Procedure for Corrective Action and Non-conformities

Similar documents
Archived. DPC: Corrective Action. Quality Manual

IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT OF NONCONFORMITIES

CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST

Standards for Forensic Drug Testing Accreditation

CAP Forensic Drug Testing Accreditation Program Standards for Accreditation

Corrective and Preventive Action

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

MANAGEMENT OF PROTOCOL AND GCP DEVIATIONS AND VIOLATIONS

QMP-LS: A Canadian Regional EQA Program How Labs Get In and Out of Trouble in Ontario

Observations of Implementing the Nuclear Promise for CAP

Standards for Laboratory Accreditation

Pars Oil & Gas Company HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT PROCEDURE. HSE Anomaly Reporting Procedure DOCUMENT ID - PR-74-POGC-002 REVISION 0.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

DRAFT. (Industry Name) (Industry Address) (Industry Address) (SIC NUMBER (S))

CNAS-RL01. Rules for the Accreditation of Laboratories

Work of Internal Auditors

SECTION 11 JANUARy 2015

BrooklY!I~ Park Police CRAIG EHEVOLDSEH POLICE CHIEF. August 15, To whom it may concern:

INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PLAN (IIPP) October 2015

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Standards for Biorepository Accreditation

Technical Procedure for Integrated Ballistics Identification System (IBIS)

ASSE International Seal Control Board Procedures

CACFP : Conducting Five-Day Reconciliation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program, with Questions and Answers

COMMISSION ON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION. Laboratory Accreditation Program TEAM LEADER ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR & QUALITY CHECKLIST

Complaints, Feedback and Appeals Management

IACUC Policy 09: Researcher Non-Compliance

Data Quality Guidelines and Principal Investigator Verification of Compliance

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

Incident Reporting, Notification, and Review Procedure

Missoula Police Department Policy Manual. Firearms

RITAZAREM CRF Completion Guidelines

VAUGHAN PRIMARY SCHOOL HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERODROMES AND AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES. Foreword

Unregulated Heating Oil Tank Program Guidance

IAF Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC Guide 61:1996

DNV. Established in 1864

Problem Solving Tools

AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL ANNUAL REPORT JULY 1, 2013 JUNE 30, 2014

POCKET GUIDE TO THE ACCREDITATION STANDARDS (ISO 15189:2014)

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL STSB

Request for Proposal PROFESSIONAL AUDIT SERVICES. Luzerne-Wyoming Counties Mental Health/Mental Retardation Program

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR CALIBRATION LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

Personnel. From RLM, COM, GEN and TLC Checklists

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR TESTING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

Life Sciences Simons Collaboration on the Origins of Life Fellowship Policies and Procedures

FLSA Classification Problems. Advanced FLSA Regional Workshops. Chapel Hill. February 28 March 1, 2017

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA

EFFECTIVE ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCESS

cancer immunology project awards application guidelines

II. Accuracy: Professional work is completed with due diligence and is accurate.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Contract Management Agency INSTRUCTION. Corrective Action Process

Heart of America POC Group Quality Management Making it Meaningful

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE PEACE OFFICERS STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION. LCB File No. R September 7, 2007

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT COM 2035

CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY TITLE III PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION CAT-TRAC OPERATIONS MANUAL

Owner Verification Report Guide. August by Texas Department of Transportation 512/ All Rights Reserved

6/28/2016. Questions? Workshop 6 CAP Inspection Preparation Thursday, June 23, 2016

SAAG-ZA 12 July 2018

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT

TESTIMONY OF THOMAS HAMILTON DIRECTOR SURVEY & CERTIFICATION GROUP CENTER FOR MEDICAID AND STATE OPERATIONS CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. June 2, 1997

Spill Prevention and Control

QUALITY POLICY MANUAL. Revision: 05 Author: T. Joseph Issue Date: 6/6/2010 Approved By: Dr S. King

