A document that describess the study specific monitoring to be performed. It includes frequency of visits and data points to be monitored onsite and/or remotely. Clinical Trial/Study: Any investigation in human subjectss intended to discover or verify the clinical, pharmacological, and/or other pharmacodynamic effectss of an investigational product(s), and/or to identify any adverse reactions to an investigational product(s), and/orr to study absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of an investigational product( (s) with the object of ascertaining its safety and/or efficacy. Approver Name: Cathy Radovich, Dir. CRM Next Review Date: 19Dec2015 Last Reviewed Date: N/A Page 1 of 5

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Clinical Research Monitoring TITLE: Site Initiation Visit SOP Number: Version: 1.0 MICHR CRM MON 002 Effective Date: 19Dec2013 Good Clinical Practice (GCP): A standard for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring, auditing, recording, analyses, and reporting of clinicall trials that provides assurance that the data and reported results are credible and accurate, and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of trial subjects are protected. Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), Human Subjects Review Committee (HSRC) or Ethical Review Board (ERB): a committee that has been formally designated to approve, monitor, and review biomedical and behavioral research involving humans with the aim to protect the rights and welfare of the research subjects. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Department of Health and Human Services (specifically Office for Human Research Protections) regulations have empowered IRBs to approve, require modifications in planned research prior to approval, or disapprove research. An IRB performs critical oversight functions for research conducted on human subjects thatt are scientific, ethical, and regulatory. Monitoring: Monitoring is the act of overseeing the progress of a clinical trial, and of ensuring that it is conducted, recorded, and reported in accordance with the protocol, standard operating procedures (SOPs), GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirements. Monitoring Report: A Monitoring Report is a written report from the monitor to the sponsor after each site visit and/ /or other trial related communication according to the sponsor ss SOPs. Protocol: A document that describes the objective(s), design, conduct, methodology, statistical considerations, and organization of a trial. The protocol usually also gives the scientific background and rationale for the trial, but these could be provided inn other protocol referenced documents. Throughout ICH GCP Guidelines, the term protocol referss to protocol and protocol amendments. Sponsor: An individual (Investigator), company, institution, or organization that takes responsibility for the initiation, management, and/or financing of a clinical trial. Sponsor Investigator: An individual who both initiates and conducts an investigation, and maintains the obligations of both a sponsor and an investigator. 5. RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 Responsibilities of the The Research Monitor or qualified designeee is responsible for the arranging, conducting, and documentation of the SIV in accordance with the Monitoring Plan, this SOP (unless otherwise agreed) ), and regulatory requirements. Approver Name: Cathy Radovich, Dir. CRM Next Review Date: 19Dec2015 Last Reviewed Date: N/A Page 2 of 5

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Clinical Research Monitoring TITLE: Site Initiation Visit SOP Number: Version: 1.0 MICHR CRM MON 002 Effective Date: 19Dec2013 5.2 Responsibilities of the Monitoring Manger: The Monitoring Manager or designee is responsible for the review and approval of the SIV report. The report review and approval will be designated to another qualified colleague if the Monitoring Manager was the person that conducted the visit. 6. PROCEDURE 6.1 Process Overview 6.1.1 An SIV is arranged, conducted, and documented by the Research Monitor in order to verify regulatory compliance and readiness too begin study enrollment. The conduct of an SIV occurs in three stages: Preparing for the SIV Conducting the SIV Following up after the SIV 6.2 Preparing for the Interim Monitoring Visit 6.2.1 The monitor, or designee, will ensure that visit arrangements are made with the investigational site. The monitor should attempt to schedule the visit at a time when key staff related to the investigation are available. Potential attendees may include the PI/Co I, research nurse, study coordinator, data manager,, pharmacist (if applicable) ), and Sponsor representative(s) (if applicable). 6.2.2 The monitor, or designee, will book any needed travel in compliance with standing University of Michigan policies and procedures as well as any guidance issued by MICHR; and if needed, confirm travel plans prior to booking with the study manager, study sponsor, or other designated key personnel responsible for oversight of study budgetary expenditures. 6.2.3 The monitor, or designee, will send a confirmation communication, which may include the monitor s expected itinerary as well as a list of items necessary for the monitoring visit, to the site PI, study coordinator, study manager, and other designated study team members once a time and date for the monitoring visit has been established. 6.2.4 In some cases, the monitor, or designee, mayy create presentations or handouts to help facilitate the SIV. Possible topics for inclusionn in the presentations and/or handouts are: Good Clinical Practice overview, protocol review, study activities and schedule of events, safety reporting, and the study Monitoring Plan. 6.3 Conducting the IMV 6.3.1 Sign the Site Initiationn Visit Log. Approver Name: Cathy Radovich, Dir. CRM Next Review Date: 19Dec2015 Last Reviewed Date: N/A Page 3 of 5

