STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Similar documents
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

IDENTIFYING, RECORDING AND REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS FOR CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF MEDICAL DEVICES

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 205

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

Standard Operating Procedure

POLICY ON RESEARCH RELATED ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS: SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING

M. Rickard, Research Governance and GCP Manager R. Fay Research Governance and GCP Manager Elizabeth Clough, Governance Operations Manager

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Adverse Event Reporting

Version Number: 003. On: September 2017 Review Date: September 2020 Distribution: Essential Reading for: Information for: Page 1 of 13

Safety Reporting in Clinical Research Policy Final Version 4.0

FINAL DOCUMENT. Global Harmonization Task Force

Research Adverse Event and Safety Reporting Procedures Outcome Statement: Title:

SOP-QA-28 V2. Approver: Prof Maggie Cruickshank, R&D Director Approver: Prof Steve Heys, Head of School

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

Marie-Claire Rickard, RG and GCP Manager Jimena Lovos, Quality Assurance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Governance Operations Manager

Reference Number: UHB 253 Version Number: 1 Date of Next Review: 22/01/2018 Previous Trust/LHB Reference Number: SR-RG-015

Details: Approval: Distribution & Storage: Pharmacovigilance for Researchers for UoL / LTHT Sponsored CTIMPs. Standard Operating Procedure

MHRA Findings Dissemination Joint Office Launch Jan Presented by: Carolyn Maloney UHL R&D Manager

TITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Adverse Event Reporting

Guide to Incident Reporting for In-vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Reporting Serious Breaches in Clinical Research

Guide to Incident Reporting for General Medical Devices and Active Implantable Medical Devices

Trial Management: Trial Master Files and Investigator Site Files

Research Staff Training

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 715. Principles of Clinical Research Laboratory Practice

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 710. Good Clinical Practice AUDIT AND INSPECTION. NNUH UEA Joint Research Office. Acting Research Services Manager

Governance %%.4- r2&% Queen s University Belfast. Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance. r2.aoc7. Research and Enterprise

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

Standard Operating Procedure. Essential Documents: Setting Up a Trial Master File. SOP effective: 19 February 2016 Review date: 19 February 2018

Document Title: Site Selection and Initiation for RFL Sponsored Studies Document Number: 026

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Adverse Event Reporting

Standard Operating Procedure INVESTIGATOR OVERSIGHT OF RESEARCH. Chief and Principal Investigators of research sponsored and/or hosted by UHBristol

Informed Consent SOP Number: 25 Version Number: 6.0 Effective Date: 1 st September 2017 Review Date: 1 st September 2019

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 325

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

MANAGEMENT OF PROTOCOL AND GCP DEVIATIONS AND VIOLATIONS

Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance

Marie-Claire Rickard, Governance and GCP Manager Jimena Lovos, Quality Assurance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Governance Operations Manager

Monitoring Clinical Trials

Trial set-up, conduct and Trial Master File for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Document Title: Investigator Site File. Document Number: 019

DIAGNOSTIC CLINICAL TESTS AND SCREENING PROCEDURES MANAGEMENT POLICY

Research Governance Framework 2 nd Edition, Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trial) Regulations 2004

Document Number: 006. Version: 1. Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Heidi Saunders, Senior Portfolio Coordinator

ACRIN ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING MANUAL. 1 March 2006 v.3

Quality Assurance in Clinical Research at RM/ICR. GCP Compliance Team, Clinical R&D

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

Research & Development Quality Manual

SOP16: Standard Operating Procedure for Establishing Sites and Centres - Site Setup

1. INTRODUCTION 2. SCOPE 3. PROCESS

Document Title: Research Database Application (ReDA) Document Number: 043

This Agreement dated DD/MM/YYYY (the Effective Date ) is between

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESEARCH STAFF, INCLUDING GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE (GCP)

Site Closedown Checklist for UoL Sponsored CTIMP Studies

SOP18b: Standard Operating Procedure for Preparing for External Audit and Inspection

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Reporting Urgent Safety Measures in Clinical Research

FERCI MODEL SOPs. [The IEC members (author/s, reviewer/s) and Chairperson will sign and date the SOP on this first page]

Document Title: Research Database Application (ReDA) Document Number: 043

Version Number: 004 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead:

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

Corporate. Research Governance Policy. Document Control Summary

Study Monitoring Plan Template

Human Samples in Research

Standard Operating Procedure:

