Combat Identification

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #32

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Air Defense System Solutions.

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER TACTICAL AIRCRAFT PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY GOALS. NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

F-35 Lightning II A New Generation of Fighter

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Electronic Warfare I 127

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

C4I System Solutions.

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

SECURE GLOBAL COMBAT AWARENESS

FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)

First Announcement/Call For Papers

Bottom Line Up Front

UNCLASSIFIED FY Quantity of RDT&E Articles

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

Accelerating Networked Sensors & Fires

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161

Patriot Missile Supervisory Control Study Luca F. Bertuccelli

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL

Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel

F-16 Fighting Falcon The Most Technologically Advanced 4th Generation Fighter in the World

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: C2ISR Tactical Data Link FY 2012 OCO

CHAPTER XV HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT

ISR Full Crew Mission Simulator. Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Capabilities for Airborne and Maritime Live Mission Training

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

Apache Fire Control LM MFC Supplier Summit TM

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

SSC Pacific is making its mark as

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Airspace Control in the Combat Zone

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Common Joint Tactical Information. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

Annual Automated ISR and Battle Management Symposium

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

STATEMENT J. MICHAEL GILMORE DIRECTOR, OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

NAVAIR Overview. 30 November 2016 NAVAIR. PRESENTED TO: Radford University. PRESENTED BY: David DeMauro / John Ross

AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

Naval Electronic Warfare Solutions Ensuring your mission success.

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST (Dollars in Millions) FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Cost to Complete

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment

Request for Solutions: Distributed Live Virtual Constructive (dlvc) Prototype

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 3 Page 1 of 15

The Verification for Mission Planning System

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Transcription:

C.04 Advanced Air and Surface Target Identification ATD C.05 Precision Targeting Identification ACTD C.07 Link 16 ACTD C.08 Advanced Combat Identification Capability C.09 Advanced Cooperative Air Target Identification (Mode 5) I 47

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES FOR JWSTP C.04 Advanced Air and Surface Target Identification ATD Objectives. Develop and demonstrate advanced, long-range, high-confidence air-to-air, surface-to-air, and air-to-surface target identification (ID) capabilities for use on current and next-generation aircraft. The joint USAF USN ATDs will leverage the investment already made in multiple S&T programs. The combat ID (CID) system resulting from this effort will incorporate multiple target recognition approaches and will result in a composite, high-confidence target ID estimate. Payoffs. Positive hostile ID is required for weapons employment. The USAF Enhanced Recognition and Sensing LADAR (ERASER) ATD is aimed at improving the airborne identification process for air and ground targets through the use of active laser technologies. Efforts for this program will concentrate on integrating ERASER laser and signal processing technology into a testbed aircraft for flight demonstration. ERASER-supplied target ID will complement other sources of ID from the warfighter s total ID suite. ERASER will incorporate 2D laser imaging technology and CID algorithms developed for ground target ID. The USAF will also improve the air-to-ground radar imaging (AGRI) tactical radar ID capability using both synthetic aperature and high-range-resolution techniques. The Navy intends to develop a composite CID capability that draws on several sources of target information (cooperative and noncooperative). In addition to the ERASER and AGRI approaches being pursued by the Air Force, there are related automatic target recognition (ATR) programs for other sensor modes (both passive and active) that are being investigated; in particular alternative synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) ATR, specific emitter identification, precision electronic support measure, and solid-state laser vibration sensing. The USN Noncooperative Air Target Identification program will demonstrate a Doppler-based imaging process to provide air target class estimates. The USN Littoral Surveillance/Moving Target Recognition program will provide a demonstration of imaging small craft. The USN Laser CID project uses laser vibrometry, high-range-resolution 1D profiling, 2D silhouette extraction, and techniques relying on unique target reflectivity characteristics when illuminated by optimized laser sources. Exit criteria for surface target ID under this DTO are declaration probability of 85% and identification confidence probability of 98%. Challenges. Challenges include technical issues such as data latency, all-weather performance, eye-safe laser development, tracking in radar clutter, and database development. FY2000: Airborne test of ERASER; flight demonstrate ERASER technology at militarily significant ranges. AGRI airborne data collection (SAR mode). Tower test ERASER. FY2001: AGRI algorithm test and demonstration (SAR mode); eyesafe ERASER flight demonstration at militarily significant ranges. FY2003: AGRI airborne data collection; complete USN Littoral Surveillance/Moving Target Recognition program. MAJ John DUNHAM, USA ACC/DRA Mr. William MICELI ONR Mr. William MOORE AFRL/SN Mr. Iftikhar JAMIL ODDR&E/AT I 48

C.04 S&T Funding ($ millions) 0602232N 00000 5.0 5.0 3.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0603203F 665A 1.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DTO Total 6.2 5.5 3.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 I 49

