Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing

Similar documents
WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

Justice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

Circuit Court of Cook County Performance Metrics Department Adult Probation

Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

Tarrant County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

Office of Criminal Justice Services

Proposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program

Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 to FISCAL YEAR 2021

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT V. OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

Eau Claire County Mental Health Court. Presentation December 15, 2011

Felony Mental Health Court Success Through Addiction Recovery Drug Court Program Veterans Court

Justice Reinvestment in Arkansas

PRE-RELEASE TERMINATION AND POST-RELEASE RECIDIVISM RATES OF COLORADO S PROBATIONERS: FY2014 RELEASES

SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board of Pardons and Paroles Correctional Managed Health Care Committee

Statewide Misdemeanant Confinement Program Annual Report Fiscal Year North Carolina Sheriffs' Association

Biennial Report of the Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or

Rehabilitative Programs and Services

St. Louis County Public Safety Innovation Fund Report

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2013 to FISCAL YEAR 2022

Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department

Pamela K. Lattimore, Debbie Dawes and Stephen Tueller RTI International

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

JANUARY 2013 REPORT FINDINGS AND INTERIM RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS. Legislative Budget Board Criminal Justice Forum October 4, 2013

Fourth Judicial District Adult Criminal Drug Court. Participant Contract

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY REENTRY COURT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL)

Urgent Routine AGENDA DATE March 2011

PROPOSAL FAMILY VIOLENCE COURT

Outcomes Analyses: Prepared 2/04/04 by Lois A. Ventura, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Justice College of Health and Human Services University of Toledo

DISTRICT COURT. Judges (not County positions) Court Administration POS/FTE 3/3. Family Court POS/FTE 39/36.5 CASA POS/FTE 20/12.38

Mental. Health. Court. Handbook

FY 2015 Court Administration Seventh Judicial Circuit

The Florida Legislature

DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

PROGRESSIVE INTERVENTIVE SANCTIONS AND INCENTIVES MODEL IN EL PASO, HUDSPETH AND CULBERSON COUNTIES

CCP Executive Retreat May 29, 2014

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Act

After years of steady decline, Rhode Island s

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

Criminal Justice Review & Status Report

Deputy Probation Officer I/II

REVIEW OF THE ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY OFFICE. Report to the Mayor and Commission OF PROBATION SERVICES. October Prepared by:

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

complex criminal activity. Detectives assigned to the Special Enforcement Unit (SEU) and Butte Interagency

The Primacy of Drug Intervention in Public Safety Realignment Success. CSAC Healthcare Conference June 12, 2013

2 nd Circuit Court- District Division- Plymouth PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK 5/11/16

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Nevada County Mental Health Court. Policies and Procedures Table of Contents

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Chapter 5 COMMUNITY SUPERVISION. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

Improving Probation and Alternatives to Incarceration in New York State:

Marin County STAR Program: Keeping Severely Mentally Ill Adults Out of Jail and in Treatment

IN JUNE 2012, GOVERNOR SAM BROWNBACK,

New Directions --- A blueprint for reforming California s prison system to protect the public, reduce costs and rehabilitate inmates

IC Chapter 2. State Grants to Counties for Community Corrections and Charges to Participating Counties for Confined Offenders

Community Transition Center: A Collaborative Approach to Offender Reentry

Factors Impacting Recidivism in Vermont. Report to House and Senate Committees April 21, 2011

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

Recent Criminal Justice Reform Initiatives

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model

HOPE: Theoretical Underpinnings and Evaluation Findings

Responding to Racial Disparities in Multnomah County s Probation Revocation Outcomes

September 2011 Report No

Oregon Criminal Justice Commission Joint Ways and Means Public Safety Committee Agency Presentation

Section 6. Intermediate Sanctions

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 to FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015

Sheriff-Coroner. Mission Statement

RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROBATION DEP ARTME Serving Courts Protecting Our Community Changing Lives

Law Enforcement Fund

5/25/2010 REENTRY COURT PROGRAM

Montgomery County s Continuity of Care (COC) Court for Mentally Ill Probationers: Process Evaluation

Jacksonville Sheriff s Office

JUVENILE JUSTICE COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE COUNTY FUNDING APPLICATION FOR CY 2016

CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR)

LANE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

Defining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program

Justice Reinvestment in Kansas (House Bill 2170) Kansas BIDS Conference October 8 & 9, 2015

