Giving in Europe. The state of research on giving in 20 European countries. Barry Hoolwerf and Theo Schuyt (eds.)

Similar documents
Giving in Europe. The state of research on giving in 20 European countries. Barry Hoolwerf and Theo Schuyt (eds.)

Giving in Europe. The state of research on giving in 20 European countries. Barry Hoolwerf and Theo Schuyt (eds.)

Giving in Europe. The state of research on giving in 20 European countries. Barry Hoolwerf and Theo Schuyt (eds.)

EUFORI Study. The Netherlands Country Report. European Foundations for Research and Innovation. Barry Hoolwerf Danique Karamat Ali Barbara Gouwenberg

Welcome to the Foundation Center s. Grantseeking Basics

Getting your Organisation ready to win grants. Bianca Williams, Strategic Grants

The Rise of Foundations Hope for Grassroots Civil Society in China?

Background paper December 2016

Table des matières. Tages-Anzeiger. Der Bund. L Agefi. Le Temps. Tribune de Genève. 24 heures. Swisster. Yes FM TSR

What Canadian Donors Want

HIMSS Europe ANNUAL SURVEY 2016

Danske Bank How we do engagements

Interreg Europe: what you need to know

TAKE A GLIMPSE INSIDE...

How To Ensure Funding Success. Philanthropy Summit 2015: Understanding the 21st Century Donor Presented by Jo Garner, Strategic Grants

Volunteers and Donors in Arts and Culture Organizations in Canada in 2013

Measuring R&D in the Nonprofit Sector: The European Experience

EU PRIZE FOR WOMEN INNOVATORS Contest Rules

Unmet health care needs statistics

FUNDRAISING IN EUROPE

A European workforce for call centre services. Construction industry recruits abroad

NATIONAL LOTTERY CHARITIES BOARD England. Mapping grants to deprived communities

First quarter of 2014 Euro area job vacancy rate up to 1.7% EU28 up to 1.6%

CORPORATE ADVISORY SERVICES

Vitalization of Community-Bases Civil Societies. Cleveland Foundation India Pierce Lee April 5, 2012

Better care, better health - towards a framework for better continence solutions

Introduction California Community Foundation

Supporting Syria and the region: Post-Brussels conference financial tracking

Interview training manual

Advancing Philanthropy in Switzerland A Vision for a Cooperative and Recognized Philanthropic Sector. Summary

Giving More for Research in Europe:

The Community Foundation Difference

EUREKA Peter Lalvani Data & Impact Analyst NCP Academy CSIC Brussels 18/09/17

Understanding & Accessing Philanthropic Grants. Vanessa Meachen Lark Philanthropy

HEALTH CARE NON EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

5. Trends in international sourcing. Authors René Bongard Bastiaan Rooijakkers Fintan van Berkel

EUREKA and Eurostars: Instruments for international R&D cooperation

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

CHARITIES: THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF COMMUNITY

The impact of broadband in Eastern and Southeast Europe

Charity Finances and Executive Salaries: Is There Any Evidence of a Problem? Highlights

Social Enterprise. Taking the Pulse of the Small Charity Sector. Income. Maximising Assets. Resilience. Mission. Based. Innovation. Economy.

2014 Letter of Inquiry Process

Foundations: A Potential Source of Funding For Charities? Highlights

Press Conference - Lisbon, 24 February 2010

Giving in Europe. The state of research on giving in 20 European countries. Barry Hoolwerf and Theo Schuyt (eds.)

This section is relevant to organisations that are, or plan to become, registered charities.

Funding guidelines. Supporting positive change in communities

HORIZON 2020 Instruments and Rules for Participation. Elena Melotti (Warrant Group S.r.l.) MENFRI March 04th 2015

Young scientist competition 2016

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS STAFF TRAINING (STT)

The funding challenge: Who will fund a Big Society approach?

Implementation of the System of Health Accounts in OECD countries

Philanthropy and Fundraising in Today s Environment. Beyond Federal Funds: The role of Philanthropy and Fundraising.

