DoD Audit Readiness Progress

Similar documents
Other Defense Organizations and Defense Finance and Accounting Service Controls Over High-Risk Transactions Were Not Effective

MANAGER S TOOLKIT FOR A SUCCESSFUL FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT

Defense Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan

GAO. DOD FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Ongoing Challenges in Implementing the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan

Report No. DODIG May 31, Defense Departmental Reporting System-Budgetary Was Not Effectively Implemented for the Army General Fund

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AGENCY-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT OPINION

United States Government Accountability Office August 2013 GAO

Navy s Contract/Vendor Pay Process Was Not Auditable

DOD FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT. Improved Documentation Needed to Support the Air Force s Military Payroll and Meet Audit Readiness Goals

How Current Government-wide Initiatives Will Shape DoD in the Future. Presented to ASMC PDI May 29, 2015

DOD FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT. Actions Are Needed on Audit Issues Related to the Marine Corps 2012 Schedule of Budgetary Activity

Department of Defense. Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act. Statement of Assurance. Fiscal Year 2014 Guidance

United States Air Force

GAO. DOD FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Numerous Challenges Must Be Addressed to Achieve Auditability

Report No. D February 22, Internal Controls over FY 2007 Army Adjusting Journal Vouchers

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Department of Defense

Department of Defense Investment Review Board and Investment Management Process for Defense Business Systems

Financial Management Challenges DoD Has Faced

Financial Management

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORT ON THE APPROPRIATION FOR THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD. Report No December 13, 1996

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) (USD(C))/Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Department of Defense

Report No. D August 20, Missile Defense Agency Purchases for and from Governmental Sources

GAO. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT An Overview of Finance and Accounting Activities in DOD

DODIG July 18, Navy Did Not Develop Processes in the Navy Enterprise Resource Planning System to Account for Military Equipment Assets

Report No. DODIG March 26, General Fund Enterprise Business System Did Not Provide Required Financial Information

a GAO GAO DOD BUSINESS SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION Improvements to Enterprise Architecture Development and Implementation Efforts Needed

Report No. D February 9, Internal Controls Over the United States Marine Corps Military Equipment Baseline Valuation Effort

Navy Enterprise Resource Planning System Does Not Comply With the Standard Financial Information Structure and U.S. Government Standard General Ledger

Ae?r:oo-t)?- Stc/l4. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017

Report No. DODIG U.S. Department of Defense SEPTEMBER 28, 2016

Department of Defense

Subj: ACCOUNTABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY PROPERTY

DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate

ASMC National 2016 PDI. June 1-3, 2016

Information System Security

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)

INSPECTOR GENERAL, DOD, OVERSIGHT OF THE ARMY AUDIT AGENCY AUDIT OF THE FY 1999 ARMY WORKING CAPITAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Delayed Federal Grant Closeout: Issues and Impact

Navy Non-DERP (Other Accrued) Environmental Liabilities (OEL) ~ Development and Outcomes

Department of Defense Charge Card Task Force Status Report

Fostering Relationships in an Audit Readiness Environment. Eric Lampkin Director, AMCOM Internal Review and Compliance

Four4Four Plan To Avoid ADA Violations. Phil Davidson 29 May 2015, PDI New Orleans, LA

a GAO GAO AIR FORCE DEPOT MAINTENANCE Management Improvements Needed for Backlog of Funded Contract Maintenance Work

Defense Travel Management Office

SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY FUND STATE PUBLIC SCHOOL FUND (SPSF) PRC 015 (LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCIES - LEAS)

Amendment Require DOD to obtain an audit with an unqualified opinion by FY 2018

JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION ALLOCATION TO STATES. U.S. Department of Justice

Headquarters Department of the Army

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Implementation of Data Collection, Development, and Management for Strategic Analyses

30. GRANTS AND FUNDING ASSISTANCE POLICY

From: Commanding Officer, Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center

Global Combat Support System Army Did Not Comply With Treasury and DoD Financial Reporting Requirements

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Four4Four Plan To Avoid ADA Violations. Phil Davidson 3 June 2016 PDI Orlando, FL

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, DC

2011 Ground Robotics Capability Conference. OSD Perspective

Grants Financial Procedures (Post-Award) v. 2.0

Cultural Competency Initiative. Program Guidelines

Compliance Appendix E: Compliance Budget Overview

Report No. DODIG U.S. Department of Defense AUGUST 21, 2015

The complete listing and description of the requirements changes, deletions, and additions by chapters and systems requirements can be found below.

Evolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development in DOD Programs: Policy Issues for Congress

FEDERAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS CAPITAL PROGRAM. U. S. Department of Transportation

Department ofthe Navy Business Transformation Plan Fiscal Year 2013 & Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Report

Information Technology

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

CG-9 Internal Controls Program Overview. CG-9 Rory Souther Association of Government Accountants Audio Conference June 8, 2011

Allegations Concerning the Defense Logistics Agency Contract Action Reporting System (D )

Department of Defense

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Coast Guard IT Investments Risk Failure Without Required Oversight

Other Defense Spending

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON. DC

Department of the Navy Managers Internal Control Manual

U.S. Department of Justice 42 U.S.C (a) N.C. Department of Public Safety

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

NSF OIG Audit Update NORTHEAST CONFERENCE ON COLLEGE COST ACCOUNTING

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE

Army Environmental Liability Recognition, Valuation, and Reporting June 2010

Air Force Officials Did Not Consistently Comply With Requirements for Assessing Contractor Performance

Defense Travel Management Office


STATEMENT OF CAPTAIN BRIAN T. DRAPP, SUPPLY CORPS, U.S. NAVY COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL SEA LOGISTICS CENTER BEFORE THE

World-Wide Satellite Systems Program

GAO CONTINGENCY CONTRACTING. DOD, State, and USAID Continue to Face Challenges in Tracking Contractor Personnel and Contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan

CAPITALIZATION GRANT FOR STATE REVOLVING FUND. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Federal Fiscal Year 2019 North Texas SBDC RFP Appendix III: Financial Management and Budget Guidance 1. Financial Basis of the Program

Followup Audit of Depot-Level Repairable Assets at Selected Army and Navy Organizations (D )

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Transcription:

DoD Audit Readiness Progress Washington-ASMC NCR PDI March 10, 2016 Mark Easton, Deputy Chief Financial Officer Alaleh Jenkins, Assistant Deputy Chief Financial Officer v8

Agenda The Department s Financial Audit Requirement & Approach History of Audit Efforts to Date Clear Strategy and Priorities Where Are We Now? Increased Congressional Visibility National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Audit Readiness Progress Rankings Current Status Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 General Funds (GF) Under Audit FY 2015 Schedule of Budgetary Activity (SBA) Audit Results Remaining Challenges Path to the Initial FY 2018 Full Financial Statement Audit FY 2016 GF Projected to Be Under Audit Strategy for 2016-2017: Move the Big Rocks Audit Readiness Validation Timeline for Critical Capability Areas Oversight of the Fourth Estate Driving Progress and Consistency DoD-Wide Initiatives Your Role: How You Can Be Prepared Final Thoughts 2

The Department s Financial Audit Requirement & Approach 3

The Department s Financial Audit Requirement and Approach History of Audit Efforts to Date 2009 1994 Initial DoD Efforts Begin Initial Priorities Established 2005 FIAR Office Established Pre-2009 Audit emphasis largely within only the comptroller organizations Post-2009 Audit efforts involve all functional areas enterprise-wide 4

The Department s Financial Audit Requirement and Approach History of Audit Efforts to Date 2014 FY 2014 Statutory Direction Achieve Audit Readiness of General Fund Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) 1994 Initial DoD Efforts Begin 2009 Initial Priorities Established 2005 FIAR Office Established Pre-2009 Audit emphasis largely within only the comptroller organizations Post-2009 Audit efforts involve all functional areas enterprise-wide 5

The Department s Financial Audit Requirement and Approach History of Audit Efforts to Date The Climb from SBA to Full Financial Statement Audit Will Be Steep 2014 2017 FY 2017 Statutory Direction Achieve Full Agency Financial Statement Audit Readiness FY 2014 Statutory Direction Achieve Audit Readiness of General Fund Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) 1994 Initial DoD Efforts Begin 2009 Initial Priorities Established 2005 FIAR Office Established Pre-2009 Audit emphasis largely within only the comptroller organizations Post-2009 Audit efforts involve all functional areas enterprise-wide 6

