Department of the Navy FY 2006/FY 2007 President s Budget. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2014 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral Joseph P. Mulloy, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2016 PRESIDENT S BUDGET. Rear Admiral William K. Lescher, USN Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Budget

April 25, Dear Mr. Chairman:

MILITARY PERSONNEL, NAVY

Summary: FY 2019 Defense Appropriations Bill Conference Report (H.R. 6157)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2019 PRESIDENT S BUDGET

FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEFENSE SPENDING REQUEST BRIEFING BOOK

Navy Affairs Committee Minutes BOD Meeting - 23 May 2008

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL MICHAEL G. MULLEN, U.S. NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY READINESS OF THE

CRS Report for Congress

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 PRESIDENT S BUDGET

NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SYMPOSIUM VADM DAVID ARCHITZEL. 29 June 2011 COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND. Presented to: Presented by:

Vice Admiral Mark Skinner, USN Principal Military Deputy, Asst. Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development & Acquisition

Recapitalizing the Navy s Battle-Line

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

STATEMENT OF GORDON R. ENGLAND SECRETARY OF THE NAVY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 10 JULY 2001

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL VERN CLARK, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 25 FEBRUARY 2003

INTRODUCTION. Before I address our current budget submission, I would like to review some of the events and highlights of the past year.

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4

NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL VERN CLARK, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

CAPT Heide Stefanyshyn-Piper

MAJ GEN PLETCHER 12 February 2018

A Ready, Modern Force!

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL GARY ROUGHEAD CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

March 23, Sincerely, Peter R. Orszag. Honorable Roscoe G. Bartlett, Ranking Member, Seapower and Expeditionary Forces Subcommittee

U. S. Navy Road Ahead Brief to: Precision Strike Association 21 January 2004

NDIA Munitions Executive Summit Sustaining Industrial Readiness

SECTION V - IMPROVED BUSINESS PRACTICES

CNO s. Navigation Plan WARFIGHTING FIRST

Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e UNCLASSIFIED

Providing the Right Force for the Nation Today While Preparing for the Uncertainties of Tomorrow.

CD&I and CDD Organization Expeditionary Force 21 MEB CONOPS Combat and Tactical Vehicle Strategy & ACV Video Seabasing and Non-Standard Platforms

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 BUDGET ESTIMATES

Statement of Admiral Vern Clark, U.S. Navy Chief of Naval Operations before the Senate Armed Services Committee Posture Statement 10 February 2005

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, 2006 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

20 mm PGU-28/B Replacement Combat Round 187 Acoustic Rapid Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Insertion for Sonar AN/BQQ-10 (V) (A-RCI) 97 Advanced

ADMIRAL VERN CLARK, U.S. NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE DEFENSE SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE POSTURE STATEMENT

R Z SEP 17 FM CMC CDI MEXWID WASHINGTON DC TO RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM G FOUR RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM G THREE G FIVE G SEVEN

Industry Day RDML Mat Winter Commander, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division. 23 May 2012

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

Ready to Profit: Corporate Beneficiaries of Congressional Add-Ons to 1. the FY 2018 Pentagon Budget

ASN (RDA) Chief Engineer

Navy Aegis Cruiser and Destroyer Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 10

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF VICE ADMIRAL JOHN J. DONNELLY COMMANDER NAVAL SUBMARINE FORCES

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 BUDGET ESTIMATES

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No June 27, 2001 THE ARMY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2002

TITLE III PROCUREMENT

The Ship Acquisition Process: Status and Opportunities. NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference 24 October 07

The World Military Market for Connectors

US Navy Ships. Surface Warfare Officer First Tours

Impact of the War on Terrorism on the USAF

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

I n d e x o f P r o g r a m s

CRS Report for Congress

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL MICHAEL G. MULLEN CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES SUB COMMITTEE ON SEAPOWER 03 MAY 2007

OPNAVINST F N4 5 Jun 2012

Amphibious Landings in the 21 st Century

Gun and Missile Systems An Integrated Warfare Perspective

Navy & Marine Corps Vertical Lift: Past and Future

Fighter/ Attack Inventory

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. An Analysis of the Navy s Fiscal Year 2017 Shipbuilding Plan

