AnJEDISON 10 CFR CFR March 31, ATTN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

Similar documents
NRC Public Meeting October 27, 2014

Testimony On the 2016 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Palo Verde Units 1, 2, & 3

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

HUMBOLDT BAY INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION LICENSE APPLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C July 7, 2011

July 1, 2006 Revision 2

Guide to the San Diego Gas and Electric, Sundesert Nuclear Power Plant Collection

FENOC AOLVS. February 3, 2000 PY-CEI/NRR-2463L. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.

Akbar Jazayeri Vice President, Regulatory Operations Southern California Edison Company P O Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770

Control Number: Item Number: 209. Addendum StartPage: 0

Energy Savings Bid Program 2007 Policy Manual

Testimony On The Reasonableness Of The SONGS 2&3 Nuclear Decommissioning Activities And Costs Incurred During

Regulatory Approach for License Renewal for Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors in the USA

NEI [Revision 0] Guidelines for a Certified Fuel Handler Training and Retraining Program

APPENDIX I AGENCY CONSULTATIONS

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY LOW INCOME ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS & BUDGETS FOR PROGRAM YEARS (A ) (TURN-SCG-01)

May 23, Docket No License No. DPR-12

Research and Test Reactor Licensing Actions and Lessons Learned

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES Commission OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

July 17, Mr. Edward Randolph Energy Division Director California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102

February 13, 2013 EA

Subject: Request for Approval to Close Energy Efficiency Portfolio Third Party Subprograms

Southern CA eziqc Contracts for HVAC ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES (C 10)

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Multifamily Affordable Solar Housing. Semi Annual Progress Report. July 30, 2012

Prop 39 Zero Net Energy (ZNE) Schools Pilot Program Overview. April 6, 2015

California Technical Forum (Cal TF) Policy Advisory Council (PAC) Meeting #10 May 2 nd, 2016 Natural Resources Defense Council San Francisco, CA

SCE s CALIFORNIA RENEWABLE ENERGY SMALL TARIFF (CREST) PROGRAM

California Self-Generation Incentive Program Evaluation

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: AUDIT SERVICES. Issue Date: February 13 th, Due Date: March 22 nd, 2017

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket Nos ; NRC ] Northern States Power Company - Minnesota; Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant

Nuclear Decommissioning: What You Need to Know

Higher Education Energy Efficiency Partnerships

Nuclear Operating Company

Multifamily Affordable Solar Housing. Semi Annual Progress Report. July 31, 2013

May 6, 2002 Revision 2

Radiation Protection Program Updates

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) )

Single-family Affordable Solar Homes (SASH) Program. Q Program Status Report

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C April 10, 2018

December 1, 2017 Advice Letter 5205-G. SUBJECT: Southern California Gas Company Request for Financing Pilots Budget Fund Shifting Approval

Single-family Affordable Solar Homes (SASH) Program. Semi-annual Program Status Report

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPENING COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U-338-E)

SOBOBA BAND OF LUISEÑO INDIANS San Jacinto, CA

EXHIBIT San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Requirements For Site Access And Access To Protected/Restricted Radiologically Controlled Areas

HVAC Distributor Rebate Program Participant Agreement

NUREG-0800 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STANDARD REVIEW PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES - GENERAL REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES

Southern California Edison Original Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Cal. PUC Sheet No.

UC/CSU/IOU Energy Efficiency Partnership

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain Cristina CORREA SÁINZ.

Decommissioning Licensing Process of Nuclear Installations in Spain Cristina CORREA SÁINZ.

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA

DOD INSTRUCTION DOD LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE (LLRW) PROGRAM

Marin Energy Authority Board of Directors Meeting

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its medical

Low Income Energy Efficiency Program

March 16, 2015 Advice Letter 4759-G

September 9, 2002 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY DIVISION

Request for Proposals and Specifications for a Community Solar Project

Innovation Village, Cal Poly Pomona Economic Benefits Analysis City of Pomona

SOCALGAS REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF BETH MUSICH GAS TRANSMISSION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE. June 2015

Regulatory Activities Related to Power Reactors Transitioning to Decommissioning

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY RADIATION SAFETY OFFICERS FOR MEDICAL-USE LICENSES UNDER 10 CFR PART 35

Upcoming Changes to the Solar Photovoltaic Incentive Programs December 15, 2006

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC ] Preparation of Environmental Reports for Nuclear Power Stations

Standard NUC Nuclear Plant Interface Coordination

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AUDIT REPORT NATIONAL LOW-LEVEL WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DOE/IG-0462 FEBRUARY 2000

January 26, Advice Letter 4983-E

F I L E D :51 AM CALIFORNIA SOLAR INITIATIVE FINAL HANDBOOK APRIL Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 15, 2018