GENESEE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE 2017 PROGRAM BUDGET

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Public Safety Trends Report Year End Review

Office of Criminal Justice System Improvements Pretrial Drug and Alcohol Initiative. Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Solicitation

Consensus Report of the Arkansas Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections

[CCP STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX]

GOB Project 193 Mental Health Diversion Facility Service Capacity and Fiscal Impact Estimates June 9, 2016

Instructions for completion and submission

Addressing the Re-entry Needs of Inmates with Serious Mental Illness. Council for State Governments St. Petersburg, Florida July 8, 2008

Macon County Mental Health Court. Participant Handbook & Participation Agreement

Adult DUI/Drug Court Certification Application

Correctional Populations in the United States, 2009

Over the past decade, the number of people in North

Grants. The county budget system contains three grant funds that are effective over three different grant periods:

San Francisco Adult Probation Department. Fiscal Year Annual Report

Merced County. Public Safety Realignment & Post Release Community Supervision

A Preliminary Review of the Metropolitan Detention Center s Community Custody Program

Transcription:

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing Misdemeanor Probation 2012 Joe Ingraham, Chief 1

Mission Statement The mission of the Department of Alternative Sentencing (DAS) is to increase safety in the community by reducing recidivism among criminal offenders, through a rehabilitative environment that includes accountability for offenses, opportunities for gaining and applying life skills, and sanctions for regressive behaviors. OBJECTIVES Reduce the revolving door syndrome in the criminal justice system Provide guidance and structure to those who are at risk of re-arrest and incarceration. Coordinate cases in a sometimes very confusing multijurisdictional environment Provide information, resources and education to probationers sentenced to the program in an effort to modify their behavior Strive to assist probationers in making positive changes in their lives Create a safer environment for our community and future generations Reduce the burden of public services to those who are capable of providing for themselves through guidance and structure Provide the best service possible to the community 2

A Multi-faceted Law Enforcement Agency providing the following services: Public Safety, working to attain the goal of a safe, secure and healthier community Alternative to jail Decreasing dependence on other Social Services through intensive supervision, improving the quality of life in Washoe County An option for all Judges when addressing offenders requiring strict supervision and providing the opportunity for all judiciary to utilize this efficient and successful supervision program to improve the opportunity for successful return to employment, housing and crime free lifestyle. Direct cost savings to the taxpayer, saving/diverting secured custody costs when appropriate Intensive misdemeanor offender supervision to ensure compliance with court order Reduce recidivism and the Revolving Door cycle. 3

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing CHIEF Office Support Specialist 1 FTE Office Support Specialist 1 PTE (grant funded) Assistant Alternative Sentencing Officer (sworn) 3 FTE Office Support Specialist 2 PTE Assistant Alternative Sentencing Officer (sworn) 5 PTE Reserve Assistant Alternative Sentencing Officer (sworn) Unlimited 4

Department of Alternative Sentencing Nevada Revised Statute 211A.090 Duties of the department. The department shall: 1. Supervise a probationer who, as a condition of a suspended sentence or a sentence of residential confinement, is released under the supervision of the department by the court. 2. At the time a probationer is released under the supervision of the department: a) Provide the probationer with a written statement describing the terms or condition of the suspended sentence or residential confinement imposed by the court; and b) Explain the terms or conditions to the probationer. 3. Be knowledgeable about the conduct and activities of each probationer under the supervision of the department. 4. Use all reasonable methods to assist a probationer under the supervision of the department to improve his conduct and comply with the terms and conditions of his suspended sentence or residential confinement. 5. Collect and disburse any money in accordance with the order of the court and make a written record of any money so collected or disbursed. 6. Cooperate with and assist any agency of law enforcement and any agency providing social services as requested by the court, or as necessary to fulfill the duties of the department. 5

Department of Alternative Sentencing Hours of Operation Probationer Hours: Monday through Thursday 9:00 a.m. 3:00 p.m. Friday closed Closed all major holidays Staff Hours: Vary based upon schedule of home visits, court appearances and probationer compliance. 6

Average Number of Probationers Under Daily Supervision 350 356 362 301 248 205 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 7

Annual New Cases 391 425 465 488 314 281 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 8

Total Number of Probationers Supervised (including house arrest) 838 799 606 655 695 629 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 9