CREDIBLE COMBAT POWER

WikiLeaks Document Release

STATEMENT OF ADMIRAL WILLIAM F. MORAN U.S. NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATE OF THE MILITARY

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

NDIA 10 th Annual Expeditionary Warfare Conference: Ship Acquisition. Presented by RADM Charles Hamilton 26 October 2005

OPNAVINST L N96 30 Mar Subj: REQUIREMENTS FOR AIR CAPABLE AND AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIPS TO OPERATE AIRCRAFT

Navy Aegis Cruiser and Destroyer Modernization: Background and Issues for Congress

STATEMENT OF REAR ADMIRAL MARK A. HUGEL, U.S. NAVY DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FLEET READINESS DIVISION BEFORE THE

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: September 30, 2002 INDEX. SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 4

Innovations in elearning Symposium. Integrating Engineering and the SEA Warrior Process. Greg Maxwell NAVSEA 03 7 JUNE 2005

STATEMENT OF MR. JOHN J. YOUNG, JR. ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY (RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ACQUISITION) AND

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements. Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited.

Agenda. DoD as an Energy Consumer. Defense Energy Challenges. Adapting to a New Environment. DoD Operational Energy Strategy. Current Initiatives

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

United States Senate Committee on Armed Services Washington, DC 20510

Freedom Variant (LCS 1) Littoral Combat Ship Launch and Handling System Lessons Learned November 2012

Expeditionary Force 21 Attributes

Small Business Contributions to the Transformational Goals of the U.S. Military

The Western UAS Symposium

Highlights of the Department of the Navy FY 2013 Budget Table of Contents

CRS Report for Congress

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT (SAR) SUMMARY TABLES. As of Date: December 31, SAR Narrative Highlights 1. Program Acquisition Cost 9

Navy Trident Submarine Conversion (SSGN) Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress

TODAY S NAVY UNCLASSIFIED 1

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

Aircraft Procurement Plan Fiscal Years (FY) Submitted with the FY 2012 Budget

Unmanned Systems. Northrop Grumman Today Annual Conference

Transcription:

Department of the Navy FY 26/FY 27 President s Budget Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow 4 February 25 1 1

Our budget resources are aligned to support both present responsibilities and future capabilities. Winning Today Transforming to Win Tomorrow Shaping Our 21 st Century Manpower Changing the Way We Fight Improving Infrastructure & Business Practices 2 2

We are postured in the world to win today. Navy 9 ships deployed (31% of total) 141 ships underway (49% of total) 3,373 activated reserves 37,183 active strength 15 Navy ships delivered more than 5 million pounds of relief supplies and equipment to tsunami relief efforts Navy-Marine Corps Team Forward deployed and ready Marine Corps First Marine Expeditionary Force (I MEF) preparing to redeploy III MEF forward deployed WESTPAC heavily involved in tsunami relief efforts II MEF beginning to deploy 13,138 activated reserves 177,894 active strength 3 (data as of 1 Feb 5) 3

We are transforming at home to win tomorrow. 18 16 FY 3* FY 4* FY 5* FY 6 FY 7 FY 8 FY 9 FY 1 FY 11 $11.7 $115.6 $119.2 $125.6 $129. $134.6 $143.3 $147.5 $153.3 $B 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 $13 $6 $3 $65 $67 $7 $58 $52 $54 $44 $47 $49 $34 $34 $34 $36 $37 $37 $38 $38 $39 $33 $35 $37 $38 $38 $4 $41 $43 $44 FY3 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 FY1 FY11 MilPers O&M Investment GWOT Supp/Transfers *Totals do not include supplemental costs. 4 4

Transformation relies on a phased investment strategy. $ in Billions 44 42 4 Replace Shipbuilding aging, less- 38 36 resources capable platforms are little 34 32 3 changed in FY 26 28 26 24 22 Enabling R&D 2 18 CG(X) 16 14 Aircraft 12 Procurement DD(X) SSN 1 DDG-51 8 MPF(F) CVN T-AOE(X) 6 4 T-AKE LHA (R) LPD-17 2 RCOH LCS SSGN RCOH FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 FY1 FY11 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 FY1 FY11 5 5