ALTERNATIVE FUEL MECHANIC TRAINING COMPONENT REMOVE II PROGRAM GUIDELINES, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES

2017 CAL COAST CARES FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM

i6 Ct AR (p. 16): HEMORANDUMI FOR: Chairman Zech Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Carr Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Curtiss FROM:

APPLICANT S AGENT RESOLUTION TO BEGIN THE DISASTER RECOVERY PROCESS WITH FEMA AND CAL-OES FOR THE JANUARY 2017 STORMS

I. Disclosure Requirements for Financial Relationships Between Hospitals and Physicians

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE

SUBJECT: REVISED ENERGY AUDIT APPROVAL PROCEDURES AND OTHER RELATED AUDIT ISSUES

New Solar Homes Partnership Program. Maggie Dimitrova Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Life Extension of Nuclear Power Plants

REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH REGULATORY GUIDE 1.8 (Drafts were issued as DG-1084 and DG-1012)

CProgress Energy. Qk4~ May 21, F U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

SENIOR SERVICES AND HEALTH SYSTEMS BRANCH DIVISION OF HEALTH FACILITIES EVALUATION AND LICENSING OFFICE OF CERTIFICATE OF NEED AND HEALTHCARE FACILITY

Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing: U.S. Policy Development

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS for ENGINEERING SERVICES

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Re: Comments on the Draft Guidelines for the Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program

F I L E D :06 AM

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR AUDIT SERVICES RFP W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research 300 S. Westnedge Ave. Kalamazoo, MI 49007

Business Requirements Specification

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Okeechobee Utility Authority Engineering Services for Water Treatment Plant Improvements

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES

2018 CAL COAST CARES FOUNDATION HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM

LICENCE APPLICATION FORM

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L))

STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS JANUARY 2017 PROPOSED RULE 58M-2.009, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

Transcription:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AnJEDISON An EDISON INTERNA TIONAL& Company Richard C. Brabec Principal Manager, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Emergency Planning 10 CFR 50.75 10 CFR 50.82 March 31, 2015 ATTN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Subject: Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v-vii), and 10 CFR 72.30(b) Decommissioning Funding Status Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 Dear Sir or Madam: As required by 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v)-(vii), this letter provides the status of the decommissioning funding for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Units 2, and 3 as of December 31, 2014. The required information is provided in the enclosure for Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric, the City of Anaheim, and the City of Riverside. Based on the requirements in 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1), this information is reported on an annual basis for SONGS Units 2 and 3 because the plants were permanently shut down before the end of their licensed lives. SONGS Units 2 and 3 were permanently shut down during 2013, and their decommissioning is currently being planned. There are no commitments contained in this letter or its enclosure. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ms. Andrea Sterdis at (949) 368-9985. fly, Enclosure: SONGS Units 2 and 3 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2014 cc: M. Dapas, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV R. L. Kellar, Region IV, Branch Chief, Repository and Spent Fuel Safety T. Wengert, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92672 (949) 368-7418 PAX 87418 Fax: (949) 368-7575 John.Brabec@sce.com 4001

Enclosure San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2014 Page 1 of 5

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 Decommissioning Funding Status Report For Calendar Year 2014 San Onofre Units 2 and 3 were pressurized water reactors (PWR) rated at 3410 MWt. Provided below is the information required by 10 CFR 50.75(f)(1) and 10 CFR 50.82(v)(8)(v-vii) for San Onofre Units 2 and 3. This information is reported every year for San Onofre Units 2 and 3 because they closed before the end of their licensed lives and are currently being decommissioned. The San Onofre Units 2 and 3 owners are reported as follows: Southern California Edison (SCE) 78.21 % San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) 20.00 % City of Anaheim (Anaheim) 0.00 % City of Riverside (Riverside) 1.79 % The decommissioning liability is shared between the current owners and former owner, Anaheim, as set forth below for each unit: Owner Unit 2 Decommissioning Unit 3 Decommissioning Liability Liability SCE 75.7363% 75.7475% SDG&E 20.0000% 20.0000% Anaheim 02.4737% 02.4625% Riverside 01.7900% 01.7900% All dollar amounts are in 100% share, 2014 dollars. 1) The decommissioning fund estimated to be required pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c) is the following: a) The minimum amount calculated by the method prescribed by 10 CFR 50.75(c). San Onofre Unit 2 528.2 million 528.2 million b) The San Onofre Unit 2 site-specific estimate for decommissioning includes the following radiological decommissioning costs associated with terminating the site license, non-radiological site restoration costs, and spent fuel storage costs:0 1 ) Page 2 of 5

