MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Similar documents
EHR/Meaningful Use

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

during the EHR reporting period.

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only.

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

The History of Meaningful Use

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

Eligible Professional Attestation Worksheet for Modified Stage 2 Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Alaska Medicaid Program

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

New Hampshire Guidelines for Program Year 2016: Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measure Supporting Documents

Meaningful Use May, 2012

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Eligible Professionals. How can the West Virginia Health Information Network (WVHIN) assist you in meeting Meaningful Use requirements?

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH

AHA Survey on Hospitals Ability to Meet Meaningful Use Requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Programs

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014

Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Medical Assistant Credentialing Requirements for Your Client Practices. Eric Christensen Director of Client Services Healthcare Compliance Pros, Inc.

June 15, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt,

Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Transcription:

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE *Please note, the below guidelines are currently proposed. ASCRS will let you know if and when they are finalized through regulatory alerts and the Washington Watch. PROPOSED RULE On April 10, 2015, CMS released the proposed Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program-Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017. The proposed rule includes major changes to both Stage 1 and Stage 2 Meaningful Use. CMS states they are working toward reducing complexity and removing topped out or duplicate measures by shifting to a single set of objectives and measures based on the previously released Stage 3 proposed rule. REPORTING PERIOD For 2015, CMS proposes to allow all eligible professionals, regardless of prior participation in EHR Meaningful Use incentive programs, to attest to an EHR reporting period of any calendar year quarter. For 2015 and 2016, CMS proposes to allow new participants in the program to attest to Meaningful Use for any continuous 90-day period within the calendar year. All returning participants in 2016 and 2017 would use an EHR reporting period of one year. PATIENT ENGAGEMENT MEASURES CMS proposes to change the threshold from the Stage 2 Patient Electronic Access measure that requires patients to view, download or transmit their health information, from 5% to equal or greater than 1 patient. CMS proposes to change the Stage 2 Secure Electronic Access measure from being a percentage-based measure to a yes-no measure stating functionality fully enabled. CHANGES TO MEASURES AND OBJECTIVES CMS proposes to eliminate the distinction between menu and core measures. Retained objectives and measures would be required for the program. CMS is proposing all eligible professionals must report on 9 objectives and one consolidated public health reporting objective for both Stage 1 and Stage 2 Meaningful Use. For details, see chart below. 1

Meaningful Use Proposed Objectives and Measures for 2015 through 2017 PROPOSED OBJECTIVE PROPOSED MEASURES PROPOSED ALTERNATE MEASURES / EXCLUSIONS / SPECIFICATIONS 1 Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Measure 1: More than 60% of medication Measure 2: More than 30% of laboratory Measure 3: More than 30% of radiology If for an EHR reporting period in 2015 the provider is scheduled to Alternative Measure 1: More than 30% of all unique patients with at least one medication in their medication list seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period have at least one medication order entered using CPOE; or more than 30% of medication orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period are recorded using CPOE. Alternate Exclusion for Measure 2: measure 2 of the Stage 2 CPOE objective for an EHR reporting period in 2015. Alternate Exclusion for Measure 3: measure 3 of the Stage 2 CPOE objective for an EHR reporting period in 2015. 2 Electronic Prescribing More than 50% of all permissible prescriptions, or all prescriptions written by the EP are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT. If for an EHR reporting period in 2015, the provider is scheduled to Alternate EP Measure: More than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using CEHRT. 2

3 Clinical Decision Support Measure 1: Implement 5 clinical decision support interventions related to 4 or more clinical quality measures (CQM)s at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR reporting period. Absent 4 CQMs related to an EP s scope of practice or patient population, the clinical decision support messages must be related to high-priority health conditions. It is suggested that one of the five clinical support interventions be related to improving healthcare efficiency. Measure 2: The EP has enabled and implemented the functionality for drugdrug and drug-allergy interaction checks for the entire EHR reporting period. Exclusion: For the second measure, any EP who writes fewer than 100 medication orders during the EHR reporting period. If for an EHR reporting period in 2015 the provider is scheduled to Alternate Objective and Measure 1: Objective: Implement one clinical decision support rule relevant to specialty or high clinical priority, along with the ability to track compliance with that rule. Measure: Implement one clinical decision support rule. 4 Patient Electronic Access Measure 1: More than 50% of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided timely (within 4 business days after the information is available to the EP) online access to their health information subject to the EP s discretion to withhold certain information. Measure 2: At least one patient seen by EP during EHR reporting period (or their authorized representative) views, downloads, or transmits his or her health information to a third party. Alternate Exclusion Measure 2: the second measure, if for an EHR reporting period in 2015, they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure. 5 Protect Electronic Health Information Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements in 45 CFR 164.308(a)(1), including addressing the security (to include encryption) of ephi data stored in CEHRT in accordance with requirements in 45 CFR 164.312(a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR 164.306(d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the EP s risk management process. N/A 3

6 Patient Specific Education Patient-specific education resources identified by CEHRT are provided to patients for more than 10% of all unique patients with office visits seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period. Alternate Exclusion: Provider may claim an exclusion for the measure of the Stage 2 Patient Specific Education objective, if for an EHR reporting period in 2015, they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 but did not intend to select the Stage 1 Patient Specific Education menu objective. 7 Medication Reconciliation The EP performs medication reconciliation for more than 50% of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP. Alternate Exclusion: Provider may claim an exclusion for the measure of the Stage 2 Medication Reconciliation objective, if for an EHR reporting period in 2015, they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1 but did not intend to select the Stage 1 Medication Reconciliation menu objective. 8 Summary of Care The EP that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care (1) uses CEHRT to create a summary of care record and (2) electronically transmits such summary to a receiving provider for more than 10% of transitions of care and referrals. 9 Secure Messaging During the EHR reporting period, the capability for patients to send and receive a secure electronic message with the provider was fully enabled. Alternate Exclusion: Provider may claim an exclusion for Measure 2 of the Stage 2 Summary of Care objective, if for an EHR reporting period in 2015, they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure. Alternate Exclusion: An EP may claim an exclusion for the measure, if for an EHR reporting period in 2015, they were scheduled to demonstrate Stage 1, which does not have an equivalent measure. 10 Public Health Measure Option 1- Immunization Registry N/A Reporting: The EP is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit immunization data and receive immunization forecasts and histories from the public health immunization registry/immunization information system. Measure Option 2- Syndromic Surveillance Reporting- The EP is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit syndromic surveillance data from a non-urgent care ambulatory setting for EPs. Measure Option 3- Case Reporting: The EP is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit case reporting of reportable conditions. Measure Option 4- Public Health Registry 4

Reporting: The EP is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit data to public health registries. Measure Option 5- Clinical Data Registry Reporting: The EP is in active engagement to submit data to a clinical data registry. OTHER CMS is not proposing any changes to the CQM selection and reporting. If you have any questions, please contact Ashley McGlone at amcglone@ascrs.org or 703-591-2220. 5