Social Welfare Report / 2014*

Similar documents
CWE FB MC project. PENTA SG1, April 8 th 2013, Brussels

CWE FB MC project. PLEF SG1, March 30 th 2012, Brussels

CWE Flow-based Market Coupling Project. at EMART Energy 2012

CWE Flow-based Market Coupling Project

CWE Flow-Based Market Coupling: on the Eve of Implementation. Pieter Schavemaker and Philippe Noury

CWE Enhanced FB. Report presentation. March 22 nd, 2011

Flow-Based Market Coupling First lessons

Current and future challenges of TSOs in the European Market design. Dr. Oliver John 27 September 2016

Methodology for capacity calculation for ID timeframe

Context paper CWE Intraday

BritNed: Enabling Market Integration

CWE MC Go-Live Forum. Düsseldorf June 8th

POSITION PAPER BY ALL CWE NRAs on THE CWE TSOs PROPOSAL for A FB IDCC METHODOLOGY

Casc Publication Handbook

Implementation of day-ahead (DA) market coupling in the North-Western Europe (NWE) region summary memo

Position Paper of CWE NRAs on Flow- Based Market Coupling

Status WG European Market Design. Users Group 20 March 2014

CWE Flow-Based Market Coupling Forum. 23 rd of June 2014 in Düsseldorf

Documentation of the CWE FB MC solution as basis for the formal approval-request (Brussels, 9 th May 2014)

Leading coordination For enhanced reliability of supply.

NWE Day-Ahead Market Coupling Project. 2 nd Progress Report

PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units APRIL DATA - Final Report 2

Nordic FB Stakeholder Forum

The Toyota Foundation 2018 International Grant Program Application Form

Second Midterm Exam - Practice Exam

COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES BLOCK GRANT REPORTING INSTRUCTIONS

Balancing pilot projects update. April 2016

Publishing date: 29/05/2015. We appreciate your feedback. Share this document

U.S. Postal Service Mail , ,466 (6,674) (6.4) 23,005 27,890 (4,885) (17.5)

IGO GROUP COMMUNITY STANDARD 1 - CORPORATE GIVING STANDARD INDEPENDENCE GROUP NL

Sustainability Grant Application Form

PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units MARCH DATA - Final Report 2

Pilot Program Framework Proposal

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Notes and reflections on a study tour to the internationally acclaimed Buurtzorg Model

BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT OBSERVATION UNIT PROCESS IMPROVEMENT

FISCAL FEDERALISM. How State and Local Governments Differ from the National Government

ACER Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators Trg republike LJUBLJANA SLOWENIEN Mail:

Accounting Services Section F Grants

HOW TO USE THE WARMBATHS NURSING OPTIMIZATION MODEL

Term of Contract 15-year term, from 1 October 2018 to 31 December 2033

Lesson 27: Export subsidies

How Does Payroll-Based Journal Reporting Impact Your Five Star? Don Feige, ezpbj

PROJECT SPONSOR INFORMATION

TRANSITION FROM CARE TO INDEPENDENCE SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS

AGENCY WORK BUSINESS INDICATOR: NOVEMBER 2016 EVOLUTION OF NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED BY AGENCY WORKERS IN EUROPE. Sept 2016.

Changes in the School Based Access Program (SBAP)

Passage of Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA): The Doc Fix

California Department of Developmental Services DDS Rate Study

State of Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services Department on Aging Kansas Health Policy Authority

AGENCY WORK BUSINESS INDICATOR: FEBRUARY 2016

Publishing date: 04/02/2014 Document title: We appreciate your feedback. Share this document

The Financial Performance of Rural Hospitals and Implications for Elimination of the Critical Access Hospital Program

ENTREPRENEURSHIP & ACCELERATION

A Quantitative Correlational Study on the Impact of Patient Satisfaction on a Rural Hospital

Executive Council approves CLP Power s Five-Year Development Plan New Tariff and Monthly Fuel Cost Adjustment Come into Effect on 1 October

Coworking Profit and Loss A customized quick look at your new coworking space

AGENCY WORK BUSINESS INDICATOR: DECEMBER 2016 EVOLUTION OF NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED BY AGENCY WORKERS IN EUROPE. Oct Oct 2016

Update from ECHA. REACH Implementation Workshop X. 13 December Laurence Hoffstadt ECHA Substance Identification & Data Sharing

EPSA 2017: Ablauf, Einreichprozess und FAQs Julia Bosse, EPSA 2017 Project Officer & Regional Category Leader, EIPA Barcelona

AGENCY WORK BUSINESS INDICATOR: SEPTEMBER 2015

Hospital Refresher Workshop. Presented by The Department of Social Services & HP Enterprise Services

CMS CR 6440: Additional Documentation on Hospice Claims Related Q&A s

City of Clarksville Non-Profit Grant Program Guidelines

National Trends Winter 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR FOOD INDUSTRY CLUSTER STUDY & STRATEGY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) )

3. Please provide a brief description of the activity you were funded to undertake as described to us in your original application:

