Research. Royal College of Midwives. Freedom of Information Request: Midwives and Disciplinary Proceedings in London.

Similar documents
Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) Data Report 2015/16

Response. Royal College of Midwives Submission to NHS Pay Review Body. September 2013

NHS WORKFORCE RACE EQUALITY STANDARD 2017 DATA ANALYSIS REPORT FOR NHS TRUSTS

NHS Grampian Equal Pay Monitoring Report

2017 National NHS staff survey. Results from London North West Healthcare NHS Trust

2017 National NHS staff survey. Results from Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust

Workforce Race Equality Standard

WORKFORCE RACE EQUALITY STANDARD (WRES)

2017 National NHS staff survey. Results from Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust

Foreword. Jackie Smith Chief Executive and Registrar. 17 November Nursing and Midwifery Council Page 2 of 36

EQUALITY AND INCLUSION ANNUAL REPORT AND WORKFORCE MONITORING REPORT 2017

Implementing race equality in the NHS: what next?

NHS WORKFORCE RACE EQUALITY STANDARD 2017 DATA ANALYSIS REPORT FOR NATIONAL HEALTHCARE ORGANISATIONS

Annual equality, diversity and inclusion report

Charlotte Banks Staff Involvement Lead. Stage 1 only (no negative impacts identified) Stage 2 recommended (negative impacts identified)

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion. Annual Report

2017 National NHS staff survey. Results from Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

NHSGG&C Referring Registrants to the Nursing & Midwifery Council Policy

2016 National NHS staff survey. Results from Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

2017 National NHS staff survey. Results from Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Race Equality in the NHS Why the NHS Workforce Race Equality Standard is being introduced

SUMMARY REPORT TRUST BOARD IN PUBLIC 3 May 2018 Agenda Number: 9

2016 National NHS staff survey. Results from Surrey And Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

NHS Workforce Race Equality Standard

2017 National NHS staff survey. Results from North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

2017 National NHS staff survey. Results from The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Equality and Diversity

2017 National NHS staff survey. Results from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust

Employing nurses in local authorities. RCN guidance

BMA quarterly tracker survey

The NMC equality diversity and inclusion framework

2. The mental health workforce

EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY DATA ANALYSIS WORKFORCE INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT

Findings of the RCM s Survey of the Health, Safety and Wellbeing of Midwives and Maternity Support Workers

Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) 2017

State of Maternity Services Report 2018 England

Equality Objectives Completion report

NHS Workforce Race Equality Standard

Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust Board 7 August 2017 SFT 3916

Equality and Diversity strategy

2011 National NHS staff survey. Results from London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Equality Information 2018

The NHS Workforce Race Equality Standard

Revalidation for Nurses

EDS 2. Making sure that everyone counts Initial Self-Assessment

Equality, Diversity & Human Rights Week May. A toolkit for NHS communications teams

Workforce Equality Monitoring Report December 2016

CQC Mental Health Inpatient Service User Survey 2014

Trust Board Meeting in Public: Wednesday 17 January 2018 TB Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Progress Report

Public Sector Equality Duty. Annual Workforce & Patient Services Equality Monitoring Report. Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust

JOB DESCRIPTION. Specialist Looked After Children s Nurse

The Maternity Workforce Meeting the challenges of the Better Births Recommendations. Dr Suzanne Tyler, Royal College of Midwives

NHS Constitution summary of rights and responsibilities

The Code. Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives

Justice Committee. Apologies (Scotland) Act 2016 (Excepted Proceedings) Regulations Written submission from the Nursing and Midwifery Council

Response to government consultation ( prompting professionalism, reforming regulation ) on development of regulation of healthcare professionals in

NMC programme of change for education Prescribing and standards for medicines management

Warrington & Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Annual Workforce Equality Analysis (2016)

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion. Annual Report 2014/15

NMC Revalidation. Are you ready? NMC Revalidation. Guidance for UNISON members

Codes of Practice. for Social Service Workers and Employers

GPs apply for inclusion in the NI PMPL and applications are reviewed against criteria specified in regulation.

