Job Development Investment Grant Quarterly Report

Similar documents
Job Development Investment Grant Quarterly Report

Job Development Investment Grant Quarterly Report

Job Development Investment Grant (JDIG) N.C. Gen. Stat. 143B to 143B

Job Development Investment Grant (JDIG) Funding Study

GUIDELINES FOR OPERATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ONE NORTH CAROLINA FUND GRANT PROGRAM ( the Program )

Job Development Investment Grant

KRS Global Biotechnology Inc. Catalyst Fund Application (TTC) to Governor s Office Of Economic Development

Association of Consulting Engineering Companies of PEI

Job Development Investment Grant

Testimony of. Before the House Armed Services Committee on the Economic Consequences of Defense Sequestration. October 26, 2011

Cardinal Bank & George Mason University

FIVE YEAR FORECAST FY THROUGH FY

Job Development Investment Grant

BUILD MISSOURI PROGRAM SUMMARY. A Program Jointly Administered By The: (Rev. October 2013)

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Wright State University

Economic Impact of the proposed The Medical University of South Carolina

International Trade Division Overview North Carolina Department of Commerce

JOB DEVELOPMENT CREDIT

Guidelines for the Virginia Investment Partnership Grant Program

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

The Global Health Sector s Contributions to the Economy of North Carolina

Innovation. Impact. Illinois.

GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT Chris Camacho, President & CEO

Accountability Gaps Limit State Oversight of $694 Million in Grants to Non-Profit Organizations

Economic Impact of Hospitals and Health Systems in North Carolina. Stephanie McGarrah North Carolina Hospital Association August 2017

The Economic Impact During FY 2015 of New Mexico's Business Incubators

The Economic Impacts of Idaho s Nonprofit Organizations

The Washington Area s Current Economic Performance

Qualified Facility Income Tax Credit Program

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR STATE-BASED DIABETES CONTROL PROGRAMS AND EVALUATION OF SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS

HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION METROPOLITAN PLANNING. U. S. Department of Transportation

Guidelines for the Major Eligible Employer Grant Program

THE STATE OF THE MILITARY

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

Minority, Women, and Small Business Enterprise Program. Board of Education Management Oversight Report Aug. 23, 2011

North Carolina Department of Public Safety Division of Emergency Management

Oregon New Markets Tax Credit Program

The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan

Peter F. Asaad, Attorney At Law Immigration Solutions Group, PLLC. Wednesday, June 3, 2009

The International Trade Resource Center

Fiscal Research Center

U.S. DEFENSE EXPORTS

A MONTHLY UPDATE OF THE FIFTH DISTRICT ECONOMY FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND

Grassroots Competitive Grant NC Museum of Natural Sciences Karin Cochran and Emlyn Koster April 12, 2016

Fiscal Research Center

Economic Analysis of Proposals to Limit the Municipal Bond Market: 501(c)(3) Issuance

Common Fallacies about Globalization and International Business. Ram Mudambi, Temple University Ajai Gaur, Rutgers University

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DEFENSE-RELATED SPENDING IN ILLINOIS

Telecommuting or doing work

An ongoing research program at the Real Estate Center. Texas Job Market Outpaces Nation's

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Business Commons

GUIDANCE. Impact Aid Section 8007 School Construction Funds. Made Available Under. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey: Costa Rican employers report optimistic hiring plans for the April June quarter

North Carolina Economic Development Board

Economic Trends and Florida s Competitive Position

Vidant Health: An economic engine. David C. Herman, MD March 18, 2014

State of Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services Department on Aging Kansas Health Policy Authority

Chapter The Importance of ICT in Development The Global IT Sector

Rural Grants Program (

NORTH CAROLINA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD 2011 ANNUAL REPORT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