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Clinical Research Monitoring TITLE: Site Initiation Visit SOP Number: Version: 1.0 MICHR CRM MON 002 Effective Date: 19Dec2013 6.3.2 Ensure that all required essential documents are present in the Investigator Regulatory file. 6.3.3 Review GCP standards and the Monitoring Plan. 6.3.4 Discuss study logisticss to ensure site preparedness for enrollment. 6.3.5 If applicable, check for the receipt, security, and proper storage of the investigational product, and review dispensing and accountability procedures. 6.3.6 Confirm that the site facilities and study personnel are adequate for the conduct of the study. 6.3.7 Document any concerns or action items. 6.4 Following up After the IMV 6.4.1 A follow up communication will be sent to the Sponsor and site as soon as possible following the final day of the visit addressing any action items identified during the visit. 6.4.2 The Research Monitor will complete an SIV Report (Appendix A) and submit the draft to the Monitoring Manager or designee for review. 6.4.3 The Monitoring Manager will review the draft report and return the draft to the Research Monitor for finalization. 6.4.4 The SIV Report should be finalized with appropriate attachments (attachments may include the confirmation communication, Essential Document Checklist, Training Log, etc.) and distributed to appropriate study personnel, including pharmacist (if applicable) within 15 business days of the last day of the SIV. 6.4.5 A copy of the SIV report should be archived perr the Monitoring Plan. 7. REFERENCES FDA 45 CFR 46 and 21 CFR 50 21 CFR 56 21 CFR 312 21 CFR 812 Protection of Human Subjects Institutional Review Boards Investigational New Drug (IND) Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) ICH Consolidated Guideline E6 (R1) Approver Name: Cathy Radovich, Dir. CRM Next Review Date: 19Dec2015 Goodd Clinical Practice (GCP) Last Reviewed Date: N/A Page 4 of 5

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Clinical Research Monitoring TITLE: Site Initiation Visit SOP Number: Version: 1.0 MICHR CRM MON 002 Effective Date: 19Dec2013 8. APPENDICES Appendix A: Site Initiation Visit Report Template REVISION HISTORY Date Author(s) Remarks Version 09 Sep 2013 Amanda Phelps Final version. 1.0 Approver Name: Cathy Radovich, Dir. CRM Next Review Date: 19Dec2015 Last Reviewed Date: N/A Page 5 of 5

Attendees: Trial Status (at this visit) Not Started In Progress Completed Discontinued Subject Enrollment Status (Cumulative) ICF Signed Screen Baseline Enrolled Ongoing Failed (if applicable) (Randomized) (Active) Withdrawn Completed Select the appropriate response(s) for the discussion/monitoring items listed below. Provide comments as necessary. Conduct 1. Conduct trial according to the approved Protocol, Investigator s Agreement, GCP, IRB policy and Federal regulations? YES NO N/A 2. Compliance with the protocol and handling of protocol deviations? 3. Recruitment and enrollment process? 4. Instructions on study-specific procedures, windows, and timelines? 5. Randomization procedures? 6. Informed Consent procedures? 7. Progress reports to EC/IRB?

Select the appropriate response(s) for the discussion/monitoring items listed below. Provide comments as necessary. YES NO N/A 8. Procedures for subject/study discontinuation? 9. Appropriate storage of study data and supplies Investigational Product 10. Current Investigator Brochure/Instructions For Use 11. Was the study drug and storage area inspected? 12. Were ordering and control procedures discussed? 13. Were dispensing, dose modification, accountability discussed? 14. Were storage conditions discussed? 15. Was return and destruction discussed? 16. Is the expiry date compatible with the study duration? 17. Are there sufficient study drug supplies available and stored appropriately? 18. Have unblinding procedures been discussed?

Select the appropriate response(s) for the discussion/monitoring items listed below. Provide comments as necessary. YES NO N/A Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events 19. Description of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events? 20. Reporting requirements? 21. Documentation of Adverse and Serious Adverse Events? 22. Reporting regular safety updates, safety alerts and (S)AEs to EC/IRB in accordance to local requirements? Case Report Forms 23. Completion of the CRFs and database entry (if applicable)? 24. Data discrepancies and query resolution? 25. Monitoring frequency as per monitoring plan? Monitoring 26. Monitoring procedures and objectives as per monitoring plan? Audit 27. The investigational site s previous audit experience and outcomes?

Select the appropriate response(s) for the discussion/monitoring items listed below. Provide comments as necessary. 28. Procedure for contacting the Sponsor in the event of notification of audit by regulatory authority? YES NO N/A Facility/Laboratory 29. Were all required lab supplies present at the site? 30. Are the central laboratory ranges current? 31. Are the central laboratory certificates current? Biological Samples 32. Has the storage area been inspected? 33. Is site staff familiar with sample taking, labeling and storage procedures? 34. Is site staff familiar with the sampling handling and shipment procedure? 35. Is freezer log or other required temperature controls available and adequate? Study File 36. Was the investigator study file reviewed?

Select the appropriate response(s) for the discussion/monitoring items listed below. Provide comments as necessary. YES NO N/A 37. Are all required documents filed in the Investigator Study File? 38. Has document storage and archiving been discussed and agreed to? Activation 1. In the opinion of the monitor, is the study site ready to begin enrollment? Yes No Additional Narrative (as needed) Item No. Action Item By Whom Status Ongoing Resolved Ongoing Resolved Ongoing Resolved Ongoing Resolved Ongoing Resolved Prepared by: Signature: Printed Name: Date: Reviewed by: Signature: Printed Name: Date: