CAREGIVING COSTS. Declining Health in the Alzheimer s Caregiver as Dementia Increases in the Care Recipient

Similar documents
Statistical Portrait of Caregivers in the US Part III: Caregivers Physical and Emotional Health; Use of Support Services and Technology

Caregiving in the U.S.: How Foundations Can Support Family Caregivers

Trends in Family Caregiving and Why It Matters

Caregiving: Health Effects, Treatments, and Future Directions

Care costs and caregiver burden for older persons with dementia in Taiwan

A REVIEW OF NURSING HOME RESIDENT CHARACTERISTICS IN OHIO: TRACKING CHANGES FROM

Long-Term Services & Supports Feasibility Policy Note

KEY FINDINGS from Caregiving in the U.S. National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP. April Funded by MetLife Foundation

An Overview of Ohio s In-Home Service Program For Older People (PASSPORT)

DEMENTIA CAREGIVING IN THE U.S.

CAREGIVING IN THE U.S.

End-of-Life Care and the Effects of Bereavement on Family Caregivers of Persons with Dementia

11/13/2017. Thank You to Our Sponsors. Evaluations & CE Credits. University at Albany School of Public Health. New York State Department of Health

A Focused Look at Those Caring for Someone Age 18 to 49

NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELLNESS RISK MITIGATION - CONTINUING CARE BRANCH. Caregiver Benefit Program Policy

RESEARCH ON FAMILY CAREGIVing

FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY AND INFORMAL CARE FOR OLDER ADULTS IN MEXICO

Executive Summary. Caregiving in the U.S. conducted by. in collaboration with. funded by

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

Executive Summary. Caregiving in the U.S. conducted by. in collaboration with. funded by

Results from the Green House Evaluation in Tupelo, MS

Hidden. Heroes. America s Military Caregivers. Rajeev Ramchand Terri Tanielian

Caregivers of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Patients

CAREGIVING IN THE U.S. A Focused Look at the Ethnicity of Those Caring for Someone Age 50 or Older. Executive Summary

THE PITTSBURGH REGIONAL CAREGIVERS SURVEY

UNIVERSAL INTAKE FORM

Evidenced-Informed Training Intervention For Puerto Rican Caregivers of Persons with ADRDP

GERIATRIC SERVICES CAPACITY ASSESSMENT DOMAIN 4 ALTERNATE LIVING ARRANGEMENTS

Caregivers of Adults with Severe Mental Illness: Results of a National Study

Family Caregivers in dementia. Dr Roland Ikuta MD, FRCP Geriatric Medicine

NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CAREGIVING

NCPOP Report Launch Family Carers of Older People: Results of a National Survey of Stress, Conflict and Coping

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) FOCUSED QUESTION

Long-Stay Alternate Level of Care in Ontario Mental Health Beds

Background. Population/Intervention(s)/Comparison/Outcome(s) (PICO) Interventions for carers of people with dementia

Selected State Background Characteristics

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

Aging and Caregiving

Designing a Medicare Help at Home Benefit: Lessons from Maryland s Community First Choice Program

UNIVERSAL INTAKE FORM

Aging in Place: Do Older Americans Act Title III Services Reach Those Most Likely to Enter Nursing Homes? Nursing Home Predictors

Innovations in Medicaid Managed Long-Term Services and Supports: How Health Plans are Providing Support to Family Caregivers

Predicting use of Nurse Care Coordination by Patients in a Health Care Home

Dual Eligibles: Medicaid s Role in Filling Medicare s Gaps

Respite Care For Caregivers. The What, Why, and How for Family Caregivers

The Number of People With Chronic Conditions Is Rapidly Increasing

Caregiving in the U.S.

Caregiver Stress. F r e q u e n t l y A s k e d Q u e s t i o n s. Q: Who are our nation's caregivers?

Medi-Cal Managed Care CBAS Program Transition

Selected State Background Characteristics

Michigan Office of Services to the Aging. OSA National Aging Program Information System (NAPIS) Caregiver Reporting Primer

ON PINS & NEEDLES. Caregivers of adults with mental illness. February Conducted in partnership with

Home Alone: Family Caregivers Providing Complex Chronic Care

VA Caregiver Support Program

Health and Long-Term Care Use Patterns for Ohio s Dual Eligible Population Experiencing Chronic Disability

Selected State Background Characteristics

A Policy Conversation on Family Caregiving for Older Adults

Unpaid individuals who provide care and/or assistance to the person

Selected State Background Characteristics

VJ Periyakoil Productions presents

THE RESOURCE UTILISATION IN DEMENTIA (RUD) QUESTIONNAIRE Case Report Form

Services for Caregivers

EVALUATING CAREGIVER PROGRAMS Andrew Scharlach, Ph.D. Nancy Giunta, M.A., M.S.W.