[INSERT YEAR] Fundraising Plan [INSERT FOUNDATION NAME]

Presentation of Interreg Europe

Contracts and Grants between Nonprofits and Government

SOUTH AFRICA EUREKA INFORMATION SESSION 13 JUNE 2013 How to Get involved in EUROSTARS

SAMPLE. Henry Smith Charity Christian Projects. Your organisation. Organisation Contact Details. 1. Organisation Name. 2. Organisation's Legal Name

Information pack for Beacon Award nominations

ERA-Can+ twinning programme Call text

THINK BIG, GET SMART: A Data-Driven Approach to Social Change

the definition of insanity who are the affluent in america Today? Executive Summary Contents Wealth and Philanthropy in America White Paper

The EU ICT Sector and its R&D Performance. Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2018 The EU ICT sector and its R&D performance

STANFORD SURVEY ON LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT IN THE NONPROFIT SECTOR

What Women Want Understanding the Needs and Objectives of Women s Philanthropic Giving

UK GIVING 2012/13. an update. March Registered charity number

DEFINITION OF PHILANTHROPIC FUNDING. Identifying philanthropic funds. Sources of philanthropic funds. To be followed by all University staff

STAGE ONE APPLICATION GUIDE

European Funding Programmes in Hertfordshire

Children with Cancer UK JOB PROFILE

UK Giving An overview of charitable giving in the UK, 2009/10. December 2010

5.U.S. and European Museum Infrastructure Support Program

Terms of reference for the external evaluation of the LINKS project

The EUREKA Initiative An Opportunity for Industrial Technology Cooperation between Europe and Japan

Current Trends in Philanthropy and Charitable Giving. Eric Javier and Sevil Miyhandar, CCS Fundraising January 26, 2018

The ERC funding strategy

OUR PURPOSE Our purpose is to nurture a socially engaged and culturally rooted civil society across Europe

Consultation on Charities Regulatory Authority Citizens Information Board Submission

SO YOU RE THINKING OF STARTING A B NAI TZEDEK TEEN PHILANTHROPY PROGRAM

Coutts Million Dollar Donors Report 2014 RUSSIA FINDINGS

EUA Funding Forum: Efficient universities: value for society

Call for Proposals 2014 cycle

U K C O M M U N I T Y F O U N D A T I O N S M A N I F E S T O

ERC Grant Schemes. Horizon 2020 European Union funding for Research & Innovation

Certificate in Charity Law and Governance

Nonprofit Industry Trends

EUROPEAN JOINT TASK FORCE IV. WONCA perspective

To a Successful Planned Giving Program Thursday, May 22

Erasmus Student Work Placement Guide

Responsible medication processes ( pharmaceutical care ) and good pharmaceutical practices for improved patients quality of life and batter healthcare

VENTURE CAPITALISTS AND ENTREPRENEURS BECOME VENTURE PHILANTHROPISTS

FUNDRAISING SUPPORT FOR SMALLER CHARITIES

Innovation for Growth i4g. Major Findings and R&I policy recommendations of the first ten. i4g policy briefs. February 2013

Individual Giving Survey 2012 Media Briefing

Commissioning and statutory funding arrangements for hospice and palliative care providers in England 2017

APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS TEACHING ASSIGNMENT (STA)

Document: Report on the work of the High Level Group in 2006

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-39 FLORIDA STATE EMPLOYEES CHARITABLE CAMPAIGN

Transcription:

Giving in Europe The state of research on giving in 20 European countries Barry Hoolwerf and Theo Schuyt (eds.) Bequests Foundations Charity lotteries Households Corporations

Executive Summary Giving in Europe The state of research on giving in 20 European countries An ERNOP publication This publication is part of: Giving in Europe. The state of research on giving in 20 European countries. The full publication is available at www.europeangiving.eu. For more information, please also visit the ERNOP website at www.ernop.eu.

