Florida Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Similar documents
Delaware Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

South Dakota Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Nevada Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Montana Smart Transportation:

Utah Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Michigan. Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?

Stimulus Funding and Transportation

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

PROJECT SELECTION Educational Series

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

Transportation. Fiscal Research Division. March 24, Justification Review

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

MORPC Executive Committee Members. Joe Garrity, Senior Government Affairs Coordinator

Future Trends & Themes Summary. Presented to Executive Steering Committee: April 12, 2017

Lorie Tudor, P.E. Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer. Alma Area Chamber of Commerce

KEY TAKEAWAYS THE STIMULUS BREAKDOWN

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

The President s Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Overview

Appendix 5 Freight Funding Programs

SSTI s PennDOT Smart Transportation Webinar

Federal Actions to Reduce Energy Use in Transportation

FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

Get it Done: Rebuild Michigan GRETCHEN WHITMER S PLAN FOR SAFE ROADS, CLEAN WATER, AND A BETTER ECONOMY

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

North Texas Commission 2017 Legislative Priorities

Proposition 6 Debunking the Myths

OF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2012 Legislative Policies

Texas Department of Transportation

Update on Transportation Funding and Potential Sources for Additional Revenue. June 19, 2017

Drive America s Economy Forward by Reinvesting in Municipal Infrastructure

Massachusetts and the Stimulus:

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

RURAL BRIEF AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS. Department of Agriculture

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Creating Jobs, Supporting the States and Investing in Our Country s Future

FLORIDA S 2017 BUSINESS AGENDA. SECURING FLORIDA S FUTURE FloridaChamber.com

Oregon John A. Kitzhaber, M.D., Governor

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

LAKE~SUMTER MPO 2035 TRANSPORTATION PLAN & LAND USE WORKSHOP

APPENDIX METROFUTURE OVERVIEW OVERVIEW

SUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014

TALKIING POINTS FOR THE APTA LEGAL AFFAIRS CONFERENCE

DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REPORT ON AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO

Project Selection Advisory Council

Federal Stimulus Dollars for Louisiana

S E N A T E F I S C A L O F F I C E I S S U E B R I E F 2016-S RhodeWorks FEBRUARY 2, 2016

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

DOT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRANSPORTATION ASSETS

Summary of. Overview. existing law. to coal ash. billion in FY. funding in FY 2013 FY 2014

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

Funding the Federal-Aid Highway Program

August 3, Laura Mester Chief Administrative Officer Michigan Department of Transportation

STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017

FLORIDA S 2018 BUSINESS AGENDA. SECURING FLORIDA S FUTURE FloridaChamber.com

Making the MOST. of MAP-21. A Guide to the 2012 Federal Transportation Law And How to Use it for Positive Change in Your Community

Regional Transit System Plan. Regional Task Force Meeting No. 1

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of Enacted February 17, 2009

First & Main A Blueprint for Prosperity in America s Local Communities

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Transportation Funding Terms and Acronyms Unraveling the Jargon

Appendix Tactics and Metrics from State Agencies and Organizations

TRB National Cooperative Rail Research Program: Report 1. Alternative Funding and Financing Mechanisms for Passenger and Freight Rail Projects

FUNDING PLEASE! PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PERSPECTIVES ON GRANT AWARDS AND GRANT-WRITING

SMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.

Alternative Funding and Financing Mechanisms for Rail Projects: Summary and Relevance for Intercity Passenger Rail (NCRRP 07-01)

ODOT S MISSION: MOVING OHIO INTO A PROSPEROUS NEW WORLD M

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

Transit Operations Funding Sources

Overview of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program

TRANSPORTATION. The American County Platform and Resolutions

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. A. Robert Kucab Executive Director

2016 DOT Discretionary Grants

Federal Support for Streetcars: Frequently Asked Questions

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

FP2 Inc. Update. Jim Moulthrop, PE Executive Director FP 2 Inc. North East Pavement Preservation Partnership April 29, 2015 Newark, DE

ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process

TAMPA BAY PUBLIC TRANSIT INITIATIVES: A Response to Questions of the MPO citizens advisory committee

Washington State Department of Transportation

SFTP Technical Advisory Committee September 19, 2012

Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

STATEMENT OF The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, 2018

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

Notice. Quality Assurance Statement

MAP-21: An Analysis. The Trust Fund

Long Range Transportation Plan

DCHC MPO Funding Source Overview & Guidance draft January 2015

The FAST Act: Implications for the African-American Community

Section 6. The Transportation Plan

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Transcription:

