.s,,5~r. _ * sl vr r. Stra.tegic. January 1993 REFERENCE COPY TECHNICAL LIBRARY, E231 DAHLGREN DIVISION NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER

Similar documents
Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Shallow-Water Mine Countermeasure Capability for USMC Ground Reconnaissance Assets EWS Subject Area Warfighting

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

MK 83 WARHEAD EFFECTIVENESS TESTS

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

First Announcement/Call For Papers

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

***************************************************************** TQL

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

at the Missile Defense Agency

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Report No. D February 9, Internal Controls Over the United States Marine Corps Military Equipment Baseline Valuation Effort

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Report Documentation Page

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Support for FLIP/ORB. Fred H. Fisher. Final Report to the Office of Naval Research Contract N D-0142 (DO#26)

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Expeditionary Basecamp Passive

Improving the Tank Scout. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain R.L. Burton CG #3, FACADs: Majors A.L. Shaw and W.C. Stophel 7 February 2006

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

LCS Mission Modules Program

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

A FUTURE MARITIME CONFLICT

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

This Product Area Directorate encompasses the following core equities:

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAINING TRANSFORMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class (CVN-21) Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification. February 2000 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-4

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Blue on Blue: Tracking Blue Forces Across the MAGTF Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain D.R. Stengrim to: Major Shaw, CG February 2005

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

Naval Directed-Energy Weapons No Longer A Future Weapon Concept

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Military to Civilian Conversion: Where Effectiveness Meets Efficiency

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

Transcription:

T C NI A IBRARY REFERENCE COPY TECHNICAL LIBRARY, E231 DAHLGREN DIVISION NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER DO NOT REMOUE FROM LIBRRRY 965580 V- 0 0 1 CL C-, c: Stra.tegic.s,,5~r _ * sl vr r Pl i~~~~~~~~k I= January 1993 Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division Dahlgren. Virginia 22448-5000 R 4 _ - -,.1-

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE JAN 1993 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Strategic Plan 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-1993 to 00-00-1993 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Naval Surface Warfare Center,Dahlgren Division,Dahlgren,VA,22448-5000 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 14 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Strategi ;;;; iiijjjjjji jm ;i -i~~lbill~mml~lmmmi-d~ii5%bmislilsirliime~immmmfmlmmm~r, Zjji...i.. bitti~mn~mtmbjl s h MM Pla idjj~g i~djjg ~ijigigdii;it d ljiiji ;jj gj n jbm5jj L j0jmj~''... Mbl January 1993 Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division Dahlgren, Virginia 22448-5000.1' ; na..-..:-.... -i- -._......,,. -... if i-.- i-, ; :j-- ;- :%:. ; ; - ": ;..: --. :--:-- :. :U:::;.; ;:f :::; : ' -E: ;-f---~ :-%.... '-' ''; --.; ; =- ~ri ''' ': =~ - '-'r;;.' --l'd':' ' '': ; m '"t-

FOREWORD On 2 January 1992, two former Navy Research and Development (R&D) Centers - the Naval Surface Warfare Center and the Naval Coastal Systems Center - merged to become the Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD). At the time of this merger, both Centers were involved, in varying degrees, with strategic planning efforts. As a result, we decided that these separate efforts should be combined to produce a Division Strategic Plan. This plan consists of a set of strategic goals and accompanying tactical objectives that are keyed to the Division's assigned mission areas. Collectively, these may be viewed as strategic opportunities for the Division to pursue as we move forward. The context in which this planning effort has occurred embraces a rapidly changing world order that is redefining U.S. national security interests. And while future U.S. defense needs cannot be clearly defined in this changing environment, they certainly will have to be met with less money and fewer people. Therefore, the Navy, and NSWCDD, for its part, must also find a more effective and cost efficient way of doing business. The challenge is to fashion an approach for accommodating this mandated change in a way that preserves our existing ability to successfully develop, field, and support the complex systems needed to conduct modern naval warfare, while minimizing disruption to on-going fleet support and development efforts. The Division can meet this challenge. As we move forward in this dynamic period, certain fundamental precepts should guide the future direction of the Division. These underlying precepts are as follows: * We see ourselves retaining our long-standing mission as the Navy's primary R&D activity for surface ship combat systems, strategic systems, mines, mine countermeasures, amphibious warfare, special warfare, diving, and ordnance. These areas of endeavor will remain essential to the continuing ability of the Navy to carry out its overall mission. * Working with the other Divisions of the Center, we expect to maintain critical technical expertise in all areas of acquisition and support, but particularly in the R&D phase, which will be our primary focus. We believe this broadly based connectivity will enable us to: - Retain an essential capability to understand fleet operational requirements - Translate these requirements into systems concepts - Develop, engineer, and integrate these concepts into fielded weapon and warfare systems This totality of experience provides the feedback and synergism of effort that will continue to ensure the success of our systems engineering approach to our work..i

