Uncompensated Care before

Similar documents
Working Paper Series

Findings Brief. NC Rural Health Research Program

Journal of Business Case Studies November, 2008 Volume 4, Number 11

Provision of Community Benefits among Tax-Exempt Hospitals: A National Study

Decrease in Hospital Uncompensated Care in Michigan, 2015

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

time to replace adjusted discharges

The Financial Performance of Rural Hospitals and Implications for Elimination of the Critical Access Hospital Program

Rural Relevance in Oklahoma

Final Report No. 101 April Trends in Skilled Nursing Facility and Swing Bed Use in Rural Areas Following the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003

INPATIENT REHABILITATION HOSPITALS in the United. Early Effects of the Prospective Payment System on Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital Performance

2014 MASTER PROJECT LIST

Analysis of 340B Disproportionate Share Hospital Services to Low- Income Patients

COST BEHAVIOR A SIGNIFICANT FACTOR IN PREDICTING THE QUALITY AND SUCCESS OF HOSPITALS A LITERATURE REVIEW

Home Health Agency (HHA) Medicare Margins: 2007 to 2011 Issue Brief July 7, 2009

Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012

Chapter 9. Conclusions: Availability of Rural Health Services

paymentbasics Defining the inpatient acute care products Medicare buys Under the IPPS, Medicare sets perdischarge

Appendix B: Formulae Used for Calculation of Hospital Performance Measures

Critical Access Hospital Quality

Meaningful Use of Health Information Technology by Rural Hospitals

Impact of Financial and Operational Interventions Funded by the Flex Program

The Home Health Groupings Model (HHGM)

August 25, Dear Ms. Verma:

Executive Summary BERKELEY RESEARCH GROUP COMPLIANCE TRENDS WITH HOSPITAL CHARITY CARE REQUIREMENTS

Hospital Financial Analysis

California Community Clinics

The Influence of Vertical Integrations and Horizontal Integration On Hospital Financial Performance

MEDICARE FFY 2017 PPS PROPOSED RULES OVERVIEW OHA Finance/PFS Webinar Series. May 10, 2016

Innovation and Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs)

Recent efforts to transform the quality of health

Introduction and Executive Summary

STATEMENT. of the. American Medical Association. for the Record. United States Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs.

Minnesota health care price transparency laws and rules

Health Economics Program

Rural Essential Access Community Hospitals (REACH) For Rural America

The Essential Care, Everywhere study provides new insight into Washington s rural communities, and their 42 hospitals.

Introduction. Background and Political Climate. White Paper Winter 2009

ORIGINAL STUDIES. Participants: 100 medical directors (50% response rate).

Secondary Care. Chapter 14

Repricing Specialty Hospital Outpatient Services Using Ambulatory Surgery Center Prices

January 10, Glenn M. Hackbarth, J.D Hunnell Road Bend, OR Dear Mr. Hackbarth:

THE MEDICARE PHYSICIAN QUALITY REPORTING INITIATIVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR RURAL PHYSICIANS

ALTERNATIVES TO THE OUTPATIENT PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM: ASSESSING

Data Shows Rural Hospitals At Risk Without Special Attention from Lawmakers

Summary of U.S. Senate Finance Committee Health Reform Bill

Trends in Skilled Nursing and Swing-bed Use in Rural Areas,

Course Module Objectives

The Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare

Rural Hospital Closures and Finance: Some New Research Findings

Ernst & Young Schedule H Benchmark Report for the American Hospital Association Tax Years 2009 & 2010

Report to the Greater Milwaukee Business Foundation on Health

GME FINANCING AND REIMBURSEMENT: NATIONAL POLICY ISSUES

A Comparison of Closed Rural Hospitals and Perceived Impact

Guidance for Developing Payment Models for COMPASS Collaborative Care Management for Depression and Diabetes and/or Cardiovascular Disease

