I-605 CORRIDOR HOT SPOT INTERCHANGES

Similar documents
Saskatchewan Industry Labour Demand Outlook, Ministry of the Economy Fall 2017

The Economic Impact of Highway & Bridge Construction Investment in Virginia

See footnotes at end of table.

Economic Impact of the proposed The Medical University of South Carolina

Innovation Village, Cal Poly Pomona Economic Benefits Analysis City of Pomona

SBA s Size Standards Analysis: An Overview on Methodology and Comprehensive Size Standards Review

Monthly Review of the Texas Economy November 2013

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT

Monthly Review of the Texas Economy May 2012

The Economic Impacts of Idaho s Nonprofit Organizations

Snohomish County Labor Area Summary April 2017

Monthly Review of the Texas Economy

SECTION II. Collection and Analysis of Metro Contract Data

BUSINESS REGISTRATION POLICY. The County of Northern Lights believes in assisting and promoting local business developments.

Employment & Unemployment

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE DOWNTOWN "CONVADIUM" PROPOSAL

AT TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY. By Ali Anari, Research Economist Mark G. Dotzour, Chief Economist TECHNICAL REPORT

Kentucky Education and Workforce Development Cabinet releases April 2018 unemployment report

Regional Health Care as an Economic Generator Economic Impact Assessment Dothan, Alabama Health Care Industry

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BUSINESS INCUBATION COMMUNITY READINESS ASSESSMENT Dalton-Whitfield County. October 17, 2012 Erin Rosintoski

Saskatchewan Polytechnic Employer Survey Graduates. September 2016

BELLVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION GENERAL INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS

The Impact of DoD Contracting on Maryland s Economy. Michael Siers, Senior Economist Regional Economic Studies Institute

MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW PARRY SOUND DISTRICT MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY YEAR IN REVIEW - PARRY SOUND DISTRICT

MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY 2016 YEAR IN REVIEW NIPISSING DISTRICT MONTHLY JOB VACANCY STUDY YEAR IN REVIEW

WorkSource Georgia: Yesterday Today Tomorrow

Alliance. Chesterfield-Daleville. Linking Local Economic Analysis to Economic Development Strategies Economic and Real Estate Development

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Business Commons

Economic Development Strategic Plan Executive Summary Delta County, CO. Prepared By:

Serving the Community Well:

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE SAN ANTONIO MEDICAL FOUNDATION IN BEXAR COUNTY

Attraction Development Grant Program Guidelines & Application

Economic Contribution of the North Dakota University System in 2015

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

Regional Projections to 2040: Methodology and Results. Stephen Levy, CCSCE Presentation to ABAG Regional Planning Committee April 4, 2012

3. Award and execute contract modifications for up to $1,200,000.

Area. Market. Average Establishments. Monroe Region. makes up. o 14.77% in Madison

Metro Areas See Improvement in April s Unemployment Numbers

Health Care Sector Profile for the Lake Charles RLMA. Employment and Wage Trends 4th Quarter 2015 for the Health Care Sector by Parish

ATTACHMENT 5. Section 26.45: Overall DBE Three-Year Goal Methodology

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

Economic Impact. North Dakota University System. in of the. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report 690. August 2012

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Wright State University

Employment and Wage Trends 3 rd Quarter 2015 for the Healthcare Sector by Parish

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF DEFENSE-RELATED SPENDING IN ILLINOIS

NATURAL GAS AMERICA S NEW ENERGY OPPORTUNITY: CREATING JOBS, ENERGY, AND COMMUNITY GROWTH

LOCATION QUOTIENTS. Berks, Chester, Lebanon, Lancaster, Lehigh, Montgomery, Schuylkill counties

Gunnedah Shire Local Government Area NORTHERN INLAND NSW

Employment & Unemployment

Employment & Unemployment

$5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads

TAX PHASE-IN GUIDELINES FOR BEXAR COUNTY AND CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

Innovation. Impact. Illinois.

Employment & Unemployment

Healthy Hospitals. Healthy Communities. The economic impact of Wisconsin s hospitals

Oakland Workforce Development Board (OWDB) Confirming Local & Regional Priority Industry Sectors

Administrative Regulation SANGER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. Business and Noninstructional Operations FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS

Defense-Related Employment. of Skilled Labor: An Introduction to LDEPPS

KRS Global Biotechnology Inc. Catalyst Fund Application (TTC) to Governor s Office Of Economic Development

STATE ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

Management Standards. EHS Policy and Program

OSHA Electronic Submission of Records October 26, :00 to 11:00

Labour Market Information Monthly

Estimating the Economic Contributions of the Utah Science Technology and Research Initiative (USTAR) to the Utah Economy

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: LOCAL BUSINESS PREFERENCE PROGRAM