U.S. Department of Labor

Department of Defense PRIME CONTRACT AWARDS, SIZE DISTRIBUTION Fiscal Year 1986

INFOBRIEF SRS TOP R&D-PERFORMING STATES DISPLAY DIVERSE R&D PATTERNS IN 2000

Cultural Competency Initiative. Program Guidelines

Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

Florida s Financially-Based Economic Development Tools & Return on Investment

Southern Dallas GO Bond Program Public/Private Partnership Amendment

HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION

Virginia s Economic Future: Bright Ideas for Manufacturing Competitiveness. June 22, George Mason University

ARIZONA COMPETES FUND. Annual Report November 1, 2014

Analysis of Incurred Claims Trend and Provider Payments

The Economic Impact of Hospitals and Health Systems in North Carolina

NORTH CAROLINA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD 2010 ANNUAL REPORT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 10, 2018

NATURAL GAS AMERICA S NEW ENERGY OPPORTUNITY: CREATING JOBS, ENERGY, AND COMMUNITY GROWTH

STATE OF MAINE Department of Economic and Community Development Office of Community Development

U. S. Department of Agriculture

Metrics Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal Actual Goal

Reshoring: Is your manufacturing business bringing operations back to the U.S.?

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 15, SYNOPSIS Creates Joint Apprenticeship Incentive Grant Program.

EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project

first edition GEORGIA NONPROFIT Employment Report In the Center of the Industry

INDIRECT COST ALLOCATION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2016

WEDC HELPING TO MOVE WISCONSIN FORWARD. Reed E. Hall Secretary/CEO

U. S. Department of Education

Incentives and Economic Development Policy ELLEN HARPEL NACCTFO COURSE WASHINGTON, DC MARCH 2018

Department of Environmental Quality Water Infrastructure

Economic Trends and Florida s Competitive Position

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

Maine s Economic Outlook: 2009 and Beyond

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey

OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY

Investing in Canada - BC

I-605 CORRIDOR HOT SPOT INTERCHANGES

Collaborative Patent Grants. A program aimed to increase GDP and boost university collaboration by incentivising patent filing costs

Expenditures by Program Explore Minnesota Tourism 0 9,915 10,626 11,626 22,252. Full-Time Equivalents (FTE)

Financing the Future of Water Systems

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE DRH30055-MC-54 (02/05) Short Title: Modify Film Grant Fund. (Public)

Public/Private Partnership Program. November 4, 2013

The Economic Impact of Hospitals and Health Systems in North Carolina

Transcription:

Job Development Investment Grant Quarterly Report First Quarter 2012 January March

Introduction This report describes all Job Development Investment Grant ( JDIG ) awards made by the Economic Investment Committee (the EIC ) during the first calendar quarter of 2012, as required by North Carolina General Statutes 143B-437.55(d). The report includes the name of each first quarter grantee, the results of the cost/benefit analysis considered by the EIC in making these awards, a description of each project, and the maximum grant amount payable under each such grant for the current fiscal year. Summary of the Job Development Investment Grant Program The JDIG program, adopted by the General Assembly in the 2001-2002 session, is a performance-based economic development incentive program that provides annual grant disbursements for a period of up to 12 years, to new and expanding businesses based on a percentage of withholding taxes paid by new employees during each calendar year that is a grant year under a particular grant. The percentage of withholdings that is awarded ranges from 10% to 75%. Grants are made to qualifying companies by the five-member EIC, subject to caps set by the General Assembly on future grant year liability. In considering whether or not to award a grant, the EIC conducts an extensive review and analysis of an application submitted by a proposed grantee, to determine whether its project meets the requirements of the JDIG Statute 1 and Criteria 2, and particularly, whether the benefits of the project outweigh the costs to the State. The EIC considers both economic and fiscal impacts. The analysis of each project s impact on net State revenue is conducted using a model developed by Dr. Mike Walden of North Carolina State University. The EIC seeks projects that are the most beneficial to the State, after considering a number of different evaluation factors enumerated in the JDIG Statute and Criteria. The EIC also considers these factors when deciding on the appropriate amount and term of an award. JDIG Awards As shown below in Table 1, the following grantees received grants in the first quarter of 2012: Caterpillar, Inc. ( Caterpillar ), Reed Elsevier Inc. ( Reed Elsevier ), and XPO Logistics, Inc. ( XPO ). Table 1 Company County County Tier Status Caterpillar Johnston 3 Reed Elsevier Wake 3 XPO Mecklenburg 3 1 N.C. Gen. Stat. 143B-437.50 et. seq. 2 Criteria for Operation and Implementation of Job Development Investment Grant Program, available at http://www.thrivenc.com/sites/default/files/incentives/financial/criteria-of-jdig-feb-16-2009.pdf 2