Elder Services/Programs

November 14, Chief Clinical Operating Officer Division of Medical Assistance Department of Health and Human Services

Feasibility Analysis for Assisted Living A Model for Assessment

Selected State Background Characteristics

Caregiver Participation in Service Planning in a System of Care

Selected State Background Characteristics

6th November 2014 Tim Muir, OECD Help Wanted? Informal care in OECD countries

Selected State Background Characteristics

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING EXPERT TESTIMONY BY ANSWERS TO WRITTEN DEPOSITION

Midlife and Older Americans with Disabilities: Who Gets Help?

Appendix A: Full Questionnaire

The Extent of the Problem

Respite Contract Services Agreement & Responsibilities

ASSESSMENT OF FINANCIAL INCAPABILITY FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT AGA PART 2.1

RESPITE CARE VOUCHER PROGRAM

Long Term Care. Lecture for HS200 Nov 14, 2006

Payment Reforms to Improve Care for Patients with Serious Illness

Gender And Caregiving Network Differences In Adult Child Caregiving Patterns: Associations With Care-Recipients Physical And Mental Health

Policy & Providers. for Managing Chronic Care Patients. Mary Alexander Strategic Alliances Director - Home Instead, Inc. Kelly Funk.

CANCER CAREGIVING IN THE U.S.

Critical Review: What effect do group intervention programs have on the quality of life of caregivers of survivors of stroke?

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CAREGIVERS

National Hospice and Palliative Care OrganizatioN. Facts AND Figures. Hospice Care in America. NHPCO Facts & Figures edition

Using the patient s voice to measure quality of care

INTRODUCTION. In our aging society, the challenges of family care are an increasing

Who are New Jersey s Caregivers? Findings from the NJ Family Health Survey

Statewide Implementation of Reducing Disability in Alzheimer s Disease: Challenges to Sustainability

A Model of Health for Family Caregivers. Flo Weierbach, RN, MPH, PhD East Tennessee State University College of Nursing

New Facts and Figures on Hospice Care in America

Is It Time for In-Home Care?

Nucleus Mobile Supports for Daily Living for Seniors

Caregiving 101 Checklist

N4A Annual Conference Philadelphia July 14, The Role of the Family Caregiver and the Aging Network in the Chronic Care Model

Overview. Caregiverosis. The Caregiving Role. The Caregiving Role 3/20/2013. The Dementia Care Triad: Understanding the Partnership

Organization: Solution Title: Program/Project Description, including Goals: What is this project? Why is this project important?

kaiser medicaid uninsured commission on

Physician Workforce Fact Sheet 2016

Transcription:

CAREGIVING COSTS Declining Health in the Alzheimer s Caregiver as Dementia Increases in the Care Recipient National Alliance for Caregiving and Richard Schulz, Ph.D. and Thomas Cook, Ph.D., M.P.H. University Center for Social and Urban Research Department of Psychiatry University of Pittsburgh November 2011 Supported by The Alzheimer s Immunotherapy Program of Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy & Pfizer Inc.

About Alzheimer s Immunotherapy Program The Alzheimer s Immunotherapy Program (AIP) of Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy and Pfizer Inc. is an equal collaboration committed to delivering comprehensive and meaningful solutions to address the needs of people affected by Alzheimer s disease. We believe that it is possible to reduce the burden of disease through early intervention in the illness. The AIP is harnessing the combined scientific experience, expertise and scale of our respective companies to advance patient care worldwide. About National Alliance for Caregiving Established in 1996, National Alliance for Caregiving is a non-profit coalition of national organizations focusing on family caregiving research. Alliance members include grassroots organizations, professional associations, service organizations, disease-specific organizations, government agencies, and corporations. The Alliance conducts research, does policy analysis, develops national best-practice programs, and works to increase public awareness of family caregiving issues. Recognizing that family caregivers make essential social and financial contributions toward maintaining the well-being of those they care for, the Alliance is dedicated to being the foremost national resource on family caregiving research to improve the quality of life for families and care recipients. We would like to thank Donna Wagner, Ph.D., for her review of the study For more information, visit www.caregiving.org Empowering Family Caregivers through Research, Awareness & Advocacy

