Russia s National System of Innovation: strengths and weaknesses Studying the business sector of Russia s NSI

Similar documents
SAINT-PETERSBURG: PERSPECTIVE COOPERATION. GOVERNMENT OF SAINT-PETERSBURG Committee for Industrial policy and innovations

UPDATE ON INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN RUSSIA

INNOVATION IN RUSSIA: POTENTIAL, CHALLENGES & DRIVERS

New Developments in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in the Russian Federation

Skolkovo Innovation Center Chairman of the Skolkovo Foundation Board Andrey Burenin

SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE «ZELENOGRAD» Unique Environment for High-technology Business In Moscow Region.

PRESENTATION BY B. E. MOSHKOVICH LUXEMBOURG

Why do some innovative models work and others not in the Russian Federation?

INNOVATION CENTER SKOLKOVO

Innovation processes management and its efficiency for area development

Problems and prospects of university innovative infrastructure in the triple helix model university - business government.

Special Economic Zone Definition

INCENTIVES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS TO FOSTER PRIVATE SECTOR INNOVATION. Jerry Sheehan. Introduction

The Present State of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Russia

Stimulating Innovation and Entrepreneuship by Public R&D Financing. Christine Hagström-Näsi, Tekes

Factors and policies affecting services innovation: some findings from OECD work

Saint-Petersburg The Special Economic Zone (technical-implementation implementation type)

Role of universities in the development of innovative economy of countries in transition Academic perspective

Innovation in Support of National Strategies for Sustainable Development: the Case of Kazakhstan

Poland s s New Innovation Initiatives

FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT

TULA REGION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. January 2018 REGION FOR BUSINESS. 4 th. in rating of investment attractiveness of Russian regions.

The Russian Foundation for Technological Development: Boosting Business R & D in Russia

Operational Programme Entrepreneurship and Innovations for Competitiveness Regional Office of CzechInvest for South Moravia region

Development of infrastructure of support of small and medium business

Armenia s IT Sector and Opportunities for Regional Cooperation. Artak Ghazaryan, Armenia CAPS Project SARAJEVO, MAY 2010

Innovation and Technology in Spain

Information & Communication Technology in Bavaria

Hong Kong (China) is ranked 14th in the GII 2018, moving up 2 positions from the previous year.

Innovation Market. International Forum. November International Forum. Innovation Market:

Innovative entrepreneurship in the Republic of Belarus: condition, problems and prospects of development

Finnish STI Policy

Kotovo Industrial park as example of formats industrial cooperation in Russia: joint ventures, industrial cooperation, technology partnership

Innovative and Industrial Clusters in Russia: Current Agenda of the State Policy. Trade Mission of Russian Federation in Germany

AZERBAIJAN ECONOMIC REFORMS REVIEW ENTERPRISEAZERBAIJAN.COM SPECIAL EDITION

How to increase national absorptive capacity for green technology

National Innovation System of Kazakhstan: Regional Aspect

SME DEVELOPMENT IN JORDAN

CHALLENGES FOR INDUSTRY-ACADEMIA COLLABORATION Workshop Sofia, November 2009

Commercialising cleantech innovation, Finnish national support instruments

III. The provider of support is the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (hereafter just TA CR ) seated in Prague 6, Evropska 2589/33b.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 152 ( 2014 ) ERPA 2014

STRATEGY GUIDELINES OF BUSINESS & INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT ( )

Web-site: Address: Samara region, Togliatti, Yuzhnoe shosse, 161 Tel: +7 (8482)

INNOVATIONS IN UKRAINE opportunities for cooperation. Ivan Kulchytskyy

UNIDO and the strategies to invest in Myanmar

SKOLKOVO INNOVATION CENTER

Overview of investment activities of pharmaceutical companies in Russia

Smart Specialisation in the Region of Attica

Innovation and Prosperity

Facilitating Responsible Innovation in South East Europe countries

Appendix A: World Bank Group Response to Market and Government Failures

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN LITHUANIA

TOGLIATTI THE CITY OPEN FOR COOPERATION

MISSION. Skolkovo is a strategic development initiative to: Diversify and grow Russia s economy through innovation and entrepreneurship

