potential unfair competitive advantage conferred to technical advisors to acquisition programs.

Similar documents
SUBPART ORGANIZATIONAL AND CONSULTANT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (Revised December 29, 2010)

(13) VerDate Sep :13 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A040.XXX A040

Public Law th Congress An Act

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 R E P O R T COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H.R. 5136

Open DFARS Cases as of 5/10/2018 2:29:59PM

(15) VerDate Sep :18 May 12, 2016 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A532.XXX A532

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BUY AMERICAN AMENDMENTS TO THE FY 2004 DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BILL

124 STAT PUBLIC LAW JAN. 7, 2011

DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information

ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO TOTAL FORCE MANAGEMENT (SEC. 933)

DIVISION A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS TITLE I PROCUREMENT

H. R To direct the Department of Energy to support fusion energy innovation, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Part 1: Employment Restrictions After Leaving DoD: Personal Lifetime Ban

Open DFARS Cases as of 12/22/2017 3:45:53PM

Report to Congress on Distribution of Department of Defense Depot Maintenance Workloads for Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017

(111) VerDate Sep :55 Jun 27, 2017 Jkt PO Frm Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A910.XXX A910

The Other Transaction Authority Basic Legal Principles*

Updates: Subcontracting Program TRIAD

TITLE IV MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

CONVERSION OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS FROM CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE TO PERFORMANCE BY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES (SEC. 938)

H. R. ll [Report No. 115 ll]

H. R. ll IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A BILL

Open FAR Cases as of 2/9/ :56:25AM

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Utilization Programs

PUBLIC LAW OCT. 1, 1986

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

TITLE IV MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 CONFERENCE REPORT S. 2943

SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE, EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Micro- AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of

H. R To amend the Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 to authorize certain polygraph waiver authority, and for other purposes.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND DURATION OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE COMPETITIONS (SEC. 937)

[Discussion Draft] [DISCUSSION DRAFT] SEPTEMBER 9, H. R. ll

Homeless Veterans Comprehensive Assistance Act of 2001 Prime Sponsor: Mr. Christopher H. Smith (NJ-04)

DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate

General Procurement Requirements

H. R To modernize recreational fisheries management. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Amendments. Related to Sources of Electronic Parts (DFARS Case 2016-D013)

S IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SUBPART ACQUISITIONS IN SUPPORT OF OPERATIONS IN IRAQ OR AFGHANISTAN (Added September 15, 2008)

Report to Congress. June Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment)

Subj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

DOD INSTRUCTION DIRECTOR OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS (SBP)

TITLE III OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

30 10 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Originating Component: Office of the General Counsel of the Department of Defense. Effective: February 27, Releasability:

H. R. ll IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A BILL

SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS; REFERENCE.

Report No. D August 12, Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal's Management of Undefinitized Contractual Actions Could be Improved

The President. Part V. Tuesday, January 27, 2009

S [Report No ] To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RADM WILLIAM A. MOFFETT BUILDING BUSE ROAD, BLDG 2272 PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND

GAO CONTINGENCY CONTRACTING. DOD, State, and USAID Contracts and Contractor Personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan. Report to Congressional Committees

FEDERAL SUBCONTRACTING. Further Actions Needed to Improve Oversight of Passthrough

S To establish the Caddo Lake National Heritage Area, and for other purposes. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Subcontracting Program Update August 2017

GAO IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. DOD, State, and USAID Face Continued Challenges in Tracking Contracts, Assistance Instruments, and Associated Personnel

EMS Systems Act of 1973

TWENTY BASIC RULES FOR PERSONNEL LEAVING THE ARMY RESTRICTIONS ON SEEKING EMPLOYMENT (BEFORE YOU LEAVE)

Department of Defense

Small Business Considerations New Times, New

TITLE 14 COAST GUARD This title was enacted by act Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 1, 63 Stat. 495

The reserve components of the armed forces are:

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MISSION STATEMENT

ANNUAL CERTIFICATION BY PUBLIC FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE FILERS

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DFAR) GOVERNMENT CONTRACT PROVISIONS

ANNUAL POST-EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATION & NOTIFICATION TO SENIOR OFFICIALS OF POST-GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT RESTRICTIONS UNDER 18 U.S.C.

(Billing Code ) Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Costs. Related to Counterfeit Electronic Parts (DFARS Case 2016-D010)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

CENWD-ZA 04 February 2016

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

FEDERAL CONTRACTS PERSPECTIVE Federal Acquisition Developments, Guidance, and Opinions

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

POLICY: Effective for all solicitations issued after 21 June 2010 and in resultant contracts, except for acquisitions-.