Keele Clinical Trials Unit

Biomedical IRB MS #

RITAZAREM CRF Completion Guidelines

ACTIONS/PSOP/001 Version 1.0 Page 2 of 6

GCP: Investigator Responsibilities. Susan Tebbs Nicola Kaganson

Document Title: GCP Training for Research Staff. Document Number: SOP 005

Auditing of Clinical Trials

Hertfordshire Hospitals R&D Consortium Incorporating West Herts Hospitals NHS Trust and East & North Herts NHS Trust

11/18/2016. UC Irvine s Clinical Research Coordinator Certification Preparation Series PI Roles and Responsibilities SESSION 4

Joint R&D Support Office SOP S-2011 UHL

R. Fay, Research Governance & GCP Manager K. Mahiouz, Clinical Trials Facilitator E. Clough, R&D Governance Operations Manager

University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines

Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. On: 25 January Review Date: December Corporate / Directorate. Department Responsible for Review:

MEDICINES FOR HUMAN USE (CLINICAL TRIALS) REGULATIONS Memorandum of understanding between MHRA, COREC and GTAC

What does governance look like in homecare?

Elmarie Swanepoel 24 th September 2017

SOP MONITORING & OVERSIGHT OF RESEARCH ACTIVITY. Contact Jess Bisset, Research Operations Manager x20227

Risk Assessment and Monitoring

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Storage and Archiving of Research Documents SOP 6

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS

Transcription:

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Title Reference Number Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Medical Device Trials SOP-RES-033 Version Number 1 Issue Date 08 th Dec 2015 Effective Date 22 nd January 2016 Review Date 22 nd January 2018 Author(s) Reviewer(s) Teresa O Leary Head of Regulatory Compliance (Interim) Melanie Boulter, QA Auditor Authorisation (Original signatures are retained by Research & Innovation) Dr Brian Thomson Director of Research & Innovation Dr Stephen Fowlie Medical Director 24 th Nov 2015 01 th Dec 2015 USERS OF THIS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE MUST REFER TO WWW.NUHRISE.ORG TO ENSURE THE MOST CURRENT VERSION IS BEING USED

Page 2 of 15 1. Document History Version Issue Date Reason for Change Number 1 08 th Dec 2015 Original SOP, replaces SOP-52

Page 3 of 15 2. Introduction In order to comply with the Clinical Investigation of Medical Devices for human subjects Good Clinical Practice ISO 14155:2011, and the Medical Devices Regulations 2002, it is important that all researchers are aware of the different definitions related to adverse events in research, and how to record, report and review each of these specific occurrences. It is essential that all adverse events which occur during the course of a study are recorded and reported appropriately in order to ensure that patient safety is maintained. Adverse events are reportable from the time of study enrolment. For medical device trials the time of enrolment is defined as the time at which, following recruitment, a subject signs and dates the informed consent form. Adverse events relating to trials involving medical devices can be classified in to different categories (Further information on these categories is provided in section 4): Adverse event (AE) Adverse Device Effect (ADE) Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Anticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (ASADE) Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) Investigator assessment of causality and expectedness is of particular importance. 3. Purpose and Scope This SOP is applicable to all researchers undertaking projects that fall within the Clinical Investigation of Medical Devices for human subjects Good Clincial Practive ISO 14155:2011 and the Medical Devices Regulations 2002 that are sponsored by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, where the study involves Non-CE marked devices or CE marked devices that are being used outside the intended use(s) covered by the CE marking. Studies which do not fall under the scope of this SOP are Clinical medical device studies managed by a third party (e.g. NCTU) and where a specific safety reporting procedure has been agreed with NUH R&I (sponsor).

Page 4 of 15 4. Responsibilities All Research Staff For NUH sponsored Clinical Medical Devices studies, any researcher who is delegated AE recording and reporting duties on the delegation log must comply with this SOP. For all studies, the researcher delegated this responsibility should also ensure, where appropriate, the AE is reported via the NUH Datix system if the event has occurred at NUH (refer to the NUH NHS Trust - Incidents Reporting Policy and Procedures Manual 2009). Chief Investigator (CI) Responsible for discussing AE information with researchers, including for multi-site CMDs, in accordance with this SOP. Sponsor (fulfilled by the Research and Innovation (R&I) department on behalf of NUH) Responsible for ensuring an independent assessment of AEs is performed as required, and that any AEs that require expedited reporting are reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the Research Ethics Committee (REC) appropriately, and disseminated to all researchers in multi-site CMDs. 5. Definitions Adverse Device Effect (ADE) Adverse event related to the use of an investigational medical device. NOTE 1- This includes any adverse event resulting from insufficiencies or inadequacies in the instructions for use, the deployment, the implantation, the installation, the operation, or any malfunction of the investigational medical device. NOTE 2- This includes any event that is a result of a use error or intentional misuse. Adverse Event (AE) Any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury or any untoward clinical signs (including an abnormal laboratory finding) in subjects, users or other persons whether or not related to the investigational medical device. NOTE 1: This includes events related to the investigational device or the comparator. NOTE 2: This includes events related to the procedures involved (any procedure in the clinical investigation plan). NOTE 3: For users or other persons this is restricted to events related to the investigational medical device.