The Financial Effects of Wisconsin Critical Access Hospital Conversion

Reimbursement Models of the Future A Look at Proposed Models

2. AHRQ Fund research and dissemination of best

UK GIVING 2012/13. an update. March Registered charity number

Health Reform and IRFs

Testimony Robert E. O Connor, MD, MPH House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform June 22, 2007

FEDERAL SPENDING AND REVENUES IN ALASKA

Lessons from Medicaid Pay-for- Performance in Nursing Homes

NURSING FACILITY ASSESSMENTS

HB 254 AN ACT. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:

Health Care Spending Growth under the Prospective. Care

Hospital On-Call Responsibilities: A Urology Group Practice Analysis

Chapter 6 Section 3. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (Basis Of Payment)

Medicaid HCBS/FE Home Telehealth Pilot Final Report for Study Years 1-3 (September 2007 June 2010)

Rural Health Clinics

Physicians Views of the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Law A Poll

Rural Hospital System Growth and Consolidation

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

Measuring Hospital Operating Efficiencies for Strategic Decisions

The Center For Medicare And Medicaid Innovation s Blueprint For Rapid-Cycle Evaluation Of New Care And Payment Models

Contracts and Grants between Nonprofits and Government

Critical Access Hospital-Relevant Measures for Health System Development and Population Health

Department of Human Services Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services Transportation Broker Services Contract Capitation Rates

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMPLICATION AND COMORBIDITY CLINICAL CODES AND THE FINANCIAL HEALTH OF A HOSPITAL

RURAL HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY ANALYSIS CENTER. A Primer on the Occupational Mix Adjustment to the. Medicare Hospital Wage Index. Working Paper No.

Information systems with electronic

Higher Education Employment Report

Rural Hospital Closures and Recent Financial Performance of Critical Access Hospitals in the Carolinas

Freestanding Emergency Care Centers

An Empirical Study of Economies of Scope in Home Healthcare

May 3, 2018 Rick Reid Director, Provider Payment Analytics Michael Felczak Director, Provider Payment Analytics

Predicting Transitions in the Nursing Workforce: Professional Transitions from LPN to RN

State Policy, Health Care Disparities, and the Invisible Hand of the Market

Framework for Post-Acute Care: Current and Future Issues for Providers

Geographic Variation in Medicare Spending. Yvonne Jonk, PhD

R H W. October 2016 Research Study

A Comparison of Job Responsibility and Activities between Registered Dietitians with a Bachelor's Degree and Those with a Master's Degree

Comparison of Duties and Responsibilities

Making the Business Case

Using Secondary Datasets for Research. Learning Objectives. What Do We Mean By Secondary Data?

Oregon s Safety Net Incorporating Value-based payment into system reform. Don Ross, Manager Program and Planning October 18, 2016

Are the Non- Monetary Costs of Energy Efficiency Investments Large? Understanding Low Take- up of a Free Energy Efficiency Program

Chronic Disease Management: Breakthrough Opportunities for Improving the Health And Productivity of Iowans

Critique of a Nurse Driven Mobility Study. Heather Nowak, Wendy Szymoniak, Sueann Unger, Sofia Warren. Ferris State University

Nursing Trends: 2009 Key f acts facts about a changing changing workforce Compiled b y by D r Dr. Peter Peter Buerhaus July 2009

Transcription:

