CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Similar documents
CMS Meaningful Use Stage 3 NPRM Elizabeth Holland Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

EHR/Meaningful Use

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use Stage 2

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

during the EHR reporting period.

Meaningful Use. UERMMMC Medical Alumni Association Meeting July 17, David Nilasena, M.D., Chief Medical Officer CMS Region VI

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only.

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Meaningful Use and How it Relates to the Quality Payment Program. Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

Proposed Rules for Meaningful Use 1, 2 and 3. Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS CMIO Stratis Health

Game Plan. Meaningful Use Where are We? So is Anyone Registering? So, are EPs getting any money? $31,968,176,183

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Final Meaningful Use Stage 3 Requirements Released August 2018

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. Shay Surowiak, RN, BSN, CHTS-CP HIT Practice Advisor

Alaska Medicaid Program

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

= AUDIO. Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ 9/23/2015. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016

Eligible Professionals. How can the West Virginia Health Information Network (WVHIN) assist you in meeting Meaningful Use requirements?

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Re: CMS Code 3310-P. May 29, 2015

Medicaid Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use. Lisa Reuland, Program Manager October 15, 2015

MEANINGFUL USE FOR THE OB/GYN. Steven L. Zielke, MD 6/13/2014

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014

The History of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

Part 3: NCQA PCMH 2014 Standards

Meaningful Use: Introduction to Meaningful Use Eligible Providers

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Legal Issues in Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Programss

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

Transcription:

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015 Elisabeth Myers Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Disclaimer» CMS must protect the rulemaking process and comply with the Administrative Procedure Act. During the rulemaking process, CMS can only present the information that is in the NPRM as it is contained in the NPRM. CMS cannot interpret that information, nor clarify or provide any further guidance.» CMS cannot address any comment suggestion or statement made by anyone attending the presentation or consider any such comment or suggestion in the rule writing process.» Please submit comments through the formal process outlined in the Federal Register. 1

Learning Objectives 1 Understand approach for Stage 3 2 Explain Stage 3 proposed requirements 3 Provide overview of Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015-2017 proposed rule 1

Stage 1 Data capturing and sharing Stage 2 Advanced clinical processes Stage 3 Improved outcomes 2

Overview of Proposed Rules CMS and ONC recently released notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRMs) for the EHR Incentive Programs and the Certification program: Released March 20:» Stage 3 of Meaningful Use NPRM Specifies the Stage 3 requirements for eligible professionals, eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals in the EHR Incentive Programs» EHR Technology Certified to the 2015 Edition NPRM Outlines the certification and standards to help providers meet the proposed Stage 3 requirements with EHR technology certified to the 2015 Edition Released April 10:» Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015-2017 NPRM Proposes revised requirements for eligible professionals, eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals participating in the EHR Incentive Programs in years 2015 through 2017 4

Stage 3 NPRM Requirements

Goals of Proposed Provisions 1 Provide a flexible, clear framework to simplify the meaningful use program and reduce provider burden 2 Ensure future sustainability of Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs 3 Advance the use of health IT to promote health information exchange and improved outcomes for patients 4

Stage 3 NPRM Streamlines Programs Streamlining Synchronizing on single stage and single reporting period

Stage 3 NPRM Streamlines Programs Streamlining Reducing burden by removing objectives that are: Redundant paper based versions of now electronic functions Duplicative of other more advanced measures using same certified EHR technology function Topped out and have reached high performance 8

Stage 3 NPRM Streamlines Programs Streamlining 8 advanced use objectives

Stage 3 NPRM Improves Outcomes Stage 3 NPRM focuses on objectives which support advanced use of EHR technology and quality improvement Health information exchange objectives improve outcomes by: Ensuring providers caring for same patient are sharing info with one another Providing patients with easy access to health info Fostering data collection in sharable format across multiple health care organizations Supporting learning health system through sharing of common clinical dataset and expanding types of registries to which hospitals and providers can report

Stage 3 NPRM Increases Interoperability Stage 3 NPRM increases interoperability by: Simplifying requirements to focus on objectives supporting advanced use of health IT Requiring providers to report on 2 of 3 HIE measures Requiring Stage 3 in 2018 for all to increase scale of participation and support growth in HIE and patient engagement infrastructure

Stage 3 NPRM Provides Flexibility The Stage 3 proposed rule makes the meaningful use program more flexible: Have option to report on Stage 3 criteria in 2017 Required to report on Stage 3 beginning in 2018 regardless of prior participation/stage of meaningful use

Stage 3 NPRM Provides Flexibility The Stage 3 proposed rule makes the meaningful use program more flexible: Simplifying meaningful use objectives and measures and allowing flexible measures for: health information exchange consumer engagement public health reporting Providing enhanced flexibility and options for public health reporting 13

Stage 3 Requirements, Objectives & Measures

Reporting Period» Full calendar year reporting period beginning in 2017» CQM reporting in coordination with quality reporting programs 15

Stage 3 Proposed Objectives 1. Protect Electronic Health Information 2. Electronic Prescribing (erx) 3. Clinical Decision Support 4. Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) 5. Patient Electronic Access to Health Information 6. Coordination of Care through Patient Engagement 7. Health Information Exchange 8. Public Health Reporting 16