Northern Ireland Practice and Education Council for Nursing and Midwifery. Impact Measurement Project

INFORMATION PACKAGE. Professional Officer (Midwifery Project) POSITION. Brisbane

Hard Truths Public Board 29th September, 2016

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

Public Sector Equality Duty: Annual Equality Data Monitoring Report Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership Trust

Health priorities for the next UK government a manifesto from the Royal College of Nursing

INFORMATION PACKAGE. Temporary Full-time Member Organiser POSITION. Brisbane

Quality Management in Pharmacy Pre-registration Training: Current Practice

Request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the FOI Act )

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Ask. Listen. Act. Questioning and influencing to improve workplace conditions. Practical guide for RCN representatives

WAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE

Support for parents. Nursing & Midwifery. Council. How supervision and supervisors of midwives can help you

Mary Seacole Awards. Annual Report October

DISTRICT HEALTH BOARDS QUALITY AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAMME FOR MIDWIVES COVERED BY THE MERAS AND NZNO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

Annual Equality and Diversity Report 2015/16

Practice nurses in 2009

Workforce issues, skill mix, maternity services and the Enrolled Nurse : a discussion

Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust Summary of Equality Monitoring Analyses of Service Users. April 2015 to March 2016

Independent Mental Health Advocacy. Guidance for Commissioners

Equality Delivery System. South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust. Goals, Outcomes and Grades

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Part(s) of the register: RM, Registered Midwife (8 May 2014)

Human Resources Activity Report

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Patient Choice Directive Policy & Guidance

Oxleas Workforce Equality Report

NMC programme of change for education Prescribing and standards for medicines management

West Gippsland Healthcare Group. Position Description Graduate

Welcome to the Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom. Our policy and international work

Annual Equality Report Draft: December 2016 Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Team

INFORMATION PACKAGE. Member Organiser POSITION. Cairns

Past review date Use with caution. Accountability and delegation: What you need to know

Report on District Nurse Education in the United Kingdom

Past imperfect, future tense

Maximising the Nursing Contribution to Positive Health Outcomes for the New Zealand Population

SUPERVISION OF MIDWIVES. Evaluation of time spent by Supervisors of Midwives on supervisory. activities

Trust Board Meeting in Public: Wednesday 18 January 2017 TB Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Progress Report

NHS Equality and Diversity Council Annual Report 2016/17

Transcription:

Research Royal College of Midwives Freedom of Information Request: Midwives and Disciplinary Proceedings in London November 2012 15 Mansfield Street London W1G 9NH Tele: 020 7312 3535 Fax: 020 7312 3536 Email: info@rcm.org.uk

The Royal College of Midwives 15 Mansfield Street, London, W1G 9NH The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) is the trade union and professional organisation that represents the vast majority of practising midwives in the UK. It is the only such organisation run by midwives for midwives. The RCM is the voice of midwifery, providing excellence in representation, professional leadership, education and influence for and on behalf of midwives. We actively support and campaign for improvements to maternity services and provide professional leadership for one of the most established clinical disciplines. In addition to representing nearly 90% of the midwives in the UK we also represent student midwives and maternity support workers (sometimes called maternity care support workers or maternity care assistants). The Royal College of Midwives November 2012-2 -

The Royal College of Midwives Executive Summary Following research and anecdotal reports of the disproportionate number of black and minority ethnic (BME) midwives involved in disciplinary proceedings in September 2011 the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) sent a Freedom of Information Request to the 24 Trusts in the London Strategic Health Authority that provide maternity services to gather information about the number of midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings broken down by ethnic group. The Freedom of Information Request showed a disproportionate number of black/black British midwives were subjected to disciplinary hearings and a disproportionate number of black/black British midwives were subjected to a more punitive outcome from the disciplinary proceedings. The key findings were: 60.2% of the midwives who were subject to disciplinary proceedings were black/black British however only 32.0% of midwives in London were black/black British. There were ten midwives who were dismissed during the time period; every midwife who was dismissed was black/black British; 15.4% of the black/black British midwives who were subject to disciplinary during the time period were dismissed. The RCM recognises that the findings of the research indicate a very serious problem regarding the disproportionate number of BME midwives involved in disciplinary proceedings. However, the numbers from the Freedom of Information request only show one side of the story and it is likely that the causes for the numbers are complex. The RCM would like to make the following recommendations: The RCM would like to work with various stakeholders to address these issues, including other NHS Trade Unions, NHS Employers, the Department of Health, the Nursing and Midwifery Council and the Local Supervising Authority of London to investigate the issues further and find solutions at a national, regional and local level. We would like to work with all the Trusts in London, regardless if they have been identified as having a disproportionate number of BME midwives involved with disciplinary proceedings, so we can work in partnership to develop best practice. - 3 -