Page 5 of 15 Anticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (ASADE) A serious adverse device effect which by its nature, incidence, severity or outcome has been previously identified in the risk analysis report or Clinical Investigation Brochure. Device deficiency Inadequacy of a medical device related to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety or performance, such as malfunction, misuse or use error and inadequate labelling. Medical device A medical device is any instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, appliance, implant, software, material, or other similar or related article: a) Intended by the manufacturer to be used, alone or in combination, for human beings for one or more of the specific purpose(s) of: 1) Diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease, 2) Diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of, or compensation for, an injury, 3) Investigation, replacement, modification, or support of the anatomy or of a physiological process, 4) Supporting or sustaining life, 5) Control of conception, 6) Disinfection of medical devices, and b) Which does not achieve its primary intended action in or on the human body by pharmacological, immunological or metabolic means, but which may be assisted in its intended function by such means N.B: The term medical device is usually defined by national regulations. For the purposes of this International Standard, this definition does not list in vitro diagnostic medical devices (see ISO 13485:2003, definition 3.7[1]). Investigational medical device An investigational medical device is a medical device being assessed for safety or performance in a clinical investigation. This includes medical devices already on the market that are being evaluated for new intended uses, new populations, new materials or design changes. Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Adverse device effect that has resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of a serious adverse event. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Adverse event that:

Page 6 of 15 a) led to a death, b) led to a serious deterioration in health that either: 1) resulted in a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2) resulted in a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3) required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or 4) resulted in medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. c) led to foetal distress, foetal death or a congenital abnormality or birth defect. NOTE 1: This includes device deficiencies that might have led to a serious adverse event if a) suitable action had not been taken or b) intervention had not been made or c) if circumstances had been less fortunate. These are handled under the SAE reporting system. NOTE 2: A planned hospitalization for pre-existing condition, or a procedure required by the Clinical Investigation Plan, without a serious deterioration in health, is not considered to be a serious adverse event. Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) Serious adverse device effect which by its nature, incidence, severity or outcome has not been identified in the current version of the risk analysis report. NOTE: Anticipated: an effect which by its nature, incidence, severity or outcome has been previously identified in the risk analysis report AE ADE AE ASADE CI CIB CIP ICH-GCP ISF MHRA NCTU NHS NHSP NUH PI QA Adverse Event Adverse Device Effect Adverse Event Anticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect Chief Investigator Clinical investigation Brochure Clinical Investigation Plan International Conference on Harmonisation Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice Investigator Site File Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Nottingham University Clinical Trials Unit National Health Service Nottingham Health Science Partners Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Principal Investigator Quality Assurance

Page 7 of 15 QMC Queen s Medical Centre R&I Research and Innovation REC Research Ethics Committee Researcher Any member of the research team identified on the trial delegation log to perform trial-specific activities RPM Research Project Manager SADE Serious Adverse Device Effect SAE SOP USADE Serious Adverse Event Standard Operating Procedure Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect 6. Procedure 6.1 Identification and recording Adverse Events The research site must protect the dignity, rights, safety and well-being of participants as a priority at all times. The Investigator (or other delegated researcher) must identify if an AE has occurred, as defined by the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP). This is usually achieved through discussion with the participant during trial visits, but may also be identified if the researcher reviews the participant s medical records or is informed by the participant s relative, carer, another clinician or support department of an occurrence that would constitute such an event. If an AE has occurred the Investigator (or other delegated researcher) must review all relevant documentation (e.g. medical notes, laboratory results and diagnostic reports). The Investigator (i.e. medically qualified researcher) will assess the intensity, causality, expectedness and seriousness of the event as described in section 6.2. Unless stated otherwise in the CIP, all AEs must be recorded in detail. The research site must record all AEs using the Adverse Events Record (TAFR01901) and retain it with the participant s Case Report Form (CRF), unless an AE record is incorporated into the CRF design and agreed by the Sponsor in which case this must be completed. The AE, including its severity, cause and seriousness, must also be recorded in the participant s medical notes by the Investigator (or other delegated researcher). The CI (or Principal Investigator (PI) in multi-centre research) must review all recorded AEs at their site, and this must be documented on the Adverse Events Record (TAFR01901) and made available to the Sponsor on request. AEs and/or laboratory abnormalities defined in the protocol as critical to the evaluation of safety shall be reported to the Sponsor by the research site in accordance with the reporting requirements detailed in the protocol.

