IHS Jane's examines North Korean missile bases

Similar documents
Analysis: North Korea parades newest missiles

North Korea's Nuclear Programme and Ballistic Missile Capabilities: An Assessment

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

North Korean Nuclear and Missile Programs and Capabilities

Fact Sheet: North Korea Missile Activity in 2017

Iranian missile development defies restrictions

N Korea threatens 'physical response' to US-South Korea anti-missile system 8 hours ago From the section Asia Share

The Future of North Korean Nuclear Delivery Systems

An Overview of North Korea s Ballistic Missiles

Role and Modernization Trends of China s Second Artillery

The secret to North Korea s ICBM success

A/55/116. General Assembly. United Nations. General and complete disarmament: Missiles. Contents. Report of the Secretary-General

Technical parameters of the 9K720 Iskander (SS-26 Stone)

North Korea s Nuclear Futures: Technology and Strategy

Hit to kill: the US strategic missile defence system moves on from ICBM target intercept

Arms Control Today. U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance

Flashback to the Past: North Korea s New Extended-Range Scud

Setting Priorities for Nuclear Modernization. By Lawrence J. Korb and Adam Mount February

US-Russian Nuclear Disarmament: Current Record and Possible Further Steps 1. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov

Banning Ballistic Missiles? Missile Control for a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World

MATCHING: Match the term with its description.

Towards a European Non-Proliferation Strategy. May 23, 2003, Paris

INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY

Seeing Missile Defense as U.S. Hostility, North Korea Aims at More and Better Weapons By Naoko Aoki

THAAD and the Military Balance in Asia

Introduction to missiles

MANAGING NUCLEAR MISSILE COMPETITIONS BETWEEN INDIA, PAKISTAN AND CHINA

provocation of North Korea

Italy s Nuclear Anniversary: Fake Reassurance For a King s Ransom

V. Chinese nuclear forces

United States Air Force and Military Aircraft

VII. Pakistani nuclear forces

mm*. «Stag GAO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE Information on Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and Other Theater Missile Defense Systems 1150%

Issue 16-04B (No. 707) March 22, THAAD 2. CHINA S CORE KOREA POLICY 3. UN SANCTIONS WHICH ONE NEXT? 5.

THE NUCLEAR WORLD IN THE EARLY 21 ST CENTURY

Gulf shield: Missile threats and defence in the GCC

MEMORANDUM. BASE OPS/ International Spy Museum. Operation Minute by Minute. 01 October, 1962 (time travel skills required)

Russia s New Conventional Capability

Piecing together the puzzle: North Korea country briefing

Why Japan Should Support No First Use

100th Missile Defense Brigade (GMD)

North Korea s failed attempt to launch a satellite from its Unha-3 space rocket on

U.S. Nuclear Policy and World Nuclear Situation

AMERICA S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION AS OF: AUGUST

Steven Pifer on the China-U.S.-Russia Triangle and Strategy on Nuclear Arms Control

Section 2 Korean Peninsula

Nuclear Forces: Restore the Primacy of Deterrence

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council

Introduction. General Bernard W. Rogers, Follow-On Forces Attack: Myths lnd Realities, NATO Review, No. 6, December 1984, pp. 1-9.

This Protocol is organized into ten Parts.

Nuclear Disarmament Weapons Stockpiles

A/56/136. General Assembly. United Nations. Missiles. Contents. Report of the Secretary-General

China s Missile Buildup

NATO s Ballistic Missile Defense Plans a game changer? February 22, 2011

Analysis of Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Bill: HR Differences Between House and Senate NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

Missile Defense Agency Advanced Research Overview Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

ARMY TACTICAL MISSILE SYSTEM (ATACMS) BLOCK II

A technically-informed roadmap for North Korea s denuclearization

Northrop Grumman s Enduring Role in the ICBM System

Copyright INEGMA 2009

CRS Report for Congress

Ladies and gentlemen, it is a pleasure to once again six years for me now to

GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS)