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES FOR JWSTP C.05 Precision Targeting Identification ACTD Objectives. Demonstrate the standoff aspect in variant classification of aircraft and surface targets with a low probability of intercept. Precision targeting identification (PTI) combines an advanced thirdgeneration infrared sensor together with a C 4 I sensor fusion package and a target tracking and identifying laser radar (LADAR). The LADAR performs target ID by exploiting the return signal that contains the targets vibration spectrum (micro-doppler signature). Payoffs. The PTI ACTD will evaluate the potential to improve military capabilities to address critical military needs in three warfare mission areas: (1) joint surveillance/intelligence (positive ID of noncooperative air targets), (2) joint electronic warfare (over-the-horizon targeting (OTH T)), and (3) battle damage assessment (BDA). Specific payoffs include (1) sensor technology packaging that can meet the needs of various transition sponsors (i.e., fighter/strike aircraft, ground combat vehicles, patrol/surveillance aircraft, and ships), (2) combat ID and precise tracking of small aircraft and ships at extended ranges, (3) real-time sensor-to-shooter updates for OTH T and BDA, and (4) low probability of counterdetection. Challenges. Technical objectives to be accomplished include the integrated C 4 I sensor fusion package, stable laser transmitter, in-flight vibration compensation for LADAR, producibility of a low-cost common module LADAR unit for transition, and classification of aircraft and surface targets. FY2000: Achieve unit cost of less than $500,000 (targeting $370,000/unit for 270 units); improve aircraft vibration compensation to 2.0-g level. FY2001: Classify airborne and surface targets; initiate operational database collection and upgrade target database; integrate fighter-based LADAR with UK Tornado aircraft; complete PTI evaluation program. FY2002: Conduct fighter-based LADAR evaluation; conduct air-to-ground target detection/classification evaluation; complete operational data collection; complete military utility assessment and final report. FY2003: Prototype pre-production LADAR system integration design with fighter aircraft; conduct interim capability support. CAPT Michael MATHIS, USN NAVSEA, PEO/TAD Mr. Terry MCGEE JIATFE Mr. Chyau N. SHEN NAWCAD Lt Col Marty MEYER, USAF DUSD/AS&C C.05 S&T Funding ($ millions) 0603750D P523 3.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DTO Total 3.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 50

C.05 Non-S&T Funding ($ millions) 0604221N 0000 2.4 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 MOD/UK 0000 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DTO Total 2.7 1.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 I 51

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES FOR JWSTP C.07 Link 16 ACTD Objectives. Provide interoperability between the Link 16 and joint variable message format (VMF) networks. The ACTD will provide situational awareness between the networks and digital communications connectivity for air-to-ground and maritime-to-ground attack missions. (Air and maritime operations are migrating to Link 16, while ground operations are migrating to joint VMF.) Payoffs. Disparate datalink message formats and communications media have resulted in untimely, incorrect, or incomplete delivery of crucial battlespace information due to the use of translators/gateways to make these systems communicate with one another. Currently, it is difficult to establish seamless information flow among diverse datalink units. A major goal of this ACTD is to begin standardizing C 4 I messaging and data elements used to provide a seamless, flexible datalink environment. The objective is to demonstrate a joint integrated capability to pass tactical information seamlessly across Link 16 and joint VMF networks. This ACTD will be demonstrated by the military services and, potentially, some of our NATO allies. It also resulted in operational demonstrations at the Joint Interoperability Test Center (JITC) January February 99, using (in large part) simulated message exchange, and an operational demonstration at the ASCIET 99 Exercise. The system was deployed to Northern Italy in support of Operation Allied Force in June 1999. Challenges. The barriers include platform integration of specific, standardized C 4 I messaging and data elements for messages crossing the air-to-ground and maritime-to-ground seams. Since work has been underway for several years to do waveform/frequency conversion, the technology is maturing and should be easily incorporated into this effort. FY2000: Demonstrate the first step of the Rosetta translating and forwarding technology in the Tactical Air and Missile Defense Interoperability (TAMDI) ACTD at the ASCIET 2000 exercise. FY2001: Conclude interim capability support. Maj James ASHWORTH, USAF SAF/AQII Maj Vernon FREDERICK, USMC AC/SC 4 I CDR Bill MOSK, USN USACOM/J611 Mr. Ed ROBINSON CECOM Mr. Steven DERGANC PEO/SCS Lt Col Marty MEYER, USAF DUSD/AS&C C.07 S&T Funding ($ millions) 0603750D P523 1.3 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DTO Total 1.3 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 52