Compliance Program Updated August 2017

RIN 0955-AA00 Page 1 of 113. ONC Health IT Certification Program: Enhanced Oversight and Accountability

Chapter 2 - Organization and Administration

Discrepancy Reporting Instructions

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Incident/Injury Reporting & Investigation Program

Life Sciences Simons Collaboration on the Global Brain (SCGB) Fellowships

Internal Audit Report. Public Transportation Grant Management TxDOT Office of Internal Audit

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR POLICE OPERATIONS STUDY. Police Department CITY OF LA PALMA

Safety Department. Issue Date: 29 Sep. 14 Approval Date: 29 Sep. 14. Occupational Hygiene

Guide to Incident Reporting for In-vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 302. FIELD LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

DOD DIRECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT

KAREN E. RUSHING. Audit of the Vendor Selection Process

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration

Methodist Billing and Collection Policy

2. This SA does not apply if the entity does not have an internal audit function. (Ref: Para. A2)

Marina Strategy: Section A Request for Proposal. 1. Request for Proposal. 2. Communication. 3. Key Contacts

NEW CASTLE COUNTY POLICE

To establish a consistent process for the activity of an independent double-check prior to medication administration, where appropriate.

Root Cause Analysis. Chris Bills Compliance Enforcement Attorney

The purpose of this procedure is to provide a procedure for organizing, planning, and conducting on site construction quality surveillances.

3-Year Interim Surveillance Audit Application for Accredited Organizations

Workplace Safety and Health Management System Administration

ONC Health IT Certification Program: Enhanced Oversight and Accountability

Objectives. Key Elements. ICAHN Targeted Focus Areas: Staff Competency and Education Quality Processes and Risk Management 5/20/2014

LA14-22 STATE OF NEVADA. Performance Audit. Department of Education. Legislative Auditor Carson City, Nevada

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

CHEYNEY UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION AUGUST 21, 2014

Provider Rights. As a network provider, you have the right to:

NIJ DNA GRANT SUMMIT Grant Progress Assessment Program. Patricia Kashtan Program Operations Specialist

This is a Legal Document. By completing and signing, this you certify under

Biennial Audit of the Shakopee Police Department Automated License Plate Reader System Conducted by LEADS Consulting

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information to the Public

CMS TRANSPLANT PROGRAM QUALITY WEBINAR SERIES. James Ballard, MBA, CPHQ, CPPS, HACP Eileen Willey, MSN, BSN, RN, CPHQ, HACP

It is the Department policy to promptly and thoroughly investigate alleged misconduct involving employees.

Transcription:

Procedure for Corrective Action and Non-conformities 1.0 Purpose - This procedure establishes the process to identify, track, investigate, and correct non-conformities within the State Crime Laboratory (Laboratory) Quality Management System. 2.0 Scope - This procedure is applicable to all organizational units and personnel in the Laboratory. 3.0 Definitions Cause A deficiency that results in a non-conformity which must be corrected to prevent reoccurrence of the same or similar non-conformity. Corrective action An action taken to eliminate the cause(s) of a detected non-conformity, defect, or other undesirable situation in order to prevent reoccurrence. Non-conformity A non-fulfillment of a specified or implied requirement of the Quality Management System. 4.0 Procedure 4.1 Overview 4.1.1 Technical or administrative case-related non-conformities shall be grouped into four classes as determined by the impact on the Laboratory. 4.1.2 Class I non-conformities shall be documented and corrected on the spot, while Class II, Class III and Class IV non-conformities require management involvement. 4.1.3 The goals of this corrective action policy are to identify the root cause of a problem; correct nonconformities; implement a solution to avoid recurrence; and maintain the highest level of quality. 4.2 Class I Non-conformities 4.2.1 Class I non-conformities generally: Are discovered prior to case completion. Are foreseeable. Have a clear-cut, immediate cause. Have a defined remedial action, which shall be adequately documented by a simple entry on the examination documentation, or noted in the administrative or technical review. Shall be corrected on the spot by the individual who discovers them or by the original examiner when administrative or technical review is returned. Do not compromise the overall quality of work if properly addressed. Are not required to be documented on the Non-conformity Record. 4.2.1.1 Examples: administrative or transcription error, or failure in a quality control check such as carry-over in a blank, etc. (Some Class I non-conformities may be Section-specific and defined by the Technical Leader.) 4.2.2 Class I non-conformities occur as part of casework. Remediation for such Class I non-conformities shall be made on the spot by Forensic Scientists. Page 1 of 5

