Long Range Transportation Plan

Similar documents
Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type:Informational Report

Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update

Local Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal

ATTACHMENT G-1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL ITS ARCHITECTURE CONSISTENCY SELF-CERTIFICATION FORM

ADJOURNMENT TO THE REGULAR MEETING, 5 P.M., MONDAY, January 23, 2016, in Room 101, Community Services Building, 150 N.

Coolidge - Florence Regional Transportation Plan

Project Budget and Schedule Status

INTRODUCTION. RTPO Model Program Guide February 27, 2007 Page 1

Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003

Transportation Planning & Investment in Urban North Carolina

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act: FAST Act Implications for the Region

SECTION II. Collection and Analysis of Metro Contract Data

RESOLUTION NO. 18-XX RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zo~-.,. Los Angeles, CA g0012-2g52 rnetro.net

Shaping Investments for San Francisco s Transportation Future The 2017 San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) Update

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

San Francisco Transportation Plan (SFTP) and Early Action Plan

Intentional blank page. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

2016 Measure B Program Areas

A. Amend the FY LACMTA Budget to add $3,000,000 from Measure R 3% Commuter Rail funds for the Rancho Vista Grade Separation Project

SFTP Technical Advisory Committee September 19, 2012

Centre County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Coordinating Committee Meeting Tuesday, March 22, :00 p.m.

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: August 21, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: 9

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011

In developing the program, as directed by the Board (Attachment A), staff used the following framework:

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

.?-& Approved as to Fonn. R. ZIEGLER, County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMD~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER:

Appendix E: Grant Funding Sources

$5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads

Metro REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE JUNE 18, 2014

Measure A Strategic Plan Update Citizens Advisory Committee July 1, 2014

SUBJECT: REGIONAL RAlL PLANNING AND ENGINEERING BENCH AND REGIONAL RAlL UPDATE. INITIATE PROCESS TO ESTABLISH A REGIONAL RAlL BENCH

HOW DOES A PROJECT GET INTO THE STIP?

FISCAL YEAR TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW REPORT RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR TRIENNIAL REVIEW REPORT

Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project

Metrolink Budget for FY /Additional Service on the Antelope Valley Line

Staff Report. Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding

INTRODUCTION... 1 OVERVIEW... 2 SECTION I: FUND LISTING AND ELIGIBILITY CHART... 5 SECTION II: FUNDING SOURCE DESCRIPTIONS... 8

RESOLUTION ADOPTINGPRINCIPLES AND APPROVING A LIST OF CANDIDATE PROJECTS AND FUNDING REQUESTS FOR REGIONAL MEASURE 3

Memorandum. Date: RE: Plans and Programs Committee March 19, 2013

RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan

WESTERN SLOPE CIP AND TIM FEE UPDATE

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Legislative Priorities

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Puget Sound Gateway Program

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SCSPC STAFF REPORT. Peak Hour Rail Service Update. MEETING DATE: February 14, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5 RECOMMENDATION:

NC General Statutes - Chapter 136 Article 19 1

Re: Comments on the Draft Guidelines for the Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program

Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT October 19, 2016 Page 2 of 2 Background On July 20, 2016 the Authority approved Resolution G

Special Meeting Agenda

Staff Recommendation:

Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting #52. February 16, :00 PM - 8:00 PM Progress Park Downey Ave, Paramount, CA MEETING SUMMARY

Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1. FINAL Draft

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Program Management Plan

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works David Martin, Director of Planning and Community Development

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT October 7, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Changes from Committee Background MTC began preparing its 2017 RTP Update earlier this yea

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation

Virginia Association of Counties

FY 2018 Application Support Guide

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza z13.gzz.zooo Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooi2-zp52 metro.net

2015 call for projects draft application package

PUBLIC HEARING FY 2017 AND FY 2018 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET. February 16, 2016 SFMTA Board of Directors

2007 Annual List of Obligated Projects

A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS FOUR AND SIX COMMUTER SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief

Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to award and execute the following contracts for the Eastside Phase I1 Transit Corridor Project:

APPENDIX B BUS RAPID TRANSIT

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

Transit Operations Funding Sources

ORDINANCE NO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION EXPENDITURE PLAN AND RETAIL TRANSACTION AND USE TAX ORDINANCE

DRAFT JARC FUNDING APPLICATION January 29, 2013

SOUTH FLORIDA COMMUTER SERVICES CONTRACT SCOPE OF SERVICES

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA (510)

DRAFT FUNDING APPLICATION October 20, 2010

Chapter 8. Glossary and Index. Chapter 8

Create good jobs within Alameda County by requiring local contracting that supports residents and businesses in Alameda County.