Annual Cases Closed 363 353 255 211 180 197 170 218 118 82 29 56 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Successful Unsuccessful 6% unsuccessful termination Cases completely closed either by successful completion of probation or unsuccessful with sentence revoked. Presented with the resources needed compliance is attainable for all. 10

Annual Fees Collected $77,995 $85,552 $83,550 $88,879 $41,130 $26,289 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Probationers are required to pay monthly supervision fees prior to successful completion of probation. Probationers must also pay a one time lab fee for drug testing. 11

Annual Home Visits 2031 1897 1537 1403 720 17 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Home visits are completed to assure compliance and include verification of residence, urinalysis, breath test, status changes, etc. Home visits are random and could occur day or night. Most arrests for violation of probation are the result of a home visit related to a positive test for alcohol or drugs. 12

Annual Urinalysis Testing 884 870 672 715 523 427 193 39 132 106 142 204 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total UA Tests Positive UA Tests 13

Annual Preliminary Breath Testing 21,607 15,919 9,146 9,509 12,061 8,602 122 73 50 76 68 47 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 PBT's Positive PBT's Use of 24/7 alcohol monitoring technology (TAD/SCRAM) has effected the number of required office testing. Most arrests made for drinking were the result of a PBT performed in the probationers home. This demonstrates two things, random testing verses scheduled office visits may be more productive in preventing use. 14

Annual Probation Violation Arrests 274 224 236 242 122 73 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 All arrests made were for probation violation or an active warrant related to current DAS case. Not all arrested will be revoked; unless bail is posted they will remain in jail until seen by a judge and revocation determined depending upon severity of violation. 15

Annual Jail Days Diverted 115500 113550 113290 109792 110850 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Jail bed days diverted to probation by the courts. Bed days are based on suspended sentence. Probationers under supervision are responsible for their own housing, medical and other costs, relieving the taxpayers of the costly burden of incarceration. Failure to comply issues are handled through DAS and the courts while under supervision relieving the correctional system of this additional cost. 16

Annual Jail Costs Diverted $14,668,500 $14,420,850 $13,943,584 $14,077,950 $13,502,070 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Incarceration costs are diverted using misdemeanor probation. It is a positive alternative method of sentencing. Prior to this program immediate incarceration was the only intensive supervision option outside of the jail. Savings are based on WCSO cost of $119.00 per day. 17

Department of Alternative Sentencing Operational Costs vs. Incarceration Costs $13,943,584 $14,668,500 $14,077,950 $14,420,850 $13,502,070 $556,031 $751,615 $821,627 $688,675 629,758 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 DAS Operating costs Jail Costs Based on WCSO $119 per day and DAS Budget including current grant funding 18

ACCOMPLISHMENTS Collaborated with other agencies to train in joint probationary function Utilized volunteer reserve personnel to decrease costs Retained dedicated work force under decline of financial resources Obtained additional year of grant funding for DUI Prevention Program Utilized grant funding obtained by Nevada Sheriff s and Chief s Association, in conjunction with Nevada Post, from draft to implementation, department wide policy and procedure manual that is standardized format statewide 42% of caseload successfully completed probation Reno Justice Courts contributed over $40,000 of funding for needed equipment and supplies Achieved 6% recidivism rate Conducted several training and outreach programs in local schools and colleges 19

EMERGING ISSUES AND CONCERNS Continue fiscal ability to retain current skilled workforce Dispatch services: City of Reno $20,000, Washoe County TBD Meet the Board s Financial Sustainability Metrics Maintain level of service that works toward highest level of safety in our community 20

STRATEGIC PLAN Continue to reduce revolving-door syndrome by proactive supervision Continue to reduce jail population by increasing the number of probationers on house arrest Increase collaboration with other departments by joint trainings and sharing of resources Explore new case management system that will have the ability to integrate with the court system 21

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing Proposed Budget Reductions Pooled Positions- $17,900 Overtime- $7,500 Shift Differential- $3,000 Total reduction $28,400 4.5% 22

IMPACT OF 4.5% REDUCTION Any reduction in personnel would increase a threat to community due to fewer officers in the field. Overtime, shift differential, response time and home visits will decrease thus increasing the likelihood of re-offense, lack of rehabilitation and accountability. Impact to employees: increased workload due to staffing reduction, and less frequent training. Impact to other departments: increase jail population, lack of personnel to assist court and the court s calendar. Supervision would transfer to reactive rather than proactive. 23

Comments or Questions 24