Project Impacts and Cost/Benefit Analysis Table 2 describes the economic and fiscal impacts for the first quarter 2012 grants. The Job Impact columns in Table 2 describe the direct jobs that are expected to be created as well as the multiplier employment impacts of each company s activities. The projects approved in the first quarter are expected to create 750 direct jobs at full production and approximately 1,045 more indirect and induced jobs. The expected total increase in the State s gross domestic product (the GDP ) over the life of the grants is measured in the GDP column in Table 2. 3 GDP is a measure of the size of the economy. The three projects approved in the first quarter of 2012 are expected to generate approximately $1.215 billion in GDP over the life of the grants. Table 2 displays the maximum State grant liability over the life of each grant. The grants will only reach the maximum liability noted if company performance (jobs, salaries, and investment) meet targets in every grant year, and if withholding amounts meet expectations. All of the grants awarded in the first quarter of 2012 are for projects that will locate in a Tier 3 county. For projects located in Tier 3 counties, 25% of the payments for which the grantees are eligible will be transferred to the Utility Account of the Industrial Development Fund (the Utility Account ) to provide grants for infrastructure in distressed counties. The cumulative State net revenue impact column in Table 2 represents all State revenues generated by a project minus the cost of any State-provided economic incentives (including the JDIG award, potential Article 3J Tax Credits for Growing Businesses, One North Carolina Fund grants and community college training services), and minus the cost of providing State services to migrants from out-of-state that come to North Carolina because of the project. Only projects that generate positive net revenue impacts are eligible for a grant. The three projects approved in the first quarter of 2012 are expected to generate over $19.727 million in net State revenue over the life of these grants. Table 2 Job Impact GDP Revenue State Grant Liability Target Average Wage Total NC GDP Impact (millions) Net State Revenue Impact (millions) State Liability to State Liability to Utility Account Total State Liability Direct Indirect Total Caterpillar 199 501 700 $41,465 $485.704 $13.344 $1,644,000 $548,000 $2,192,000 Reed Elsevier 350 353 703 $91,644 $508.013 $4.305 $8,860,500 $2,953,500 $11,814,000 XPO 201 191 392 $56,606 $221.775 $2.078 $3,219,750 $1,073,250 $4,293,000 Totals 750 1,045 1,795 $1,215.492 $19.727 $13,724,250 $4,574,750 $18,299,000 Note: This table shows job impacts at full employment. Project amounts and impacts reflect the full term of the grants. 3 The GDP and fiscal impact are measured over the life of the grant. Therefore, if a grant is awarded for seven years, the impacts displayed are the cumulative impact over seven years. If a grant is awarded for twelve years, the impacts displayed are the cumulative impacts over twelve years. However, it should be noted that the economic and fiscal benefits to the State will continue as long as operations continue at the project facility. 3

