US Special Operations Command

Similar documents
Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

Testing in a Joint Environment. Janet Garber Director Test and Evaluation Office Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

Joint Interoperability Certification

Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

UNCLASSIFIED. LandWarNet Army Request for IT (ARFIT) Information Exchange Forum (IEF)

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

Mr. James Hondo Geurts Deputy Director for Acquisition United States Special Operations Command

Technical Evaluation, Operational Evaluation, Lessons Learned in Small Arms Procurement

Report No. DoDIG June 13, Acquisition of the Navy Organic Airborne and Surface Influence Sweep Needs Improvement

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA4

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Future of Logistics Civil Augmentation Program

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 20 JULY 1994

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

ATEC Overview and the AEC Logistics Mission

Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Possible Business Opportunities Within The SOF Weapons Program

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Prepared for Milestone A Decision

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

Agenda. DoD as an Energy Consumer. Defense Energy Challenges. Adapting to a New Environment. DoD Operational Energy Strategy. Current Initiatives

Mission Based T&E Progress

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

of Trauma Assembly 28 th Page 1

US Special Operations Command

United States Special Operations Command. Science and Technology

This is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

U.S. Forces in Afghanistan

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Airborne Reconnaissance Advanced Development (ARAD)

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO

US Special Operations Command

Tactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm

2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective

Systems Engineering & LRASM

United States Special Operations Command

NON-MAJOR SYSTEMS OT&E

B. Program Change Summary: RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) FEBRUARY 2008 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

UNMANNED SYSTEMS T&E Challenges & Opportunities. Dr. James Streilein February 2008

FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)

Technical Data (an Output of Systems Engineering) in the Context of the LCMC

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

WARFIGHTER TRAINING ON MRTFB RANGES A SUCCESS STORY

Test and Evaluation and the ABCs: It s All about Speed

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

DOING BUSINESS WITH USSOCOM

R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE BB SOF PSYOP/D476. COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM (NAS)

Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Program Overview

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: DoD Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Program

U.S. ARMY MEDICAL SUPPORT

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

CONTEXT FOR ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS: WHY DO WE HAVE TO DO VE? WHO HAS AUTHORITY OVER VE? THE CUSTOMER WON T PAY FOR VE!

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Subj: THREAT SUPPORT TO THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

System Test and Evaluation Policy

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Managing a Special Forces Human Performance Program

United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Challenges & Opportunities

OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

Ms. Kelly Stratton-Feix Director SOF AT&L ACQUISITION AGILITY

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

2011 Ground Robotics Capability Conference. OSD Perspective

CJCSI B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Joint Automated Deep Operation Coordination System (JADOCS)

Integrating System Safety into Forward Deployed Theater Operations

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

STATEMENT OF GENERAL BRYAN D. BROWN, U.S. ARMY COMMANDER UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Title:F/A-18 - EA-18 Aircraft / System Program Protection Implementation Plan

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO

Transcription:

US Special Operations Command Operational Test & Evaluation Overview HQ USSOCOM LTC Kevin Vanyo 16 March 2011 The overall classification of this briefing is:

Agenda OT&E Authority Mission and Tenants Responsibilities Operationally Effective, Suitable, & Safe Documentation Environment T&E Implementation Examples Conclusion 2

Authority Concurrent with Title 10 USC Authority and Head of Agency responsibilities, USSOCOM ensures that the systems, products, and equipment fielded to Special Operations Forces (SOF) are operationally effective, suitable, and safe. These assurances are gained through the test and evaluation process. USSOCOM Directive 71-5, Operational Test and Evaluation 10 USC 139 3

Mission WHAT WE DO.. Ensure that USSOCOM Acquisition Program System Capabilities, Independently Evaluated, are Measured Against Validated Requirements Under Realistic Operational Conditions to Determine a System s Operational Effectiveness, Suitability and Survivability Prior to Fielding to Special Operations Forces 4

T&E Tenants L E X I B L E C C O U N T A B L E N D E P E N D E N T E S P O N S I B L E 5

T&E Tenants Flexibility Operational Test Agencies SOCOM ARMY NAVY AIR FORCE MARINE CORPS All Services: AFOTEC ATEC COMOPTEVFOR MCOTEA Army Test & Evaluation Command (ATEC) Commander, Operational Test & Evaluation Force (COMOPTEVFOR) Air Force Operational Test & Evaluation Center (AFOTEC) Marine Corps Test & Evaluation Activity (MCOTEA) JITC National Assessment Group (NAG) JITC JITC JITC COMOPTEFOR JITC USASOC Test & Evaluation Division (TED) 18 th Flight Test Squadron (AFSOC) MCPD, NAVSEA NAVAIR, SPAWAR, WARCOM UNLIKE MOST OF THE SERVICES, USSOCOM HAS MULTIPLE SOURCES FOR OT&E 6

Responsibilities Oversee OT&E for SOF Acquisition Programs Develop and Implement OT&E Policy via USSOCOM Directive 71-5 Assess and Determine system: Effectiveness Suitability Interoperability Safety With J4 and PEO, issue a System Production Certification (SPC) and/or Fielding and Deployment Release (F&DR) Review Requirement Documents for Relevancy and Testability Assist / Approve the Test Strategy in the Single Acquisition Management Plan or the Test and Evaluation Master Plan Coordinate w/ Program Manager in Selection of the Operational Test Agency Observe Critical Operational Test Activities Validate New Equipment Training (NET) Independent of SORDAC; Directly communicate with CDR USSOCOM 7