Executive summary In many countries across Europe, philanthropy is being rediscovered as a source of funding for public goods and social innovation. Before the advent of the welfare state, philanthropists were major funders of social, cultural and religious institutions. The recent era of austerity has given way to a rediscovery of the rich tradition of giving in Europe. However, facts on the size and composition of the philanthropic market in Europe are missing. Who donates what, and for what purpose? Without valid and reliable data, it is difficult to demonstrate and promote the societal significance of philanthropy. This study provides a comprehensive overview of what we know about giving by households, corporations, foundations and charity lotteries in 20 European countries. As such, it lays the groundwork for a Giving in Europe study, a comprehensive atlas of philanthropy. In due course, Giving in Europe will provide key figures and statistics about the philanthropic sectors in Europe by using a shared methodology. By summarizing the current state or research on giving, this study has taken a step towards a benchmark tool for governments, foundations, and non-profit organisations. It gives an indication of the size of the fundraising sector and donation behaviour. This benchmark is important as governments redefine their responsibilities and the level of private giving is expected to increase. The country chapters also include a description of the degree to which philanthropy is covered as a source of income for charitable causes. Table 1. Philanthropic contributions in Europe, lower bound estimations, by source in 2013* Sources of contribution million EUR percentage Individuals In vivo Bequests 41 348 4 822 47 % 6 % Corporations 21 729 25 % Foundations 16 784 19 % Charity lotteries 2 834 3 % Total 87 517 100 % *Because the coverage of available data sources is known to be incomplete, the figures represent lower bound estimates, and are based on 2013 data or the closest year available. For more details on the data please see the country reports in the full report. Based on the currently available data on the value of the philanthropy sector in 18 countries, we estimate that at the philanthropy sector in Europe accounts for at least EUR 87.5 billion annually. This is a lower bound estimate. From the 20 contributors to the study, 18 were able to provide at least a lower bound estimate of giving by at least one source of philanthropy. There is not a single country in Europe that can provide a complete overview of donations from all sources. Also, macro data on the size and scope of philanthropy were not at all available in Croatia and Lithuania. A number of European countries were not included in this study due to the unavailability of ERNOP members in

household donations in the United Kingdom, compared to only 9% in Austria. Finally, differences also emerge with regard to international aid. Based on the data presented in this study, Swiss households donate relatively less to organizations related to international aid, with only 10% of the total amount going to this category. Much more different is the giving behaviour of Norwegian households, who give 38% of their donations to goals related to international aid. However, again, it must be noted that these difference might be the result of using different classifications and methods of data collection. Also, the current data do not allow for an in-depth explanation of these differences. Figure 3. Household donations to different charitable goals 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Religion Health Public and/or social benefit International aid Other 8% 23% 22% 32% 34% 13% 16% 10% 38% 10% 20% 11% 35% 9% 14% 19% 23% 27% 11% 40% 9% 27% 17% 14% 13% United Kingdom Netherlands France Switzerland Norway Austria Research Agenda and Recommendations This publication shows that philanthropy is indeed widespread across the continent, and that the phenomenon is an unquestionable part of our European identity. It also shows a large variety in the amounts given by different sources of philanthropy and, where data is available, major differences in support provided to philanthropic goals. Considering the large differences in policies and public financial support for different philanthropic goals, questions arise regarding the effect of public policy on philanthropic behaviour in general, and more specifically, the effect of public support for different philanthropic goals. However, unfortunately, a lack of comparable data makes it very difficult to foster this discussion, and ERNOP will strive to put these questions on the agenda of the relevant policy officials. The research has also identified the structure of the philanthropic sector and its umbrella organisations. With better data, research on giving in Europe can provide a benchmark for philanthropic organisations and it could serve a monitoring, signalling and agenda setting function. Differences in the giving behaviour of sources of philanthropy show opportunities for fundraising organisations, but also call for a better representation of the philanthropic sector. Gaps in data

enough, there are few countries that provide representative, valid data on giving by corporations, neither categorisations regarding their supported goals nor background information about the donating companies. The same also goes for giving by foundations, which we have only an incomplete picture of in most European countries. This gap in information should be kept in mind when interpreting the presented numbers. Considering its potential for the future, it is striking that data on bequest giving are hard to find. At the moment, there is only one European country for which we can provide an estimate of the total amount of bequests to charitable goals, Switzerland. In 2007, the Swiss donated EUR 660 million through bequests; a considerable amount, especially when compared to the total amount that Swiss households donate to charitable goals (EUR 1 381 million). So, on the other hand, the current gaps may also turn out to be a positive surprise in the future. Figure 2. Average quality of data per source of philanthropy HOUSEHOLDS BEQUESTS CORPORATIONS FOUNDATIONS LOTTERIE S + Representative data available in majority of the countries +/- Limited representative data available, lower bound estimates in the majority of the countries - No representative data in majority of the countries The popularity of charitable causes varies between countries Although the number of countries able to provide representative data on giving by households is limited, interesting discrepancies between them have arisen. Next to the differences in the amount given to charitable goals, differences in household preferences for charitable causes also seem to exist. For example, in the Netherlands, 40% of household donations goes to religious causes, while in France and Austria only 14% and 13% of household donations are being donated to these organisations. Similar differences arise if we compare health-related causes, which cover 27% of