Estimate of Radiological s Less: Actual Radiological s through 12/31/2014 "To Go" Radiological s Estimate of Site Restoration s Less: Actual Site Restoration s through 12/31/2014 "To Go" Site Restoration s Estimate of Fuel Storage s Less: Actual Fuel Storage s through 12/31/2014 "To Go" Fuel Storage s Total SONGS Unit 2 "To Go" s as of 1/1/2015 San Onofre Unit 2 1,034.2 million 94.8 million 939.4 million 423.3 million 53.7 million 369.6 million 623.2 million 77.7 million 545.5 million 1,854.5 million c) The site-specific estimate for decommissioning includes the following radiological decommissioning costs associated with terminating the site license, non-radiological site restoration costs, and spent fuel storage costs:0 1 ) Estimate of Radiological s Less: Actual Radiological s through 12/31/2014 "To Go" Radiological s Estimate of Site Restoration s Less: Actual Site Restoration s through 12/31/2014 "To Go" Site Restoration s Estimate of Fuel Storage s Less: Actual Fuel Storage s through 12/31/2014 "To Go" Fuel Storage s Total SONGS Unit 3 "To Go" s as of 1/1/2015 1,078.0 million 94.5 million 983.5 million 599.5 million 53.8 million 545.7 million 653.0 million 76.9 million 576.1 million 2,105.3 million 2) The Decommissioning Trust Fund amounts remaining at the end of calendar year 2014 (net of estimated capital gains taxes) are:(2): Owner SCE SDG&E (3) Anaheim (3) Riverside (3) Less: 2013-2014 Net Balances San Onofre Unit 2 1,465.4 million 410.9 million 61.8 million 37.7 million 1,975.8 million 226.2 million 1,749.6 million 1,641.3 million 465.3 million 67.2 million 40.6 million 2,214.4 million 225.2 million 1,989.2 million Page 3 of 5

3) The annual amounts projected to be collected in 2015 are: Owner SCE SDG&E (3) Anaheim (3) Riverside (3) San Onofre Unit 2 0.0 million 5.8 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 5.8 million 0.0 million 2.2 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 2.2 million Each owner either (A) recovers, directly or indirectly, the estimated total cost of decommissioning through rates established by "cost of service" or similar rate making regulation, including entities that establish their own rates and are able to recover their cost of service allocable to decommissioning, or (B) has as its source of revenues for its external sinking fund a "non-bypassable charge," the total amount of which, with earnings, provides the funds estimated to be needed for decommissioning. 4) The amounts spent on San Onofre Units 2 and 3 decommissioning work performed during 2014 are summarized below: Cateqory License Termination Site Restoration Spent Fuel Storage San Onofre Unit 2 55.4 million 12.7 million 38.6 million 106.7 million 55.1 million 12.8 million 38.3 million 106.2 million 5) The composite escalation rate for San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Decommissioning is 3.07%. 6) The after-tax composite investment rate of return for the San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Decommissioning Trust Funds is 3.58%. The composite investment rate of return (3.58%) less the composite escalation rate (3.07%) yields a composite real earnings rate less than the 2% real rate of return allowed under 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii). 7) None of the owners of San Onofre Units 2 and 3 are relying on any contracts for the purposes of providing decommissioning funding pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(v). There have been no modifications to the method of providing financial assurance. Page 4 of 5

8) The amounts of decommissioning funds available as of December 31, 2014 for the costs to manage San Onofre Units 2 and 3 irradiated fuel, are shown in the table below:(2): SONGS 2 License Termination s Site Restoration s Spent Fuel Management s Estimated "To Go" Decommissioning 939.4 million 369.6 million 545.5 million 1,854.5 million Ratios in Estimate 50.7% 19.9% 29.4% 100.0% 12/31/2014 Trust Balance 886.2 million 348.7 million 514.7 million 1,749.6 million SONGS 3 License Termination s Site Restoration s Spent Fuel Management s Estimated "To Go" Decommissioning 983.5 million 545.7 million 576.1 million 2,105.3 million Ratios in Estimate 46.7% 25.9% 27.4% 100.0% 12/31/2014 Trust Balance 929.3 million 515.6 million 544.3 million 1,989.2 million Notes: (1) The site-specific decommissioning cost estimate for San Onofre Units 2 and 3 that was submitted to the NRC on September 23, 2014 and to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) on December 10, 2014, includes the radiological costs associated with terminating the site license, non-radiological costs, and fuel storage costs. (2) During the period between June 7, 2013 and December 31, 2014, SCE incurred costs of 226.2 million for San Onofre Unit 2 and 225.2 million for. These costs have not yet been withdrawn from the Decommissioning Trusts. Therefore, the Net Balances are the differences between the December 31, 2014 Decommissioning Trust Balances and the 2013-2014 incurred costs. (3) SCE is submitting information with respect to its current co-owners, SDG&E and Riverside and its former co-owner, Anaheim, on their behalf, and they are responsible for the completeness and accuracy of their respective information. Page 5 of 5