SUMMARY OF CHANGES Amendment 7, Version Date: March 24, 2010 (Broadcast 4/6/10)

Similar documents
Who Has Been Doing Clinical Trials in my Hospital? Objectives

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

10 Publications Committee charter and mission guidelines

ACRIN ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING MANUAL. 1 March 2006 v.3

MARKEY CANCER CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP No.: MCCCRO-D

TITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18

REGISTERING A PATIENT

Prepared by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Protocol Development and Regulatory Compliance Department

Theradex Audit 2013: Findings & Corrective Action

Alliance New Investigators: Trial Funding in the NCTN. Grace Mishkin, MPH NCTN Operations

Patient Case Records Review

ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

NCORPs Navigating Site Codes/ MD Registrations

The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

How to Help Write a Good Consent Form: MOVING FROM! INFORMED CONSENT to INFORMED CHOICE

DANA-FARBER / HARVARD CANCER CENTER STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

Revised: August 2017 Effective: 6 September 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Data Quality Tools: SWOG Expectation Reports and CTSU Data Quality Portal

Version 1.1, 6/30/2016 Guidance for Abbreviated IDE Requirements

Office of Clinical Research. CTMS Reference Guide Patient Entry & Visit Tracking

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Data and Safety Monitoring Plan

Consolidated Table of Changes

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Adverse Event Reporting

CLINICAL TRIALS INFRASTRUCTURE. New Investigators Course. Andrew Robinson

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY SAUDI FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM FELLOWSHIP FINAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY (2016)

CHAPTER 2 STUDY POLICIES

Clinical Trials at PMH

To: Prefectural Governors From: Director General, Pharmaceutical and Food Affairs Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

Cancer Drugs Fund. Managed Access Agreement. Daratumumab monotherapy for treating relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Changes to the Common Rule

Title: Additional parenteral nutrition support for patients with pancreatic cancer. Results of a phase II study.

Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors. Exception from Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WARNING LETTER. (b) (4) clinical investigation (Protocol entitled A Phase II, Multicenter,

AN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDY TASKS AND ACTIVITIES

Utilizing the NCI CIRB

Setting up a CITI account for users not enrolled at or employed by Georgia Tech. Georgia Institute of Technology December 2016

11/18/2016. UC Irvine s Clinical Research Coordinator Certification Preparation Series PI Roles and Responsibilities SESSION 4

The FOCUS Program: Helping Cancer Patients and Family Their Caregivers. Laurel Northouse PhD, RN, FAAN Professor of Nursing University of Michigan

Ministerial Ordinance on Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Safety Studies of Drugs

Guide to Completing Medical University of South Carolina s Institutional Review Board (IRB) Continuing Review Application

APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH REQUESTING AN IRB WAIVER OF CONSENT AND HIPAA AUTHORIZATION

Department of Defense Human Research Protection Program DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR)

IRBNet Instructions for Investigators

Abstract submission regulations and instructions

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

NURSING CONTINUING EDUCATION 2017 Catalogue

GCP INSPECTION CHECKLIST

DID YOU KNOW? Truman Medical Centers is set to open the new 90,000 sq. ft., $29 million University Health facility

Abstract submission regulations and instructions

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Patient Advocacy Group Feedback on a pcodr Expert Review Committee Initial Recommendation

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

20 STEPS FROM STUDY IDEA INCEPTION TO PUBLISHING RESEARCH/ Evidence-Based Practice

ABSTRACT SUBMISSION TERMS AND CONDITIONS 2018

Student Poster Presenter

Drugs and Cosmetics rules, 2013 India

I. Preamble: II. Parties:

The NCI Central IRB Initiative. Third Annual Medical Research Summit Washington, D.C. March 2003

(Type inside gray boxes, cells will expand) A. EIGHT POINT CRITERIA for IRB Review

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

STYLE SHEET FOR REVISING AND WRITING BOARD POLICIES AND COLLEGE PROCEDURES

Guidance for the Tripartite model Clinical Investigation Agreement for Medical Technology Industry sponsored research in NHS Hospitals managed by

Chemotherapy Training and Assessment Framework for Registered Nurses

Investigational Drug Service (IDS) Rotation Tool APPE Student Rotation

SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board

SCIENCE COMMITTEE PROGRAMME FOUNDATION AWARDS OUTLINE APPLICATION GUIDELINES

FAQs March 12, 2012 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

MANUAL OF PROCEDURES

Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Common Findings

OPEN Person Types and Business Rules Revision 2

Not the Same Old EOD: the New and Improved SEER EOD for 2018 and Beyond

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

3. Practicing fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation in the practice of medicine.

October 11 13, 2018 Dallas, TX Poster Submission Rules & Format t Guidelines

ACCREDITATION PROCESS FOR TESTING/ CALIBRATION/ MEDICAL LABORATORIES

Comprehensive Protocol Feasibility Questionnaire

(INTENTIONALLY BLANK)

Research & Funding A Step-by-Step Guide

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

Systemic anti-cancer therapy Care Pathway

A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky

June 23, Dear Ms. Moreland:

Background and Issues. Aim of the Workshop Analysis Of Effectiveness And Costeffectiveness. Outline. Defining a Registry

Instructions for Completing a Human Research Billing Analysis Form

Managing Treatment With Oral Oncology Medications. An Educational Toolkit for Health Care Providers

8/10/2011. Welcome. PRIM&R s Primer on the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. PRIM&R s Primer on the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

managing or activities.