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Title 24: Housing and Urban Development

DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information

SIGAR. CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY: DOD Has Limited Assurance that Contractors with Links to Enemy Groups Are Identified and their Contracts Terminated

(Revised January 15, 2009) DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION (DEC 1991)

(INTENTIONALLY BLANK)

(Billing Code ) Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Defense. Contractors Performing Private Security Functions (DFARS Case

SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE, EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

National Indian Gaming Commission

THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973, AS AMENDED (by WIOA in 2014) Title VII - Independent Living Services and Centers for Independent Living

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018: A Preview of What s to Come. November 29, 2017

August 23, Congressional Committees

CLIENT ALERT. FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L ): Impacts on Small Business Government Contracting.

S. ll. To provide for the improvement of the capacity of the Navy to conduct surface warfare operations and activities, and for other purposes.

DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information

This appendix provides the following Federal and State Regulations related to the Hazard Mitigation Planning process.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Defense Logistics Agency Instruction. Organic Manufacturing

Suffolk COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCUREMENT POLICY

GAO INTERAGENCY CONTRACTING. Franchise Funds Provide Convenience, but Value to DOD is Not Demonstrated. Report to Congressional Committees

Transcription:

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING 230 potential unfair competitive advantage conferred to technical advisors to acquisition programs. SEC. 896. SURVEY ON THE COSTS OF REGULATORY COMPLIANCE. (a) SURVEY. The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a survey of contractors with the highest level of reimbursements for cost type contracts with the Department of Defense during fiscal year 2014 to estimate industry s cost of regulatory compliance (as a percentage of total costs) with Government-unique acquisition regulations and requirements in the categories of quality assurance, accounting and financial management, contracting and purchasing, program management, engineering, logistics, material management, property administration, and other unique requirements not imposed on contracts for commercial items. (b) REPORT. Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the survey conducted under subsection (a). The data received as a result of the survey and included in the report shall be aggregated to protect against the public release of proprietary information. SEC. 897. TREATMENT OF INTERAGENCY AND STATE AND LOCAL PUR- CHASES WHEN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACTS AS CONTRACT INTERMEDIARY FOR THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION. Contracts executed by the Department of Defense as a result of the transfer of contracts from the General Services Administration or for which the Department serves as an item manager for products on behalf of the General Services Administration shall not be subject to requirements under chapter 148 of title 10, United States Code, to the extent such contracts are for purchases of products by other Federal agencies or State or local governments. SEC. 898. COMPETITION FOR RELIGIOUS SERVICES CONTRACTS. The Department of Defense may not preclude a non-profit organization from competing for a contract for religious related services on a United States military installation. SEC. 899. PILOT PROGRAM REGARDING RISK-BASED CONTRACTING FOR SMALLER CONTRACT ACTIONS UNDER THE TRUTH IN NEGOTIATIONS ACT. (a) PILOT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED. The Secretary of Defense may conduct a pilot program to demonstrate the efficacy of using risk-based techniques in requiring submission of data on a sampling basis for purposes of section 2306a of title 10, United States Code (popularly known as the Truth in Negotiations Act ). (b) INCREASE IN THRESHOLDS. For purposes of a pilot program under subsection (a), $5,000,000 shall be the threshold applicable to requirements under paragraph (1) of section 2306a(a) of such title, as follows: (1) The requirement under subparagraph (A) of such paragraph to submit cost or pricing data for a prime contract entered into during the pilot program period. (2) The requirement under subparagraph (B) of such paragraph to submit cost or pricing data for the change or modification to a prime contract made during the pilot program period. VerDate Sep 11 2014 09:35 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 095996 PO 00000 Frm 00264 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR270.XXX HR270

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING 231 (3) The requirement under subparagraph (C) of such paragraph to submit cost or pricing data for a subcontract entered into during the pilot program period. (4) The requirement under subparagraph (D) of such paragraph to submit cost or pricing data for the change or modification to a subcontract made during the pilot program period. (c) RISK-BASED CONTRACTING. (1) AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF COST OR PRIC- ING DATA ON BELOW-THRESHOLD CONTRACTS. Subject to paragraph (4), when certified cost or pricing data are not required to be submitted pursuant to subsection (b) for a contract or subcontract entered into or modified during the pilot program period, such data may nevertheless be required to be submitted by the head of the procuring activity, if the head of the procuring activity (A) determines that such data are necessary for the evaluation by the agency of the reasonableness of the price of the contract, subcontract, or modification of a contract or subcontract; or (B) requires the submission of such data in accordance with a risk-based contracting approach established pursuant to paragraph (3). (2) WRITTEN DETERMINATION REQUIRED. In any case in which the head of the procuring activity requires certified cost or pricing data to be submitted under paragraph (1)(A), the head of the procuring activity shall justify in writing the reason for such requirement. (3) RISK-BASED CONTRACTING. The head of an agency shall establish a risk-based sampling approach under which the submission of certified cost or pricing data may be required for a risk-based sample of contracts, the price of which is expected to exceed $750,000 but not $5,000,000. The authority to require certified cost or pricing data under this paragraph shall not apply to any contract of an offeror that has not been awarded, for at least the one-year period preceding the issuance of a solicitation for the contract, any other contract in excess of $5,000,000 under which the offeror was required to submit certified cost or pricing data under section 2306a of title 10, United States Code. (4) EXCEPTION. The head of the procuring activity may not require certified cost or pricing data to be submitted under this subsection for any contract or subcontract, or modification of a contract or subcontract, covered by the exceptions in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 2306a(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code. (5) DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY PROHIBITED. The head of a procuring activity may not delegate functions under this subsection. (d) REPORTS. Not later than January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on activities undertaken under this section. (e) DEFINITIONS. In this section: VerDate Sep 11 2014 09:35 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 095996 PO 00000 Frm 00265 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR270.XXX HR270