GREAT DECISIONS WEEK 8 NUCLEAR SECURITY

Doc 01. MDA Discrimination JSR August 3, JASON The MITRE Corporation 7515 Colshire Drive McLean, VA (703)

Keywords. Guided missiles, Classification of guided missiles, Subsystems of guided missiles

Soviet Noncompliance With Arms Control Agreements

Trump review leans toward proposing mini-nuke

The United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, hereinafter referred to as the Parties,

NATO's Nuclear Forces in the New Security Environment

SALT I TEXT. The United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, hereinafter referred to as the Parties,

Unclassified Summary of a National Intelligence Estimate. Foreign Missile Developments and the Ballistic Missile Threat Through 2015

Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions

LAB4-W12: Nation Under Attack: Live Cyber- Exercise

Jane's Defence Weekly. Rearming Russia. [Content preview Subscribe to IHS Jane s Defence Weekly for full article]

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

SEA-BASED MISSILE DEFENSE EXPANDING THE OPTIONS A JOINT STUDY BY THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS AND THE LEXINGTON INSTITUTE

CHINA S ADVANCED WEAPONS

This report was prepared by the National Air and Space Intelligence Center with significant contributions from the Defense Intelligence Agency

Missile Defense: Time to Go Big

Science, Technology, and Attack Tactics Relevant to National Missile Defense Systems

Global Missile Launch Surveillance for Increasing Nuclear Stability*

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

Military Radar Applications

Policy Responses to Nuclear Threats: Nuclear Posturing After the Cold War

18. WARHEADS AND GUIDANCE SYSTEMS

New Artillery Sunday Punch

Section 6. South Asia

Question of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and of weapons of mass destruction MUNISH 11

Proliferation in the Axis of Evil :

Report to Congress. Theater Missile Defense. Architecture Options. for the Asia-Pacific Region

Application of Safeguards in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

French response to air and ballistic missile threats

Section 2. Korean Peninsula

European Parliament Nov 30, 2010

North Korea s development of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles poses a new level of threat

Ballistic and Cruise Missile Threat

Russian defense industrial complex s possibilities for development of advanced BMD weapon systems

The North Korean Military Threat in 2015: The Threat to the ROK- U.S. Alliance and Peninsula Unification

Transcription:

Jane's Intelligence Review [Content preview Subscribe to IHS Jane s Intelligence Review for full article] IHS Jane's examines North Korean missile bases The ongoing development of North Korea's missile capability has the potential to bring into question the US's commitment to its regional allies. In a detailed survey of satellite imagery over North Korea, Allison Puccioni assesses the current state of the threat. North Korea's ballistic missiles form an integral part of Pyongyang's strategic deterrent. The majority of its inventory is made up of shorter-range systems that span the country in three broad belts. Shorter-range systems are generally deployed closer to the Demilitarised Zone (DMZ) between North Korea and South Korea, with longer-range systems located in the strategic rear, closer to the border with China, to permit greater defence from South Korean and US forces. Although North Korea's missiles are too inaccurate for tactical use with conventional high-explosive warheads, they may still be suited to striking large targets such as cities in South Korea or Japan. Although this configuration strongly suggests that Pyongyang still perceives its main threat to stem from the South, North Korea has steadily increased the range of its missiles. Given that it can already target Japan and South Korea, the strongest driver behind this programme is likely to be its desire to reach the continental United States. In April 2012, the country paraded six apparent road-mobile long-range missiles. These were later identified as KN-08 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). Article 1 Page 1 of 12

Reported missile activity at identified military bases ( 2015 Google Earth/DigitalGlobe/IHS) 1630457 Show of force A KN-08 missile on a TEL at a military parade in Pyongyang on 15 April 2012. There is no evidence that the KN-08 is operational but North Korea continues to develop its ballistic missile programme. (PA) 1572441 Article 1 Page 2 of 12