Page 8 of 15 6.2 Assessment of AEs Each AE must be assessed for seriousness, causality, severity and expectedness. It is the Investigator(s) responsibility to assess each AE. This may be delegated to other suitably qualified physicians in the research team who are trained in recording and reporting AEs. 6.2.1 Assessment of Seriousness The Investigator should make an assessment of seriousness as defined in section 5. 6.2.2 Assessment of Causality The relationship between the investigational medical device and the occurrence of each adverse event will be assessed and categorised. The investigator will use clinical judgement to determine the relationship. Alternative causes, such as natural history of the underlying diseases, concomitant therapy, other risk factors etc. will be considered. The Investigator will also consult the current version of the risk analysis report and/or investigator brochure where available. Causality assessments Relationship Not related: Description No relationship with investigational device. Other factor(s) certainly or probably causative. Related: Temporal relationship of the onset of the event, relative to use of the device, is reasonable and there is no other cause to explain the event. Where there are two assessments of causality, for example, the Investigator and the Sponsor assessment, or the CI and Investigator assessment, the causality made by the Investigator cannot be downgraded. In the case of a difference of opinion, both assessments are recorded and the most conservative assessment is used for reporting purposes. However, if the Sponsor s disagrees with the investigators causality assessment then both opinions should be reported and fully documented.

Page 9 of 15 6.2.3 Assessment of Severity The Investigator should make an assessment of severity for each AE and this should be recorded on the CRF or AE form according to the following categories: The intensity of an adverse event will initially be assessed according to the following definitions: Intensity Description Mild An event easily tolerated by the patient, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with everyday activities Moderate An event sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal everyday activities Severe An event that prevents normal everyday activities 6.2.4 Assessment of Anticipation Once an AE is deemed serious and device or procedure related it then must be assessed to determine if the SAE is Anticipated or Unanticipated. The Investigator should make an assessment of anticipation as defined in section 5. 6.2.5 Categorisation The following table summarises categorisation of adverse events: Adverse events Non-device related Device or procedure related Nonserious Adverse Event (AE) Adverse Device Effect (ADE) Serious Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Anticipated Unanticipated Anticipated Serious Device Effect (ASADE) Unanticipated Serious Device Effect (USADE)

Page 10 of 15 6.3 Quarantine Devices If the event is defined as serious (SAE) or device deficiency that could have led to (U)SADE then the Investigator must quarantine the device as soon as possible. Until the MHRA has been given the opportunity to carry out an investigation, the device should not be: discarded repaired returned to the manufacturer All material evidence, i.e. devices/parts removed, replaced or withdrawn from use following an incident, instructions for use, records of use, repair and maintenance records, packaging materials, or other means of batch identification must be: clearly identified and labelled stored securely Evidence should not be interfered with in any way except for safety reasons or to prevent its loss. Where appropriate, a record should be made of all readings, settings and positions of switches, valves, dials, gauges and indicators, together with any photographic evidence and eyewitness reports. N.B: Consideration should be given to the practicality and implications of quarantining the device; for example if the device is an implantable device all further local supplies of the device should be quarantined as a precaution until further advice is sought. 6.4 Reporting of SAE, SADE or USADE to Sponsor (NUH R&I) If the research site determines that an AE fulfils the criteria of an SAE or device deficiency that could have led to (U)SADE (as defined in the CIP and IB) the Investigator (or other delegated researcher) must report the SAE or (U)SADE to NUH R&I without unjustified delay. The only exception to this is where the CIP identifies the event as not requiring immediate reporting. The SAE or (U)SADE must be recorded on the Serious Adverse Events Log (TAFR01902) and retained in the ISF. The research site must report the SAE to R&I in writing using the SAE Reporting Form (Medical Devices) (TAFR01908), providing as much information as possible. The reporting form must be completed legibly ensuring that names, dates, and descriptions are clear and that abbreviations have not been used. For details of definitions required in the SAE reporting form, refer to section 6.2. The SAE may be reported verbally (but not by voicemail) in circumstances where a written report is not immediately possible; however this must be followed by a written report the next working day. SAE reports must be retained in the ISF.