Table 3 FY12/13 Liability to FY12/13 Liability to Utility Account Total FY12/13 Liability Caterpillar $101,250 $33,750 $135,000 Reed Elsevier $243,750 $81,250 $325,000 Totals $345,000 $115,000 $460,000 As reflected in Table 3, if Caterpillar and Reed Elsevier meet performance and withholdings requirements, they could be eligible for grant payments during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 (for performance as of December 31, 2012). Once JDIG annual reports are received, analyzed, DOR certification received, and EIC approval of disbursement authorized, grant disbursements are made. For calendar year 2013, which is the first grant year for XPO, if the company meets its performance minimums and withholding requirements, it would be expected to receive payment sometime between the second and fourth calendar quarter of 2014. Project Descriptions Caterpillar, Inc. ( Caterpillar ) Caterpillar is the world s leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines, industrial gas turbines and diesel-electric locomotives. Caterpillar currently employs more than 104,000 employees across the globe. Caterpillar is currently producing small wheel loaders in Clayton, N.C., Illinois, Japan, Brazil and Belgium. This project is a consolidation of small wheel loader production into its facility located in Clayton. As a result of the consolidation of this line into a single location, the number of units produced in Clayton will dramatically increase in future years. Additionally, Caterpillar is considering consolidating its engineering services into the Clayton Product Development Center. With production of the small wheel loaders currently taking place in five locations around the world, Caterpillar had the option to consolidate at one of any of the five locations or to continue to operate separate facilities. In evaluating its options, the company considered both the one-time costs as well as expenses that would be required in order to execute a transition. The company stated that incentives played an important role in determining its location decision, based on financial analysis of the various options available. The company stated that the JDIG award was critical to the selection of North Carolina as the location for this project. Over the next 5 years the company will create 199 new jobs at an average annual wage of $37,759 for the first year and $41,465 in subsequent years. In addition, the company is required to retain 1278 existing jobs in order to be eligible for a grant payment. The company will invest $33 million in real and personal property in this project. Reed Elsevier Inc. ( REINC ) REINC consists of five major business units, which include: Elsevier the world s leading provider of scientific and medical information, LexisNexis Risk Solutions provides data and analytics to evaluate and manage risks associated with transactions and improve performance, LexisNexis Legal and Professional provides legal, tax, regulatory, news and business information and analysis to a variety of markets, Reed Exhibitions the world s leading organizer of events, Reed Business Information a leading provider of business information, online data and marketing solutions. 4

This project is intended to concentrate marketing, sales, customer support and product development in Wake County, a tier 3 county, that the company believes will promote business growth through internal efficiencies and improved access to talent that can provide highly knowledgeable customer support for its varied computer-based information systems. REINC will create 350 new jobs over the next five years at an average annual wage of $91,644. The company employs 130 individuals in Cary and an additional 181 through a number of affiliates in Charlotte. All of these jobs are required to be retained as a condition of this award. The company evaluated the 10 locations in which it is currently located, as well as an additional 20 locations with no company presence. Key factors that were evaluated and that influenced the final decision included the availability of skilled labor force, labor costs, corporate income tax and other taxes, quality of life and the availability of incentives to offset operating and implementation costs. Through this process the company narrowed the search to three sites: Charlottesville, VA., metropolitan Chicago, and the Raleigh region (Cary). The company stated that the North Carolina location fell between the other two sites with respect to most factors, with the exception of business taxes, as to which N.C. was found to be inferior to the other two. Award of this JDIG was critical to the selection of North Carolina as the location for this project. XPO Logistics, Inc. ( XPO ) XPO is a third-party logistics provider offering expedient, single-source solutions for time-critical and servicesensitive shipments. XPO serves customers in the U.S., Canada and Mexico with domestic and international freight destinations, and offers logistics services through three brands: Express 1, Inc., Concert Group Logistics, and Bounce Logistics, Inc. XPO conducted a site search for its new North American Operations Center. The facility located in Mecklenburg County, a tier 3 county, will incorporate accounting/finance, human resources, IT, brokerage, carrier procurement and operations under one roof. XPO will create 201 jobs over the next three years, paying an average annual wage of $56,606. The company currently has four sales-related positions in Charlotte and will be required to retain them in order to be eligible to receive a grant payment. Over a period of several months, XPO conducted an extensive site search. Factors the company considered included labor, real estate, and overall operational costs. The search was narrowed to three states: Texas (Plano), South Carolina (Lancaster) and North Carolina. Because all three sites offered similar characteristics, financial incentives were a critical factor driving the final decision. North Carolina s incentive package was not the largest; thus the JDIG award was pivotal. 5