The New Carolina Initiative

Implementing Economic Policy for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: The Mexican Case. Lorenza Martinez April, 2012

Bussines driven innovation

Business Environment and Knowledge for Private Sector Growth: Setting the Stage

Skolkovo, 2014 NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES CLUSTER

EBF Working Groups Report. Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg and Baden-Württemberg November 12-18, 2017

MANUFACTURING INCENTIVES. Small Business and Transformation Workshop 18 January 2017

DEVELOPING A NEW GENERATION OF SUSTAINABLE AND ECO-EFFICIENT INDUSTRIAL SITES

Invest in. ULSAN, Korea. We Put Investors First

( ) Page: 1/24. Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures SUBSIDIES

Chapter 02 Sources of Innovation

DETAILED STRATEGIC PLAN

encouraging investment

Transformation through Tourism: Harnessing Tourism for Growth and Improved Livelihoods

Enhancing Competitiveness in Small Island Development States A UNIDO-Competitive Industries Partnership

Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur , INDIA

The Second Science with Africa Conference

Technological cooperation between Finland and Russia: Example of technology parks in St. Petersburg

Collaborating for Success Working with Research Organisations

R&D AND INNOVATION POLICIES IN ROMANIA. Viorel VULTURESCU Counselor National Authority for Scientific Research

the dti Incentive Programmes Mzwakhe Lubisi 18 October 2013 Austrian roundtable discussion DBSA

DOING BUSINESS IN GERMANY

POWERING UP SASKATOON S TECH SECTOR SASKATOON REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JULY 2017

Encouraging innovation in Malaysia Appropriate sources of finance

Firms and universities: a Portuguese view

COUNTRY PROFILE. Luxembourg

The 10 billion euro question. How to most effectively support innovation in Poland. Marcin Piatkowski Senior Economist The World Bank, Warsaw

STARTUPS. Presentation by Giorgio Guidi CEO & Founder THE HIVE Business Incubator. Foreign Direct Investment Department Italian Trade Agency Rome

Unlocking the potential

Ms. Nino Elizbarashvilli, President

INDEPENDENT PRIVATE CONSULTING COMPANY

APEC Best Practices Guidelines on Industrial Clustering for Small and Medium Enterprises

CEA COMMENTS ON THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON STATE AID FOR INNOVATION

Time to invest properly!

Zakariah Abdul Rashid

CREATING 21ST CENTURY COMMUNITIES MAKING THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR PLACE

INNOVATION POLICY FOR INCLUSIVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE ARAB REGION

SOFT-LANDING SERVICES -- CHINA & JAPAN

Sergei Sobyanin. Address by Mayor of Moscow

The role of national development banks un fostering SME access to finance

Towards a RIS3 strategy for: Wallonia. Seville, 3 May 2012 Directorate For Economic Policy Mathieu Quintyn Florence Hennart

Indonesia SME Strategy

Department Edmonton Economic Development Corp.

Country Profile: Lithuania

UNIÓ DE POLÍGONS INDUSTRIALS DE CATALUNYA FOREIGN BUSINESS AND INVESTMENT DOSSIER

Transcription:

Russia s National System of Innovation: strengths and weaknesses Studying the business sector of Russia s NSI Tatiana Khvatova St.Petersburg State Polytechnic University 2008

Russia s NSI indicators 2007 Global Summary Innovation index (25 th out of 49) Knowledge Economy index (47 th out of 140) Global Competitiveness index (48 th out of 131) Proportion of innovative products at the World market 1% Proportion of innovative SME 5% R&D expenses - 1% of GDP Number of registered patents per 1 mln ppl 1.65

Objective of research: - to analyze the peculiarities of NSI functioning in Russia, its strengths and weaknesses, and also to work out recommendations on its improvement

Questions to be answered: What are the peculiarities of Russia s NSI, its problems and disproportions, that originate from the Soviet period and still have an effect on Russia s NSI? What are the main subjects of Russia s NSI, and how they interact? Which organizational and economic forms increase the effectiveness of innovation processes on the federal and regional levels? How are the innovation processes regulated on the municipal level? How can we summarize foreign experience of NSI shaping and developing and apply it for improving Russia s NSI? Business sector of Russia s NSI.

