Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

Similar documents
Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

A Call to the Future

America s Airmen are amazing. Even after more than two decades of nonstop. A Call to the Future. The New Air Force Strategic Framework

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

AIR FORCE CYBER COMMAND STRATEGIC VISION

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

The pace of change and level of effort has increased dramatically with

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAINING TRANSFORMATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Challenges of a New Capability-Based Defense Strategy: Transforming US Strategic Forces. J.D. Crouch II March 5, 2003

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

Intelligence, Information Operations, and Information Assurance

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Fiscal Year 2017 President s Budget Request for the DoD Science & Technology Program April 12, 2016

USMC Identity Operations Strategy. Major Frank Sanchez, USMC HQ PP&O

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Staffing Cyber Operations (Presentation)

Global Vigilance, Global Reach, Global Power for America

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

Air Force intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR)

Innovation Across Industry Panel

To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.

at the Missile Defense Agency

This block in the Interactive DA Framework is all about joint concepts. The primary reference document for joint operations concepts (or JOpsC) in

National Defense Industrial Association. Disruptive Technologies Conference

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

The Changing Face of the War Fighter

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Cyber Attack: The Department Of Defense s Inability To Provide Cyber Indications And Warning

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

Executing our Maritime Strategy

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY DR. MIKE GRIFFIN UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING BEFORE THE

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance Foreword

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

CHIEF OF AIR FORCE COMMANDER S INTENT. Our Air Force Potent, Competent, Effective and Essential

3 rd Annual Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Summit

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

The 2008 Modeling and Simulation Corporate and Crosscutting Business Plan

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT

Tactical Technology Office

First Announcement/Call For Papers

Expeditionary Basecamp Passive

Electronic Warfare / Electronic Protection (EW/EP) S&T Priority Steering Council

Army Operating Concept

Air Force Research Laboratory

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

CJCSI B Requirements Generation System (One Year Later)

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Information Operations

James T. Conway General, U.S. Marine Corps, Commandant of the Marine Corps

An Introduction to Wargaming

Battle Captain Revisited. Contemporary Issues Paper Submitted by Captain T. E. Mahar to Major S. D. Griffin, CG 11 December 2005

Space as a War-fighting Domain

Area Fire Weapons in a Precision Environment: Field Artillery in the MOUT Fight

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program

Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance

Transcription:

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy 2010 F AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff ~~~ Secretary of the Air Force

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) December 2010 Final 01 December 2010 01 December 2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE AIR FORCE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY 2010 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Air Force Research Laboratory Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433 Air Force Materiel Command United States Air Force 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition 1060 AF Pentagon Washington, DC 20330-1060 United States Air Force 12. DISTRIBUTIOVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. AGENCY ACRONYM(S) SAF/AQR 11. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Portions cleared by SAF/PA Office, Case Number 2011-0354, 03 Jun 2011. This report contains color. See the 2011 Air Force S&T Plan for strategy implementation. 14. ABSTRACT The 2010 Air Force (AF) Science and Technology (S&T) Strategy contains the AF S&T vision, tenets, the strategic environment, and S&T priorities including increased emphasis areas. 15. SUBJECT TERMS strategy, strategic priorities, tenets, S&T program priorities, Technology Horizons, Strategic Planning, Flagship Capability Concept, Air Force Service Core Functions 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION a. REPORT Unclassified b. ABSTRACT Unclassified c. THIS PAGE Unclassified OF ABSTRACT: SAR 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 10 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON (Monitor) Joseph P. Harrington 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18

