Breast Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract

Similar documents
Head and Neck Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract

The FOCUS Program: Helping Cancer Patients and Family Their Caregivers. Laurel Northouse PhD, RN, FAAN Professor of Nursing University of Michigan

Consumer perceptions of the effectiveness of a breast care nurse in providing coordinated care to women with breast cancer in Queensland, Australia

Models for Patient-centered Cancer Care

Patient Navigation: A Multidisciplinary Team Approach

Barwon South Western Survivorship Project. Improving outcomes for survivors of cancer

Barb Henry, APRN-BC, MSN

Deborah Mayer, PhD, RN, AOCN, FAAN School of Nursing Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

Multidisciplinary Cancer Care

Initial Assessment, Survivorship Care Plans

Massachusetts Health Connector. Fiscal Year 2011 Commonwealth Care Member Survey

Administrative Approval: Vice President of Professional Services

Perceptions of the role of the hospital palliative care team

Understanding and Managing End of Life Symptoms: A Teaching Guide for the Primary Caregiver

Patient Experience Survey Results

Long Term Care Nurses Feelings on Communication, Teamwork and Stress in Long Term Care

CANCER LEADERSHIP COUNCIL

The Danger of Silence: A Loud Rebuttal to Michael Porter s Value-Based Health Care Delivery Proposal

Oncology Pharmacy Services

Transitions of Care: The need for collaboration across entire care continuum

The Agency for Co-operative Housing 2015 Client Satisfaction Survey. Prepared by TNS Canada. December 21, 2015

Survivorship Care: Building a Program

Colorectal Recovery Package & Risk Stratified Pathways. Julie Burton Lead Colorectal / Stoma Care CNS Nurse Endoscopist

2011 University Life Survey

An analysis of service quality at a student health center

Patients Being Weaned From the Ventilator: Positive Effects of Guided Imagery. Authors McVay, Frank; Spiva, Elizabeth; Hart, Patricia L.

ONCOLOGY NURSING SOCIETY RESEARCH AGENDA. Prepared and Submitted by. Ann M. Berger, PhD, APRN, AOCN, FAAN ONS Research Agenda Team Leader

An evaluation of the National Cancer Survivorship Initiative test community projects. Report of the baseline patient experience survey

New Options in Chronic Care Management

The Schwartz Center Mission

Objectives. Brief Review: EBP vs Research. APHON/Mattie Miracle Cancer Foundation EBP Grant Program Webinar 3/5/2018

History of Patient Navigation 8/26/17. Cancer Navigation September 26, Agenda

University of Washington Medical Center

The Development of the Oncology Symptom Management Clinic

Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease Lorig K R, Sobel D S, Ritter P L, Laurent D, Hobbs M

Tools and Resources for the New and Experienced Oncology Nurse Navigator & Oncology Care Coordinator

2016 Smithsonian Employee Perspective Survey Highlights

Piloting a Lay Navigation Program in a Community and Academic Jean B. Sellers, RN, MSN Administrative Clinical Director UNC Lineberger Comprehensive

DRAFT Optimal Care Pathway

Patient and carer experiences: palliative care services national survey report: November 2010

2014 Smithsonian Employee Perspective Survey Highlights

Patient Navigation Programs Leveraging Care Pathways. Tina Evans, RN, BS Director of Nursing,Onco-Nav

Identifying Research Questions

Family Caregiving Issues that Cancer Survivors and their Caregivers Face

Renal cancer surgery patient experience February 2014-February 2015

Patient Navigation & Psychosocial Care. Angelina Esparza, RN, MPH Director, ACS Patient Navigator Program & Cancer Resource Centers

National findings from the 2013 Inpatients survey

Domain 1 Patient Engagement

Patient experiences of Discharge at the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital June 2016

Evaluation of Electronic Holistic Needs Assessment (ehna)

COPE Intervention for Cancer Caregivers

Family Participation in Rounds

Request for Applications. Community-Based Programs and Community-Academic Partnership Programs

Pre-Implementation Provider Survey

Hardwiring Technology into Care Delivery to Increase HCAHPS

Nebraska Lifespan Respite Caregiver Survey

Trauma-Informed Primary Care Initiative

03/24/2017. Measuring What Matters to Improve the Patient Experience. Building Compassion Into Everyday Practice

INNOVATIVE TOOLS TO SUPPORT FAMILY CAREGIVERS

2013 Call for Proposals. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (CBCF) Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Evidence-Based Education Intervention to Improve Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses' Postoperative Pain Management for Improved Patient Satisfaction

The Impact of Patient Suicide on Mental Health Nurses THESIS SUMMARY KERRY CROSS RN MN 2017

CANCER LEADERSHIP COUNCIL

2017 SURVEY OF CFP PROFESSIONALS CFP PROFESSIONALS PERCEPTIONS OF CFP BOARD, CFP CERTIFICATION AND THE FINANCIAL PLANNING PROFESSION

Complete Grant Applications are due by 10:00 a.m. on July 10, 2018

Benchmarking across sectors: Comparisons of residential dual diagnosis and mental health programs

Victorian Cancer Survivorship Program. Breast Cancer Survivorship Program Integration with Community Practice

Managing Treatment With Oral Oncology Medications. An Educational Toolkit for Health Care Providers

THE 3 STEP PROCESS FOR SUCCESSFUL EMPLOYEE GOAL MANAGEMENT IN ACUTE CARE

Usability Testing of an Online Self-Management Program for Adolescents with Cancer

July to December 2013: Outcome Measurement System (OMS) Report

Transforming Care After Treatment: Evidence and Learning Bulletin. Holistic Needs Assessment: Implications for Practice

Innovations in Models of Care Delivery

Text-based Document. Implementing Strategies to Improve Patient Perception of Nursing Communication. Dunbar, Ghada; Nagar, Stacey

Pediatric Psychology

Could Helping Parents Achieve Being a Good Parent to My Very Ill Child be Effective Bereavement Care?