The FY 26 budget is up in every appropriation category, compared to FY 25. Pay Raise Separation/Special Pays Housing Allowance Overseas Allowances/SIK Subsistence Allowance Reduced strength MilPers +$1.1B Navy Strength 365,9 to 352,7 Marine Corps 175, Baseline O&M +$2.1B Readiness +$776M Base Support +634M Servicewide Communications +222M NWCF Transfer +15M Weapons Support +81M Combat Readiness Surge Capable +$59M +$511M +$244M +$77M +$68M -$44M $ FY5: 119.2 FY6: 125.6 +6.4B* MILCON* Family Housing* BRAC MILCON +$.1B FH PPV/BAH *FY5 Budget Authority (w/o Supp) to FY6 President s Budget Procurement +$1.9B +23 Aircraft MH-6S EA-18G KC-13J MV-22 MH-6R UH-1Y/AH-1Z -3 DDG-51-1 T-AKE +1 CVN Refueling Overhaul DD(X) Advanced Procurement CG Modernization MPS Buyout Trident II HIMARS -$17M -$1M +$143M *Excludes new program financed with prior balances Transforming Investment R&D +$1.3B MMA VXX JSF Helo Dev LCS +$474M +$385M +$248M +$17M +$123M 6 6

With the FY 26 budget, ship force structure is back on the rise. FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY5 to FY6 Aircraft Carriers 12 11 11 - Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarines 14 14 14 - Guided Mis s ile (SSGN) Submarines 4 4 4 - Surface Combatants 13 99 12 +3 Nuclear Attack Submarines 54 55 54-1 Amphibious Warfare Ships 35 35 35 - Combat Logistics Ships 34 32 34 +2 Mine Warfare Ships 17 17 17 - Support Ships 19 18 18 - Total 292 285 289 +4 FY 27 FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 293 297 32 32 35 Transitioning to a More Capable Force Battle force count reaches low in FY5 New platforms feature tremendous capability increase over legacy ships Deployment/surge practices produce greater availability from ship force structure Inacts/Deliveries in FY6: -1 CG +4 DDG-51-1 SSN +3 T-AKE -1 LHA -1 AOE +2 LPD-17-1 LPD 7 7

We are fielding an aircraft force structure that is more capable and efficient. Primary Authorized Aircraft FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY5 to FY6 Active Navy and Marine Forces 2,466 2,44 2,351-53 Reserve Navy and Marine Forces 397 382 358-24 Total 2,863 2,786 2,79-77 FY 27 FY 28 FY 29 FY 21 FY 211 2,641 2,629 2,643 2,659 2,679 Transitioning to a More Capable Force F/A-18 E/F: 4% increase in combat radius, 5% increase in endurance, 25% greater weapons payload, and 5 times more survivable than F/A-18C Helos: Converging to 2 highly common Navy platforms V-22: 2 times the speed, 3 times the payload, and 6 times the range compared to the CH-46E MMA: 25% higher availability rate, 3% faster, and 33% higher altitude capability than the P-3 Retirements/Deliveries in FY6: -43 F-14 B/D -22 S-3B -3 SH-6-3 MH-53E -16 UH-3H -5 HH-1N -3 HH-46D -3 CH-46E -6 KC-13RF -2 DC-9-31 P-3C -17 Trainer/Utility +24 F/A-18E/F +16 MH-6 +15 MV-22B +5 KC-13J +2 C-37A (Future MMA) +15 Trainer/Utility 8 8