Operationally Effective The overall degree of mission accomplishment of a system when used by representative personnel in the environment planned or expected for operational employment of the system considering organization, doctrine, survivability, vulnerability and threat. SOCOM OT&E Focus Linked to Mission Accomplishment What Operational Capabilities are Critical to Mission Accomplishment Test Environment Adequate Meets Technical and Operational Performance Requirements 8

Operationally Suitable The degree to which a system can be satisfactorily placed in field use, with consideration given to availability, compatibility, transportability, interoperability, reliability, wartime usage rates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower, supportability, logistics supportability, documentation, and training requirements SOCOM OT&E Focus Linked to Mission Accomplishment What Operational Capabilities are Critical to Mission Accomplishment Test Environment Adequate Compatible With U.S./DOD/Service Processes and Facilities 9

Operationally Safe Identify Hazards and Eliminate or Mitigate those Hazards to an Acceptable Level Concurrently Satisfy the Technical Performance Parameters in CPD, CDD, or equivalent USSOCOM System Safety Risk Assessment Safety Certification Authorities Safe to Use, Handle, Transport, Store and Demilitarize 10

Documentation- F&DR Fielding and Deployment Release (F&DR) is the Final Documentation Required to Certify that a SOCOM System is Ready for Fielding: J4 Document (Logistics) Certification to the Milestone Decision Authority that all Issues Identified in SPC are Satisfied Addressing Primarily the Effectiveness, Suitability, Reliability, Safety. Can be a Combined SPC/F&DR Depending upon how System is Managed 11

SOCOM T&E Environment High Risk Environment Delayed Point of Knowledge Further delayed Point of Influence Medium Risk Environment Delayed but synchronized Point of Knowledge and Point of Influence Low Risk Environment: Integrated DT/OT Up-front/ Early Point of Knowledge and Point of Influence 12

Program Investment High Risk Environment Point of Knowledge CT DT OT Acquisition Timeline IER Point of Influence Just-in-Time OE/OS 13

Program Investment Medium Risk Environment Point of Knowledge CT DT OT Acquisition Timeline IER Point of Influence Just-in-Time OE/OS Plus Executability Insight 14

Program Investment Low Risk Environment- Integrated T&E Point of Knowledge CT DT OT Acquisition Timeline Point of Influence IER Earlier OE/OS Insight Plus Executability Insight Plus Affordability Insight 15

T&E Implementation Requirements JMA Assessments Programmers POM Statutory 10 USC 167, 2430, 137, 87 Regulatory OMB, DOD5000, CJCSI USSOCOM Implementation 70-1, 71-4, 71-5 SOFM SORDAC Requirements OT&E J4 PEO F & D R Warfighter Repeat 16

Example: MK 20 MOD 0 Sniper Support Rifle (SSR) 17

Example: MK 20 MOD 0 Sniper Support Rifle (SSR) Originally competed as SV in CAR Solicitation User Assessment (UA) Conducted at Camp Billy Machen, CA: 22-27 Feb 2009 9 Test Operators NSW, USASOC & MARSOC Developmental Test (DT) Conducted (Endurance) at FNMI, Columbia, SC: 8-11 Nov 2009 NSWC Crane Personnel Participated Operational Test & Evaluation (OT&E) Conducted at Camp Billy Machen, CA: 6-18 Dec 2009 10 Test Operators NSW, USASOC & MARSOC Achieved Joint Safety Approval on 1 June 2010 Achieved F&DR on 18 Aug 10 Note: Core Operators continued throughout this process 18

Example: SOF Tactical Combat Casualty Care Echelon of Care I+ Operator Kits Point of Wounding Mobility Set Rigid Flexible Litters & Litter Aids Casualty Collection Point Transport Set Adapt SO Land, Sea, & Air Platforms for CASEVAC Theater CASEVAC Pick Up Zone SOF Medic Medic Kits Extraction Set Locate & Gain Access to Casualty Unit Medical Officer Definitive Care Capabilities Echelon 1 Plus Care TCCC SOF Trauma Mgmt Set Extraction Locate & Gain Access Mobility Litters & Aids Sustainment Stabilization Transport Land, Sea, Air * Water & Night * High Angle * Pry & Cut * Transport * Various Vehicles * Vitals * Cardiac * Inspired Oxy * Blood/Fluid * Hypothermia *Secure Equipment * Blood Loss *Advanced Airway

Example: SOF Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) PMO involved with early, during establishment of Acquisition Program Baseline, to ensure OT adequately included in plan test input reflected in Section M of Contract Solicitation Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) conducted 7-18 Jun 2010 9 members with user reps from: NSW, AFSOC, MARSOC & USASOC Developmental Testing (DT) Received DTC Safety Release ISO Operational Testing: Nov 2010 USAARL: Air Worthiness and environmental (ongoing) USAAMA: Medical Sustainability (ongoing) Operational Test & Evaluation (OT&E) Conducted product demonstration Phase 1: Fort Carson, CO - Jan/ Feb 11 15 Test Operators: NSW, AFSOC, MARSOC & USASOC Conduct product demonstration Phase 2: Crawfordsville, AR Mar/ Apr 11 16 Test Operators: NSW, AFSOC, MARSOC & USASOC 20

Conclusion- USSOCOM Acquisition Challenges Diversity of Platforms, Users, Systems, Operating Environments, and Program Management Structures Mandate to Rapidly Respond to Emergent Warfighter Requirements 80% Solutions Take Risk and Manage It Many SOCOM Systems Installed in Platforms Owned and Developed by Others (Services, MILDEPS) Contractor-off-the-shelf / Non-developmental Items 21

Our Reason for Being Questions? 22