Retained Stage 2 objectives with modifications

Objective Protect Electronic Health Information Electronic Prescribing (erx) Clinical Decision Support Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Measure(s) Conduct or review a security risk analysis including addressing the encryption/security of data stored in CEHRT, and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the EP s, EH s, or CAH's risk management process. EP Measure: More than 80% of all permissible prescriptions, or all prescriptions, written by the EP are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT. EH/CAH Measure: More than 25% of hospital discharge medication orders for permissible prescriptions (for new, changed, and refilled prescriptions) are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT. EPs, EHs, and CAHs must satisfy both measures in order to meet the objective: Measure 1: Implement at least 5 CDS interventions tied to clinical quality measures or key high-priority health conditions. Measure 2: Enable and implement the functionality for drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks for the entire EHR reporting period. More than 80% of medication, 60% of laboratory, and 60% of diagnostic imaging orders are recorded using CPOE. EPs, eligible hospital, or CAH must meet all 3 measures.

Objectives with expanded scope: 1. Patient Electronic Access to Health Information 2. Coordination of Care through Patient Engagement 3. Health Information Exchange 4. Public Health Reporting

Objective Patient Electronic Access to Health Information Measure(s) EPs/EHs/CAHs must satisfy both measures in order to meet the objective. Measure 1 More than 80% of all unique patients seen by the EP or discharged from the hospital during the EHR reporting period are provided access to new information within 24 hours of its availability to the EP/EH/CAH, subject to the provider's discretion to withhold certain information. Measure 2 Use clinically relevant information from CEHRT to identify patientspecific educational resources and provide electronic access to those materials to 35% of patients.

Objective Coordination of Care through Patient Engagement Measure(s) EPs/EHs/CAHs must attest to 3 measures, but meet 2 out of 3 thresholds: Measure 1 More than 25% of all unique patients (or authorized representatives) under the care of the EP/EH/CAH during the EHR reporting period (1) view, (2) download, or (3) transmit to a third party their health information. Or enable API and meet Measure 1 of Patient Electronic Access Objective. Measure 2 EP/EH/CAHs communicate with patients electronically through secure messaging for 35% of patients encountered during the reporting period. In patient-to-provider communication, provider must respond to patient to receive credit under this objective. Communicate means when a provider sends a message to patients OR when a patient sends a message to the provider and the provider responds. Measure 3 EP/EH/CAH must use health information received electronically from a non-physician source for 15% of patients encountered by EP/EH/CAH in the reporting period and must use health information received from a patient or from the patient s caregiver for 5% of patients encountered by the EP/EH/CAH in the reporting period.

Objective Health Information Exchange Measure(s) EPs/EHs/CAHs must attest to 3 measures, but meet 2 out of 3 thresholds: Measure 1 The EP/EH/CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or to another provider of care creates and exchanges an electronic summary of care record for 50% of such transitions of care and referrals. The electronic summary of care must be sent in accordance with the standards for transitions of care set by ONC. Measure 2 The EP/EH/CAH must receive, request or query for a patient s electronic summary of care record that has been created by another setting of care or provider of care for 40% of all new patient encounters during the reporting period. The electronic summary of care must be accessed in accordance with the standards for transitions of care set by ONC. Measure 3 Clinical Information Reconciliation (CIR) Providers perform clinical information reconciliation for more than 80% (percent will be the same as Measure 1) of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP/EH/CAH. Provider may choose to reconcile 2 out of 3 of the following: meds, problems, and allergies.

Objective Public Health Reporting Measure(s) Providers must report data on an ongoing basis to established public health registries. Registry options: Immunization, syndromic surveillance, ELR, specialized (PDMP, cancer, etc.) EP Objective: Report 3 measures from #1-5 EH/CAHs Objective: Report 4 measures from #1-6 Measure 1- Immunization Registry Reporting Measure 2- Syndromic Surveillance Reporting Measure 3- Case Reporting Measure 4- Public Health Registry Reporting* Measure 5- Clinical Data Registry Reporting** Measure 6- Electronic Reportable Laboratory Results *Providers may choose to report to more than one public health registry to meet the number of measures. *Providers may choose to report to more than one clinical data registry to meet the number of measures required to meet the objective.

Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015-2017 NPRM

Goals of Proposed Provisions 1 Align with Stage 3 proposed rule to achieve overall goals of programs 2 Synchronize reporting period objectives and measures to reduce burden 3 Continue to support advanced use of health IT to improve outcomes for patients

Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 NPRM Proposed rule for Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs: Streamlines program by removing redundant, duplicative and topped out measures Modifies patient action measures in Stage 2 objectives related to patient engagement Aligned reporting period with full calendar year Changes EHR reporting period in 2015 to 90-day period to accommodate modifications

Changes to Participation Timeline 2015 Attest to modified version of Stage 2 with accommodations for Stage 1 providers 2016 Attest to modified version of Stage 2 2017 Attest to either modified version of Stage 2 or full version of Stage 3 2018 Attest to full version of Stage 3 27