To win today, the budget must sustain robust readiness funding. Ship Operations Flying Hour Operations Marine Corps Operations 3,5 3, 2,5 2, $M 1,5 1, 5 172 2,652 5 2,66 3,62 3,182 5, 4, 3, $M 2, 1, 241 4,684 53 4,462 4,951 4,87 3, 2,5 2, $M 1,5 1, 5 977 1,526 1,658 1,285 1,17 1,295 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 Readiness Requirements Preserved Ship Depot Maintenance Aircraft Depot Maintenance Base Support 4,5 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 $M 2, 1,5 1, 5 76 514 4,3 4,91 3,799 3,529 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 1,4 1,2 1, 8 $M 6 4 2 66 17 1,246 1,55 1,14 1,115 8, 7, 6, 5, $M 4, 3, 2, 1, FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 Indicates Supplemental Funds Enacted Through 24 113 44 1,717 1,732 2,117 2,222 4,444 4,686 4,935 4,898 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 Navy Marine Corps9 9

People are our number one readiness enabler. 2, 177,48 175, 175, 175, 15, E/S 1, 5, 39,658 39,6 39,6 39,6 Marine Corps Military Personnel Strength FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 Increase warfighting units Military to civilian conversions Strong retention and effective recruiting BAH/PPV transition 3.1% basic pay raise Active Reserve Additional strength, as authorized for FY5, will be funded through supplemental requests as necessary 1 1

Navy manpower levels change with the times, shaping a new force. 385, 38, 375, 37, 365, 36, 355, 35, 345, 34, 88, 86, 84, 82, 8, 78, 76, 74, 72, 7, 375,7 FY3 382,235 82,558 373,197 Reserve Personnel 83,4 8,462 365,9 Expected Strength 73,1 371,6 71,2 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 FY 27 Active PB4 37,4 Transforming the Force 352,7 PB6 371,1 Improved training + development processes Increased technology 345,3 369,6 37,1 Decommission older manpower intensive platforms 36,6 PB5 More efficient infrastructure manning Active/Reserve integration Human capital strategy 345,3 357,4 345,3 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 Properly Priced and Sized for the Future 11 11

R&D resources surge in FY 26, as several critical programs peak. $B 18 15 12 9 6 3 $14.8B 2.2 1. $16.9B 2.3.7 $18.1B 1.8.8 $17.4B 1.8.8 15.5 13.9 14.8 11.6 FY 4 FY 5 FY 6 FY 7 Development Management Science and Technology Critical Aviation Programs Major Systems: ($M) FY 4 FY 5 FY 6 FY 7 Joint Strike Fighter 2,82 2,145 2,393 2,287 MMA 67 49 964 1,138 VXX 19 551 936 561 Advanced Hawkeye 328 591 63 558 EA-18G 24 354 49 372 V-22 357 263 26 266 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 183 169 13 15 F/A-18 164 128 89 21 DD(X) 1,15 1,164 1,92 853 LCS 158 453 576 299 Virginia Class SSN 141 171 156 139 C4I 746 871 1,67 1,283 EFV 232 243 254 187 Critical Shipbuilding Programs 12 12

A sustained increase in production is essential to Naval Aviation. Aircraft FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 FY1 FY11 FY6-11 JSF - - 2 16 1 4 32 36 33 111 F/A-18E/F 42 38 3 24 2 22 14 148 EA-18G - 4 12 18 22 2 14 9 MV-22 8 15 9 29 14 3 19 33 3 35 38 145 AH-1Z/UH-1Y 9 7 12 1 19 18 21 21 22 23 115 MH-6S 15 26 3 26 3 26 4 26 17 15 136 MH-6R 8 6 15 12 21 25 31 25 31 3 3 31 153 E-2C 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 2 CH-53X - - - 3 5 2 2 4 MMA - - - 4 8 6 8 18 ACS - - 1 2 1 2 1 4 5 12 C-4 1 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 6 C-35 2 - - - - - - - C-37 1 2 - - - 2-1 1 T-45 8 1 5 6 12 - - - - 18 T-48 1 3 3 7 - - - - JPATS 2-24 48 48 48 48 216 KC-13J 4 4 12 4 4 5 - - 12 V-XX 5 3 5 3 4 3 4 3 4 19 BAMS UAV - - 2 4 4-4 4 VTUAV 2 3 3 3 9 5 18 7 11 11 4 MC VUAV - 2 1 2 3 - - 8 F-5E 9 9 5 - - - - 14 TOTAL 115 138 174 212 249 261 256 1,29 Funded in RDTEN 13 13