Background The research that has already been conducted into the experience of black and minority ethnic (BME) staff in the workplace has found that BME staff are more likely to face harassment and bullying in the workplace and BME staff are disproportionately subjected to disciplinary proceedings in the NHS. Research also shows that when there is evidence of high levels of discrimination of BME staff in the NHS this can lead to negative patient outcomes. In 2004 the Institute of Employment Studies published a report that found that midwives report more incidents of harassment, including verbal abuse and racial abuse, than any other groups of workers in the NHS. 1 In 2005 a report was published by the Valleys Race Equality Council and the University of Glamorgan Business School on workplace bullying found that BME staff are five times more likely to suffer bullying in the workplace than their white colleagues. 2 In 2009 a report was published by the Aston Business School that linked NHS staff survey data to patient survey data and found that the staff survey item that was most consistently linked to patient survey scores was discrimination, in particular discrimination on the basis of ethnic background. They found that high levels of bullying, harassment and abuse against staff related to negative patient experiences. 3 In March 2010 the Centre for Inclusion and Diversity at the University of Bradford conducted research into the involvement of BME staff in NHS disciplinary proceedings. The research, The Involvement of Black and Minority Ethnic Staff in NHS Disciplinary Proceedings 4 which was commissioned by NHS Employers and the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, found that BME staff were almost twice as likely to be disciplined in comparison with their white counterparts and BME staff employed by acute, primary care, mental health and learning disability and care trusts were significantly overrepresented in disciplinary proceedings. The research investigated issues around the collection of disciplinary data; issues around management practices; organisational culture; support networks and behaviours and attitudes of staff members. 1 Safety, Health and Equality at Work Labour Research Department April 2012 2 Safety, Health and Equality at Work Labour Research Department April 2012 3 Does the experience of staff working in the NHS link to the patient experience of care? An analysis of links between the 2007 acute trust inpatient and NHS staff surveys. Jeremy Dawson, Aston Business School, July 2009 4 The Involvement of Black and Minority Ethnic Staff in NHS Disciplinary Proceedings (2010) University of Bradford Centre for Inclusion and Diversity - 4 -

The research findings are consistent with anecdotal reports received by the RCM that BME midwives are overrepresented in disciplinary proceedings, particularly in London. The RCM collects equality and diversity data from members requiring representation, including disciplinary proceedings, our data shows that a disproportionate number of BME midwives require representation. With this in mind, the RCM undertook research into the involvement of BME midwives in disciplinary proceedings. Our equality and diversity data showed that the findings were particularly marked in London so it was decided that the research would focus on the London Strategic Health Authority. - 5 -

Key Findings In September 2011 the RCM sent a Freedom of Information Request to the 24 Trusts in the London Strategic Health Authority that provide maternity services to gather information about the number of midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings broken down by ethnic group. Out of the 24 Trusts in London that provide maternity services two Trusts were unable to provide data due to section 40 of the Freedom of Information Act 5 and one Trust did not respond to the request. The response rate was 87.5%. The key findings from the Freedom of Information Request were: 60.2% of the midwives who were subject to disciplinary proceedings were black/black British however only 32.0% of midwives in London were black/black British. There were ten midwives who were dismissed during the time period; every midwife who was dismissed was black/black British. 15.4% of the black/black British midwives who were subject to disciplinary during the time period were dismissed. 33.9% of black/black British midwives were suspended compared with 17.2% of white midwives. 26.2% of black/black British midwives had no further action taken compared with 31.0% of white midwives. 6.2% of black/black British midwives had an informal warning compared with 10.3% of white midwives. Due to the sensitivity of the findings individual trusts can not be identified. 5 Section 40 of the Freedom of Information Act applies to requests for personal data that could breach the Data Protection Act - 6 -