Executive Summary Many studies have shown that the health of family caregivers can be adversely affected, especially as their caregiving continues and becomes more intense. This study looked at Alzheimer s caregivers in the REACH 1 project (Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer s Caregiver Health) to see if their health use was different from non-caregivers and, if so, how much more that care was estimated to cost. The results: in the 18 months of the study, the caregivers self-reported health declined steadily and significantly. For example, emergency room visits and hospital-based services doubled over that time. There was an overall 25% trend in increased use of all types of health services. The best predictor of this increased health care utilization was those caregivers who had fair or poor self-reported health at the beginning. Caregivers were asked to rate their health as Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair or Poor. The median cost of health care service use was calculated for caregivers and noncaregivers. Healthcare for family caregivers providing care for someone with Alzheimer s cost an average of $4,766 more per year. Introduction The health effects of family caregiving on the caregiver have been well documented by researchers. 1 Health effects are especially pronounced among those caregivers caring for persons with Alzheimer s disease (AD). These caregivers are most likely to report higher levels of burden and stress than other caregivers and to face unique challenges in providing care due to the cognitive and physical disability experienced by care recipients. Although there has been clear documentation of the adverse effects experienced by caregivers to persons with AD, little empirical attention has been given to the resulting use of health care services by these caregivers and the associated costs. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of formal health care services (as defined below) in a large sample of AD caregivers who were providing care for moderately to severely impaired AD patients at home. The following questions were addressed in the study: What is the prevalence of formal health service use among AD caregivers and how does this compare with rates of service use among non-caregivers? Does health service use by a caregiver relate to the AD care recipient s increasing dementia? Is there a financial impact of a change in caregivers health? 1 Schulz, R, & Sherwood, P. (2008). Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. American Journal of Nursing, Vol. 108 (9-Supplement), 23-27, PMID: 18797217. PMCID: PMC2791523. National Alliance for Caregiving 1

The Sample Data from the REACH 1 study was used to examine the research questions above. Resources For Enhancing Alzheimer s Caregiver Health (REACH) is a project started in 1995 by the National Institutes of Health to explore ways in which families who are caregiving for someone with AD can better manage the difficult tasks associated with this care. The REACH project, for example, includes skills training and behavioral management. The research is coordinated by the University of Pittsburgh and involves several researchers around the country. 2 The REACH project includes testing of the support interventions as well as data collection on 1,222 family caregiver and care recipient pairs recruited at six sites around the country including: Birmingham, AL; Boston; Miami; Palo Alto, CA; and Philadelphia. The family caregivers were a diverse group and included African Americans, Hispanics (both English and Spanish-speaking), and Whites. The support interventions tested with the caregivers and their care recipients included educational, behavioral and environmental modifications. Study sample members were assigned to either a control group or an intervention group lasting six months. Caregivers were eligible to participate in the study if they were over the age of 21, able to complete a screening form, living with and caring for someone with AD for at least the previous six months. Respondents were also required to be spending at least four hours a day in their caregiving activities. At the beginning of the intervention trial, caregivers were not screened for depression or health status with the exception that those being treated for cancer were ineligible to participate in the study. Care recipients were eligible if they were assessed as having moderate to severe cognitive impairment and had at least one limitation in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) requiring personal care, such as bathing, dressing, feeding, toileting, etc. or two needs in the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) such as housekeeping, handling finances, transporting to doctor s appointments, etc. This limited the caregiver sample to those with responsibilities that could be considered burdensome. Caregivers were asked a standard, very reliable question about whether their health was excellent, very good, fair or poor. Data collected about caregiver health utilization included physician visits, visits to a nurse practitioner or other health care practitioner, short term or overnight hospital stays, emergency room visits, medical testing, or visits to counselors, psychologists or psychiatrists, or clergy for help with personal problems. Medication use, self-rated health, and presence of chronic conditions were health status indicators for the caregivers. 2 For additional information about REACH: www.nia.nih.gov/alzheimers/researchinformation/ 2 National Alliance for Caregiving

Sample Characteristics For this study, we focused on a sample of AD family caregivers who provided care over an 18- month period in the home. Table 1 provides demographics of these caregivers. The average age of the caregivers was 61.7 years. More than half were Caucasian/White (58%), 23% were African American and 18% were Hispanic/Latino. All were unpaid, and most were either spouses (48%) or adult children (41%). The vast majority were female (82.8%) who were spending an average of 7.9 hours daily on care tasks. The average duration of caregiving was 4.3 years. The care recipients average age was 78.7 years, and nearly half of them were men (42%). Table 1. Characteristics of Alzheimer s Caregivers and Care Recipients in Study Family Caregivers Providing In-Home Care N=583 Caregiver Age Mean Age Care Recipient Age Mean Age 60.8 years 77.9 years Caregiver Race White 53% African American 27 Hispanic 21 Caregiver/Care Recipient Relationship Spouse 48% Other than Spouse 52 REACH Intervention Intervention Group 68% Control Group 32 Caregiver Gender Female 83% Care Recipient Gender Female 58% Revised Memory & Behavior Problem Checklist 3 Mean 1.1 3 Teri, L., Truax, P., Logsdon, R., Uomoto, J., Zarit, S., & Vitaliano, P. P. (1992). Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: The Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist. Psychology and Aging, 7(4), 622-631. National Alliance for Caregiving 3