Public displays of the KN-08 showed a new missile, approximately 18 m in length, 2 m in diameter at its widest point, on top of a 16-wheeled transporter-erector-launcher (TEL). The 2013 edition of the US National Air and Space Intelligence Center's (NASIC's) Ballistic and Cruise Missile Threat attributed it a range of more than 5,500 kilometres (km) and described the North Korean name as the Hwasong-13. However, the true status of the missile has repeatedly been called into question. In January 2014, for example, the Asan Institute for Policy Studies, a prominent South Korean think-tank, published a report casting doubt on whether the KN-08 was capable of breaching the 5,500-km threshold that would allow it to be classed as an ICBM, noting, "A parade always is a show of force, intended to transmit a message. It is also a perfect setting for spreading disinformation." Strategic depth North Korea's ballistic missile force is the largest missile force in the developing world. Pyongyang acquired the Scud-B missile from Egypt in the late 1970s/early 1980s, and reverse-engineered it to create the Hwasong-5. Further development led to the Hwasong-6 (Scud-C), and provided a capability to strike anywhere in South Korea. Other incremental improvements on the basic Scud are thought to include the Scud-D/ER and Scud-E. In addition, modified Soviet technology has enabled North Korea to develop longerrange systems such as the Musudan intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM), based on the R-27 (SS-N-6 'Serb'); the Nodong medium-range ballistic missile; the Taepodong 1 and 2 ICBMs; and the KN-08. North Korea's missiles have traditionally been deployed across the country in three broad belts - two close to the DMZ and the other in the strategic rear. After interviewing defence and intelligence officials and vetting media reports relating to missile bases, in 2009 IHS Jane's concluded that North Korea had approximately 22-28 operating bases. Telltale signature After comprehensively surveying satellite imagery over North Korean territory, IHS Jane's found bunkers indicative of mobile-missile activity at 16 bases throughout the country, and a pattern of visual signatures that indicate heavily concealed bunkered vehicle storage. Because bunkered facilities are difficult to build (especially in industrial resource-poor North Korea) and serve no purpose other than to store high-value vehicles or payloads with volatile material, these bunkers are the strongest indication of activities associated with mobile missiles. North Korea employs ballistic missiles largely through mobile missile launchers, which are parked in highly concealed, fortified bunkers. When deployed, the TEL vehicles, carrying a missile, exit the bunkers to a cleared area, launch the missile, and quickly retreat back into the bunkers before their location can be determined. Once inside, they can reload and repeat the process. These bases were built with concealment from outside forces and overhead surveillance in mind. Operational variations of this include various support systems and missile carriers exiting protective bunkers separately and converging at different pre-surveyed reload and launch sites in order to complicate Article 1 Page 3 of 12

enemy targeting. In addition to providing focal points for missile operators, pre-sighted sites also aid missile accuracy and, with a known start point, speed up the preparations for the missile's inertial navigation system. Detailed imagery from the Yongnim-up (Jonchon) facility. ( 2015 DigitalGlobe/IHS) 1518814 Bunker busting In 2013, North Korea released a propaganda video entitled Kim Jong Il's Efforts to Defend the Country, in which Kim Jong-Il was shown touring a KN-08 TEL support building (meaning the video was filmed before his death in December 2011). In the video, Kim stood next to an apparent KN-08 in a building with an unusual roofline. Using this media footage, in 2014 the US-based James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS) determined that the location of this KN-08-related building was one of two sites, both located at the Yongnim-up facility at Jonchon in the centre of North Korea. The CNS located 'Site A' at 40 38' 43.80" N, 126 25' 57.66" E, and 'Site B' at 40 36' 42.90" N, 126 25' 34.49" E. Both sites are drive-in facilities with a rooftop superstructure, or cupola, built into each roof to allow a missile TEL to be erected within. The interiors show a marked lack of missile or propellant handling features; combined with previous reporting indicating that the locations supported TEL development for the Nodong missile system, this leads IHS Jane's to assess that the two locations serve as fabrication plants for converting imported Chinese WS51200-series chassis into TELs for the KN-08. Although both buildings look like the interior shown in the video, Site B was determined to be the likelier match and this location is now widely accepted by the open-source intelligence community as supporting the KN-08 system. Article 1 Page 4 of 12