August 16, KIM BARRETT Dean, Graduate Division Graduate Student Funding Report

FLORIDA NURSING HOME ESTIMATED AVERAGE PRIVATE PAY RATE 2016

Annual KPCA Meeting October 2014

LOVING HEART MULTI SERVICE CENTRE Annual Report for the Year Ended 31 Mar 2016

The Lodge FAQs updated February 2018

Cumulative Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenses After the Age of 70

DEVELOPING A GOOD PURPOSE AND NEED. Patrick Lee TxDOT Environmental Affairs Division

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) POLICY

Employment Measures for Young People. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

ems PROJECT APPLICATION FORM drafting tool ESTONIA-RUSSIA PROGRAMME PROJECT SUMMARY FORM

Suffolk COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCUREMENT POLICY

Voluntary Sector. Community Snapshot. Introduction

Predicting 30-day Readmissions is THRILing

DER Pilot Program. Brian Yung Market Design Specialist Business Issues Committee. August 9, 2017, 10 Krey Blvd, Rensselaer, NY 12144

PROCESSING OF SHORT TERM TRANSMISSION SERVICE REQUESTS

Update : CalWORKs Employment Services (CWES) Family Services Program

California s Health Homes Program

Will PBJ erase your star rating?

The Science of Medication Adherence P R E S E N T E D T O L E A D I N G A G E W A S H I N G T O N J U N E 6 TH,

Medicare Cost Reporting and PPS FFY 2015 Proposed Rule Why it Still Matters. Glenn Grigsby, CPA OACHC 2014 Annual Spring Conference March 11, 2014

M I L L E R T H O M S O N LLP Barristers & Solicitors, Patent & Trade Mark Agents

U.S. Postal Service Mail ,618 73,358 (6,740) (9.2) 28,824 25,424 3,

FY19 Adult English Literacy PROGRAM Grants Request for Proposals and Application Instructions Date of Issue: January 26, 2018

The Rising Importance of Patient Satisfaction in a Value-Based Environment

Edinburgh and South East Scotland City Region Deal Update

Pediatric Hematology / Oncology Clinic

Quincy Riley Assessment Manager, HUD-REAC. Brian Edwards Auditor/Financial Analyst, HUD-REAC

An economic - quality business case for infection control & Prof. dr. Dominique Vandijck

2018 COMMUNITY ARTS GRANTS Budget Form Instructions

DATA EXTRACT OF VETERANS HOME CARE (VHC) DATA PROVIDED TO UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND FOR THE AUSTRALIAN LONGITUDINAL STUDY INTO WOMEN S HEALTH (ALSWH)

Cork County Council Housing Adaptation Grant for People with a Disability

Community Service Center- Eugene and North Central Lane County

Transcription:

Social Welfare Report 02-04 / 2014* * This report contains welfare indicators for the NWE area as of the NWE go-live in February. The report for January, containing CWE welfare indicators only, has been published separately.

February 2014 Additional Social welfare in the NWE area that could be gained with no network constraints in CWE: 11,3 M Social welfare = Producer surplus + Consumer surplus + Congestion rent Producer surplus 62,5 M Consumer surplus -31,1 M Congestion Rent -20,1 M NB: Producer surplus, Consumer surplus and Congestion Rent are calculated as such: Sum of daily ( Value with ATC= ) - (Historical value) The daily values being a Sum of hourly values. In single hours the producer/consumer gain can be positive or negative. The highlighted value presents the sum of all hours of the respective month. 2

February 2014 Evolution of social welfare in NWE area that could be gained with no network constraints in CWE 3

1-Feb 2-Feb 3-Feb 4-Feb 5-Feb 6-Feb 7-Feb 8-Feb 9-Feb 10-Feb 11-Feb 12-Feb 13-Feb 14-Feb 15-Feb 16-Feb 17-Feb 18-Feb 19-Feb 20-Feb 21-Feb 22-Feb 23-Feb 24-Feb 25-Feb 26-Feb 27-Feb 28-Feb February 2014 Split of social welfare gain in surplus and congestion rent in the NWE area 4 000 000 3 000 000 2 000 000 1 000 000 - -1 000 000-2 000 000-3 000 000 NWE surplus Change NWE CR change 4

March 2014 Additional Social welfare in the NWE area that could be gained with no network constraints in CWE: 13,4 M Social welfare = Producer surplus + Consumer surplus + Congestion rent Producer surplus 62,8 M Consumer surplus -25,1 M Congestion Rent -24,3 M NB: Producer surplus, Consumer surplus and Congestion Rent are calculated as such: Sum of daily ( Value with ATC= ) - (Historical value) The daily values being a Sum of hourly values. In single hours the producer/consumer gain can be positive or negative. The highlighted value presents the sum of all hours of the respective month. 5

March 2014 Evolution of social welfare in NWE area that could be gained with no network constraints in CWE 6

March 2014 Split of social welfare gain in surplus and congestion rent in the NWE area 7

