Scheduling Activities for the Patrol Boat Force

Similar documents
White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Wildland Fire Assistance

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

Public Works Department Project Charter

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS


Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Regulation Conditions Influence on the Thermic and Exergic Efficiency Factors Size with the Heat Exchanger of a Coiled Type

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Mission Task Analysis for the NATO Defence Requirements Review

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

AMCOM Corrosion Program

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Report Documentation Page

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

MCAS BEAUFORT SUSTAINABLE RANGES BRIEF MCAS BEAUFORT COMMUNITY PLANS AND LIAISON OFFICE (CP&L)

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

UNITED STATES ARMY AVIATION and MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND CORROSION PROGRAM

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

U.S. Army Reserve Base Realignment & Closure (BRAC) Sustainable Design & Construction in Action

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

at the Missile Defense Agency

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Conservation Law Enforcement Program Standardization

Explosives Safety Planner Community Development and Sustainment

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

,II II' GUIDELINES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL SCALE RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION PROJECTS IN ETHIOPIA. l 'S /\11) CR5 *******

Choose to Lose. Tammy Lindberg, Lt Col, USAF, BSC

FACADE IMPROVEMENTS INCENTIVE PROGRAM for EXISTING COMMERICAL BUILDINGS

Air Education and Training Command

Unclassified/FOUO RAMP. UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Air Education and Training Command

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

US ARMY CENTER OF MILITARY HISTORY

FFC COMMAND STRUCTURE

~ NATO STANDARDIZATION ~ 60 YEARS of NORMATIVE SUCCESS. NATO Standardization Agency

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Representability of METT-TC Factors in JC3IEDM

Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Drinking Water Operator Certification and Certificate to Operate Criteria/Requirements for US Navy Overseas Drinking Water Systems

Technical Considerations for Alamo Lake Operation

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

User Manual and Source Code for a LAMMPS Implementation of Constant Energy Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD-E)

Improving Safety of Demil Operations Through Automation. Mark M. Zaugg July 14, 2010

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Junior Leader Innovation: William Sims & Continuous Aim Fire. LCDR Benjamin BJ Armstrong HSC-28

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Analysis of the Operational Effect of the Joint Chemical Agent Detector Using the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) MORS: June 2008

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

Transcription:

Scheduling Aciviies for he Parol Boa Force Ping Cao, Greg Searle DSTO Defence Sysems Analysis Division Mark Horn, Houyuan Jiang, Phil Kilby CSIRO Mahemaical and Informaion Sciences July 2003

Repor Documenaion Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporing burden for he collecion of informaion is esimaed o average 1 hour per response, including he ime for reviewing insrucions, searching exising daa sources, gahering and mainaining he daa needed, and compleing and reviewing he collecion of informaion. Send commens regarding his burden esimae or any oher aspec of his collecion of informaion, including suggesions for reducing his burden, o Washingon Headquarers Services, Direcorae for Informaion Operaions and Repors, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suie 1204, Arlingon VA 22202-4302. Respondens should be aware ha nowihsanding any oher provision of law, no person shall be subjec o a penaly for failing o comply wih a collecion of informaion if i does no display a currenly valid OMB conrol number. 1. REPORT DATE 01 OCT 2003 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Scheduling Aciviies for he Parol Boa Force 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) DSTO Defence Sysems Analysis Division 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, disribuion unlimied 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM001929. Proceedings, Held in Sydney, Ausralia on July 8-10, 2003., The original documen conains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 18 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Sandard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Sd Z39-18

Overview Inroducion The scheduling asks Problem-solving scheme Cos formulaions The sofware Possible furher developmen July 2003 Page 2

Inroducion CBM: scheduling crews also mainenances and pors. crews, boas, missions Carried ou by CSIRO wih DSTO, for he Replacemen Parol Boas projec. July 2003 Page 3

Scheduling asks summary Main asks: Se imings for missions and mainenances Deermine assignmens of crews o boas Consruc week-by-week schedule of aciviies for each boa and each crew. We assume a 12-monh planning period, wih one-week granulariy of ime. Muli-crewing makes for complexiy and is a primary driver of he projec. July 2003 Page 4

Scheduling asks - objecives 1 Spread imings evenly in each mission-group 2 Regular operaional cycles for crews 3a Leave during school holidays 3b A leas one leave during school holidays 3c Spread leave evenly in year 3d Desired leave block sizes 5 Minimise hand-overs 6 Minimise remoe hand-overs July 2003 Page 5

Scheduling asks consrains 1 1 Include UUC 2 Include all planned missions 3 Limied boas 4 Limied mission-ime 5 Boas available for surge 6 Resriced mainenance faciliies in pors 7 All missions assigned o crews 8 One aciviy a a ime per crew 9 Operaional workload limi 10a Leave quoa per crew 10b Minimum leave block size July 2003 Page 6