Air Force Science and Technology Strategy Introduction As a leader in the military application of air, space, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance technology, the Air Force is committed to innovation to guide research, development, and fielding of unsurpassed capabilities. The Air Force nurtures and promotes its ability to translate our technology into operational capability to prevail in conflict and avert technological surprise. Air Force Doctrine Document 1 The United States Air Force finds itself at an undeniably pivotal time in its history. It is without question the most effective and powerful air force in the world and the only air force that can truly project global power. The single most important factor in achieving this position has been the unmatched technological advantage the Air Force has attained over its many competitors (Technology Horizons, A Vision for Air Force Science and Technology During 2010-2030). Air Force S&T Vision Create compelling air, space, and cyber capabilities for precise and reliable Global Vigilance, Reach and Power for our Nation The Air Force s technological advantage is threatened by the worldwide proliferation of advanced technologies, including integrated air defenses, long-range ballistic missiles, and advanced air combat capabilities. In addition, advances in adversarial capabilities in space control and cyber warfare technologies may limit Air Force operations in air, space and cyberspace. Some of these technologies may be achievable at relatively minimal cost, resulting in lowering the barriers to entry that have historically limited the reach and power of non-state actors, organized militias, and radical extremists. The current world state presents a broad range of threats and an unpredictable set of challenges. Today s strategic environment requires flexibility and a shift from systems designed for fixed purposes or specific missions to those inherently more agile. The Air Force depends on its Science and Technology (S&T) Program to discover, develop, and demonstrate high-payoff technologies needed to address these ever-changing environments and to sustain air, space, and cyberspace superiority in the near-, mid- and far-term. The Air Force S&T Program invests across a broad portfolio to attain a balance between near-term, quick-reaction capability support; mid-term technology development to modernize the force; and revolutionary technologies that address far-term warfighting needs. The Air Force S&T Program will address the gaps identified by the Air Force Capability Review and Risk Assessment (CRRA) process and the Major Commands (MAJCOMs), while addressing the S&T Vision provided in Technology Horizons. The Air Force S&T Strategy will serve as the cornerstone of all Air Force S&T activities and will enable the development of an Air Force S&T Plan. The Air Force must continue to build its technological edge as it adapts to evolving threats to win today s fight and prepare for tomorrow s challenges.

Science and Technology Program Tenets The Air Force has a single, fully integrated S&T Program directed by Air Force leadership and based on the following tenets: Prepare for an uncertain future and investigate game-changing technologies to affordably transition the art-of-the-possible into military capabilities Create technology options that address urgent warfighter needs and provide new capabilities in support of Air Force Service Core Functions Demonstrate advanced technologies that address affordability by promoting efficiencies, enhancing the effectiveness, readiness, and availability of today's systems, and addressing lifecycle costs of future systems Develop throughout the Air Force an appreciation for the value of technology as a forcemultiplier Maintain in-house expertise to support the acquisition and operational communities and modernize and improve the sustainability of unique research facilities and infrastructure Remain vigilant over and leverage global science and technology developments and emerging capabilities Strategic Environment Informed by national posture statements, Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), Defense Planning and Programming Guidance (DPPG), Air Force Strategy, CRRA, Technology Horizons, Air Force Service Core Function Master Plans, and additional strategic documents and stakeholder inputs, this section describes the strategic environment that influences Air Force S&T priorities. As adversarial operations have expanded to encompass the full spectrum of conflict, so too have the demands for a wider range of capabilities across all facets of conflict. The S&T strategic environment is dominated by the following major trends: Evolving Operational Environment: Dense urban environments present strategic and tactical challenges. Defeating adversaries in urban environments requires new and unique scientific and technological efforts to enhance warfighting capabilities while minimizing collateral damage. In the air, the Air Force faces more capable anti-access/area denial capabilities making traditional power projection operations increasingly risky and costly. The space domain will become increasingly competitive, congested, and contested, with U.S. dominance no longer assured. Nearly all weapon systems have cyber dependencies and the Air Force should fully understand these dependencies and mitigate cyber vulnerabilities to assure mission success. Changing Adversaries: The possible set of adversaries has broadened from a few global powers to nonstate actors, organized militias, and radical extremists. The Air Force must be prepared to deter and defeat this broadening spectrum of adversaries. Increasing Global Demand for Energy: The world s requirement for fossil fuels has substantially increased. Air Force mission success is becoming increasingly susceptible to supply disruptions and pricing impacts. Maintaining Technological Dominance: Air Force technological superiority is increasingly challenged by globalization. The U.S. technical base is increasingly stressed as manufacturing expertise and its associated engineering are expanding overseas. Technological innovation is at risk unless the U.S. can