Alignment of Meaningful Use NPRMs The Stage 1 and 2 Modification NPRM reconciles measures to align criteria for 2015 to 2017 with Stage 3 to: Prepare providers to report Stage 3 criteria in 2018 Reduce provider burden and create a single set of sustainable objectives that promote best practices for patients Enable providers to focus on objectives which support advanced use of health IT, such as: o health information exchange o consumer engagement o public health reporting

For New Participants In 2015, propose allowing providers to attest to an EHR reporting period of any continuous 90-day period within calendar year In 2016, first-time participants may use EHR reporting period of any continuous 90-day period between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016 o All returning participants must use EHR reporting period of full calendar year (January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2016) In 2017, all providers, both new or existing, must use EHR reporting period of one full calendar year as defined in Stage 3 proposed rule

EHR Certification No proposed changes to individual certification requirements for objectives and measures of meaningful use for EHR reporting period in 2015 through 2017 under proposed rule Proposing providers continue to use 2014 Edition certification criteria for EHR reporting period in 2015 and subsequent years until transition to 2015 Edition certification criteria is required for EHR reporting period in 2018 Note: Providers may upgrade early to technology certified to the 2015 Edition for EHR reporting period prior to 2018 as outlined in Stage 3 proposed rule

Reporting in 2015 and 2016 2015 Only- Stage 1 providers only may use alternate exclusions and specifications In 2016, all EPs will report on 9 objectives 2 public health measures o All EHs, 8 objectives and 3 public health measures Modifications to patient action and public health objectives

Changes from Stage 1 for EPs Current Stage 1 EP Objectives 13 core objectives 5 of 9 menu objectives including 1 public health objective Proposed EP Objectives for 2015-2017 9 core objectives 2 public health options Current EP Objectives Aligning with Stage 3 6 core objectives 3 menu objectives 2 public health objectives

Changes from Stage 1 for EHs Current EHs/CAHs Stage 1 Objectives 11 core objectives 5 of 10 menu objectives including 1 public health objective Proposed EHs/CAHs Objectives for 2015-2017 8 core objectives 3 public health options Current EHs/CAHs Objectives Aligning with Stage 3 5 core objectives 3 menu objectives 3 public health objectives

Changes from Stage 2 for EPs Current EP Stage 2 Objectives 17 core objectives including public health objectives 3 of 6 menu objectives Proposed EP Objectives for 2015-2017 9 core objectives 2 public health options Current EP Objectives Aligning with Stage 3 7 core objectives 1 menu objective 3 public health objectives

Changes from Stage 2 for EHs Current EHs/CAHs Stage 2 Objectives 16 core objectives including public health objectives 3 of 6 menu objectives Proposed EHs/CAHs Objectives for 2015-2017 8 core objectives 3 public health options Current EHs/CAHs Objectives Aligning with Stage 3 7 core objectives 1 menu objective 3 public health objectives

Changes to Patient Access Objectives Following changes would be effective for providers for EHR reporting period beginning in 2015: Changing threshold from Stage 2 objective for Patient Electronic Access measure #2 from 5% to equal to or greater than 1 patient seen by provider or discharged from hospital Changing threshold from Stage 2 objective Secure Electronic Messaging from percent to functionality fully enabled (yes/no)

Changes to Public Health Objectives Following changes would be effective for providers for EHR reporting period beginning in 2015: Consolidating all public health reporting objectives into one objective with measure options following structure of Stage 3 Public Health Reporting objective Changing eligible hospital electronic prescribing objective from menu to core with an exclusion available for certain eligible hospitals/cahs

Clinical Quality Measures Proposing no changes to CQM selection or reporting scheme from CQM requirements in Stage 2 rule For EHR reporting period in 2015 (and for providers participating for first time in 2016), proposing providers attest to any continuous 90-day period of CQM data during calendar year through Medicare EHR Incentive Program Registration and Attestation site Providers also have option to electronically report CQM data using established methods for electronic reporting For 2016 and subsequent years, providers beyond first year of meaningful use may attest to one full calendar year of CQM data or electronically report CQM data using established methods for electronic reporting outlined

Submitting Comments 1. Electronically: You may submit electronic comments on this regulation to: http://www.regulations.gov/#!submitcomment;d=cms-2015-0033- 0002 Follow the Submit a comment instructions. 2. By regular mail 3. By express or overnight mail 4. By hand or courier

CMS Help Desks» EHR Information Center Help Desk (888) 734-6433 / TTY: (888) 734-6563 Hours of operation: Monday-Friday 8:30 a.m. 4:30 p.m. in all time zones (except on Federal holidays)» NPPES Help Desk Visit https://nppes.cms.hhs.gov/nppes/welcome.do (800) 465-3203 - TTY (800) 692-2326» PECOS Help Desk Visit https://pecos.cms.hhs.gov/ (866)484-8049 / TTY (866)523-4759» Identification & Access Management System (I&A) Help Desk PECOS External User Services (EUS) Help Desk Phone: 1-866-484-8049 TTY 1-866-523-4759 E-mail: EUSSupport@cgi.com 40