Florida Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Keep Florida Moving in the Right Direction Save Money by Taking Better Care of What You Have 1. Dedicate more to maintain and repair existing roads and bridges. Grow the Economy by Making Your Investments More Strategic 2. Fund the biggest job creator: public transportation. 3. Spark innovation and cost-savings through a competitive transportation solutions program. 4. Revisit near-term spending decisions and long-term project selection to improve transportation outcomes, add jobs, and grow Florida s economy. Smart Growth America Florida Report January 2011 2

Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Florida Economy Like the rest of the country, Florida s state budget and economy face significant challenges. These challenges also create the opportunity indeed the imperative to revisit existing programs and ask if Florida is really getting everything it can from them. Right now, voters do not think the current approach is working. Polling nationwide shows people are dissatisfied with the economy and believe the nation is on the wrong track. People do not trust their state with their money. Only 10% of voters think the government spends money wisely while fully 86% think their state does a fair or poor job. Moving forward, Americans do think there is a better way. In a recent survey by Hart Research Associates, 68% of those polled believe now is the time for the state to invest in transportation because if done right these investments will create new jobs and attract new businesses. Voters are clear about their hopes for their state, and Smart Growth America has practical solutions to help make that vision a reality. In the following pages we outline an innovative, yet common sense approach to transportation spending that cuts costs, creates jobs, attracts businesses, and clearly shows that the state is responding to the fiscal and economic crisis with strong leadership that is not satisfied with a system that makes fair or poor use of taxpayer dollars. The Need: If it continues on its current path, Florida s transportation system is on track to become highly expensive, uncompetitive, and unsafe. Florida has invested heavily in transportation, but declining revenues and escalating debt service will reduce the state s ability to maintain its facilities in a state of good repair. Carrying on business as usual will result in a deteriorated road network, inadequate transit network, and a six- to ten-fold increase in repair costs resulting from neglect and deferred maintenance. The Smart Solution: Florida is at a crossroads. While there is still a sizable gap between revenue and the large wish list of projects, this gap can be closed if the state makes strategic decisions about how to get the highest return on its investment. By making fiscally responsible choices about the state s transportation priorities, Florida can not only save money and create jobs, but it can also help preserve the transportation system and create a more welcoming business climate on the mid- and long-term horizons. Smart Growth America Florida Report January 2011 3

Save Money by Taking Better Care of What You Have 1. Dedicate more to maintain and repair existing roads and bridges Spending more on repair and maintenance is a good investment: it saves the state money, saves citizens money, is a superior job creator, and is very popular among voters. According to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), every $1 spent to keep a road in good condition avoids $6-14 needed later to rebuild the same road once it has deteriorated. In addition, poor roads add an average of $335 to the annual cost of owning a car in some cities an additional $740 more due to damaged tires and suspensions and reduced fuel efficiency. While Florida has invested heavily in repair and maintenance in recent years, insufficient investment over the long-term has led to a backlog of roads and bridges in poor and deficient condition requiring $83 million annually in major rehabilitation costs over the next twenty years. Funding, to the extent possible, the annual maintenance need to keep Florida s road and bridge system in a state of good repair - currently $2.1 billion - is the most fiscally responsible transportation investment the state can make. Florida should strive to fully fund the annual repair need or as much of it as possible based on nearterm highway revenue forecasts. Prioritizing system preservation will save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, while improving road and bridge conditions. The investment in maintaining infrastructure will also pay off in job creation. Numerous studies find that maintenance and repair creates even more jobs than building new roads. Without a renewed commitment to system maintenance and repair, the state ensures a network of declining quality with attendant safety problems, additional cost to Florida families for car repairs, and a loss of economic competitiveness as businesses target states with better freight access. Repair Costs for Road and Bridge Network FDOT major roads (lane miles) 1 42,358 Lane miles in poor condition 2 836 Structurally deficient bridges 1 (3%) 256 Annual preventative maintenance needs for road/bridge network 2 Annual major rehabilitation needs for poor and deficient roads/bridges 2 Total annual road/bridge repair need 2 Past FDOT annual investment in repair (2004-2008) 1, 3 $2.1 billion $83 million $2.2 billion $1.4 billion 1 Source: 2008 FHWA Highway Statistics Report 2 As calculated by Smart Growth America based on data available from FHWA. Poor and deficient road/bridge rehabilitation costs were annualized over 20 years. 3 FDOT s road/bridge repair spending increased in 2009 and 2010 due to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). $1 billion spent on fixing existing highways creates 16% more person-years of construction jobs than new road construction. 51% of voters believe fixing roads and bridges should be the top priority for the state (33% chose expanding transit and other choices, 16% chose expanding roads). Most voters 59% believe that the government has a duty to make sure that roads and bridges are safe and reliable. Smart Growth America Florida Report January 2011 4