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING 232 (1) HEAD OF AN AGENCY. The term head of an agency has the meaning given the term in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code. (2) PILOT PROGRAM PERIOD. The term pilot program period means the period beginning on October 1, 2016, and ending on September 30, 2019. TITLE IX DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT Sec. 901. Update of statutory specification of functions of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to joint force development activities. Sec. 902. Sense of Congress on the United States Marine Corps. SEC. 901. UPDATE OF STATUTORY SPECIFICATION OF FUNCTIONS OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF RELAT- ING TO JOINT FORCE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. Section 153(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (F) Advising the Secretary on development of joint command, control, communications, and cyber capability, including integration and interoperability of such capability, through requirements, integrated architectures, data standards, and assessments.. SEC. 902. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS. (a) FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) As senior United States statesman Dr. Henry Kissinger wrote in testimony submitted to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate on January 29, 2015, The United States has not faced a more diverse and complex array of crises since the end of the Second World War.. (2) The rise of non-state forces and near peer competitors has introduced destabilizing pressures around the globe. (3) Advances in information and weapons technology have reduced the time available for the United States to prepare for and respond to crises against both known and unknown threats. (4) The importance of the maritime domain cannot be overstated. As acknowledged in the March 2015 Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard maritime strategy, A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower: Forward, Engaged, Ready : Oceans are the lifeblood of the interconnected global community... 90 percent of trade by volume travels across the oceans. Approximately 70 percent of the world s population lives within 100 miles of the coastline.. (5) The United States must be prepared to rapidly respond to crises around the world regardless of the nation s fiscal health. (6) In this global security environment, it is critical that the nation possess a maritime force whose mission and ethos is readiness a fight tonight force, forward deployed, that can respond immediately to emergent crises across the full range of military operations around the globe either from the sea or home station. (7) The need for such a force was recognized by the 82nd Congress during the Korean War, when it mandated a core mis- VerDate Sep 11 2014 09:35 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 095996 PO 00000 Frm 00266 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR270.XXX HR270

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING 722 Survey on the costs of regulatory compliance (sec. 896) The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 879) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a survey of defense contractors with the highest level of reimbursements for costtype contracts and identify the cost to industry of regulatory compliance with government unique acquisition regulations and requirements that are not imposed on commercial item contracts. The House bill contained no similar provision. The House recedes with a clarifying amendment. Treatment of interagency and State and local purchases when the Department of Defense acts as contract intermediary for the General Services Administration (sec. 897) The House bill contained a provision (sec. 847) on the sense of Congress on the treatment of the procurement of fire hoses. The Senate amendment contained a similar provision (sec. 830) that would clarify that the requirements under chapter 148 of title 10, United States Code would not apply to a contract executed by the Department of Defense where the Department is acting as an intermediary for the General Services Administration (GSA) for purchase of products by other federal agencies or state and local governments. The House recedes. The conferees note that the chapter 148 process of obtaining a domestic non-availability determination of certain products, such as fire hoses, could have a significant effect on the ability of Federal agencies to respond to natural disasters or other emergencies. Competition for religious services contracts (sec. 898) The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 829) that would ensure that non-profit organizations can compete for contracts for religious related services on a United States military installation. The House bill contained no similar provision. The House recedes. Pilot program regarding risk-based contracting for smaller contract actions under the Truth In Negotiations Act (sec. 899) The Senate amendment contained a provision (sec. 823) that would amend the Truth in Negotiations Act (Public Law 87 653; 10 U.S.C. section 2306a) to raise the threshold for the requirement to provide certified cost or pricing data in non-price competitive procurements on non-commercial items from the current $750,000 to $5.0 million and require the Department of Defense (DOD) to establish a risk-based contracting approach, under which certified cost or pricing data would be required for a risk-based sample of contracts, to ensure that DOD is getting fair and reasonable prices for such contracts. The House bill contained no similar provision. The House recedes with an amendment that would establish a pilot program to test this authority. VerDate Sep 11 2014 09:35 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 095996 PO 00000 Frm 00756 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR270.XXX HR270