Uncompensated Care before and after Prospective Payment: The Role of Hospital Location and Ownership Cheryl I. Hultman Research was undertaken to determine the effects of hospital ownership, location, and Medicare's prospective payment system (PPS) on inpatient uncompensated care. A nonequivalent group design was used with repeated measures of uncompensated care (UNCC) on 137 system hospitals taken pre-and post-pps. Investorowned system hospitals demonstrated the largest increase in UNCC (37 percent) under the PPS. Results suggest that not-for-profit and investor-owned system hospitals are becoming more similar in levels of uncompensated care provided and that the PPS has had a negative effect on rural hospital profitability. BACKGROUND Concern has been expressed about the effect of cost-containment measures and the growth of system and investor-owned (IO) hospitals on access to health services for the poor. This concern is due to the fact that the cross-subsidies that have historically allowed hospitals to provide charity care without serious financial consequences have been The data reported here were obtained during a research project on the strategies, structures, and performance of multihospital systems conducted by Professor Stephen Shortell of the J. L. Kellogg School of Management and the Center for Health Services and Policy Research of Northwestern University. The project was funded under NCHSR Grant No. HS 5-159 and by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Data analyses were partially supported by a Dissertation Year Grant from Northwestern University's Research Grants Committee. Address correspondence and requests for reprints to Cheryl I. Hultman, Ph.D., Research Health Scientist, Midwest Health Services Research and Development Field Program (151 H), Department of Veterans Affairs, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, IL 6141. This article, submitted to Health Services Research on July 13, 1989, was revised and accepted for publication on November 7, 199.

614 HSR: Health Services Research 26:5 (December 1991) gradually disappearing. It has been hypothesized that increasing hospital system involvement and the prospective payment system (PPS) under Medicare will have a negative effect on charity care; however, there has been little empirical evidence to support or reject such hypotheses. Past research that has dealt specifically with multihospital systems and access to care for the poor has not demonstrated much difference between system hospitals and independent voluntary hospitals. Ermann and Gabel's (1985) review of the multihospital system literature, for example, found no discernible differences between 1 system hospitals and matched independent hospitals in the percentages of revenue from Medicare and Medicaid (Sloan and Vraciu 1983), the availability of specific services, or diagnostic case mix (Pattison and Katz 1983). However, IO system hospitals were found to treat fewer charity patients than independent voluntary hospitals, although neither group serves substantial numbers of these patients (Ermann and Gabel 1985): the majority of such patients are treated by large urban public and teaching hospitals (Pattison and Katz 1983). More recent findings of Schlesinger, Bentkover, Blumenthal, et al. (1987) and Shortell et al. (1987) provide evidence that increasing competitive pressures and the growth of IO hospitals and multihospital systems may be accompanied by restrictions on access to hospital services for low-income patients. To date, research on the PPS does not suggest that it has caused access to deteriorate substantially. The one exception is patient dumping, which may have been exacerbated by PPS; however, national studies have not yet demonstrated a significant effect. The effect of PPS on the profitability of hospitals has been more obvious and has caused concern among providers and in Congress. While the first year of PPS was a profitable year for most hospitals, more recent studies indicate that Medicare operating margins have declined rapidly (Cassidy 1988). Rural hospital profit margins have been hurt especially by the wage index used in the PPS reimbursement formula. This differential has posed a severe problem for rural hospitals located near urban areas where they have to compete with urban hospitals for staff. Also, rural hospitals have a greater proportion of Medicare admissions and are therefore more dependent than urban hospitals on Medicare reimbursement (Tauke 1985). The research reported here examines the effects of the PPS and hospital ownership and location on the amount of inpatient uncompen-