* During previous cycles of strategic planning, we found ourselves largely resource constrained in the pursuit of strategic goals supportive of Navy needs. The future, however, clearly portends an era of budget-constrained choices for the Navy. These choices will directly affect the scope of work that we may pursue, the resources available to do our work, and indeed, our ultimate size. Therefore, in the face of this uncertainty, we should responsibly maintain our broad scope and type of work and aggressively pursue work in all areas, particularly in science and technology and systems concept formulation and its underpinnings in naval warfare analysis. * In the current environment, as stated above, significant emphasis is on achieving efficiencies and economies of operation through consolidation of overhead and support functions. These operations will also be targeted for improved effectiveness in delivering quality services and products to our customers and stakeholders. To this end, applying the principles of continuous process improvement will help sustain our expectations for quality in support services, as well as in our scientific and engineering work, with reduced financial and human resources. In addition, we must adopt a truly corporate view of our needs, our wants, and what we can afford. Tradeoffs will be made in light of our priority commitment to retaining and recognizing the needs of our valuable human resources. People are the foundation to accomplishing our mission. In summary, we have developed a vision of our future, guiding principles, and core objectivesand a number of strategic opportunities to support this vision. These are outlined in the following plan. We understand that the guidance embodied in these aspects is less specific than from previous strategic planning cycles; the vagueness results from the degree of our uncertain future. Nevertheless, we do feel this guidance will sufficiently communicate to our employees and our partners in industry the broad areas of science and technology and systems work anticipated for the future. Looking to the future with optimism, we feel certain that this guidance will challenge employees of this Division to develop a wide variety of new thrusts in the eight principal mission areas and that it will serve as a useful basis for the Division's follow-on tactical planning. T.A. CLARE Executive Director Captain, USN Commander ii

A VISION FOR THE DAHLGREN DIVISION MISSION Provide research, development, test and evaluation, engineering, and fleet support for surface warfare systems, surface ship combat systems, ordnance, mines, amphibious warfare systems, mine countermeasures, special warfare systems, and strategic systems. GUIDING PRINCIPLES We exist to: * Provide our customers with quality products and services, and * Provide the Navy with a sound technical basis to obtain systems, equipments, computer programs, and documentation required by the fleet We will balance the following means to achieve this end: * Be responsive to customers' current needs and tasks, and * Anticipate and prepare to be responsive to the Navy's needs for the future VISION In the future, our Nation will expect from the Navy: * Greater emphasis and evolving roles for surface, strategic, amphibious, mine and special warfare systems Little to no losses during battle * Affordable systems that can operate jointly and are capable of affordably evolving over time via demonstrated new technologies As part of the Naval Surface Warfare Center, the Dahigren Division will: * Complement and support other Divisions, helping to support the Naval Surface Warfare Center's Vision "...be recognized...as an integrated Warfare Center..." * Focus on R&D and modernization of systems and components in surface, strategic, amphibious, mine and special warfare, and diving Foster a team environment with other Divisions, Navy and DOD institutions, and industry to meet Navy needs in a joint forces environment * Conceive, develop, and use technology We will contribute: * The benefits of combining both scientific and engineering skills * A systems perspective, making the whole greater than the sum of the parts Products and services built on a solid foundation of science and technology, evaluated against current and future needs * Innovation in our approaches and solutions to Navy needs, helping to achieve the Navy's vision "...to create a climate that fosters innovation and invention..." * Effective use of unique facilities and dedicated business management resources to provide quality products and services, while maintaining our commitment to environment and safety CORE OBJECTIVES We will: * Provide challenging work and appropriate facilities and equipment * Create a climate that - Encourages self-development through experience, training, and education - Values and respects each individual - Empowers people to express themselves and take action Be an institution widely known for technical competence and integrity, providing quality products and services within budget and schedule * Build on and exploit a solid foundation in science and technology in conceiving, developing, and modernizing systems for the fleet and joint forces * Continuously improve all processes * Keep affordability and cost effectiveness in the forefront of our operations, in our development, and use of science and technology to meet Navy needs I