Request for Approval Section 899, FY 2016 Pilot on Risk Based Technology to Require Submission of Cost or Pricing Data Section 1: For the purposes of carrying out a pilot program as authorized by section 899 of the Fiscal Year 2016 National Defense Authorization Act, in which $5,000,000 shall be the threshold applicable for obtaining certified cost or pricing data, please provide the following information: a. As submitted for Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy approval to participate in this pilot program: (i) Program Name (ii) Contract Number(s) (iii) Contractor(s) Name (iv) Subcontractor(s) Name (v) Amount of Prime Level Award & Estimated Subcontract Price(s) b. Please address the following: (i) Whether the Government received, within the previous 12 months, adequate certified cost or pricing data and completed cost analysis, with similar configuration, and quantity and delivery schedules. (ii) Whether the price analysis demonstrates historical pricing stability with no significant expectation of future deviation. (iii) Report any deficiencies with DFARS 252.215-7002 (Estimating System Requirements) or DFARS 252.242-7006 (Accounting System Administration). (iv) Have contractors/subcontractors demonstrated a history of providing quality products in accordance with delivery terms? (v) Have contractors/subcontractors demonstrated a history of providing data required by the contracting officer to determine the proposed prices are fair and reasonable? (vi) Identify any significant previous audit findings or other required previous contract adjustments. c. Include a discussion of the potential for a contract or subcontract entered into or modified during the pilot program period where certified data may nevertheless be required to be submitted upon HCA determination that (i) Such data is necessary for the evaluation by the agency of the reasonableness of the price of the contract, subcontract, or modification of a contract or subcontract; or (ii) Such data is required in accordance with a risk-based contracting approach established pursuant to section 899, paragraph (c). Section 2: Reporting requirements for the approved programs: a. For any usage of this pilot program authority, submit a report to DPAP/CPIC (osd.pentagon.ousd-atl.mbx.cpic@mail.mil) by October 31, 2018. The report should include the following, at a minimum:

(i) Extent and applicability of use to include a description of the risk-based approach taken (ii) Contract Number(s) (iii) Contractor Name(s) (iv) Subcontractor Name(s) (v) Amount of Prime-Level Award(s) & Estimated Subcontract Prices (vi) Savings (dollars and time) to Include the Basis for the Savings (vii) Lessons Learned (viii) Recommendations, if any, for Future Legislative Changes

Attachment DARS Tracking Number 2016-O00XX Class Deviation 2016 OYYYY Pilot Program Regarding Risk-Based Contracting For Smaller Contract Actions Under The Truth In Negotiations Act 252.215-7010 Requiring certified cost or pricing data. (DEVIATION Fiscal Year 2016-O00XX) Include the attached clause in the contract(s) that were approved by DPAP for participation in the pilot program authorized by Section 899 of the National Defense Authorization Act and regarding riskbased contracting for smaller contract actions under the Truth in Negotiations Act. This deviation applies for the purposes of a pilot program under FAR Part 15.403-4(a)(1), in which $5,000,000 shall be the threshold applicable for obtaining certified cost or pricing data for pricing contracts and for any price adjustment amounts considering both increases and decreases. Requiring certified cost or pricing data. (DEVIATION 2016-O00XX) a. The threshold for submission of certified cost or pricing data at FAR 15.403-4 on this contract is $5,000,000. b. If the Head of Contracting Actvity (HCA) determines that such data are necessary for the evaluation by the agency of the reasonableness of the price of the contract, subcontract, or modification of a contract or subcontract, the HCA may determine such data may nevertheless be required to be submitted (for a contract or subcontract entered into or modified during the pilot program period). However, requiring certified cost or pricing data under this paragraph shall not apply to any contract of an offeror that has not been awarded, for at least the one-year period preceding the issuance of a solicitation for the contract, nor any other contract in excess of $5,000,000 under which the offeror was required to submit certified cost or pricing data. c. If the HCA requires certified cost or pricing data to be submitted under paragraph b, the Contracting Officer will notify the contractor of this determination prior to contract negotiations. d. As a condition of participating in this pilot program, the contractor shall provide the contracting officer, with verifiable data documenting any savings (time or money) achieved and as a result of this pilot the basis of those savings, resulting from the higher threshold. (End of clause) Page 1 of 1