Higher Higher in the Tree

Litchfield Hillsborough County, New Hampshire

Federal Regulations Governing the Financial Management of National School Lunch / School Breakfast Programs


The six-year Jobs PILOT for the Applicant is based on the following terms:

The Economic Impacts of the New Economy Initiative in Southeast Michigan

Minnesota. Report. FORESTRY, AND FISHING: agricultural production crops agricultural production livestock and animal specialities

Testimonials. ~ Karissa Kersey, Benefits and Compensation Manager, Trihydro, Corporation

Kendall Corridor Development Miami, Florida

Jobs Demand Report. Chatham / Kent, Ontario Reporting Period of April 1 June 30, July 7, 2015

Nevada s Unemployment Rate Remains Unchanged in March

FIVE YEAR FORECAST FY THROUGH FY

Seven Dimensions of Oregon s Employment Situation

Economic Analysis of Proposals to Limit the Municipal Bond Market: 501(c)(3) Issuance

Chapter 5 Planning for a Diversified Economy 5 1

Southeast Region Labor Market Analysis

Issues and Strategies Shaping Brampton s Economic Base. Presented by Dennis Cutajar, EcD (F), MSc Brampton Economic Development February 10, 2006

Regional Data Snapshot

October 17, Prepared for

Labour Market Information Monthly

INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED ECONOMICS Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation. Economic Impact Analysis Report for Pacific Standard Time: LA/LA

NAPA COUNTY GRAND JURY

Florida Economic Development Program Evaluations Year 5

Florida Job Growth Grant Fund Public Infrastructure Grant Proposal

Rural Business Investment Scheme

Job Vacancies in the Portland Tri-County Area Lynn Wallis, Workforce Analyst, (971)

Economic Development Services Join Us On the Road to Success

CITY OF PROVIDENCE: ECONOMIC CLUSTER STRATEGY. Presentation to City Council Final Analysis November 18 th, 2015

Employment Outlook: Kristina Bartsch James Franklin Council of Graduate Schools Graduate Education Research and Policy Forum March 21, 2012

The Economic Impact of North Dakota's Health Care Industry on the State's Economy in 1991

The Loop Media Hub. Gigabit Economic Development Impact Statement. Prepared for: The Loop Media Hub Feasability Study. June 27, 2012.

Trends in Merger Investigations and Enforcement at the U.S. Antitrust Agencies

2017 Workforce Education Conference

51 million EU funding for enterprises

Transcription:

I-605 CORRIDOR HOT SPOT INTERCHANGES Project Description Several traffic congestion Hot Spots have been identified in the I-605 Corridor through a Needs Assessment and an Initial Corridor Study. These Hot Spots are chronic traffic congestion areas which are attributed to increasing passenger car and truck traffic, and localized design, capacity and operational deficiencies of the freeway. The following interchanges have been identified as Hot Spots : I-605/SR-60, I-605/SR-91, I-605/I-5, I- 605/I-405. In order to provide policy guidance, the Gateway Cities Council of Governments (GCCOG) Board of Directors adopted the SR-91/I-605/I-405 Guiding Principles. The guiding principles include confining improvements within state right-of-way, excluding double-decking as an option for expanding freeway capacity and examining options for a non-freeway, regional freight corridor. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is now conducting a feasibility study to further analyze improvement alternatives for the Hot Spots already identified in previous studies, in addition to others that may be identified through the analysis. Conceptual geometric plans, costs estimates and a preliminary environmental review will be prepared for each of the Hot Spots. Examples of improvements include ramp reconfigurations, additional general purpose lanes, arterial intersection enhancements and added signage. The results of this feasibility study will also be used to develop a transportation strategic and funding plan for all the existing and proposed transportation projects in Gateway Cities. Upon completion of the feasibility study, Metro will advance the design of the highest priority projects selected from the identified Hot Spot locations. The Hot Spot Interchanges improvement program is expected to cost $2.41 billion, of which approximately $2.18 billion will be spent on construction and $232 million on rightof-way (ROW) acquisition. The project will be partially financed by sales and use taxes generated under Measure R, the half-cent sales tax increase approved by the Los Angeles County voters in November 2008. Economic and Policy Analysis Group 1

I-605 Corridor Hot Spot Interchanges Source: Metro The LAEDC estimated the total economic impact in the five-county Southern California region of $2.18 billion in construction spending. The ROW expenditure is excluded from the economic impact analysis. The results of the economic impact analysis of this one-time construction project are shown on the following page. Economic and Policy Analysis Group 2