The Department s Financial Audit Requirement and Approach Clear Strategy and Priorities DoD s FIAR strategy balances the need to achieve short-term accomplishments (Waves 1 and 2) against the long-term goal of achieving an unqualified opinion on the Department s full financial statements (Wave 4) Includes four prioritized waves to achieve and sustain audit readiness Initial waves focus on information management actually uses and generates enterprise-wide support Incrementally builds audit infrastructure for increased scope 2012 2014 2016 2017 7

The Department s Financial Audit Requirement and Approach Where Are We Now? Seven Defense Agencies continued to sustain full financial audits in FY 2015 Military Services and seven additional defense agencies were under SBA audits / examinations in FY 2015 Beginning in FY 2016 Sustain and expand audit coverage: DLA and DISA to go through Full Financial Statement Audits Developing corrective action plans for SBA audit findings and tracking progress Implementing a risk-based approach for remaining financial statements; measuring progress in high-risk areas for each component Detailed information is contained in the November 2015 FIAR Plan Status Report at http://comptroller.defense.gov/portals/45/documents/fiar/fiar_plan_november_2015.pdf 8

The Department s Financial Audit Requirement and Approach Increased Congressional Visibility Key National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Provisions NDAA for FY 2010 NDAA for FY 2014 NDAA for FY 2015 NDAA for FY 2016 Requires DoD financial statements to be validated as ready for audit by the end of FY 2017 Establishes the timeline for a full audit of the FY 2018 full financial statement Senate Armed Service Committee report requires DoD to submit an annual report to Congress on the aggregate funding included in the Schedule of Budgetary Activity Requires a report to Congress ranking the Military Departments and other defense organizations on their progress toward achieving auditable Statements of Budgetary Resources 9

Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 The Department s Financial Audit Requirement and Approach NDAA Audit Readiness Progress Rankings Tier & Rank Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) Auditability Ranking Existence & Completeness (E&C) Auditability Ranking Full Financial Statement Auditability Ranking 1 Marine Corps GF Army GF Marine Corps GF 2 Air Force GF Navy GF Army WCF 3 Army GF Air Force GF Air Force GF 4 Army WCF Marine Corps GF Army GF 5 Navy GF Army WCF Navy GF 6 Air Force WCF Department of the Navy WCF (incl USMC WCF) Air Force WCF 7 Department of the Navy WCF (incl USMC WCF) Air Force WCF Department of the Navy WCF (incl USMC WCF) 1 Defense Information Systems Agency WCF Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials Defense Information Systems Agency WCF 2 Defense Information Systems Agency GF Defense Logistics Agency WCF Defense Information Systems Agency GF 3 Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials Defense Logistics Agency GF Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials 4 Defense Logistics Agency WCF Defense Information Systems Agency WCF Defense Logistics Agency WCF 5 Defense Logistics Agency GF Defense Information Systems Agency GF Defense Logistics Agency GF 6 Defense Health Program (incl DHA and SMAs) Defense Health Program (incl DHA and SMAs) Defense Health Program (incl DHA and SMAs) 7 U.S. Transportation Command U.S. Special Operations Command U.S. Special Operations Command 8 U.S. Special Operations Command U.S. Transportation Command U.S. Transportation Command 1 Missile Defense Agency Chemical Biological Defense Program Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency 2 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Defense Security Cooperation Agency Chemical Biological Defense Program 3 Chemical Biological Defense Program Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Missile Defense Agency 4 Defense Threat Reduction Agency Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Contract Management Agency 5 DoD Education Activity Missile Defense Agency Defense Threat Reduction Agency 6 Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Threat Reduction Agency Defense Security Cooperation Agency 7 Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 8 Defense Security Cooperation Agency Washington Headquarters Services DoD Education Activity 9 Washington Headquarters Services DoD Education Activity Washington Headquarters Services

Current Status 11

Current Status FY 2015 General Funds Under Audit ODOs (TI-97) $137.57B (14.4%) Full Financial Statements ODOs (TI-97) $64.83B (6.7%) Undergoing Examination ODOs (TI-97) $31.40B (3.3%) Performing Audit Readiness Activities Air Force (TI-57) $188.51B (19.7%) GF (SBA) Marine Corps (TI-17) $28.17B (2.9%) GF (SBA) $957.12 Billion Total Under Audit Military Retirement Fund (TI-97) $55.45B (5.8%) Full Financial Statements Army (TI-21) $240.80B (25.2%) GF (SBA) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers- Civil Works (TI-96) $28.73B (3.0%) Full Financial Statements Navy (TI-17) $181.66B (19.0%) GF (SBA) 12