The peculiarities of Russia s NSI Underdeveloped infrastructure of innovation activity, disconnection between science and industry No independence in innovation activity, control of the Academy of Science Difficulties in starting own business Telecommunications are not well developed in Russia which impedes information and knowledge transfer Science is excessively concentrated in big scientific and industrial centers Lack of high quality specialists to manage innovation processes and financial institutions Insurance, financial and legislative institutions are underdeveloped Centralized model of managing all spheres of activity still has a lot of impact on interaction and coordination between federal and local authorities

Three ways to define NSI 1. NSI as a complex of institutions whose activity is aimed at generation and diffusion of innovations 2. NSI as a set of interconnected economic mechanisms and activities that serve innovation processes 3. NSI treated as a part of national economic system that builds in the innovation processes into economic and social development

What are the main subjects of Russia s NSI and how they interact? Market needs, macroeconomic policy, peculiarities of labor market, etc: Creating environment that stimulates innovation activity of the society Companies: State and private enterprises Corporations SMEs Institutions that formulate policy and monitor results State and regional authorities Non-profit organizations Funds, professional unions, associations, charities R&D system: environment that generates knowledge: State sector of science Higher education sector Entrepreneurial sector Infrastructure of innovational activity (financial institutions, venture funds, technoparks, innovation centers, standards)

Proportion of innovative enterprises 70% 60% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 16,3% 19,5% 5,2% 4,8% 8% 9,6% 10,9% 12% 15% 0% 1989 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2001 2003 2005 2006

Innovation activity of industrial enterprises with various types of property Type of property Total number of industrial enterprises Number of innovation-active industrial enterprises Percentage of innovation-active enterprises, % State 46000 162 3.52 Municipal 24000 5 0.21 Private 1400000 444 0.32 Non-commercial organizations 6000 11 1.83 Mixed 88000 517 5.88 Foreign and joint property 25000 34 1.36

Distribution of organizations involved in R&D activities in various sectors of science in Russia Sector of higher education 15% Private noncommercial sector 1% State sector 36% Entrepreneurial sector 48%

Industries with strong and weak market positions Market position Strong on external and internal markets Weak on external and internal markets Branches of industries Oil industry Gas industry Metallurgy Basic chemical production Military industries (military planes, air defense equipment, shipbuilding) Electrical industry Machine construction Instrument-making Automobile construction Road construction Pharmaceuticals

Scientific processes at firms or plants don t have as high a status as they do in other countries. Examples of expenses on R&D: Microsoft $7.7 bln. Ford Motors $7.5 bln. Pfitzer $7.1 bln. Daimler $6.6 bln Siemens $6.0 bln. Toyota - $6.2 bln. Gazprom $100 mln. Lukoil $25 mln.

Main reasons: 1). There is not enough demand for innovative products; many enterprises have obsolete equipment and try to harvest as much as possible without any costly innovation; 2). There is no stable technological unity between new technologies and product development and their commercialization; 3). Unfriendly climate for SME, complicated taxation. The total number of taxes a firm has to pay is 22 in Russia, which is twice as high as in the USA and Japan. For every thousand of people in Russia there are only 7.9 SME, in the USA 181.7 SME, in Japan 60.8 SME. As a result of this, only 12-17% of Russia s GDP is produced by SME (in developed countries they produce up to 70% of GDP).