Grow the Economy by Making Your Investments More Strategic 2. Fund the biggest job creator: public transportation Investments in public transportation create almost twice the jobs that highways do, help others get to their jobs, and attract private sector investment, creating still more jobs. Florida should invest strategically in public transportation statewide. Specifically, it should shift resources to restore transit service and hold the line on fares. To address budget shortfalls, transit agencies across the state have proposed both fare increases and service cuts that disproportionately impact lower-income households. From 2004 to 2008, the state of Florida contributed only 12% of annual transit budget needs statewide, leaving the responsibility largely to local and federal governments. It ranked 24 th in the nation for supporting transit. By not contributing more toward transit, Florida is missing a critical opportunity to create jobs and boost regional and state economies. Every $1 billion of ARRA dollars invested in new public transportation projects produced 16,419 job-months, compared to 8,781 job-months produced by highway infrastructure projects. Using state resources to bridge transit budget shortfalls would enable low-income workers to get to their jobs and prevent the potential layoff of transit workers. It would also increase critical access in rural communities and support key economic centers of the state, where commuters, senior citizens, and those with limited transportation alternatives rely on transit for daily needs. In addition to channeling state funds to keep transit moving, the flexible funding provision in the national transportation act allows states to transfer federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds toward public transportation needs. Florida should develop a plan to build support for transit over the next four years in order to feed the state s economy. These investments would put transit at the forefront of growing the state s economy creating more jobs faster than any other public infrastructure investment. Other states have realized substantial returns on similar investment. For example, the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail line in New Jersey has attracted $5.3 billion in development over the eight years since it opened, Dallas has seen more than $4.2 billion in development at light rail station areas, and Portland has seen over $4 billion in development. Public transportation is popular with voters November 2010 National Poll by Hart Research Associates: 73% of those polled rated the number of jobs created in the long term that would remain in [my] community as the most important factor in developing the state transportation plan. 61% regardless of their party affiliation (and 57% of Independents) said they would feel more positively about a governor who favors a plan that provides more choices such as buses, carpools, light rail, van service, and commuter rail. 64% said buses, carpools, light rail, van service, and commuter rail were a good or very good value for the cost. March 2010 National Poll by Public Opinion Strategies and Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates: 66% of respondents agreed they would like more transportation options available to them. 69% agreed their community would benefit from an expanded and improved public transportation system. Smart Growth America Florida Report January 2011 5

Grow the Economy by Making Your Investments More Strategic 3. Spark innovation and cost-savings through a competitive transportation solutions program There are many ways to solve transportation problems. While many leaders fall into the old standby of building large pieces of infrastructure, there are under-used alternatives to consider. A state program similar to the federal TIGER (Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery) grant program would enable Florida communities to put their best ideas forward. From the funding the state has available for new capacity, the state could set aside a portion of its federal and state revenues for places that want to pursue innovative least cost solutions to transportation problems. The widest range of projects should be eligible, and they should be judged against criteria such as job creation, private sector investment, and other criteria emphasizing returns on investment. Florida has already taken innovative steps by using variable pricing for key high volume corridors to raise additional revenues and provide further choice in transportation decisionmaking. Additional strategies to utilize include: Demand management telecommuting, alternate work schedule, employee commute programs, and car- and bike-sharing Coordinated land use Investment bringing grocery stores to underserved areas, and transitoriented development Biking and walking networks connections that provide simple, low cost solutions for many of the short trips people take every day System management ramp metering, improved stoplight timing, better incident management, and improved local road network connections Among transportation professionals it is widely acknowledged that these techniques are often cheaper and more effective than either a road or a transit solution. It is also true that most governments underutilize these low-cost strategies, leaving significant benefits on the table. Smart Example: Oregon Flexible Funds Program As an outcome of the 2009 Legislative Session, the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) was asked to increase its investment in Non-Highway Transportation. In June 2010, the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) directed staff to develop a Flexible Funds Program and form an Advisory Committee to help develop criteria for the new program. The Purpose Statement, Vision and Criteria included in the Flexible Funds Program Application Instructions were developed with the assistance of the Advisory Committee and approved by the OTC in August 2010. What is the focus of the new program? The intent is to fund sustainable, non-highway transportation projects, programs, and services that positively impact modal connectivity, the environment, mobility and access, livability, energy use, and the overall operation of the transportation system. Projects likely to be funded include transit; bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure; transportation demand management; and the planning, research, and project development that supports those projects as well as related programs and services. Projects should further support development of a multimodal transportation system that is interconnected, safe, seamless, and increasingly looks to non-highway solutions that are: Interconnected/multifaceted Environmentally Sensitive Sustainable Fostering livability as well as providing Oregonians with better access and more transportation choices Smart Growth America Florida Report January 2011 6