Uncompensated Care 615 sated care that hospitals provide, and it also examines how hospital profitability has been affected by the PPS. METHODOLOGY SOURCES OF DATA The data were obtained from a national two-wave panel study of multihospital systems; the study was a joint effort conducted by the Center for Health Services and Policy Research (CHSPR) of Northwestern University and the J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management. The national study's first wave sample, conducted pre-pps in 1983-1984, consisted of 574 system hospitals representing eight systems, and ranging in size from very small (under ten hospitals) to very large (several hundred hospitals) (Shortell, Morrison, Hughes, et al. 1986). Of these eight systems, three were investor-owned and five were not-for-profit (NFP). The hospitals were located in 45 states and provided a good cross section for research purposes. There were 839 comparison hospitals in the first-wave sample. The second-wave sample, conducted post-pps in 1985-1986, was slightly larger, consisting of 57 system hospitals and 898 comparison hospitals. The response rates to the first wave were 94.6 percent (543) of the system hospitals and 65.7 percent (551) of the comparisons (Shortell, Morrison, Hughes, et al. 1986). The response rates for the second wave were similar but somewhat lower than the first-wave response rates. Ninety-two percent (524) of the system hospitals and 5.2 percent (451) of the comparison hospitals responded to the second-wave survey. The data used in this study contained information on hospital uncompensated care (bad debt and charity care) and the financial status of system-owned hospitals that responded to both waves of the CHSPR study. These data were collected directly from corporate offices and dealt with total revenue and total hospital uncompensated care (UNCC). This sample consisted of 77 (56 percent) IO and 6 (44 percent) NFP system hospitals. No market area competitors were included in this part of the national study. The variables uncompensated care and financial status were measured over time and across different hospital types, that is, IO system hospitals versus NFP system hospitals. Other variables examined included geographic location and hospital profitability. The geographic location variable, developed from Area Resource Files (DHHS 1985

616 HSR: Health Services Research 26:5 (December 1991) and 1987), included four categories: rural, collar county, urban, and central city. The profitability data included hospital operating margins and net income margins (income after federal income tax), as well as total revenue and uncompensated care values as a percentage of hospital total revenue. The research design used was a quasi experiment with a nonequivalent group design. In such experiments, there are treatments, outcome measurements, and experimental units, but use is not made of random assignment (Cook and Campbell 1979). In this design, the implementation of PPS was assumed to be the treatment, and outcomes included changes in hospital uncompensated care. The nonequivalent groups being considered were the IO and the NFP system hospitals. Both between-group and within-group changes over time were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance statistical techniques. Tukey B multiple comparison tests were also used in determining which groups were significantly different from each other at the.5 level. RESULTS As shown in Figure 1, the average percentage of uncompensated care increased by a statistically significant amount [F (1,96) = 31.1; p <.1 and the different slopes of the lines in Figure 1 illustrate what turned out to be a significant interaction between the hospital organization type and the UNCC variable. The interaction indicates that the different hospital organization types have had different trends in uncompensated care since the PPS began. The IO system hospitals experienced a greater increase than the NFP system hospitals; however, the 1 levels of uncompensated care stayed below the NFP levels of uncompensated care during both waves of the study. The results of the three-way ANOVA of UNCC by system type by location are presented in Figure 2. Although the numbers are small in some of the categories of Figure 2, the main effects of the location [F (3,11) = 4.97; p <.31 and system type [F (1,11) = 15.3; p <.] are statistically significant. It was found that rural system hospitals were significantly different from the other hospital groups at both waves of the study (N = 216 for 1983 and N = 16 for 1985), and they averaged the highest levels of UNCC during 1983 and 1985. Also apparent in Figure 2 are the statistically significant interac-

Uncompensated Care 617 Figure 1: Uncompensated Care by Organization Type a 1 SH 6 ~4 NFP SH 5 3 2 Px PPS POST PPS TIME The number of cases equaled 98 during each time frame. There were 43 not-for-profit system hospitals and 55 investor-owned system hospitals. tions of system type and location with UNCC. The difference in UNCC between wave 1 and wave 2 was also significant [F (1,11) = 42.2; p <.], reflecting the definite increase in its level over the course of the study. The sample hospital mean level of UNCC increased from 3.65 percent in 1983 to 5. percent in 1985. A comparison of the location and net income margin means of the sample hospitals from 1983 and 1985 suggests that central city system hospitals were the most profitable, while the rural system hospitals were the least profitable, on the average. Table 1 demonstrates that the sample rural system hospitals actually experienced a net decrease in their mean net income margins from 1983 to 1985. In summary, rural system hospital UNCC has increased since the PPS began. And, as alluded to earlier, the rural system hospitals of this study provided more uncompensated care with relatively less profit in comparison to hospitals in other locations; however, the location differences in net profits were not statistically significant. Additional analysis of American Hospital Association (AHA) annual hospital survey data collected in 1983 and 1985 support these results. As shown in Table 2, up to 1986, IO hospitals increased their