April 2014 Additional Social welfare in the NWE area that could be gained with no network constraints in CWE: 12,1 M Social welfare = Producer surplus + Consumer surplus + Congestion rent Producer surplus 49,1 M Consumer surplus -14,2 M Congestion Rent -22,9 M NB: Producer surplus, Consumer surplus and Congestion Rent are calculated as such: Sum of daily ( Value with ATC= ) - (Historical value) The daily values being a Sum of hourly values. In single hours the producer/consumer gain can be positive or negative. The highlighted value presents the sum of all hours of the respective month. 8

1-Apr 2-Apr 3-Apr 4-Apr 5-Apr 6-Apr 7-Apr 8-Apr 9-Apr 10-Apr 11-Apr 12-Apr 13-Apr 14-Apr 15-Apr 16-Apr 17-Apr 18-Apr 19-Apr 20-Apr 21-Apr 22-Apr 23-Apr 24-Apr 25-Apr 26-Apr 27-Apr 28-Apr 29-Apr 30-Apr April 2014 Evolution of social welfare in NWE area that could be gained with no network constraints in CWE 2 000 000 1 500 000 1 000 000 500 000-9

1-Apr 2-Apr 3-Apr 4-Apr 5-Apr 6-Apr 7-Apr 8-Apr 9-Apr 10-Apr 11-Apr 12-Apr 13-Apr 14-Apr 15-Apr 16-Apr 17-Apr 18-Apr 19-Apr 20-Apr 21-Apr 22-Apr 23-Apr 24-Apr 25-Apr 26-Apr 27-Apr 28-Apr 29-Apr 30-Apr April 2014 Split of social welfare gain in surplus and congestion rent in the NWE area 4 000 000 3 000 000 2 000 000 1 000 000 - -1 000 000-2 000 000-3 000 000 NWE surplus Change NWE CR change 10

Definitions / explanations 11

Additional Social welfare that could be gained with no network constraints (Definition/explanation) The figure shows the additional social welfare that could be gained in the NWE area with no network constraints inside CWE (borders D-NL, NL-B, B-F, D-F). This key figure is calculated by hourly simulating/ coupling the CWE-region with ATC= at the borders D-NL, NL-B, B-F, D-F and comparing to real MC-results: Producer surplus= Producer surplus (ATC= )- Producer surplus(real ATC) Consumer surplus=consumer surplus (ATC= )- Consumer surplus(real ATC) Congestion rent= Congestion rent (ATC= )- congestion rent(real ATC) 12

Additional Social welfare that could be gained with no network constraints (Definition/explanation) The purpose of the welfare reporting is the demonstration of the benefits of CWE ATC Market Coupling and future CWE FB MC. The monthly publishing of this figure was commonly agreed between the CWE Regulators and the CWE Project. It is one part of the welfare reporting. 13

Examples: In single hours the producer/consumer gain can be positive or negative 14

Decrease in consumer surplus example 1/2 Two isolated markets (zero capacity) 80 70 60 80 70 60 50 40 30 consumer surplus (1) 50 40 30 producer surplus (2) 20 20 10 10 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Demand Supply Demand Supply Area 1 MCV: 1000 MW, MCP: 10 Area 2 MCV: 500 MW, MCP: 50 Consumer surplus: 60K Producer surplus: 0 Consumer surplus: 0 Producer surplus: 10K Totals Consumer surplus: 60K Congestion revenue: 0 Producer surplus: 10K Social welfare: 70K 15

Decrease in consumer surplus example 2/2 Two coupled markets (infinite capacity) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 consumer surplus (1) producer surplus (1) producer surplus (2) 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Demand Supply Area 1 MCV: 1400 MW, MCP: 50 Consumer surplus: 20K Producer surplus: 56K Area 2 MCV: 500 MW, MCP: 50 Consumer surplus: 0 Producer surplus: 10K Totals Consumer surplus: 20K (-40K) Congestion revenue: 0 Producer surplus: 66K (+56K) Social welfare: 86K (+16K) 16

Decrease in producer surplus example 1/2 Two isolated markets (zero capacity) 80 70 60 80 70 60 50 40 30 producer surplus (1) 50 40 30 consumer surplus (2) 20 20 10 10 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Demand Supply Demand Supply Area 1 MCV: 1000 MW, MCP: 70 Area 2 MCV: 500 MW, MCP: 30 Consumer surplus: 0 Producer surplus: 60K Consumer surplus: 10K Producer surplus: 0 Totals Consumer surplus: 10K Congestion revenue: 0 Producer surplus: 60K Social welfare: 70K 17

Decrease in producer surplus example 2/2 Two coupled markets (infinite capacity) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 consumer surplus (1) producer surplus (1) consumer surplus (2) 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Demand Supply Area 1 MCV: 1400 MW, MCP: 30 Consumer surplus: 56K Producer surplus: 20K Area 2 MCV: 500 MW, MCP: 30 Consumer surplus: 10K Producer surplus: 0 Totals Consumer surplus: 66K (+56K) Congestion revenue: 0 Producer surplus: 20K (-40K) Social welfare: 86K (+16K) 18