This is a pivotal year, from legacy to next generation shipbuilding. Ships FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 FY1 FY11 FY6-11 CVN 21 - - 1 1 - - - 1 SSN 774 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 DDG 51 3 - - - - - - - DD(X) 1-2 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 5 CG(X) - - - - - - 1 1 LCS 1 2 1 1 2 3 6 5 5 5 21 LPD 17 1 1 1 1 1 - - 2 LHA(R) - - 1 1-1 - 2 T-AKE 2 2 1 1 1 - - - 3 T-AOE(X) - - - - 2 1 1 2 4 MPF(F) - - 1-3 1 1 2 4 New Construction 8 4 7 7 9 1 12 49 Intratheater Connectors - - - - 1 1 1 3 Sea-Shore Connectors - - - - - 1 4 5 SSBN ERO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 SSN ERO - - 3 1 1 - - - 2 RCOH - 1 - - - 1-2 Funded in RDTEN 14 14

Effective munitions must be agile, precise, and joint, for more lethality. FY 5 FY 6 FY 7 FY 8 FY 9 FY 1 FY 11 Precision Guided TACTOM 298 379 372 467 386 389 379 JSOW 45 42 4 453 496 494 52 JDAM 6,62 3,4 3,4 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5 LGBs 5,536 3,228 3,15 2,298 - - - Other Munitions Trident II 5 - - - 12 24 24 AMRAAM 46 11 15 14 15 15 15 AIM-9X 135 165 213 195 181 181 181 Standard Missile 75 75 75 75 9 1 15 RAM 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 ESSM 71 116 18 18 18 21-15 15

The Marine Corps will modernize already strong, existing capabilities and also pursue transformational systems for future conflicts. FY 5 FY 6 FY 7 FY 8 FY 9 FY 1 FY 11 EFV - - 15 17 26 42 18 HIMARS 1 15 19 - - - - Joint LW 155 18 77 35 42 - - - Unit Ops Ctr 2 - - - - - - HMMWV 1,83 1,31 1,415 1,235 1,45 1,275 1,235 ABV 2 2 8 - - - - USMC 21st Century Warfighting Systems 16 16

# of Homes (End of Year) Effectiveness begins ashore and demands prudent investment in tomorrow s infrastructure. Family Housing Meets DoD goal of zero inadequate FH units by FY 27 through 3 pronged approach: privatization, basic housing allowance, and construction Privatization a key element to improving housing 9, 75, 6, 45, 3, 15, FY3 FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7 Navy Owned Privatized USMC Inadequate USMC Owned Navy Inadequate $ M illions 2, 1,5 1, 5 FY5 (Enact) Military Construction FY6 FY7 FY8 FY9 FY1 FY1 FY11 Navy Maximizes MILCON recapitalization efforts Finances critical and new mission facilities (Executive Helo, V-22, ABV, F/A-18, H-6 Series, MMA, SSGN, T-AKE, Pacific Warfighting Center, USMC armories) Enhances Anti-Terrorism and Force Protection for our Sailors and Marines Eliminates inadequate barracks by FY 25/FY 27 (USMC/USN) Enhances Quality of Life/Service USMC 17 17

Business systems must transform to keep pace with the warfighter. Provide decision makers with the information they need when they need it Business Management Modernization Program (BMMP) DoD-wide Business Enterprise Architecture Framework to seek resolution of business interoperability issues Navy Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Program Key enabler to transform business processes and generate efficiencies First release is scheduled for FY 26 DON Financial Improvement Plan (DON FIP) Vehicle that will carry the Department toward clean financial statements Information Technology (IT) IT Portfolio Management Functional Area Management to optimally transform systems Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) 18 18

Naval Power 21 is an enduring vision for joint capabilities for the future. Assure Access - Sea Based Fight and Win Persistent and Decisive Transform to Improve Joint, Netted Committed to winning the fight today, while shaping the 21 st century manpower, 19 improving business practices, and changing the way we fight tomorrow. 19