County Executive Office/Legislative Affairs. County of Orange Report on Grant Applications/Awards

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

Western Slope CIP and TIM Fee Update Workshop

George Washington Region Scenario Planning Study Phase II

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO

Memorandum. Date: To: Prospective Project Sponsors From: Aprile Smith Senior Transportation Planner Through: Subject:

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

MOVE LV. Show Us the $ + Transportation Funding May 25, 2016, 12 PM MOVE LEHIGH VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

South Dakota Smart Transportation: Save Money and Grow the Economy

Transcription:

Summary of Policy Governor in 2000. The baseline can The purpose of the Long Range also be considered as the scenario in Transportation Plan (LRTP) is to which no new transportation projects provide decision makers with a vision will be built beyond those currently for addressing transportation approved. Various transportation plan challenges in Los Angeles County alternatives may be measured against through 2025. Developed through a the baseline scenario. collaborative process, the LRTP helps us plan for a countywide transportation system that meets the needs of the entire traveling public, whether they are driving cars, riding public transit, riding a bicycle, or walking. Over the next 25 years, the population of Los Angeles County is expected to increase somewhere between 2.7 and 3.5 million, bringing the total population to approximately 13 million people. From this growth, planners estimate that daily trips will increase by 30 percent, overloading streets, highways, and public transit, which are already operating near capacity. But with good planning this need not happen. It is the role of the LRTP to guide transportation development to make sure that people and goods remain mobile. The LRTP, which is updated regularly, examines the impacts that population growth will have on the mobility of the county and recommends improvements to the transportation system by mode. Projects are listed in either the Recommended Plan or the Strategic Plan. The Recommended Plan is the fully funded plan that includes Baseline and Constrained priorities. Baseline refers to those projects approved by the Board of Directors before September 2000, as well as the California Traffic Congestion Relief Program passed by the State Legislature and signed by the Constrained priorities are those projects and programs that can be accomplished within the $11.2 billion budget forecast for new projects. Projects identified as Strategic Priorities go beyond the $11.2 billion budget. If funding can be identified, they would be a desirable addition to our long-term planning because they would further improve accessibility and air quality. The Recommended Plan provides a balanced transportation program with a strong emphasis on public transit to meet the expected growth in travel. Components of the Recommended Plan s transportation program include: completion of the Eastside and Pasadena Gold Line projects; two busways for the San Fernando Valley; a fixed guideway project from downtown to West Los Angeles; 22-line expansion of the successful Metro Rapid Bus program; freeway widenings, extensions and gap closures; freeway interchange improvements; expansion of the HOV (carpool) lane network; construction of additional soundwalls; expansion of the Metrolink commuter rail system