Comparison of the total numbers of midwives in London and the total numbers of midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings by ethnic group Midwives in London Midwives in London Subject to Disciplinary Proceedings Number Percentage Number Percentage White 2265 53.7 29 26.9 Mixed 98 2.3 3 2.8 Asian/Asian British 182 4.3 3 2.8 Black/Black British 1348 32.0 65 60.2 Chinese 90 2.1 1 0.9 Other 95 2.3 4 3.7 Unknown 139 3.3 3 2.8 4217 100% 108 100% 100 90 80 70 60 50 Proportion of Midwives 40 30 20 10 0 Proportion of Midwives subject to Disciplinary - 7 -

Comparison of the outcomes of disciplinary proceedings by ethnic group number subject to disciplinary Suspended Outcome unknown No further action Informal warning First written warning Final written warning Dismissed No No % No % No % No % No % No % No % White 29 5 17.2 3 10.3 9 31.0 3 10.3 4 13.8 10 34.5 0 - Mixed 3 1 33.3 0-0 - 0-1 33.3 2 67.7 0 - Asian/Asian British 3 2 66.7 0-0 - 3 100.0 0-0 - 0 - Black/Black British 65 22 33.9 10 15.3 17 26.2 4 6.2 11 16.9 13 20.0 10 15.4 Chinese 1 0-0 - 1 100.0 0-0 - 0-0 - Other 4 0-1 25.0 1 25.0 2 50.0 0-0 - 0 - Unknown 3 0-1 33.3 1 33.3 1 33.3 0-0 - 0 - - 8 -

Comparison of the outcomes of disciplinary proceedings between white and black/black British midwives 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 White Midwives Black/Black British Midwives 0-9 -

Comparison of the proportion of non black/black British midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings and the proportion of black/black British midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings by Trust Number of non Black/ Black British Midwives in Trust Number of non Black/Black British Midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings Number of Black/ Black British Midwives in Trust Number of Black/Black British Midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings Percentage of non Black/Black British Midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings Percentage of Black/Black British Midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings Difference in percentage of non Black/Black British and the percentage of black/black British midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings Trust One 70 1 40 5 1.4% 12.5% 11.1% Trust Two 65 3 30 4 4.6% 13.3% 8.7% Trust Three 176 3 39 4 1.7% 10.3% 8.6% Trust Four 108 1 62 5 0.9% 8.1% 7.2% Trust Five 194 1 136 9 0.5% 6.6% 6.1% Trust Six 149 3 112 9 2.0% 8.0% 6.0% Trust Seven 213 1 66 4 0.5% 6.1% 5.6% Trust Eight 77 0 84 4 0.0% 4.8% 4.8% Trust Nine 91 1 92 5 1.1% 5.4% 4.3% Trust Ten 226 8 63 4 3.5% 6.3% 2.8% Trust Eleven 117 0 74 2 0.0% 2.7% 2.7% Trust Twelve 47 1 66 3 2.1% 4.5% 2.4% Trust Thirteen 284 3 74 2 1.1% 2.7% 1.6% Trust Fourteen 179 8 17 1 4.5% 5.9% 1.4% Trust Fifteen 98 1 105 2 1.0% 1.9% 0.9% Trust Sixteen 59 2 62 2 3.4% 3.2% 0.2% Trust Seventeen 204 2 25 0 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% Trust Eighteen 105 4 28 0 3.8% 0.0% 3.8% - 10 -

14 Comparison of the percentage of non Black/Black British midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings to the percentgae of black/black British midwives subject to disciplinary proceedings 12 10 8 Non Black/Black British Midwives 6 4 Black/Black British Midwives 2 0-11 -