Total Economic Impact in Southern California Initial Spending $ 2.18 billion We used initial spending estimates for the project as direct activity, and estimated the indirect and induced effects using models developed with the IMPLAN system (V3 software and 2010 data) from MIG, Inc. All dollar figures are quoted in 2010 dollars. Total Output $ 4.7 billion The total economic output includes direct, indirect and induced business revenues. Direct revenues are captured by construction, architecture and engineering firms hired by Metro. Indirect and induced revenues stem from the purchases made by Metro and those generated by the spending of employees whose wages are sustained by both direct and indirect spending. Total Employment 27,700 jobs Direct employment includes the Metro workers and other employees hired during the project. Indirect and induced workers are those whose jobs are sustained by purchases for the project and household purchases funded by workers wages. Job creation estimates are measured on a job-count basis for both wage-earners and proprietors regardless of the number of hours worked. Total Compensation $ 1.7 billion Total compensation includes income of direct and indirect workers and may exceed the initial project spending. Compensation includes wages and salaries and benefits, such as health and life insurance, retirement payments, and non-cash compensation. Total Tax Revenue $ 194.2 million The proposed projects will generate state income taxes, sales taxes, State Unemployment Insurance (SUI) and State Disability Insurance (SDI) taxes, in addition to permits, property taxes, corporate income taxes, gross receipts taxes and other licenses and fees. Economic and Policy Analysis Group 3

Industry Sector Impacts The $2.4 billion project will generate over $4.7 billion in total economic output, support 27,700 jobs with more than $1.7 billion in total compensation. These economic impacts spill across industries in the Southern California five-county region through indirect and induced effects. The complete list of impacts by industry sector due to spending for this project appears in the table below. The values in the exhibit should be interpreted as illustrative of the industry effects rather than precise given model and data limitations. Impact of I-605 Corridor Hot Spot Interchanges in Southern California by Industry Sector Industry Output Compensation Jobs ($ million) ($ million) Agriculture $ 9 80 $ 3 Mining 33 60 8 Utilities 35 31 6 Construction 2,194 13,012 917 Manufacturing 539 1,113 79 Wholesale trade 140 703 53 Retail trade 172 2,030 73 Transportation and warehousing 80 563 33 Information 136 270 29 Finance and insurance 210 830 73 Real estate 330 810 32 Professional, scientific and technical services 346 2,260 188 Management of companies 30 134 14 Administrative and waste management 79 1,254 42 Education services 21 340 12 Health care and social assistance 148 1,474 82 Arts, entertainment and recreation 32 313 11 Accommodations and food services 69 1,092 26 Other services 100 1,163 40 Government & non-naics 35 168 15 Total * $ 4,738 27,700 $ 1,736 * May not sum due to rounding Source: Estimates by LAEDC Economic and Policy Analysis Group 4

National Impact of Construction Metro plans to spend $2.18 billion on I-605 Corridor Hot Spot Interchanges in Los Angeles County. Construction spending on this scale will create a significant impact, measured in terms of output, employment, labor income and state and local taxes, as shown on Page 3. Most of the construction-related impact will be concentrated in Southern California. Some of the indirect and induced activity, however, will spill over to states throughout the country. This happens, for example, when a subcontractor on a Metro project purchases insurance from a vendor in Connecticut. In this section, we have estimated the total national impact that includes the Southern California impact plus the cumulative impact in all other states. I-605 Corridor Hot Spot Interchanges Total Economic Impact Initial Construction Spending ($ billions) $ 2.18 National Impact of Construction Output ($ billions) $ 5.93 Employment (jobs) 34,900 Labor income ($ billions) $ 2.17 Source: Estimates by LAEDC Economic and Policy Analysis Group 5

Appendix Methodology The total estimated economic impact includes direct, indirect and induced effects. Direct activity includes the materials purchased and the employees hired by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and its contractors during the project construction period. Here we account for construction workers which have been added due to the project and the materials purchased for the project. Indirect effects are those which stem from the employment and business revenues motivated by the purchases made by the Metro and its contractors. For example, indirect jobs are sustained by the suppliers of the office supplies and insurance purchased by contractors hired for the construction. Induced effects are those generated by the spending of employees whose wages are sustained by both direct and indirect spending. We used data supplied by the Metro for initial spending, and estimated the direct, indirect and induced effects using models developed with the IMPLAN system (V3 software and 2010 data) from MIG, Inc. In all cases, we have proceeded as if the spending will take place within a single year, as is customary in this type of impact analysis. For long-term projects such as multi-year transportation improvement projects, the reader is cautioned to note that the modeling system does not account for changes in prices and wages over time. All dollar figures are quoted in 2010 dollars. The estimated economic impacts are based on spending within the five-county Southern California region, which includes the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura. These counties are chosen as representative of the region most affected by the Metro s projects. Although most of the employment and economic activity will be in Los Angeles County, we expect that the workforce, the materials purchased, and the businesses that will be impacted by the Metro s spending are located throughout the fivecounty Southern California region. Data limitations prevent us from estimating how much of the overall construction spending will take place outside of the region; for example, construction materials might be purchased locally but be manufactured elsewhere. In some instances, spending related to a project may occur in neighboring counties such as Santa Barbara or Imperial and thus generate additional economic impact that spills over from those neighboring counties. This spillover is not captured by our five-county analysis. Any spending in the budget category denoted as right-of-way acquisition is excluded from economic impact analysis since this is an exchange of assets. Job creation estimates are measured on a job-count basis for both wage-and-salary workers and proprietors regardless of the number of hours worked. Economic and Policy Analysis Group 6