What We Found Not surprisingly, analysis of the data showed that, over the 18 months of the study, the AD care recipients as a group declined in the cognitive abilities as measured by the Mini Mental State Exam, and their need for assistance increased as measured by the ADLs and IADLs they needed help with. During this same time period, the health status of the Table 2. Repeated Measures of Caregiver and Patient Status Indicators Baseline Time 1 Time 2 Time 3 p-value Care Recipient Status Mini-Mental State Exam 13.5 11.3 p <.001 Needs Help with ADLs 4 3.10 3.46 3.76 4.08 p <.001 Needs Help with IADLs 7.25 7.33 7.42 7.49 p <.001 Caregiver Health Status Self-rated health (1-5 scale) 3.02 2.97 2.99 2.91 p =.026 Depression (CES-D) 5 14.10 13.46 12.82 13.03 p =.002 Health Care Utilization (Ever) Emergency room visit 0.032 0.032 0.042 0.053 p =.069 Hospital use 0.027 0.025 0.032 0.057 p =.017 Doctor visit 0.474 0.478 0.492 0.492 p =.779 Nurse visit 0.091 0.078 0.100 0.078 p =.455 Counselor/mental health 0.167 0.173 0.167 0.123 p =.756 Psychiatric Medication Use Antidepressants 0.130 0.151 0.159 0.156 p =.087 Anti-anxiety medications 0.134 0.144 0.134 0.132 p =.693 Total 0.234 0.250 0.261 0.253 p =.170 Non-routine Use of Services Multiple hospital or ED visits 0.010 0.017 0.019 0.023 p =.088 > = 3 doctor visits 0.067 0.098 0.102 0.104 p =.018 > = 3 nurse visits 0.023 0.015 0.032 0.051 p =.824 > = 3 mental health visits 0.032 0.032 0.030 0.025 p =.389 > = 3 All services combined 0.163 0.195 0.216 0.195 p =.073 4 ADLs are personal care tasks, such as bathing, dressing, feeding, toileting and transferring. IADLs are instrumental activities of daily living such as cooking, housekeeping, handling finances, and transportation to doctor visits. 5 CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale 4 National Alliance for Caregiving

family caregivers was mixed. Self-rated health scores declined steadily and significantly over the 18 months on average from 3.02 at the beginning to 2.91 at 18 months. Caregiver depression as measured by the CES-D 6 test was mixed over time as well. However, the use of medical services by the caregivers including emergency room visits, hospitalbased services and increased use of primary care services and mental health service use did increase over time. But only the emergency room use and hospital-based services increase were statistically significant (see Table 2). To better understand these trends, we calculated service utilization based upon the rate of healthcare use per 100 caregivers. As shown in Table 3, the rate of increased use for all healthcare services was statistically significant. In fact, caregiver hospital or emergency room visits doubled from beginning to end of the 18-month period, from 6.3 stays to 12.5 total visits per 100 caregivers. Overall, caregivers use of all types of healthcare services increased significantly from 106.8 visits per 100 caregivers at the beginning to a peak of 133.3 visits at 12 months and a slight drop to 124.4 visits per 100 at 18 months. This overall time trend of a 25% increase in use of all types of services combined was statistically significant. Table 3. Summary of Healthcare Use by Caregivers over Time (Visits per Month) Baseline Time 1 Time 2 Time 3 p-value Visits per 100 caregivers Hospital-based Services Hospital use 3.0 2.5 3.8 7.0 p =.013 Emergency room visits 3.2 4.0 5.1 5.5 p =.052 Subtotal, hospital-based services 6.3 6.4 8.9 12.5 p =.004 Primary Care Doctor visits 76.9 93.2 99.8 95.5 p =.010 Nurse visits 23.6 15.3 24.6 16.5 p =.565 Subtotal, primary care 100.6 108.5 124.4 111.9 p =.114 Total Healthcare Services 106.8 114.9 133.3 124.4 p =.034 Mental Health/Counselor 36.8 31.9 35.9 27.7 p =.393 Total Use of All Services 143.5 146.7 169.0 152.0 p =.279 6 Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale National Alliance for Caregiving 5