Q I IL ui U cn -o. a( Uż.>.._ U.. I I -. I I - I - a b ( ) ct ) DONn % NM U; o -Q oc. - r. > Cl U (L) C Cl)._ 1 U.. t3 k Q 2 - 'U- ^UU ' C)4 V 5-4 z..q HE:2 -o w~~ I I*I* ( I- * UI.- UI v) a a *^- U) lw ( cm onnn %

Mean Net Income Profit Margins of System Uncompensated Care 619 Table 1: Hospitals Percent Percent Percent Location * 1983 1985 Difference Central city 5.8 5.65 +.57 Urban 6.14 6.36 +.22 Collar county 6.1 6.27 +.26 Rural 4.44 3.75 -.69 Overall mean 5.53 5.66 +.13 *The number of the cases equaled 278, with the following location breakdown: 63 central, 87 urban, 73 collar, and 55 rural system hospitals. Table 2: AHA National Survey Data Uncompensated Care Hospital Type Percent Percent Percent 1983 1985 Change Not-for-profit Investor-owned 4.99 4.7 5.51 5.22 1.4 28.25 Rural Urban 5.86 6.53 6.48 6.93 1.6 6.1 Not-for-profit Bad debt Charity care 27.6* 17.9* Investor-owned Bad debt 58.7* Charity care 126.6* *Bad debt and charity care are measured separately in the AHA National Hospital Survey. levels of uncompensated care and total hospital charity care at a rate faster than the NFP hospitals. And the AHA sample of rural hospitals also increased their uncompensated care to a greater degree than did the sample urban hospitals. DISCUSSION LIMITATIONS Because the samples used in this analysis and in the larger CHSPR study were not randomly selected, the inferences that can be made to the population of U.S. hospitals are somewhat limited. Limitations of generalizability are due to two types of bias: selection and nonresponse

62 HSR: Health Services Research 26:5 (December 1991) bias. In this article, the IO system hospitals are overrepresented and NFP system hospitals are underrepresented. Also, comparisons of respondents to nonrespondents demonstrate that respondents to both waves of the study were more likely to be smaller hospitals, investorowned and from collar or urban locations. COMMENTS The results indicate that significant changes in uncompensated health care have occurred since implementation of the PPS. Sample system hospital uncompensated care increased by 37 percent between 1983 and 1985. If one assumes that the heterogeneity of the sample -that is, the large number of states and hospitals represented by the samplecancels out differences in uncompensated care due to state-level regulatory policies and hospital differences, then one can assume that the PPS, up until 1986, has been associated with an increase in UNCC. However, since UNCC has been found to represent about 75 percent bad debt and about 25 percent charity care (Wasserman 1986), the increase found in UNCC could have been due to an increase in bad debt with no accompanying change in charity care. Of interest is that the 1 system hospitals demonstrated the largest relative increase in UNCC between 1983 and 1985 compared to the NFP system hospitals. However, NFP system hospitals still provided more UNCC than IO system hospitals did during 1983 and 1985. Results indicate that between 1983 and 1985 the IO system hospitals were coming closer to the NFP system hospitals in terms of UNCC. Also, rural location and NFP system affiliation were related to the highest average levels of UNCC in both waves of the study. And the trends in UNCC from 1983-1985 varied more with hospital location than with hospital organizational type. The sample rural system hospitals also demonstrated the least profits after taxes of all of the hospital location categories; in fact, they sustained an average net loss in profits from 1983 to 1985. These results confirm previous reports that rural hospitals are being more negatively affected by the PPS than was anticipated (Rolph and Lindsey 1986). An additional contributing factor to the low profits of rural hospitals could be the nation's poor farm economy in recent years. Also, another drawback for rural hospitals is that they are more likely to be sole community providers unable to shift patients and thereby increase profits. Congress has recently become more aware of the financial difficulties facing rural hospitals. As a result, the fiscal year 1987 budget