Description of Industry Sectors The industry sectors used in this report are established by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). NAICS divides the economy into twenty sectors, and groups industries within these sectors according to production criteria. Listed below is a short description of each sector as taken from the sourcebook, North American Industry Classification System, published by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2007). Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting: Activities of this sector are growing crops, raising animals, harvesting timber, and harvesting fish and other animals from farms, ranches, or the animals natural habitats. Mining: Activities of this sector are extracting naturally-occurring mineral solids, such as coal and ore; liquid minerals, such as crude petroleum; and gases, such as natural gas; and beneficiating (e.g., crushing, screening, washing and flotation) and other preparation at the mine site, or as part of mining activity. Utilities: Activities of this sector are generating, transmitting, and/or distributing electricity, gas, steam, and water and removing sewage through a permanent infrastructure of lines, mains, and pipes. Construction: Activities of this sector are erecting buildings and other structures (including additions); heavy construction other than buildings; and alterations, reconstruction, installation, and maintenance and repairs. Manufacturing: Activities of this sector are the mechanical, physical, or chemical transformation of material, substances, or components into new products. Wholesale Trade: Activities of this sector are selling or arranging for the purchase or sale of goods for resale; capital or durable non-consumer goods; and raw and intermediate materials and supplies used in production, and providing services incidental to the sale of the merchandise. Retail Trade: Activities of this sector are retailing merchandise generally in small quantities to the general public and providing services incidental to the sale of the merchandise. Transportation and Warehousing: Activities of this sector are providing transportation of passengers and cargo, warehousing and storing goods, scenic and sightseeing transportation, and supporting these activities. Information: Activities of this sector are distributing information and cultural products, providing the means to transmit or distribute these products as data or communications, and processing data. Finance and Insurance: Activities of this sector involve the creation, liquidation, or change of ownership of financial assets (financial transactions) and/or facilitating financial transactions. Economic and Policy Analysis Group 7

Real Estate and Rental and Leasing: Activities of this sector are renting, leasing, or otherwise allowing the use of tangible or intangible assets (except copyrighted works), and providing related services. Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services: Activities of this sector are performing professional, scientific, and technical services for the operations of other organizations. Management of Companies and Enterprises: Activities of this sector are the holding of securities of companies and enterprises, for the purpose of owning controlling interest or influencing their management decision, or administering, overseeing, and managing other establishments of the same company or enterprise and normally undertaking the strategic or organizational planning and decision-making of the company or enterprise. Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services: Activities of this sector are performing routine support activities for the day-to-day operations of other organizations, such as: office administration, hiring and placing of personnel, document preparation and similar clerical services, solicitation, collection, security and surveillance services, cleaning, and waste disposal services. Educational Services: Activities of this sector are providing instruction and training in a wide variety of subjects. Educational services are usually delivered by teachers or instructors that explain, tell, demonstrate, supervise, and direct learning. Instruction is imparted in diverse settings, such as educational institutions, the workplace, or the home through correspondence, television, or other means. Health Care and Social Assistance: Activities of this sector are operating or providing health care and social assistance for individuals. Arts, Entertainment and Recreation: Activities of this sector are operating facilities or providing services to meet varied cultural, entertainment, and recreational interests of their patrons, such as: (1) producing, promoting, or participating in live performances, events, or exhibits intended for public viewing; (2) preserving and exhibiting objects and sites of historical, cultural, or educational interest; and (3) operating facilities or providing services that enable patrons to participate in recreational activities or pursue amusement, hobby, and leisure-time interests. Accommodation and Food Services: Activities of this sector are providing customers with lodging and/or preparing meals, snacks, and beverages for immediate consumption. Other Services (except Public Administration): Activities of this sector are providing services not specifically provided for elsewhere in the classification system. Establishments in this sector are primarily engaged in activities, such as equipment and machinery repairing, promoting or administering religious activities, grant-making, advocacy, and providing dry-cleaning and laundry services, personal care services, death care services, pet care services, photofinishing services, temporary parking services, and dating services. Economic and Policy Analysis Group 8