4.2.3 Staff shall take appropriate measures to correct or repair non-conforming data, reporting or equipment. 4.2.4 Remedial actions shall be documented in the Case Record. 4.3 Class II Non-conformities Raised by Laboratory Employee 4.3.1 Class II non-conformities generally: Are discovered prior to case completion. Have a clear-cut, immediate cause. Do not compromise the overall quality of work if properly addressed. Are required to be documented on the Non-conformity Record and in the case file. 4.3.1.1 Examples: contamination issues, non-systemic identification of a Laboratory employee by DNA or Fingerprints or non-conformities not immediately corrected during the audit process. 4.3.2 The individual who identifies any Class II non-conformity shall inform the Forensic Scientist Manager and/or Technical Leader within two business days and initiate the Non-conformity Record (NCR) to document the issue. The Forensic Scientist Manager and/or Technical Leader shall conduct basic fact finding and forward the NCR to the Quality Manager (QM) within two business days. 4.3.3 The QM, in collaboration with the Forensic Scientist Manager and/or Technical Leader, shall determine if the non-conformity rises to the level of a Corrective Action/ Preventive Action. 4.3.4 Remedial actions shall be documented in the case file if applicable. 4.3.5 The QM or designee shall keep a file of all Class II Non-conformities and place them on the Nonconformity Record Log. 4.3.6 The NCR shall use the following numbering scheme: YY-L-#, where the first two digits indicate the year, followed by a letter indicating the Laboratory (R=Raleigh, W=Western, T=Triad), and the next available sequential number. 4.4 Corrective Actions Class III and Class IV Non-conformities 4.4.1 Class III non-conformities generally: Require an inquiry to determine the root cause. Require comprehensive action with documentation. Require management involvement. May affect the quality of work, but are not serious enough to cause immediate concern for the overall quality of the Laboratory work product. Page 2 of 5

4.4.1.1 Examples: missed identifications (failing to identify something present), false negatives or inconsistencies in proficiency test results, etc. 4.4.2 Class IV non-conformities: Require an inquiry to determine their root cause. Require comprehensive action with documentation. Require management involvement. Raise immediate concern and may compromise the quality of the Laboratory work product. 4.4.2.1 Examples: erroneous identifications (identifying something not present), or systemic quality issues. 4.4.3 The employee who identifies a potential Class III or Class IV non-conformity shall inform the Forensic Scientist Manager and/or Technical Leader within two business days. The Forensic Scientist Manager and/or Technical Leader shall document the non-conformity and method of identification by completing a Corrective Action Record (CAR) and submitting the record to the QM within two business days of the identification of the non-conformity. 4.4.4 The QM shall determine the appropriate class (Class III or Class IV) of the non-conformity. The QM shall assign a team to evaluate the non-conformity. The inquiry team shall confer with the QM to develop an approach to the inquiry and shall determine whether the employee shall be permitted to conduct casework. The team shall usually include the Section Forensic Scientist Manager and a designated Technical Leader. 4.4.5 Section I of the CAR shall be completed by the QM and given to the Inquiry Team Leader. 4.4.6 The CAR shall use the following numbering scheme: YY-L-#, where the first two digits shall indicate the year, followed by a letter indicating the Laboratory (R=Raleigh, W=Western, T=Triad) and the next available sequential number. 4.4.7 Over the course of the investigation, the inquiry team shall determine and document the following: The non-conformity. Event(s) which identified the non-conformity. Extent of the non-conformity. Effect(s) of the non-conformity on the quality of work. Short term response. Root cause(s) of the non-conformity. Examples of findings or root causes may include, but are not limited to, equipment failure; incomplete or nonexistent procedures; non-compliance with procedures and regulations; improper collection, storage, handling, or preparation; calculation errors or transcription errors; and lack of training. 4.4.8 A tentative corrective action plan shall be developed by the inquiry team and provided via CAR to the QM within 30 days. If the inquiry and/or corrective action plan extends over a period greater than 30 days, the team shall provide progress reports to the QM every 15 days. Page 3 of 5