Digging deeper Further to the work conducted by the CNS, IHS Jane's has identified a sophisticated underground complex connected by a dedicated road to the KN-08-associated building Site B. This complex has imagery signatures similar to other mobile missile facilities in North Korea: it is built against a mountain with excavated entrances, ícounter-surveillance measures have been taken to obfuscate the location and entrances, and it is connected by a road to nearby military facilities. This bunker complex appeared to be under excavation and construction in 2004, and at least partially complete by 2011. The site itself is secured behind a gate with a ícheckpoint facility. Beyond the gate, two 8 m-wide paved ramps lead towards the mountain and into three apparent entrances into the facility. A small ventilation stack beyond the entrances suggests that the bunkers are connected. Furthermore, the ventilation stack suggests long-duration occupation or a requirement for controlled temperature or humidity. Such a feature could support the storage of missile components or combustible fuels. This bunker complex is connected by a hardened, dedicated road to a building identified by the CNS as being from the Kim Jong-Il video. Strategic goal Although North Korea has demonstrated its nuclear ambitions by withdrawing from the nuclear Non- Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and by conducting three nuclear tests, it remains unlikely that it has successfully developed the three components required for a strike capability. These are a reliable long-range missile, a nuclear weapon small enough to be mounted on the missile, and a workable exoatmospheric re-entry vehicle. The KN-08 is the only known North Korean road-mobile ICBM to date. In 2013 and 2014, IHS Jane's identified KN-08 first-stage motors undergoing testing at a rocket test stand adjacent to Sohae. However, the system has yet to be observed undergoing a true full-scale flight test, and therefore cannot conclusively be classified as operational. The 2013 NASIC report attributes a range of at least 5,500 km to the KN-08, but gives little other information. Although a range of 5,500 km would mean the missile was capable of hitting Alaska, the lack of an upper limit leaves open the potential for strikes in the rest of the US mainland. In April 2013, the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) concluded with "moderate confidence" that North Korea might be capable of developing a nuclear weapon small enough to fit on a ballistic missile, although it also cautioned that the reliability of the warhead would be "low". Outlook The bulk of North Korea's missile inventory is distributed throughout the country and is capable of striking regional targets, not just in South Korea. Despite this ability to strike targets within the region, North Korea's freedom of action is constrained by the continued presence of the US in Asia and its security assurances to regional allies. Although ICBMs alone are unlikely to effect change, combining North Korea's Article 1 Page 5 of 12

nuclear programme with its apparent long-range missile ambitions has the potential to disrupt the strategic calculus of the US and undermine the credibility of US assurances in the region. Building on the identification of the KN-08 facilities by the CNS, IHS Jane's assesses that the newly identified bunker system is a potential support location for North Korea's nascent ICBM programme. If confirmed, this would suggest that, despite ongoing doubts as to its status, the KN-08 system is being prepared for integration into the North Korean armed forces concurrently with its component testing programmes, allowing for swifter service adoption following test completion. Pyongyang is yet to demonstrate all the requisites for a nuclear strike, such as a miniaturised warhead design, a successful long-range missile, and a working re-entry vehicle. Given the absence of these conditions, the existence of the KN-08 should not be conflated with a nuclear strike capability. However, as General Curtis Scaparrotti, commander of US Forces Korea, said in October 2014, "I don't think as a commander we can afford the luxury of believing perhaps they haven't gotten there." A television news broadcast showing a North Korean missile launch, at Seoul train station, South Korea, on 26 June 2014. All of South Korea is within range of North Korean ballistic missiles. (PA) 1572438 Copyright IHS Global Limited, 2015 Article 1 Page 6 of 12

For the full version and more content: IHS Jane's Military & Security Assessments Intelligence Centre This analysis is taken from IHS Jane s Military & Security Assessments Intelligence Centre, which delivers comprehensive and reliable country risk and military capabilities information, analysis and daily insight. IHS country risk and military capabilities news and analysis is also available within IHS Jane s Intelligence Review. To learn more and to subscribe to IHS Jane s Intelligence Review online, offline or print visit http://magazines.ihs.com/ For advertising solutions contact the IHS Jane s Advertising team Article 1 Page 7 of 12