4). The banks interest rates are very high Example: the interest on a loan for SME is 16-17%, for larger companies it is 12% on average; the market for SME loans is growing fast in St.Petersburg and Moscow, but still, crediting SME is considered to be quite risky; as a result, enterprises don t have enough finance; 5). Investors do not like to invest money into fundamental research because of high risks (estimated at about 90% );

6). Certain transitional links in Russia s NSI, such as venture company, small innovative high tech company, are missing; 7). Such issues as external environment control, forecasting, strategy evaluation and control are not paid enough attention to; 8). Administrative workers lack theoretical and practical knowledge in managing projects, time, finance, risks, personnel, contracts, technology transfer.

How to solve the problems: 1). Create better climate for innovative SME; 2). Provide interest-free loans to individual inventors and small start-ups; 3). Create venture funds and provide tax benefits for them; 4). Create nets of technoparks and technopolices; 5). Introduce benefits system for participants of technologies transfer; 6). Improve coordination between ministries and departments as well as between different levels of government federal, regional and municipal; 7). Increase volumes of state and private investment into R&D;

7). Increase volumes of state and private investment into R&D; 8). Stimulate purchasing of high-tech products produced in Russia; 9). Improve the system of managerial education; for this we suggest the system represented below: Specialists Industry Specialists Learning, qualification improvement Practice R&D R&D order R&D institute Specialists Education University

How to solve the problems (continued): 10). Introduce tax benefits using experience of foreign countries, such as - lowering tax rates for profit spent on R&D; - lowering taxes paid on dividends from innovation enterprises shares; - lower tax on profit received as a result of using patents, licenses, know-how and other intangible assets; - reducing taxable profit on the price for equipment given to universities and R&D enterprises; - subtracting charity payments to funds financing innovations from taxable income;

Summary of Russia s NSI strengths and weaknesses Weaknesses: 1). Low legislative activity; 2). Underdeveloped market of innovation intermediaries; 3). Weak interconnections between elements of NSI; 4). Insufficient motivation of R&D personnel for producing innovations; 5). High export and import taxes; 6). Lack of long-term industrial policy aimed at producing competitive products; 7). Ineffective system of bank loans, lack of experience in management of innovations.

Strengths: 1). Strong positions or leadership in many areas of fundamental science 2). Developed system of R&D institutes in various R&D spheres 3). Strong positions in the world market in such technological areas as aero-space industry, metallurgy and energy 4). Improved positions of higher education sector in Russia s NSI in comparison with previous years.

Positive steps towards formulating effective NSI in Russia Ekaterinburg s system of intellectual resource commercialization (the Urals) Center for innovations and technology Akademichesky - 6000 sq.m. of production facilities; The Urals Venture Fund Aim: increase the proportion of innovative products from 5% to 18% by 2015 Area: pharmaceuticals and medical equipment; construction materials

Tomsk s experimental site for the creation of a model for regional economy development (Siberia) Production of high-technology products grows 40-50% per year. Tomsk cluster has got the status of Special economic zone Aims: analysis and monitoring of innovation environment, preparing innovative projects, expertise and support for new projects

The scientific cluster of Dubna (Moscow) naukograd The scientific center of Dubna was built in Soviet times as the center for military industrial complex. Since 2001 naukograd and special economic zone. Areas: nuclear technologies, nanotechnologies, applications in medicine, IT; Also functions as business incubator Project: invest abt $0.5bln into construction IT center; Attract 10000 programmers; Reach the volume of software production worth $0.4bln by 2015

SEZ: benefits for residents Unified social tax 14% instead of 26% Lowered real estate tax (2,2%) Release from land plot tax for the first 5 years Imported goods release from import duty and VAT Profit tax 20% (instead of 26%) Comments VAT (18%), import taxes

SEZ in Особая St.Petersburg экономическая зона Особая экономическая зона Sea port Novo-Orlovsky lesopark «Neudorf» project Finnish Bay Sea Port St.Petersburg Neudorf «Novo-Orlovsky» Construction project $350mln will come from city and federal budgets

Directions of further research: Forming the culture of innovation in society Forming the culture of knowledge-sharing and trust Raising prestige of education Building the NSI that could easily integrate into the world innovation environment.