completion of a countywide traffic signal coordination system It also encourages more ridesharing, walking, bike riding, telecommuting, and improved management of truck traffic. The Recommended Plan is built on realistic financial projections of revenues from federal, state, and local taxes and subsidies, as well as revenues from passenger fares, advertising, real estate rentals, and other miscellaneous sources. Staff estimates that $106.4 billion will be available for local transportation projects through 2025. Since $95.2 billion of this sum is already committed, $11.2 billion remains in uncommitted funding that will be available for new transportation projects through 2025. If more funds can be secured, the Strategic Plan may be implemented. It includes other transportation projects and services that are of regional importance. They include: an additional 14 Metro Rapid Bus lines; extensions and/or upgrades to transit corridor projects in the constrained plan; and extension of the Pasadena Blue Line from Sierra Madre Villa (Pasadena) to Claremont. completion of countywide system of HOV (carpool) lanes; additional freeway gap closures; additional community transit services (i.e., shuttles, local circulators); and additional Metrolink expansion. Major capital projects that are identified in the LRTP have priority for future funding and construction. While these projects require further Board approval at various stages of their development, they are candidates for further planning and design. Many other projects and programs compete in the Call for Projects. They are not specifically identified in the LRTP, but funding for general categories is allocated through the LRTP. Through the Call for Projects, cities, the County, and transportation partners nominate projects that are ready for construction. This process is conducted every other year, and projects are competitively evaluated. Projects approved for funding through the Call for Projects are included in the Transportation Improvement Program, which is a list of projects recommended for funding over a sixyear period. The Transportation Improvement Program is then submitted to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and incorporated into a six-county Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). Projects in the RTIP are then eligible for State and federal funding. Historical Perspective This Long Range Transportation Plan is an update of the 1995 long-range plan entitled, A Plan for Los Angeles County: Transportation for the 21 st Century. The LRTP will be regularly updated. Transportation planning for Los Angeles County at the regional level is the responsibility of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization

for a six-county region, including the recommendations were established in counties of Imperial, Orange, response to budgetary constraints. Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, and Los Angeles. Under federal law, SCAG must prepare a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The RTP demonstrates how the region will meet federal transportation and air quality requirements and must be approved by federal agencies in order to continue receiving federal transportation funds. Only projects and programs included in the RTP and RTIP are eligible for federal funding. As the State-designated planning and programming agency for Los Angeles County, LACMTA develops a longrange transportation plan and submits recommended projects and programs to SCAG to include in the RTP. To complete the 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan, staff met extensively with partner transportation agencies, local governments, interest groups and individual citizens. To comply with federal environmental justice and Title VI requirements, staff reached out to the transit dependent and minority communities and discussed the impacts of the Plan with them. Staff also organized focus groups with many different communities and held public meetings. The LRTP planning process began with analysis of the projected performance of the transportation system in the future using baseline assumptions. Alternative scenarios were then developed to respond to the performance deficiencies in the system. These scenarios were then evaluated to determine which ones could best meet the goals of the Plan. Finally, priorities among specific Last Board Action April 26, 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan The Board approved under reconsideration, subject to amendments at the May Board Meeting, resolution adopting the 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan for Los Angeles County. May 24, 2001 Amendments to the adopted Long Range Transportation Plan The Board approved as amended revisions to the adopted 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for Los Angeles County: A. incorporate revisions to the discussion of the 1-710 Freeway Gap Closure; Approved, as amended by Director Fasana, to delete the following paragraph from Attachment a to the revised report dated May 24, 2001: "The 1-710 Project is being developed to allow construction in phases. Phase 1 will extend the freeway from Valley Boulevard to Huntington Drive. Caltrans has undertaken a traffic impact analysis of the temporary Huntington Drive terminus. Based upon the findings of the analysis, Caltrans will coordinate the implementation of traffic operations measures with the local jurisdictions to ensure safe, efficient traffic operation between phases." B. incorporate revisions which clarify that southern portion of the Arbor

Vitae Interchange is a baseline APPROVED, as amended by project needed to address existing Directors Proo/Knabe, to include: mobility needs and that the staff work with sub-regions and northern portion of the interchange individual jurisdictions to evaluate is not in the LRTP and will require local system preservation and specific Board approval before capacity enhancement programming and implementation needs/issues and report to the could occur; and Board in fiscal year 2002 with findings and recommendations for addressing such needs/issues. APPROVED, as amended by Director Burke, to include the following positions: The Arbor Vitae Project - Southern Portion is needed to relieve current conditions associated with the I-405 corridor, and given this status, we reaffirm our commitment to the Project, and Project funding; The Southern Portion of the Project is not a project included in future LAX expansion plans as a mitigation but is referenced as an existing condition; and In recognition of the community concern over increased congestion on the surface streets surrounding the I-405 corridor associated with the LAX Masterplan, the Board will not program, approve, fund or recommend for funding the Northern half of the Arbor Vitae Interchange until such a time as community issues with this project can be resolved to the satisfaction of the community. C. incorporate revisions regarding local system preservation, which clarify that staff will take a strong leadership role in assisting subregional and individual jurisdictions in accessing and drawing-down funds for system preservation needs, as well as seeking new funding for such needs. D. limit Ridershare funding to $4,367,270 in FY02 until an evaluation of the rideshare program is conducted and presented to the Board by March 2002. Attachment Resolution, Board of Directors, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Adopting 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan for Los Angeles County See Related Annual Budget Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority Adopted Budget Regional Transit Plan Short Range Transportation Plan Full text of Long Range Transportation Plan available from the Board Secretary