Patient Navigation & Satisfaction

2017 Community Grant Guidelines $25,000 One-Year Grants

NC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS)

2015 National Cancer Experience:

Title & Subtitle can. accc-cancer.org March April 2017 OI

Chronic Pain Management in the Inpatient Care Setting

Living or surviving at work. complex working environments

Oncology Nurses: Providing the Support System for Cancer Care

April 28, Dear Sir / Madam:

2018 UVA Health System Engagement Survey Items

Carers Checklist. An outcome measure for people with dementia and their carers. Claire Hodgson Irene Higginson Peter Jefferys

Practitioner Rights CREDENTIALING & YOU

FORENSIC COUNSELING SERVICES Aaron Robb, Ph.D. Program Director Mailing address: 2831 Eldorado Pkwy, Ste , Frisco, TX 75033

1/25/15. Equicare Health. Patient Management & Retention: Clinical And Financial Implications. Clinical Implica+ons of Pa+ent Management

Oncology. Embracing Excellence in. Nursing Practice HOAG FAMILY CANCER INSTITUTE PRESENTS 13 TH ANNUAL

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2016 Executive Summary

Ward design: implications for work practices, care quality and patient safety

A RESEARCH CRITIQUE ON THE LIVED-IN EXPERIENCES OF PATIENTS SUBJECTED TO CHEMOTHERAPY IN SELECTED HOSPITALS AT CHENNAI

Holistic Needs Assessment (HNA) for Adult Cancer Patients Guidelines

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Relationship between Organizational Climate and Nurses Job Satisfaction in Bangladesh

Wrong route administration of an oral drug into a vein

Integrated Offender Management Participant Exit Survey Report

Suburban Cook County Area Hospital DV Protocol (2010)

Transcription:

Breast Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract November 14, 2011 Final

Prepared by Institutional Research MD Anderson Cancer Center

Breast Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract Submitted by: Marilyn J. Greer, Ph.D. Glenda Redworth, M.S. Institutional Research November 14, 2011

Acknowledgements Special thanks to Kathy Denton, Performance Improvement Specialist, Cancer Survivorship, for assisting us with the evaluation questions and evaluation process. In addition, many thanks to Virginia Peters, Administrative Assistant, Institutional Research, for transcribing the comments for the survey. E.1-1

Breast Survivorship Clinic Follow-up Patient Satisfaction Survey Abstract The MD Anderson Cancer Center Breast Survivorship Clinic conducted a follow-up patient satisfaction survey in early 2011 to determine the level of satisfaction with the multidisciplinary care and information patients received from the Survivorship Program. The results of this follow-up survey will be compared with the baseline survey which was conducted in the second half of 2009 with patients who were not in the Survivorship Program. There were 88 responses to the follow-up survey. The results of the survey will be used to increase the survivorship clinic s effectiveness in providing patient care. When the not applicable and don t know responses were removed from the analysis, the majority of respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that the main reason for their visit was addressed to their satisfaction (98.8%), that they received as much information about their condition and treatment as they wanted from their health care provider (100.0%), and that they spent as much time with their health care team as they wanted (97.6%). Approximately 43.1% of the respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that the staff did everything they could to manage their emotional distress, while 55.6% of the respondents indicated the question was not applicable to them. When the not applicable and don t know responses were removed from the analysis, 100.0% of the respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that the staff did everything they could to manage their emotional distress, compared to 98.0% on the baseline survey. For sixteen of the nineteen (84.2%) topics listed on the follow-up survey, over 70% of the respondents indicated that they did not request information about it. On the baseline survey there were also sixteen of the nineteen (84.2%) topics over 70%. For all nineteen (100.0%) of the topics listed on the follow-up survey when the did not request information and don t know responses were removed from the analysis, over 80% of the respondents were either very satisfied or satisfied with the information they received. On the baseline survey there were also all nineteen (100.0%) of the topics over 80%. Comparing the very satisfied or satisfied percents for the nineteen topics after removing the did not request information and don t know responses from the analysis, three topics differed by 10% or more from the baseline survey to the follow-up survey: Topics Where the Satisfaction Increased on the Follow-up Survey Topic Baseline Follow-up Difference n. Sexuality counseling 85.7% 100.0% 14.3% Topics where the Satisfaction Decreased on the Follow-up Survey Topic Baseline Follow-up Difference f. Fatique 100.0% 83.4% -16.6% g. Heart health 100.0% 87.5% -12.5% The results of the follow-up survey were favorable for the Breast Center since more than 90% of patients in the Survivorship Program agreed that their main reason for visiting the clinic was addressed to their satisfaction, that they received as much information about their condition and treatment as they wanted from their health care provider, and that they spent as much time with their health care team as they wanted, and felt the staff did everything they could to manage the patient s emotional distress. In E.1-1

addition, the majority of respondents were satisfied with the information they received on the various topics listed on the survey. However, we recommend that the Breast Survivorship Clinic monitor the patient satisfaction with the information about fatigue and heart health. We also recommend that the breast patient satisfaction survey be repeated annually to ensure that the Breast Survivorship Clinic routinely assesses the effectiveness of the Breast Survivorship Program. E.1-1