Recommendations and Next Steps The RCM recognises that the findings of the research show a very serious issue regarding the disproportionate number of BME midwives involved in disciplinary proceedings. However, the numbers from the Freedom of Information request only show one side of the story and it is likely that the causes for the numbers are complex. Following on from the previous research and anecdotal reports the causes for the disproportionate number of BME midwives who are involved in disciplinary proceedings are likely to involve: Organisational culture Poor management practice, including lack of experience and confidence Poor leadership, including a lack of diversity amongst leaders Poor awareness of equality and diversity Attitudes and behaviours of all staff members The RCM has already started to work with the London Supervising Authority and some of the trusts in London on the issues raised in this report. The RCM would like to work with various stakeholders to address these issues, including other NHS Trade Unions, NHS Employers, the Department of Health, and the Nursing and Midwifery Council to investigate the issues further and find solutions at a national, regional and local level. We would like to work with all the Trusts in London regardless of if they have been identified as having a disproportionate number of BME midwives involved with disciplinary proceedings so we can work in partnership to develop best practice. We would like to work to find solutions to the issues raised in this report and the previous research conducted in this area to ensure that maternity leaders are diverse, inclusive and reflective of the workforce as a whole. - 12 -

Appendix One: Freedom of Information Request Dear XXXX, This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act. Last year the Centre for Inclusion and Diversity at the University of Bradford conducted research into the involvement of black and minority ethnic (BME) staff in NHS disciplinary proceedings. The research, which was commissioned by NHS Employers and the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, found that: BME staff were almost twice as likely to be disciplined in comparison with their white counterparts. BME staff employed by acute, primary care, mental health and learning disability and care trusts were significantly overrepresented in disciplinary proceedings. The research findings are consistent with anecdotal reports received by the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) that BME midwives are overrepresented in disciplinary hearings, particularly in London. With this in mind, the RCM is undertaking research into the involvement of BME midwives in disciplinary proceedings. This brings me onto the information we are after with this request: 1. How many midwives, by headcount and broken down by the following ethnic groups, are employed by your trust? Ethnic code headcount White Mixed Asian/Asian British Black/Black British Chinese - 13 -

Other Unknown 2. In the twelve months to 30 June 2011, how many midwives, by headcount and broken down by the following ethnic groups, employed by your trust were the subject of disciplinary proceedings (including investigations and capability procedure proceedings)? Ethnic code headcount White Mixed Asian/Asian British Black/Black British Chinese Other Unknown 3. Of the midwives who were the subject of disciplinary proceedings (including investigations and capability procedure proceedings) in the twelve months to 30 June 2011, how many, by headcount and broken down by the following ethnic groups, were suspended or otherwise excluded from employment? Ethnic code headcount White Mixed - 14 -

Asian/Asian British Black/Black British Chinese Other Unknown 4. Of the midwives who were the subject of disciplinary proceedings (including investigations and capability procedure proceedings) in the twelve months to 30 June 2011, how many, by headcount and broken down by the following ethnic groups, had no further action taken against them? Ethnic code headcount White Mixed Asian/Asian British Black/Black British Chinese Other Unknown 5. Of the midwives who were the subject of disciplinary proceedings (including investigations and capability procedure proceedings) in the twelve months to 30 June 2011, how many, by headcount and broken down by the following ethnic groups, received an informal warning? Ethnic code headcount - 15 -

White Mixed Asian/Asian British Black/Black British Chinese Other Unknown 6. Of the midwives who were the subject of disciplinary proceedings (including investigations and capability procedure proceedings) in the twelve months to 30 June 2011, how many, by headcount and broken down by the following ethnic groups, received a first written warning? Ethnic code headcount White Mixed Asian/Asian British Black/Black British Chinese Other Unknown - 16 -

7. Of the midwives who were the subject of disciplinary proceedings (including investigations and capability procedure proceedings) in the twelve months to 30 June 2011, how many, by headcount and broken down by the following ethnic groups, received a final written warning? Ethnic code headcount White Mixed Asian/Asian British Black/Black British Chinese Other Unknown 8. Of the midwives who were the subject of disciplinary proceedings (including investigations and capability procedure proceedings) in the twelve months to 30 June 2011, how many, by headcount and broken down by the following ethnic groups, were dismissed? Ethnic code headcount White Mixed Asian/Asian British Black/Black British Chinese Other - 17 -

Unknown Thank you in advance for your assistance, which is appreciated. I look forward to hearing from you promptly, as required by the legislation, and in any case within 20 working days. Should you wish to respond electronically, please email your acknowledgement and response to Amy Leversidge, RCM Employment Relations Advisor. Otherwise please submit your response to the above address. Yours sincerely Amy Leversidge Employment Relations Advisor Royal College of Midwives - 18 -