C.08 Advanced Combat Identification Capability Objectives. Advance the combat identification (CID) materiel capabilities by building upon the S&Tderived CID architecture developed in the Joint CID ACTD. The emphasis of this DTO is on mission pairings that were not fully explored in the Joint CID ACTD. The objective is to develop solutions, verify technical performance, and quantify the combat effectiveness improvements resulting from a comprehensive rotary-wing-to-ground and ground-to-ground target identification (TI) and situational awareness (SA) technically acceptable solution to mission area needs. Payoffs. This effort will extend the CID architecture developed during the Joint CID ACTD to include additional mission areas. The effort will develop and evaluate solutions for ground-vehicle-to-soldier ID, ID capability for fire support teams, and ID concepts for the Apache Longbow. These solutions will provide militarily acceptable probability of ID within the target acquisition range and timelines for the respective mission areas. Challenges. Concerns include ensuring interoperability across the battlespace while minimizing the exploitability of signatures, impact to firing sequences, required action by crews, impacts to data latency/accuracy, and production cost of solutions. FY2000: Demonstrate integration of Combat Identification for Dismounted Soldiers (CIDDS) functionality with the Battlefield Combat Identification System to provide vehicle-to-soldier ID capabilities; and demonstrate an automated SINCGARS-based ID capability for fire support teams. FY2001: Demonstrate an integrated TI and SA capability for ground-vehicle-to-ground-vehicle ID. Demonstrate a proof of concept of ID capabilities for Apache Longbow. Evaluate the different CID architectures as a function of performance (operational), cost, maturity, and interoperability. Mr. Chris KEARNS USAIC Mr. Gerardo J. MELENDEZ SFAE/IEW/CI Mr. Rob SAUNDERS SARD/TT C.08 S&T Funding ($ millions) 0602120A H15 3.3 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DTO Total 3.3 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 53

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY OBJECTIVES FOR JWSTP C.09 Advanced Cooperative Air Target Identification (Mode 5) Objectives. Develop and demonstrate an advanced cooperative air target identification (ID) capability that can overcome the deficiencies of current cooperative identification technology and satisfy the friendly platform identification needs for air-to-air and surface-to-air engagements. This Navy effort will leverage existing military, air traffic control, and commercial off-the-shelf technologies to provide affordable, secure, and reliable identification of air targets in a joint or coalition environment. Payoffs. The technology demonstration will provide the warfighter with an integrated air-to-air and surface-to-air capability to enhance combat effectiveness and reduce fratricide. The USN Mark XIIA Mode 5 Cooperative Identification System technology demonstration is aimed at improving the identification process for airborne targets over the current antiquated Mark XII Mode 4 System. The Mode 5 design addresses virtually all of the Mark XII deficiencies including a significant reduction in exploitation, deception, and operator workload while providing increased jamming resistance and data security. In addition, Mode 5 provides an increased probability of identification by providing a 7-dB processing gain and correlation improvements. Efforts for this program will concentrate on integrating the system into testbed aircraft for flight demonstration. Mode 5 friend identification will correct deficiencies in the current friend ID system and will compliment other sources of ID from the warfighter's total ID suite. Mode 5 will incorporate a new secure waveform and cryptographic computer into a highconfidence cooperative ID capability. The Mode 5 system will demonstrate a 50% improvement in surface cooperative ID systems' usable range coverage and will demonstrate the capability to overcome current deficiencies in identifying multiple friendly and closely spaced maneuvering aircraft. Challenges. Technical issues include final design and production of a prototype cryptographic computer capable of supporting the current Mark XII Mode 4 algorithm and the new Mark XIIA Mode 5 algorithm. A crypto working group led by the National Security Agency (NSA) has developed the Mode 5 algorithm. A five-nation working group (the U.K., Germany, France, Italy, and the U.S.) developed the Mode 5 waveform over the past several years. This group documented the waveform in a draft NATO Standardization Agreement 4193 Parts V and VI that is currently in the ratification process. The waveform was designed to be compatible with current technology and should be easily incorporated through modification of existing ID Friend or Foe (IFF) equipment. FY2000: Demonstrate superior performance of the Mode 5 waveform using brassboard equipment in a limited U.S. and Allied flight demonstration. Demonstrate the ability of Mode 5 to identify friendly airborne targets flying in close formation with zero range or azimuth separation. Demonstrate 50% improvement of surface cooperative ID systems' range/coverage performance in multipath conditions. FY2001: Deliver and integrate one surface interrogator, one airborne interrogator, five airborne transponders, and associated prototype cryptographic equipment. FY2002: Demonstrate capability of identifying five friendly aircraft flying in close formation/crossing patterns. Demonstrate the ability of Mode 5 to identify friendly aircraft with 50% reduction from the Mode 4 the interrogation rate. Demonstrate up to 50% improvement of surface cooperative ID systems' range performance in multipath conditions. Demonstrate operator workload reduction. Demonstrate the benefits of increased data transfer capability within Mode 5 by allowing operators to obtain Mark XII data within the Mode 5 reply. Demonstrate time-authenticated automatic update and rollover of the cryptographic algorithm. Integrate prototype equipment into testbed aircraft and one surface combatant; conduct flight demonstration concurrent with planned All Services Combat Identification Evaluation Test. I 54

LCDR David WELCH, USN OPNAV, N42 Mr. Greg OWENS NAVAIR/PMA2133C CDR I. VELEZ, USN NAVAIR/PMA2133 Mr. Alan LAHOFF, USAF OASD (C 3 I) C.09 Non-S&T Funding ($ millions) 0604777N W1253 1.4 3.2 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 DTO Total 1.4 3.2 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 55