Page 11 of 15 The CI (or PI in multi-centre research) must review and sign all SAE reports. In the event the CI/PI is unable to sign the report immediately the research site must not delay sending the report to R&I, however a CI/PI signed copy must be forwarded to R&I as soon as possible. The SAE form must be completed in full, entering N/A for questions which are not relevant. SAE reports must be sent to R&I using one of the following methods: i. Email (RDSAE@nuh.nhs.uk) ii. Hand delivered not mailed (R&I, NHSP, C Floor, South Block, QMC) iii. Telephone (0115 9709049) if written report not immediately possible For faxed SAEs an R&I representative who receives the SAE will provide a printed copy of the SAE report to the R&I RPM for the study immediately. For emailed SAEs, the R&I RPM for the study will check the group inbox daily. For hand delivered SAE reports the CI/PI (or delegate) must record the date and time the SAE was reported in the Additional Comments section of the SAE Reporting Form (Medical Devices) (TAFR01908). For telephone reporting of SAEs: o R&I representative must complete a SAE Reporting Form (Medical Devices) (TAFR01908) with the details provided. In the Additional Comments section, the R&I representative must record who received the call along with the date and time of the telephone call. The SAE form must then be reported to the Head of Regulatory compliance or R&I RPM immediately for further processing. o The CI/PI (or delegate) who telephones in an SAE must follow-up and complete a SAE Reporting Form (Medical Devices) (TAFR01908) and send the form to R&I via email or fax or hand delivery. The R&I RPM will collate and reconcile both SAE forms. The R&I RPM will check the SAE report for completeness, assign the SAE a unique reference number and ensure it is documented within the Serious Adverse Events Tracker (TAFR01907). The R&I RPM will send confirmation of receipt of the SAE report and its unique reference to the research site within 1 working day. Any omitted information or discrepancies will be requested from the research site. The research site must telephone R&I (0115 9709049) if the SAE reference number and confirmation of receipt is not received within 1 working day of sending the SAE report. The research site must provide any information omitted from the initial SAE report to R&I within a timely manner. The R&I RPM will facilitate an independent assessment of the event within 1 working day of receiving the SAE report.

Page 12 of 15 The independent assessment for causality and anticipation of the SAE will be performed by the Sponsor s Medical Monitor within 24 business hours of their receipt, using the CIP or IB. The Medical Monitor will return the completed assessment to the R&I RPM. The R&I RPM will provide the CI with details of the SAE (if not already aware), update the Serious Adverse Events Tracker (TAFR01907) and retain all SAE documentation in the Trial Master File (TMF). The R&I RPM will provide a copy of the SAE follow up information to the Sponsor s Medical Monitor and the CI (if not already aware), update the Serious Adverse Events Tracker (TARF01907) and retain the follow up documentation with the original SAE documentation in the TMF within R&I. For further reporting purpose: In the case of a difference of opinion, both assessments are recorded and the most conservative assessment is used for reporting purposes. However, if the Sponsor s disagrees with the investigators causality assessment then both opinions should be reported and fully documented. 6.5 Reporting to the research ethics committee: If the event is classified as an SAE the investigator must report to the research ethics committee (REC). SAE reports must be sent to R&I using one of the following methods: Email (RDSAE@nuh.nhs.uk) Hand delivered not mailed (R&I, NHSP, C Floor, South Block, QMC) Telephone (0115 9709049) if written report not immediately possible If the investigator classifies the event as a (U)SADE; the investigator must report the event to REC within 24 hours of becoming aware of the event. 6.6 Reporting of SADE or USADE to the regulatory authority: If the event is classified as a (U)SADE, then the sponsor (fulfilled by the R&I department on behalf of NUH) are responsible for reporting the SADE or USADE to the regulatory authority without unjustified delay. R&I RPM will inform the device manufacturer of the event. The device should not be returned to the manufacturer until the MHRA have completed their investigation. R&I RPM will inform the medical device liaison officer at NUH, this is the Head of Clinical Engineering. If the study is multicentre R&I RPM will inform all Principal Investigators involved in the study about the event.