,,,I*. I (, we * i I i, I I I f S1111. I'v Siti IL (Co)lllb)lt sv'*tfktols. Ampibou wa'iiix r I..............-.._ Nl ii II s,)llt- tily l't4 Mi,,cs O a SpeciaI Warf aret System;is St I.tt-gic sya itilmk

CYCLE IV STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITIES SURFACE WARFARE AND COMBAT SYSTEMS Be a leader in active and passive sensing for surface combatants Lead the development of warfare control systems for all warfare areas Lead the development of hard kill and soft kill combat weapons for use across the entire battle time line Play supporting role in the development of sensing information, coordination techniques, and systems Have major thrust in the general area of command support, including capability to define tactical objectives and to supervise operations Support development of System Readiness Coordination (SRCJ systems, emphasize SRC requirements and concepts, embedded training functions should receive special attention * Direct sensing resources to selfdefense, especially Antiship Cruise Missiles (ASCMs) and environmental conditions Emphasize force-level sensing * Technology initiatives should address sensors for multiple uses and integration of diverse sensors * Emphasize decision aids and automated processes for quickreaction self-defense; expanded capabilities to engage mobile land targets, mine avoidance, amphibious fire support, Antisubmarine Warfare (ASW), antitactical ballistic missile defense * Emphasize Shipboard Electronics Warfare (SEW) to provide systems engineering perspective for Electronic Warfare (EW) weapons * Emphasize advanced concepts and enabling technologies for future missile systems Develop means to task sensing resources to acquire needed information e Work in needed areas of systems engineering, databases, and information processing e Emphasize requirements definition and testing of concepts for force-level and joint operations v Develop methods and equipment to assess elements status and evaluate operational readiness of the combat system to fight. Provide integrated assessment of the combat system readiness and an embedded training capability Antiair Warfare (AAW), Self-Defense Strike, Amphibious Warfare (AMW), ASW, AAW Self-Defense, Area Defense, SEW All Warfare Areas All Warfare Areas, especially Strike All Warfare Areas :3

SURFACE WARFARE AND COMBA T SYSTEMS (CONTINUED) Strengthen capability to perform concept generation and evaluation at the force level and for surface ships * Perform top-level systems engineering and analysis * Strengthen warfare analysis capability All Warfare Areas Lead the development of combat systems for all combatants and noncombatants and lead emerging ship selfdefense initiatives Design and develop future combat systems All Warfare Areas Enhance position as leader in combat systems technology * Provide leadership for developing new combat system concept * Strengthen focus in Systems Research and Technology All Warfare Areas Enhance position as leader in protection systems and ship self-defense * Promote and become the block manager for a 6.2 program for E3 * Achieve Milestone III for Ship System Design Support (SSDS) MK 0 (RAIDS) FY93 and Initial Operational Capability (IOC) in FY94 * Demonstrate a prototype of SSDS MK I at sea in FY93 and achieve Milestone III in FY95 * Formulate a technical and programmatic strategy for development of SSDS MK 2 and SSDS MK 3 and gain acceptance by NAVSEA-06D of NSWCDD system engineering contributions Guide sponsor in details of MILCON process to obtain P-338 funding in FY94; achieve Beneficial Occupancy Date (BOD) in FY95 and IOC in FY96; minimize transition time between Bldg Z-41 and P-3:38 All Warfare Areas.1

STRA TEGIC SYSTEMS Continue leadership role for Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) program in weapons control software development, targeting, and reentry systems design X Provide R&D, system evaluation, and life-cycle support X Develop and retain required expertise and facilities, especially wind tunnel and advanced development laboratories Strategic Systems Establish leadership role in support of new programs in strategic deterrence, theater support, space control, and strategic defense; emphasize technical involvement in concept definition, and systems analysis and development Establish leadership role for surface and strategic warfare in identifying warfare requirements derived from and related to space capabilities and threats; ensure that resulting developments are integrated into surface and subsurface platforms * Develop and assess options for new Navy strategic missions and concepts and for development of requirements and acquisition strategies * Become lead laboratory for development of new strategic systems * Become recognized expert and agent for strategic systems analysis and systems engineering of strategic systems * Establish leadership role in definition, development, and application of space assets for strategic and tactical weapons systems * Become technology expert for exploitation of space systems for naval warfare Strategic Systems Strategic Systems, SEW Establish leadership role in science and technology for strategic systems; emphasize warfare analysis tools, computer systems, materials science, sensor and engagement systems, and aerodynamic and space vehicle design, analysis, and test. Become focal point for strategic system computer technology initiative * Be the focus for software development methodology R&D for strategic systems in Navy and Department of Defense (DOD) * Remain Navy expert for development of advanced materials for weapons and spacecraft * Be focus for Navy development and wind tunnel validation of computational fluid dynamics. Regain leadership in performing basic and applied research in the areas of mathematics and physics Strategic Systems