develop scientists and engineers who are well grounded in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and can attract them with desirable careers in the Air Force and industry. S&T Program Priorities As the S&T Program helps the Air Force adapt to the dynamic strategic, budgetary, and technology environments, it is critical to address the following overarching priorities: Priority 1: Support the current fight while advancing breakthrough S&T for tomorrow s dominant warfighting capabilities. Pursue S&T to: Priority 1.1: Enable the Air Force to operate effectively and achieve desired effects in all domains and operations Priority 1.2: Improve the agility, mobility, affordability, and survivability of Air Force assets Priority 2: Execute a balanced, integrated S&T Program that is responsive to Air Force Service Core Functions. Increase emphasis in S&T that will: Priority 2.1: Improve the sustainment, affordability, and availability of legacy weapon systems Priority 2.2: Reduce cyber vulnerabilities while emphasizing mission assurance Priority 2.3: Support the needs of the nuclear enterprise Priority 2.4: Develop autonomous systems and human performance augmentation technologies envisioned in Technology Horizons Priority 2.5: Provide robust situation awareness to enhance decision-makers understanding and knowledge by improving intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities and data processing, exploitation, and dissemination Priority 2.6: Enable long-range precision strike Priority 2.7: Reduce energy dependency Priority 3: Retain and shape the critical competencies needed to address the full range of S&T product and support capabilities Priority 3.1: Increase level of in-house basic research Priority 3.2: Enhance critical competencies of the organic cyber workforce Priority 3.3: Support Air Force STEM initiatives to develop and optimally manage the future science and engineering workforce Priority 4: Ensure the Air Force S&T Program addresses the highest priority capability needs of the Air Force Priority 4.1: Be a trusted partner of the acquisition/sustainment community to assess technology maturity and enhance and accelerate technology transition Priority 4.2: Leverage research and development efforts within industry, including small businesses Priority 4.3: Develop and demonstrate technology solutions that decrease manufacturing risks Turning Science into Capabilities The Air Force S&T Program will discover, develop, and demonstrate warfighter-relevant S&T to enhance air, space and cyberspace dominance. Key to this approach is the following four-stage process: Science and Knowledge Technologies Capability Concepts

Service Core Function Capabilities A balanced S&T investment portfolio is required to keep pace with threat developments and required capabilities. The Air Force S&T Program addresses far-term warfighting needs through science and knowledge, mid-term needs through technology development, and near-term needs through capability concepts and quick reaction support. Figure 1 illustrates the balance of Air Force S&T Total Obligation Authority (TOA) allocated in Science & Knowledge, Technologies, and Capability Concepts. Figure 1: Science & Technology Maturation Cycle Science and Knowledge Science and knowledge are the foundation of the Air Force S&T Program and the cornerstone of the future force. Based on visions of the future established by Air Force leadership, Air Force scientists and engineers identify, nurture, and harvest the best basic research to transform leading-edge scientific discoveries into new technologies with substantial military potential. These technologies transform the art-of-the-possible into the near-state-of-the-art and offer new and better ways for the acquisition community to address far-term warfighter needs. Technologies Air Force scientists and engineers continually interact with warfighters to understand their capability needs. The Air Force S&T Program addresses these needs by leading and harnessing innovation across service laboratories, government agencies, industry, and academia. These efforts mitigate risk and create the foundation for new capability concepts. Capability Concepts Senior representatives from Headquarters Air Force, MAJCOMs, Centers, and Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) will work together to define a balanced set of capability concepts that support known warfighter needs and mitigate risk from emerging threats. The highest-priority capability concepts are designated as Air Force Flagships Capability Concepts (FCCs). These FCCs address validated capability gaps and increase Air Force leadership s visibility into the Air Force S&T Program.

Service Core Function Capabilities The Air Force s investment in S&T ensures the infusion of revolutionary and evolutionary S&T-enabled capabilities that are needed to maintain air, space, and cyberspace dominance. The Air Force S&T Program will address the needs identified in each of the twelve Service Core Functions: Agile Combat Support Air Superiority Building Partnerships Command and Control Cyberspace Superiority Global Integrated ISR Global Precision Attack Nuclear Deterrence Operations Personnel Recovery Rapid Global Mobility Space Superiority Special Operations Summary The Air Force depends on the S&T Program to discover, develop, and demonstrate high-payoff technologies needed to address the ever-changing strategic and operational environment and to sustain air, space, and cyberspace dominance across in the near-, mid- and far-term. By embodying the S&T Program Tenets, focusing on the Air Force S&T Program Priorities, and utilizing the process of turning science into capabilities, the Air Force S&T Program will provide the technological edge needed to win today s fight and prepare for tomorrow s challenges.