Scheduling asks consrains 2 12 A mos one workup mission per crew 13 Training every operaional cycle 15 All boa aciviies assigned o boas 16 One aciviy a a ime per boa 17 Boa mus have crew assigned 18 Limi no. of crews assigned o a boa 19 Limi no. of boas a crew is assigned o 20 Mainenance a crew's home por 21 Workup follow-up July 2003 Page 7

Problem-solving scheme 1. Generae a Flee Aciviy Schedule (FAS), wih imings for all mainenances and missions. 2. Generae a Combined Operaions Plan (COP), wih mainenances and missions assigned o crews, boas and pors. 3. Define deails of leave and raining for each crew in he COP. July 2003 Page 8

Problem-solving scheme: FAS Mission imings Mainenance imings July 2003 Page 9

Problem-solving scheme: COP Crews: week-by-week deploymens, leave, raining Crew 01: Crew 02: Crew 03: Crew 04: leave leave leave leave leave ec... Boas: week-by-week deploymens and mainenance Boa 01: Boa 02: Boa 03: ec... July 2003 Page 10

Local search echniques Seepes-descen improvemen: ake an arbirary saring plan and make he mos-improving small change. Repea unil no furher change is possible. Simulaed annealing: like improvemen, wih emporary reducions in qualiy. We sar ho (allowing random changes) and proceed slowly o a cooled sae, aiming for an well-ordered oucome. July 2003 Page 11

COP annealing (11B18CSA01-CopSA-2) 12000 COP cos during annealing - firs 1000 accepances 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 0 Changes esed 4000 8000 July 2003 Page 12

2500 2000 1500 1000 500 COP annealing (11B18CSA01-CopSA-2) Cos over 1433718 ries, 65536 accepances 0 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 200000 400000 600000 July 2003 Page 13

Cos formulaion A scheduling plan comprises a FAS and a COP based on he FAS imings. For boh FAS and COP, overall soluion qualiy is measured as oal cos: Coss due o objecives, e.g. deviaions from equal-spaced imings for missions. Coss due o violaions of consrains, e.g. boa-weeks in violaion of he surge condiion. Some consrains are hard, some sof. July 2003 Page 14

Cos formulaion FAS FAS-01: cos 309.86 (O: 289.86, S: 20.00, H: 0.00)... [O1] Mission-group devs: 169.86 x 1.00 x 1 = 169.86 [O3a] Avoid school hols: 120 x 1.00 x 1 = 120.00 [C3] Toal boas used: 0 x 20.00 x 1 = 0.00 [0 weeks] [C4] Monhly miss-imes: 0.00 x 10.00 x 1 = 0.00 [0 mhs..] [C5] Surge available: 2 x 10.00 x 1 = 20.00 [2 weeks] [C6a] Mainenance cap: 0 x 20.00 x 1 = 0.00 [0 weeks] July 2003 Page 15

Cos formulaion COP COP-01: cos 524.0 (O: 384.0, S: 140.0, H: 0.0)... [O2] Regular op cycles: 105 x 1.0 x 1 = 105.0 [O3b] School holidays: 0 x 1.0 x 9.0 = 0.0 [O5] Toal handovers: 21 x 1.0 x 9.0 = 189.0 [06] Remoe handovers: 2 x 5.0 x 9.0 = 90.0 [C6b] Por capaciies: 0 x 20.0 x 1 = 0.0 [C8*] One ac per crew: 0 x 150.0 x 1 = 0.0 [C9] Toal opnal weeks: 0 x 10.0 x 1 = 0.0 [C12] Workup/crew <= 1: 0 x 10.0 x 1 = 0.0 [C13] Training/cycle: 14 x 10.0 x 1 = 140.0 [C16*] One ac per boa: 0 x 150.0 x 1 = 0.0 [C18] Crews per boa: 0 x 10.0 x 9.0 = 0.0 [C19] Boas per crew: 0 x 10.0 x 9.0 = 0.0 [C21] Workup followup: 0 x 10.0 x 9.0 = 0.0 July 2003 Page 16

The sofware CBM runs on a Windows PC, in a command-promp window. I/O is mainly Excel spreadshees. Good soluions for difficul problems can be obained in 15-60 minues. Technical awareness is required of users. July 2003 Page 17

Possible furher developmen as an operaional ool? 1. Make CBM more user-friendly, wih GUI. 2. Allow scheduling over a given calendar period insead of a sandard year. 3. Accep exising commimens, e.g. a beginning of planning period. 4. Mission prioriizaion. 5. More fairness for crews 6. Handle new scheduling condiions (squadrons?). July 2003 Page 18