Current Status FY 2015 SBA Audit Results Key Themes of the FY 2015 Audits Results Critical Issues Exist Incomplete universe of transactions, and General Ledger/Feeder system reconciliations Insufficient information technology controls, for both the reporting entity and Service Providers DoD-wide issues (e.g., Fund Balance with Treasury differences, Journal Vouchers for Eliminations and Accruals) Lack of control operating effectiveness and centralized document repository Key Takeaways A positive opinion was not expected The experience implemented a financial management discipline as the new norm, not just preparation for audit Prioritizing and tracking corrective action plans (CAPs) is imperative, as is validating that the CAP addresses the root cause of the notice of finding and recommendation As with many first year audits, the audit opinion will not be positive. It is expected that it will be several years before DoD achieves a positive SBA audit opinion, but SBR opinions should follow directly. 13

Current Status Remaining Challenges This Journey Will Take Time and Resources Resources are necessary to support and sustain audits, and remediate audit findings Legacy environment is stove-piped, complex, non-standard, and decentralized, making audits difficult and highly inefficient Migrating to a new control environment will take time, but it will enhance auditability successes and efficiencies Examples of Specific Challenges Universe of transactions (21 general ledger systems, 600 feeder systems) Defense-wide shared appropriation (TI-97), to include use of sub-allotments o Lack of visibility of transactions at the Component level hinders proper reconciliation of cash Funds Balance with Treasury auditable o Poses challenge for a complete universe of transactions Valuation of Property (and establishing policies that are cost-effective) 14

Path to the Initial FY 2018 Full Financial Statement Audit 15

Path to the Initial FY 2018 Full Financial Statement Audit FY 2016 General Funds Projected to Be Under Audit $673.35 Billion Projected Under Audit 16

Path to the Initial FY 2018 Full Financial Statement Audit Strategy for 2016-2017: Move the Big Rocks Risk-Based Approach, Measuring Progress and Performing Control Testing, Focused on Seven Critical Capability Areas: Universe of Transactions Reconcile feeder systems to general ledgers and retain underlying detailed transactions Fund Balance with Treasury (FBWT) Reconcile FBWT and retain supporting documentation Journal Vouchers (JVs) Validate that JVs are supported and justified Open Obligations Confirm that the balances are valid and supported Existence, Completeness and Rights & Obligations of Assets Validate that assets exist and records are complete; verify ownership Valuation of Assets Record assets at the correct amount Environmental and Disposal Liabilities Implement a process for identifying, estimating and recording the cleanup costs of hazardous waste Information Technology (IT) Implement and validate IT controls (e.g., security, access control) Over the next two years, the Department will continue to expand the scope of audits while sustaining a stronger, more disciplined environment, until full audit readiness is achieved. OUSD(C) and DCMO are increasing pressure and visibility using FIAR Governance. 17

Path to the Initial FY 2018 Full Financial Statement Audit Audit Readiness Validation Timeline for Critical Capability Areas 2015 2016 2017 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 2018 FY 2018 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY 2015 SBA Audit Audit Period Reporting FY 2016 SBA Audit Audit Period Reporting FY 2018 Full Financial Statement Audit 1 2 Audit Period IPA/Consultant Feedback/Validation Complete Universe of Transactions* Fund Balance with Treasury* Journal Vouchers* Open Obligations Existence, Completeness, and Rights - General Property, Plant, and Equipment and Inventory and Related Property* Valuation - General Property, Plant, and Equipment and Inventory and Related Property* Environmental Liabilities SBA UT FY 15 SBA FBWT FY 15 SBA JVs FY 16 SBA FBWT PP&E Existence & Completeness FY 16 SBA JVs SBR & B/S UT Environmental Liabilities Open Obligations PP&E Valuation FBWT B/S All JVs Administration Change - Turn-Over Package Examines: Budget Priorities, Property Priorities, and Audit Infrastructure Activities Completed by Date Legend Feedback/Validation Received During SBA Audit/Examination (where applicable ) 1 2 Government Acquisition Cycle Begins for FY 2018 Full Financial Statement Audit Congressionally Mandated Audit Readiness Date Activities Completed over Period * Linked to High Risk Areas 18