household donations in the United Kingdom, compared to only 9% in Austria. Finally, differences also emerge with regard to international aid. Based on the data presented in this study, Swiss households donate relatively less to organizations related to international aid, with only 10% of the total amount going to this category. Much more different is the giving behaviour of Norwegian households, who give 38% of their donations to goals related to international aid. However, again, it must be noted that these difference might be the result of using different classifications and methods of data collection. Also, the current data do not allow for an in-depth explanation of these differences. Figure 3. Household donations to different charitable goals 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Religion Health Public and/or social benefit International aid Other 8% 23% 22% 32% 34% 13% 16% 10% 38% 10% 20% 11% 35% 9% 14% 19% 23% 27% 11% 40% 9% 27% 17% 14% 13% United Kingdom Netherlands France Switzerland Norway Austria Research Agenda and Recommendations This publication shows that philanthropy is indeed widespread across the continent, and that the phenomenon is an unquestionable part of our European identity. It also shows a large variety in the amounts given by different sources of philanthropy and, where data is available, major differences in support provided to philanthropic goals. Considering the large differences in policies and public financial support for different philanthropic goals, questions arise regarding the effect of public policy on philanthropic behaviour in general, and more specifically, the effect of public support for different philanthropic goals. However, unfortunately, a lack of comparable data makes it very difficult to foster this discussion, and ERNOP will strive to put these questions on the agenda of the relevant policy officials. The research has also identified the structure of the philanthropic sector and its umbrella organisations. With better data, research on giving in Europe can provide a benchmark for philanthropic organisations and it could serve a monitoring, signalling and agenda setting function. Differences in the giving behaviour of sources of philanthropy show opportunities for fundraising

organisations, but also call for a better representation of the philanthropic sector. Gaps in data provide (or prohibit) effective fundraising or grant making opportunities for fundraising, particularly regarding corporate philanthropy and bequest giving. However, with a sensed closing space for philanthropy, the current gaps in the data on philanthropic donations by individuals, corporations, foundations and charity lotteries prevent a convincing and comprehensive story about philanthropy. Instead, the data on philanthropy remain for the time being a series of anecdotal evidence. This publication provides this evidence for the first time. Building the evidence base will provide a tool for the European philanthropy sector. By looking for joint initiatives and sharing data, ERNOP will engage with the philanthropy community achieving a better picture of the European philanthropy sector. Finally, this study leads to recommendations that will guide ERNOP in achieving a Giving in Europe study. In order to obtain comparable key figures and statistics about philanthropy in Europe, we should determine the definitions of (sources of) philanthropy and the usage of a standardised methodology. This accounts for data collection on giving by households, corporations, foundations (and charity lotteries). Meanwhile, as long as a comprehensive Giving in Europe study is not taking place, ERNOP should push for using the best methodologies on a national, level where data collection takes place, and have a coordinating role for the implementation. Also, as ERNOP we need to fill in the blank spaces, both by involving researchers from countries currently not included in the study and by trying to access existing data that were inaccessible for this study. With the existing data ERNOP should continue to explore differences in giving between countries and start to provide explanations for these differences.

About Giving in Europe Philanthropy is not an American, but a European invention. Giving in Europe shows: European philanthropy takes itself seriously. This study is an initial attempt by members of the European Research Network On Philanthropy (ERNOP) to map philan thropy in Europe and presents a first overall estimation of the European philanthropic sector. Containing an overview of what we know about research on the philanthropy sector, it provides data and an assessment of the data on giving by households, bequests, foundations, corporations and charity lotteries in 20 European countries. Despite the promising signs of an emerging philanthropy sector in Europe, it is still a phenomenon and a sector that is not very well understood. As a matter of fact, besides the anecdotal glimpses from national researchers and the great work that has been carried out on the subdomains of philanthropy, we know little about its actual scope, size and forms in Europe. For a better discussion and assessment of the (potential) role that philanthropy can play in solving societal problems, we need a clear picture of the size and scope of philanthropy. What amounts are donated by households, through bequests, corporations, foundations and charity lotteries, and to what goals? To what extent can we draw a picture of the philanthropy sector in Europe, what is the quality of the data involved? In answering these questions, this publication aims to stimulate researchers, policy makers and philanthropy professionals in fostering research on philanthropy and to inspire to exchange knowledge and information. For more information visit www.ernop.eu.