Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Technology Transition

Similar documents
Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

BW Threat & Vulnerability

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

An Overview of Romanian Command and Control Systems

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

Wildland Fire Assistance

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR)

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Embedded Training Solution for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) A3

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

A system overview of the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-based Epidemics

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Patriot System Performance. Report Summary

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

The Effects of Outsourcing on C2

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

Center for Systems Engineering at the Air Force Institute of Technology

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

PEO Missiles and Space Overview Briefing for the 2010 Corrosion Summit February 2010 Huntsville, AL

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

A Military C2 Professional s Thoughts on Visualization

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

An Introduction to Wargaming

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

AMCOM Corrosion Program

VSE Corporation. Integrity - Agility - Value. VSE Corporation Proprietary Information

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

forces operating in Afghani - stan continue to be subjected to frequent and deadly attacks from insurgents using improvised explosive devices

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act: Background and Issues

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

Expeditionary Basecamp Passive

Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

The pace of change and level of effort has increased dramatically with

User Manual and Source Code for a LAMMPS Implementation of Constant Energy Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD-E)

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

F-35 Lightning II. 5 th Generation True Stealth for Korea From 2016 and Beyond

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

DODIG March 9, Defense Contract Management Agency's Investigation and Control of Nonconforming Materials

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Report No. D February 9, Internal Controls Over the United States Marine Corps Military Equipment Baseline Valuation Effort

AIRFIELD DAMAGE REPAIR THE FUTURE NOW

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

The Military Health System

NORAD CONUS Fighter Basing

The Advantages of Commercial Satellites versus Military Satellites. Captain Thomas J. Heller

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION and MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND CORROSION PROGRAM

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Report Documentation Page

Intelligence, Information Operations, and Information Assurance

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization


Transcription:

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Technology Transition

Report Documentation Page Form.4f111"W'!d OMB No. OJOUJ/illl Public n:portina bunlen for tbt collection of information 11 - to av..., I baur per - includina tbt time for mviewing in.1tjuc:tiona, sevc:hina exwing data """""" aatherlna and malnlllinina tbt dato ~ and oompletins and rcviewlna 1M cou.e.tlon of intbnnatlon. Send comment~ R!pnllng tbia burdtn tttimstt or lilly othm: "'Jl"d of this colle<:tlon of information, inejudina,.for n:ducina tbit burden, to Wllltbinaton H~ Serviceo, Directorate for!nfonnation Operations and Report~~. 1215 Jetfmon O.via Hiahway, Suite 1204, Arlinaton VA 222024302. Rtlpondtnll should be aware that ootwithatandina lilly other provision of law, no person &ball be subject to penalty for fllilina to oomply with a collection of information if it <loa not display a curmttly wlid OMB control nonther. 1. REPORT DATE 1997 4. TITLE A."'D SUBTITLE DARPA Technology Transition 6. AUTHOR(S) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED - Sa. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER Sc. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER Sd. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER Sf. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) DARPA,ArUngton,VA,:Z2201 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) II. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for puhuc release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT see report 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURlTY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c.thlspaol! unclassified unclassified unclassified 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT IS. NUMBER OF PAGES 185 19a.NAMEOF RESPONSWLE PERSON Staadanl F-1911 (Rev.ll-911) Prolcribod by ANSI Sid ZJ'l-18

"Advanced Unmannrd Undersea Vehicle BETA correlation and fusion demonstration Advanced Simulation and Defense Sirnul&ion [mcrnet " Distributed Packard Commission on commi&sloned usc more proro~ programs to reduce the technical and cost uncerrainries the syswrn. The Commission the new role of., in advanced '"'';"''nrnnr>nr technical uncertainties t.o for was the taintles ln the F 11 7 full~scalc fu] ripiir>lr.rrrnpt The DARPA initiative in response to rhe Packard Commission rec~ ommendations was somewhat limited in scope and effect the small allocation. the concerns of over new programs before and the reluctance of rhe Servici's to commit ro rm"r.nn~nr>n vvas finished. progn1ms, the and can be \{' The OSD ACTD initiativi' was started in 1993. In contrast to EEMIT and Packard ACTD programs Thf' decision to