Predictors of this health care utilization were, most importantly, caregiver self-reported health status at baseline. The interaction of measures of care recipient decline and caregiver health care use was most striking among those caregivers who had poor or fair self-reported health status at baseline. This finding suggests that the caregiver group most vulnerable to the effects of increasing dependence of the care recipient is those with lower self-reported health (see Figure 1). Figure 1. Probability of Multiple Doctor Visits Reported at 18 Months Associated with Negative Changes in Care Recipient ADLs, by Caregiver Health Status at Baseline 6 National Alliance for Caregiving

Estimating Costs In order to estimate the costs associated with higher rates of health care use by caregivers, we compared caregivers (average age of 61) with non-caregiver women between the ages of 45-64. Data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 7 allowed us to estimate the marginal costs associated with caregiver health care use compared with noncaregivers of a similar age. Table 4 shows that emergency room use was twice as high for the caregivers as for similar aged non-caregiving women (2.6 visits per month/100 women contrasted with 5.5 visits per month/100 caregivers). Physician visits were nearly triple for the caregivers when compared to non-caregivers (95.5 per month/100 contrasted to 34.3 per month/100). The median cost of health care service was used to calculate the cost difference between the caregivers and the non-caregiving women. This calculation, outlined in Table 4, suggests that a caregiver providing care for an individual with AD on average costs $4,766 more per year (per person) than a non-caregiver. Table 4. Utilization and Cost for Women Aged 45-64 and AD Caregivers Median Utilization Cost per Utilization Cost per Average cost per rates per month rates per month annual person month for 100 month for 100 AD per person for 100 women for 100 AD caregivers excess women aged caregivers utilization aged 45-64 45-64 cost for AD caregivers Emergency Room Visits $395 8 2.6 $1,027 5.5 $2,172 $137 Physician Office Visits $243 34.3 $8,335 95.5 $23,206 $1,785 Hospital Use (9.8% vs. 68.4% @ $5195 per person = $50,911 vs. $335,338) $2,844 Total $4,766 7 Ezzati-Rice, T.M., Kashihara, D. & Machlin, S.R. (2004) Health care expenses in the United States 2000. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. MEPS Research Findings, No. 21, AHRQ Pub. No. 04-0022. 8 Cost data from MEPS (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey) National Alliance for Caregiving 7

Conclusions and Implications The findings suggest that the strain of caring for someone with AD can cause family caregivers to use health care services at higher rates than non-caregivers of the same age, including rates for emergency room visits, hospital use, and doctor visits. Overall, caregivers showed a 25% increase in the utilization of all types of services combined over the 18-month time period of the study. This was especially true for caregivers who initially reported their health as only fair or poor and for those whose care recipient became more disabled over that time. The estimated $4,766 more annually in health care services for caregivers whose average age is 61 could become a substantial cost to Medicare when the caregiver turns 65. The results suggest that caregiver assessments would be valuable in identifying those at risk of having their own health decline. These assessments, done by a health care professional, look at the caregiver s health, ability and willingness to do what tasks may be required as well as the caregiver s need for support. The assessment should be done at the same time as an initial diagnosis of dementia is confirmed for the care recipient. And as the care recipient s dementia increases, the family caregiver assessments should be repeated to ensure that the caregiver is getting the support she or he needs. In considering just general risks to caregiver health, primary care doctors should also be sensitive to whether their middle-aged and older patients are family caregivers. They should be asking Are you caring for a relative or friend? as a potential risk factor that may cause stress or even physical strain. One tool that will be helpful for this is the Caregiver Self-Assessment, a one page tool that can be downloaded from the American Medical Association website or from www.caregiving.org. The doctor can also refer the caregiver to the local Alzheimer s Association chapter or the local area agency on aging for community resources. Evidence-based caregiver interventions such as the REACH program, along with respite care, would be a good beginning in caregiver support. Those caregivers with fair or poor health are an obvious first target. This study is not definitive on the extent to which the AD caregiver is more likely than other caregivers or non-caregivers to experience serious health effects of caregiving. It is, however, suggestive of this finding and should be viewed as a call for additional research about the relationship between the type of caregiving and the health care utilization and health outcomes associated with caregiving. To date, health care utilization studies have focused on the care recipient rather than the caregiver. These new findings suggest we need to expand the focus to the family caregiver to obtain a more comprehensive picture of the overall effect of caregiving from both a personal and a societal perspective. 8 National Alliance for Caregiving

National Alliance for Caregiving 4720 Montgomery Lane, Suite 205 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 www.caregiving.org