4.4.9 Once a corrective action plan is determined, Sections II and III of the CAR shall be completed and signed by the Inquiry Team Leader and the CAR returned to the QM for review and approval. 4.4.10 The corrective action shall be implemented. 4.4.11 The QM in collaboration with the inquiry team shall determine if the corrective plan has been completed or specify if further action is warranted. If deemed necessary, additional follow-up actions shall be identified by the QM and a new date for completion set and approved. 4.4.12 After completion of the corrective action, the QM shall evaluate the effectiveness of the plan and complete Section IV of the Corrective Action Record. 4.4.13 If there is objective evidence that the actions are complete and effective, the QM shall approve and close the corrective action, signing Section IV of the CAR. 4.4.14 If the QM determines the Corrective Action Plan has not adequately addressed the non-conformity, then Sections II-IV of the CAR will be repeated. 4.4.15 If an employee is removed from casework or if casework in a particular discipline has been suspended as a result of a CAR inquiry, then casework in that discipline or casework by the employee shall not be allowed to resume until released by the Quality Manager and/or Technical Leader. 4.4.16 The QM shall maintain all original documentation on corrective actions. 4.5 Special Audits 4.5.1 If the findings of the corrective action indicate a systemic issue of non-compliance at Section or Laboratory-wide level, the QM shall initiate an appropriate audit. The QM, in consultation with the Assistant Director of Technical Operations, shall assign one or more experienced persons from outside of the Section or Laboratory to perform a special audit. 4.5.2 A report from the audit team shall be made to the QM, who shall determine whether follow-up action is required. 4.6 Completed Cases Released To Clients 5.0 Records 4.6.1 Data, reports, and actions shall not be released until the problem is resolved and verified by the Section Forensic Scientist Manager and/or QM. If the problem cannot be resolved, the submitting agency shall be notified in writing that the data cannot be reported or accepted, and disclaimers shall be made that the product did not meet quality standards. 4.6.2 In the event that a Class III or Class IV non-conformity has been identified and a Laboratory Report has been released through Forensic Advantage (FA - the laboratory information management system), the agency shall be notified. The Lab Director or designee may request resubmission of evidence for analysis. An amended report shall be issued to the submitting agency and the CAR shall be included in the FA case file. Page 4 of 5

Corrective Action Record (CAR) Non-conformity Record (NCR) CAR database 6.0 Attachments N/A Revision History Effective Date 09/17/2012 02/01/2013 03/08/2013 Version Number Reason 1 Original Document 2 3 4.3.1.1 - added non-conformities not immediately corrected during the audit process to the list of examples; 4.3.4 - added if applicable; 4.4.1.1 - added inconsistencies in proficiency test results to the list of examples; 4.4.3 - changed memo to Non-Conformity Record; added 4.4.12 and 4.4.14 to add language on evaluation of CA and what to do if plan in not effective; 4.4.8 - changed memo to CAR 4.4.12 - Removed 30 days and added complete Section IV of the Corrective Action Record 10/16/2013 4 Added 4.4.15; added issuing authority to header 12/19/2014 5 Throughout document: Clarified roles of Assistant Director of Technical Operations and QM; removed QCO responsibilities; 4.4.3 - replaced NCR with CAR; revised 4.4.4 accordingly Page 5 of 5