Page 13 of 15 R&I RPM will provide follow-up information to the regulatory authority within timely manner. 6.7 Follow on Reporting After the initial report the investigator is required to actively follow up the subject until either: The SAE/USADE resolves, or Until 30 days after the discontinuation of use of the medical device. This decision must be documented in the TMF (for NUH sponsored studies) & Site file. Investigators (or delegated persons) will provide follow-up information, each time new information is available. Follow-up information must be reported using the TAFR01909_Serious Adverse Event Follow Up Report (CMDs) and must be submitted to R&I by either of the following methods: Email (RDSAE@nuh.nhs.uk) Hand delivered not mailed (R&I, NHSP, C Floor, South Block, QMC) Telephone (0115 9709049) if written report not immediately possible The R&I RPM will forward a copy of the Follow-up report to CI and/or Medical Monitor (if required). The R&I Head of Regulatory Compliance, or delegated individual, will liaise with the investigator to gain an update regarding the progress of the SADE/USADE every two weeks until either: The SAE/USADE resolves, or Until 30 days after the discontinuation of use of the medical device. 6.8 Follow on action required from the MHRA investigation The investigator and NUH R&I will undertake any requirements outlined in the MHRA investigation and follow up as instructed. 6.9 Datix If applicable, SAEs, SADE or USADE which occur within NUH, must be reported on the Trusts electronic incident reporting system, Datix as well as to the Sponsor of the trial. Reporting of incidents on Datix must be carried out in accordance with the Trust s Incident Reporting Policy and Procedures Manual 2009.

Page 14 of 15 6.10 Duty of Candour Duty of Candour is a new statutory requirement which applies to all providers (including NUH) registered with the CQC. Duty of Candour was recommended following the Mid-Staffordshire inquiry and was transposed into law to ensure openness and transparency with patients when an incident surrounding their care has occurred. All incidents which have been entered onto Datix (see 6.7) as moderate, severe or death (where the death relates directly to the incident) will be required to follow the Duty of Candour process. The requirement ensures that the appropriate information surrounding the incident is disseminated to patients, their relatives and carers. The Duty of Candour Trust SOP and flowchart should be followed for such events by formally following any information up in writing, should the patient, relative or carer request this. 7. References and Associated Documents Clinical Investigation of Medical Devices for human subjects Good Clinical Practice ISO 14155:2011 Medical Devices Regulations 2002 NUH Incident Reporting Policy and Procedures Manual, 2009 TAFR01901 TAFR01907 TAFR01908 TAFR01902 TAFR01909 Adverse Events Record Serious Adverse Events Tracker SAE Reporting Form (Medical Devices) Serious Adverse Events Log Serious Adverse Events Follow Up Form

Page 15 of 15 8. Appendices Appendix 1: Reporting process AE or ADE (if causal relationship to device identified) occurs Appendix 1 Investigator Responsibilities Sponsor responsibilities Is AE/ADE serious? No Log AE in medical records, or source data where this is not the medical records ie CRF Record con meds. Investigator to assess; a) Causal relationship b) Severity. SAE or device deficiency that could have led to (U)SADE Yes If SAE; e- mail rdsae@nuh. nhs.uk or fax 0115 8493295 If (U)SADE; Report immediately to REC within 24 hours of becoming aware of the event; safety reporting form (non-ctimp) http://www.nres.npsa.n hs.uk/applications/after -ethicalreview/safetyreports/sa fety-reports-for-allother-research/ & copy in rdsae@nuh.nhs.uk or fax 01158493295 QUARANTINE DEVICE Has receipt of SAE/SADE confirmed by R&I? NUH Sponsored studies only Inform manufacturer Inform medical device liaison officer @NUH = Head of Clinical Engineering Report to MHRA If SADE or USADE SAE/SADE received- receipt acknowledged to study team Log SAE/SADE on DOCUMAS and in TMF. If multicentre, inform all PIs No Contact R&I immediately Yes Follow up until resolution or until 30 days after discontinuation of use of medical device Await outcome of MHRA Receive, file and log follow up reports until SAE/SADE resolved or until 30 days after discontinuation of use of medical device In addition the Investigator will review all laboratory reports and comment on any clinically important out of range values. All clinically important abnormal laboratory tests occurring during the trial will be repeated at appropriate intervals until they either return to baseline or to a level deemed acceptable by the Investigator and the Sponsor (or its designated representative), or until a diagnosis that explains them is made. *Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities should be reported as adverse events* Out of range values that are not clinically significant should be marked NCS on the laboratory report. The investigator must sign and date all laboratory reports. Generate reports of SAE/SADEs for as required.