Path to the Initial FY 2018 Full Financial Statement Audit Oversight of Fourth Estate Drives Progress and Consistency Detailed implementation plans for the Fourth Estate have been developed Include critical path items and progress checks Address Fourth Estate-specific issues o Universe of transactions solution o DFAS & DCFO have established tiger teams (JVs, FBWT, PP&E) o Standard process documentation (flowcharts, narrative, control matrices) have been developed to drive consistency in processes Progress and Status Are Being Monitored by DCFO and ADCMO Will leverage FIAR Governance & the Defense Business Council to raise and address DoD-wide issues Will continue to monitor results from SBA and Service Provider audits and exams ODCFO / FIAR will perform ongoing monthly testing of SBA areas to sustain the audit momentum and validate that CAPs are implemented ODCFO / FIAR continues engaging FASAB to ensure policy changes / clarifications are codified in Federal Accounting Standards 19

Path to the Initial FY 2018 Full Financial Statement Audit Audit Issues with DoD-Wide Impact Examples of Where We Are Addressing Enterprise-Wide Dependencies 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Feeder System Reconciliations Completeness can t be proven without reconciliations to all material feeder systems Material Unsupported Journal Vouchers (Eliminations) JVs are automatic high risk area for auditors subject to extensive testing. Fund Balance with Treasury Reconciliation Completeness of Disbursements & Collections Service Provider Coordination Service provider processes and systems that affect customer audit readiness Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) / Contractor Acquired Property (CAP) capitalization and recording of these assets Go Forward Valuation of Property, Inventory & Related Property proposing to FASAB cost-effective methods for valuation of property DoD Policy Updates / FASAB Updates Policy updates are needed to define our requirements for supporting our beginning balances necessary to move into a full financial statement audit Suspense Account Completeness of Disbursements & Collections Estimation Models (Environmental Liabilities & Replacement Values) Supports Valuation Baseline Methodology & Support for Estimates 20

Your Role: How You Can Be Prepared 21

Your Role: How You Can Be Prepared Are You Prepared for the Game? Who Are the Players? FM Leaders, Functional Process Owners, Service Providers, System Owners, Policy Setters (We need to share the ball [i.e., responsibilities and information]) Who is Watching in the Crowd? Legislators, Regulators, Taxpayers (Who is holding us accountable?) Who Are the Coaches? CFO, DCFO, ADCFO (Providing and enforcing clear guidance, consistent strategy, and ongoing support) Who Are the Referees? DoD IG, GAO, IPA (Ongoing audits are a reality, set the discipline now) Goal? 2018 Audit!!!! Service Provider System Owner Process Owner Policy Setter FM Leader Legislators 22

Your Role: How You Can Be Prepared Key Supporting Documentation and Controls Example: P P Travel Documentation Maintain your travel request and authorization Maintain receipts (all lodging and for expenses $75 or more) Maintain signed voucher for travel claims submitted in DTS (if entered by someone other than yourself) Maintain any other document required to support claimed reimbursement Maintain copies of your Government Travel Card training certificates YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE for YOUR Processes, Key Supporting Documentation and Controls. EVERYONE CONTRIBUTES TO THE ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY OF OUR FINANCIAL DATA! 23

Your Role: How You Can Be Prepared Setting Expectations Be Prepared Own Your Information Communicate Auditor will interview personnel and observe operations Auditor will test account balances and trace to source All organizations, locations, processes, and systems may be subject to audit Assign point personnel for supporting documentation Expect large sample sizes for testing Provide correct audit evidence in a timely manner Be able to respond to auditor s questions related to your processes, key supporting documentation and controls Own your information, not others. Do not provide information on processes you are not familiar with or have no responsibility over. Continually communicate with audit liaisons and your organizations Don t assume auditors know your business clear communication is key Embrace feedback 24

Your Role: How You Can Be Prepared Critical Success Factors Tone From the Top Strong Audit Infrastructure Access to Supporting Documentation Well organized Audit Support Team Continual and effective communication Leadership s buy-in Stress importance Emphasize deadlines Correct, clear, properly documented, and timely Auditor must be able to follow (Plain English) 25

Final Thoughts Keys to Success Leadership Ownership IT Controls Sustainment 26

Stay Connected Visit the FIAR website http://comptroller.defense.gov/fiar.aspx Read the FIAR Plan Status Report http://comptroller.defense.gov/fiar/plan.aspx Subscribe to the DCFO s Defense Audit Readiness News Join the distribution list by emailing AuditReadiness@osd.mil 27