Uncompensated Care 621 reconciliation law narrowed the difference in the PPS payments between urban and rural hospitals (Merrill 1987). IMPLICATIONS The present findings have implications for theories regarding the effects of the PPS and hospital ownership differences on uncompensated care. In contrast to the theory that the PPS would have little or no effect on uncompensated care, the data suggest that a statistically significant increase in uncompensated care has taken place since the PPS was implemented. Also, ANOVA analyses have demonstrated that hospital location is more important than system status as a determinant of uncompensated care. CONCLUSIONS Theories or assumptions about the differences in care for the poor between NFP and IO system hospitals should be reevaluated. Results suggest that these two hospital types are becoming more like each other in terms of uncompensated care. The results indicate that rural hospitals deserve the attention of policymakers. The rural/urban differences found substantiate claims that rural hospitals have made regarding the built-in inequities of the PPS, although it is also likely that the depressed farm economy has contributed to a relative increase in hospital bad debt and to the need for charity care in the rural setting. Additional areas for research should include (1) the specific benefits that NFP system hospitals provide over IO system hospitals, such as teaching and research; and (2) the examination of rural hospital profitability after recent PPS payment formula adjustments. Finally, this research highlights the need for more explicit measures of charity care by hospitals. If such measures were developed and implemented, it would be possible to evaluate more accurately the effects of various federal and state policies on the access by the poor to health care services. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges the helpful comments of Professor Stephen Shortell and Kendon Conrad during the preparation of this manuscript.

622 HSR: Health Services Research 26:5 (December 1991) REFERENCES Cassidy, J. "Protect Medicare '9 Campaign Urges Adequate Hospital Payments." Health Progress 69, no. 1 (December 1988): 24-27. Cook, T. D., and D. T. Campbell. Quasi-Experimentation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1979. Department of Health and Human Services. Area Resource Files, 1985, 1987. Washington, DC: DHHS, 1985, 1987. Ermann, D., and J. Gabel. "The Changing Face of American Healthcare: Multi-hospital Systems, Emergency Centers and Surgery Centers." Medical Care 23, no. 5 (1985): 41-2. Merrill, T. "Rural Issues Move Up on Congress's Agenda." Hospitals 61 (2 May 1987): 19-21. Pattison, R. V., and H. M. Katz. "Investor-owned and Not-for-profit Hospitals." New EnglandJournal of Medicine 39, no. 6 (1983): 347-53. Rolph, E., and P. Lindsey. "Medicare's Prospective Payment System: Healthcare Community Reaction and Perceptions." Prepared for Health Care Financing Administration and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC, 1986. Schlesinger, M., J. Bentkover, D. Blumenthal, R. Musacchio, and J. Willer. "The Privatization of Health Care and Physicians' Perceptions of Access to Hospital Services." Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 65, no. 1 (1987): 25-58. Shortell, S. M., E. M. Morrison, B. Friedman, and S. L. Hughes. A Study of the Strategies, Structures and Performance of Multihospital Systems, a NCHSR Assessment. Grant no. HS 5-159. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Services Research, December 31, 1987. Shortell, S. M., E. M. Morrison, S. L. Hughes, B. Friedman, J. Coverdill, and L. Berg. "The Effects of Hospital Ownership on Nontraditional Services." Health Affairs 5, no. 4 (1986): 97-111. Sloan, F. A., and R. A. Vraciu. "Investor-owned and Not-for-profit Hospitals: Addressing Some Issues." Health Affairs 2 (Spring 1983): 25-37. Tauke, T. J. "Rural Hospitals Suffer PP Inequities." Business and Health 2, no. 6 (1985): 37-41. Wasserman, J. "The New Jersey DRG System and Uncompensated Care: Some Empirical Results." Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2 (July-August 1986): 63-37.