ORDNANCE SYSTEMS Continue leadership role and * Maintain full-spectrum involve- Energetic Materials, Center of Excellence in the ment in ordnance systems Gun Weapons conceptualization and devel- * Emphasize basic research, explor- Systems, Surface opment of ordnance systems atory development, and proto- Launched Weapons, typing Underwater Warheads, Marine Corps Weapons, Space Weapons MINE WARFARE Retain leadership in the * Develop mines and delivery development of mine systems equipment that are affordable, and related technology remotely commandable, and use delivery assets efficiently * Extend capability of current systems through use of advanced technology Mine Warfare ti

MINE COUNTERMEASURES Enhance position as the leader. for development of mine detection, avoidance, neutralization and sweeping systems and tactics to meet the current and future fleet operational needs for all Mine Counter-. measures (MCM) missions Emphasize rapid technology prototyping to provide near-term capabilities for MCM in shallow water, very shallow water, and the surf zone, focusing on remote and standoff systems Demonstrate MCM applications of high payoff technologies, such as superconducting electromagnetic (EM), electro-optics, and sonar Lead development of advanced MCM systems, such as in-stride mine neutralization for surface ship and submarine self-protection Develop an organic MCM capability to protect ships and craft prior to an amphibious assault Increase the use of warfare analysis for developing systems and tactics for surface and airborne MCM operations and training MCM, Heavy Sealift, Choke Points, Ship Survivability STRATEGIC GOAL AMPHIBIOUS WARFARE TACTICAL OBJECTIVES WARFARE Lead development of advanced technology applications for amphibious warfare operational needs, particularly in ship-to-shore movement, ship/ craft interface, landmine countermeasures, and the use of merchant ships to augment naval sealift * Maintain an integrated program of warfare analysis and full spectrum RDT&E * Emphasize rapid technology prototyping to eliminate the landmine threat and to expand the over-thebeach offload envelope * Establish and lead a program to use merchant ships for augmenting naval sealift * Promote and become the block manager for a 6.2 program for amphibious systems * Enhance capabilities to provide amphibious warfare-unique C3N functions * Expand applications of air cushion vehicle technology to MCM and other coastal missions AMW, Heavy Sealift

SPECIAL WARFARE Enhance position as the Lead Naval Special Warfare R&D activity by becoming the lead activity for all maritime Special Operations Forces (SO F) Coordinate the design, development, and system integration of all Naval Special Warfare programs Emphasize rapid response engineering support to all maritime SOF Apply advanced technology for force delivery platforms to reduce detectability and reduce operator workload Support joint development of diving technology to improve life support for maritime SOF Design and develop advanced C3I systems to reduce detectability and improve mission performance Enhance capabilities to recon/ detect and neutralize mines and obstacles in shallow water, very shallow water, and surf zone Become the leader for developing nonattributable and standoff weapons and other specialized mission support equipment Seal Operations, AMW, MCM, Army and Air Force Maritime SOF S

DIVING AND SAL VAGE Lead development of life support and diving and salvage technology, emphasizing applications to critical warfare areas, cost beneficial enhancements, and expanded support for other armed services and agencies * Emphasize applications of diving life-support and mission-support technology to solve the critical needs in Special Warfare diving, Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) diving, and other critical missions such as MCM * Become the national center for developing manned life-support protection against hostile marine environments * Develop systems to satisfy fleet diving needs for ship and cargo salvage; clearance of harbors and shipping lanes; and the repair, construction, and maintenance of underwater installations * Lead the development of precise underwater navigation and object location/identification equipment, emphasizing applications to EOD needs for the detection, classification, and disposal of underwater ordnance * Improve the work capability of divers to equal or better than the same person on land * Design and develop work systems to reduce maintenance costs of ships and submarines; for example, systems to extend the period for dry-docking from 3 to 10 years Seal Operations, Ship Survivability/Rescue, Explosive Ordnance Disposal 9

Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahigren Division Dahigren, Virginia 22448-5000 NSWCD)DMP-93 1 Approved for public release. distribution is unlimited