Grow the Economy by Making Your Investments More Strategic 4. Revisit near-term spending decisions and long-term project selection to improve transportation outcomes, add jobs, and grow Florida s economy Florida s economy and transportation revenue situation demands that investment decisions made prior to the recession get revisited. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 2011-2014 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is based on revenue forecasts of approximately $9.5 billion annually over the period; however, the state of the economy and the uncertainty regarding federal transportation funding suggest that this forecast may be optimistic. Many projects in existing plans have spent years in the development pipeline and their original purpose has either been forgotten, no longer applies, or does not meet today s need for higher return on investment. Revisiting these spending decisions will show Floridians that the state s leadership is responding immediately to current economic and fiscal realities. Operationally, this means FDOT should update its five-year capital improvement program and should prioritize projects as it moves forward in implementing its updated Florida Transportation Plan. Florida has already taken steps by focusing future funding, beyond preservation of existing facilities, on regional priorities identified in the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) plan. Re-evaluating near-term decisions to move those of highest value to the front can serve as the poster-child for a broader initiative to bring greater transparency, performance, and accountability to the project selection process. Nationally, voters want more accountability from the government and want it to make better use of the money it has. Redesigning the project selection process around clear and transparent criteria would help to address this credibility gap. It would also show that leaders are willing to break with past practices to get better returns on the money the government does have. Criteria could include the project s potential to: Create jobs Boost near- and long-term regional and state economic output Increase mobility, access, and transportation choices Be cost-effective (i.e. provide high returns on the initial capital and subsequent maintenance burdens required by the project) With these smart transportation approaches, the leaders of Florida can demonstrate to voters the ability to be fiscally responsible while growing the economy. In 2008, McKinsey and Company evaluated potential transportation investments in Metro Atlanta, finding: $220 million invested in demand management would create $40 billion in incremental benefits. Better coordination with development (deemed to be virtually cost-free) would create $39 billion in incremental benefits. $26 billion in road investments would create $40 billion in incremental benefits. It is of particular importance in these times of severe fiscal constraint that we invest scarce public resources more wisely and efficiently, in order to maximize the reach and impact of what we spend... Otherwise we will continue to get the same results: deteriorating infrastructure marked by unacceptable compromises to safety as well as worsening performance, especially growing congestion. Bipartisan Policy Center s National Transportation Policy Project and the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Smart Growth America Florida Report January 2011 7

Smart Growth America advocates for people who want to live and work in great neighborhoods. We believe smart growth solutions support thriving businesses and jobs, provide more options for how people get around and make it more affordable to live near work and the grocery store. Our coalition works with communities to fight sprawl and save money. We are making America s neighborhoods great together. Smart Growth America is the only national organization dedicated to researching, advocating for, and leading coalitions to bring smart growth practices to more communities nationwide. Visit us online at www.smartgrowthamerica.org. 1707 L St. NW Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20036 202-207-3355 www.smartgrowthamerica.org Sources: Public opinion polling: Smart Growth America Nationwide Survey: Strategic findings from survey among 1,000 voters nationwide conducted November 16 22, 2010 by Hart Research Associates. Jobs generated by road repair, transit, new road construction: Heintz, J., Pollin, R. and Garrett-Peltier, H. (2009), How Infrastructure Investments Support the U.S. Economy: Employment, Productivity and Growth, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, www.peri.umass.edu/236/hash/efc9f7456a/publication/333/. Road and bridge inventory and maintenance and repair costs: FHWA Highway Statistics 2008 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2008/. Methodology Memo - Determining Road and Bridge System Preservation Costs Smart Growth America, December 2010. Road condition and automobile repair costs: AASHTO, Rough Roads Ahead: Fix Them Now or Pay for Them Later, May 8, 2009, http://roughroads.transportation.org/. Stimulus jobs generated by transit vs. roads: What We Learned From The Stimulus: And how to use what we learned to speed job creation in the 2010 jobs bill, http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/stimulus2009.html. McKinsey & Company study of potential investments in Atlanta: McKinsey & Company, IT3 Scenario Results and IT3 Scenario Results and Implications, State of Georgia, Discussion Document, November 13, 2008. Smart Growth America Florida Report January 2011 8