Resolution Board of Directors Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Adopting 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan for Los Angeles County Whereas, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority has developed a 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan Executive Summary and Technical Document for Los Angeles County extending through the year 2025 herein referred to as "the Draft Plan". and Wherea~ the Draft Plan bas been presented at seventeen open community workshops scheduled at locations throughout Los Angeles County and at numerous other meetings including meetings sub-regional COGs, chambers of commerce, environmental groups. business groups and community groups, and Whereas, the Draft Plan includes technical analysis necessary to meet federal Title VI and Environmental Justice responsibilities and a public outreach process was conducted that maximized opportunities for all communities to meaningfully participate in the Draft Plan development process, including the transit dependent and minority communities, and Whereas, the Board of Directors of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Board of Directors) over the last year has held public workshops and open meetings on the policies. programs. selected projects and financial costs of the Draft Plan, and Whereas, the Draft Plan has been publicly available for review and comment and includes two documents commonly referred to as the Draft Executive Summary and Draft Technical Document attached hereto and included herein in their entirety by this reference. and Whereas, the Draft Plan has been revised in consideration of the public comments received and updated technical and financial infonnation. The 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan Executive Summary and Technical Document extending through 2025 as revised is refelted to as the "Final Plan."

Whereas, the Board of Directors desires to coordinate with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to ensure that the Final Plan is coordinated and integrated with the 2001 Regional Transportation Plan, and Whereas, the Long Range Transportation Plan adopted by the Board of Directors on March 22, 1995 would be superceded by the adoption of the Final Plan, and Whereas, the Board of Directors wish to adopt the Final Plan as policy guidance and as a strategic planning tool for the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. and Whereas, the Board of Directors considers the Final Plan to be the primary transportation-planning tool to guide the development of future transportatio needs throughout Los Angeles County through the year 2025. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that: The Board of Directors hereby adopts the 2001 Long Range Transportation Plan Executive Summary and Technical Document as amended by the following: A Technical Refinements and Changes to the text of the Executive Summary and Technical Document as identified in Attachment B. and B. Teclmical Refinements and Changes to the financial costs and available revenues depicted in the Executive Summary and Plan Document, as identified in Attachment B, and c. Combines "Baseline" and "Constrained" projects into one list known as the "Recommended Plan" and. D. Shifts $2 million per year from the Rideshare to the Pedestrian programs to reflect anticipated demand for both programs. 2. In adopting the Final Plan, the Board of Directors also directs staff to: A. Continue working with Caltrans to achieve community consensus regarding 1-710 project and advise the MT A Board as consensus is reached, and B. Aggressively move forward in seeking additional revenue to accelerate projects in the Recommended Plan and to fund projects identified in the Strate~.c Plan. and

C. Take a leadership role in coordination with the Technical Advisory Committee in seeking additional revenue for local system preservation needs. 3 The Final Plan hereby supercedes the Long Range Transportation Plan adopted on March 22, 1995. 4. The Board of Directors finds the Final Plan to be in confonnance with the Regional Transportation Plan by the perfonnance criteria, project selection and modeling results that indicate compliance. 5. The Board of Directors hereby authorizes the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Officer Countywide Planning and Development and their staff to: A. Publish and circulate the Final Plan as amended herein and henceforth remove the draft notation, and Bo To further rqjresent the Final Plan as the officially adopted Long Range Transportation Plan policy and strategic planning tool of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Passed and Adopted this day of Apri12001 Signature Seal Chair of the Board of Directors Secretary to the Board of Directors