Early re.;;earch and development by DARPA led to the design and fabri~ cation of the TACIT BLUE low observable stealth aircraft. Most notably. it was the first aircraft to demonstrate a low radar cross sec~ tjon using curved surfaces, along with a low probab!llty of Intercept radar and data link.,~ such, the DARPA TACIT BLUE Program contributed directly to the development of the B~Z Stealth Bomber so sue~ ce~c;_o:;fully deployed the Air Force. In the early 1970s a study by DARPA. the Air Vehicle Observables workshop, brought to light the extent of the vulnerab!lltles of U.S. aircraft and rheir on-board equipment to detection and attack by our adversaries. After the successes of the DARPA HAVE BLUE Stealth Fighter Program, DARPA initiated the TACIT BLUE Technology Demonstration Program, an effort to demonstrate that a low observable surveillance aircraft with a low probability of intercept radar and other sensors could operate close to the forward line of battle with a high degree of survivability. TACIT BLUE flrst flew In February 1982 and accumulated 135 flights over a three-year period. Other technologies addressed by DARPA included the reduction of radar cross section through a combinatjon of shaping to form a limited number of radar return spikes designed to be Jess detectable by ground-based radar 11bsorbem matllrlctlti, infrared shielding, hllat dlss!patlon, mdue;tld visual signatures, low probability~of lntercept (LPI) radar, active cancel lation, and inlet shielding, exhaust cooling and shaping. and windshield coatings. Romh<T for Selected Users DARPA Technology Transiti<m 67

STEALTH FIGHTER Early efforts by DARPA led to the development of the Air Force F-117 tactical fighter that was so succp.ssful in rhe Desert Storm operal:ion, tlying 1.271 sorties without a single aircraft loss, succes..<;fully penetrating aj r defenses, and delivering 2,000 tons of ordhance to account for some 40% of all targets with an 80%-85% hit rate. ;\ir Furce i' 117. WdS ti< vdopi'd lru111 l<'t llllolofiy dt nwnslraied!jy. 1 I ) ;\/~ PI\ pnllotype, ti ll' 1/i\VE fluff :wrrali. In the early 1970s a study by DARPA. the Air Vehicle Observables workshop, brought to light the extent of the vulnerab!lltles of U.S. aircraft and their on-board equipment to dewctlon and attack by our adversaries. Based on rhe study and encouragement from Office of the Secretary of Defense and others. DARPA embarked on a program to develop the technologies for stealthy aircraft. Under a codeword program. "HAVE BLUE." rwo aircraft were built. nnd first flight occurred successfully in April 1977. Technologies addressed by DNzyA included the reducl:ion of radar cross secl:ion through a combinal:ion of Rullonr The J li\vf Hf UF~ ilirrrnlt. shaping to form a limited number of radar return spikes designed to be less detectable by gmund,based radars. radar absorbent materials. infrared shielding, heat dissipation, reduced vl-;ual slgnatun:s. low-probability of-lntercept (LPD radar. active signature cancellation. and inlet shielding. exhaust cooling and shaping, and windshield coatings. In November 1978. the Air Force initiated a program for the F-117 based on the HAVE BLUE demonstrations and the DARPA-developed technologies. First flight of the F-117 was in June 1981 and the aircraft became operal:ional in October 1983. A mtal of 59 aircraft were built, and 36 were deployed to Saudi 1\rabia in late 1990. from which they were highly successful in F-11 7 Nighthawks attacks against high va lue Iraqi targets. 66 DARPA Technology Transition Selected Technology Transitions by Users

DARPA program to demonstrate; a of the DARPA HAVE BLUE srmlrh demonstrator uitical of the 8~2 radar. well the DARPi\/Air Force TAC[T BLUE surveillance radar. The successful demonstration that a radar useful for air target detection could be built so ro undetectable stare-ofthe~;ut radar receivers is ro future stealth aircraft programs. prclgrilrn would rnt'"'-'"''yrllce< used to track the aircraft. Several were conducted, and a DARPA program was initiated to attack the most difficult emitter, the aircraft radar. The program and prototype radar that rhat