Objectives. Hospital Pharmacy Strategies for REMS. Evolution of FDA Drug Safety Programs. REMS: Definition. Evolution of FDA Drug Safety Programs

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

The presenter has owns Kelly Willenberg, LLC in relation to this educational activity.

Implementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review

Neuro-Oncology Program Requirements

Code of Governance of Irish Institutes of Technology. Annual Governance Statement and Statement of Internal Control - reporting arrangements to HEA

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

ONS Foundation Small Grant. Online Application Submission Overview

IRB Application the Basics GETTING STARTED

DO I NEED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS?... & OTHER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. March 2015 IRB Forum

Guidelines on the Keeping of Records in Respect of Medicinal Products when Conducting a Retail Pharmacy Business

Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy Delivery. June 2017 National External Review

FULL TEAM AHEAD: UNDERSTANDING THE UK NON-SURGICAL CANCER TREATMENTS WORKFORCE

Transcription:

Amendment 7, Version Date: March 24, 2010 (Broadcast 4/6/10) RTOG 0212, "A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Doses (Phase III-Standard Vs. Cancer" As mandated by CTEP, RTOG 0212 has been amended to replace CTC version 2.0 with the CTEP Active Version of CTCAE. Changes were made to the following sections: Section 6.5.1 Appendix IV Appendix VI, Sections "B", "D" "E", and "Adverse Event Reporting for ECOG Investigators"

Update Date: June 12, 2008 (Broadcast 6/12/08) RTOG 0212, "A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Doses (Phase III-Standard Vs. High) and Two High Dose Schedules (Phase II-Once Vs. Twice Daily) For Delivering Cancer" Study Chair: Aaron H. Wolfson, M.D., (305) 243-4210, RTOG 0212 has been updated as follows: Title page: At SWOG's request, the SWOG Co-Chair was updated from Dr. Goldberg to Dr. Gaspar. In addition, the local number for RTOG Headquarters was replaced with the 800-number, per current RTOG standard. Note: This is an editorial/administrative change to the protocol. NCI now requires that these changes be documented on the protocol title page with the date of the update noted as "Update Date".

Amendment 6, Version Date: December 6, 2005 RTOG 0212, "A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Doses (Phase III-Standard Vs. Cancer" The Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR) is closing its phase III part of the study to patient accrual on December 31, 2005. The phase II part of the study will remain open to accrual. The protocol has been amended to address data management and statistical issues after the phase III closure. These changes are as follows: Section 1.1: A paragraph was added at the end of the section stating that data for patients enrolled after December 31, 2005 will be managed by RTOG. Section 1.4: A new section was added regarding data collection for patients enrolled after December 31, 2005, as well as for those enrolled on or before December 31, 2005. Section 2.0: Objectives for patients enrolled on or before December 31, 2005, have been shaded in gray. Primary objectives for patients enrolled after December 31, 2005 were added. Section 6.5: The statement "(for toxicities in patients who enrolled on or before 12/31/05)" was added for information to be faxed to the IGR. Sections 13.1.1 and 13.1.2 were shaded in gray; they now apply only to patients enrolled on or before December 31, 2005. Section 13.1.3: Primary endpoints were added for patients enrolled after 12/31/05. Section 13.2.1 was shaded in gray; it now applies only to patients enrolled on or before December 31, 2005. Section 13.2.2: Overview was added for patients enrolled after 12/31/05. Section 13.4: The sentence regarding the rate of patient accrual and time to target accrual was revised based on December 1, 2005 data. A statement was added explaining that the phase III study met its target accrual and that the following (gray-shaded) paragraph is part of the original protocol and applies to patients enrolled from study activation through December 31, 2005.

Appendix I-Informed Consent: The original text under "Why Is This Study Being Done?" was highlighted in gray; this information now applies only to patients enrolled on or before December 31, 2005. A new paragraph was added for patients enrolled after December 31, 2005. Appendix IX-Publication Policy: A paragraph was added regarding the timing of publication of the results of the two parts of the study (phase III and phase II). In the second paragraph, Statistical unit was changed to Department of Statistics. Other Changes Section 12.1: "Treatment planning Brain CT/MRI Report" was changed to "Pre-treatment Brain CT/MRI Report." An amended protocol is available (no password required) on the RTOG Web site, http://www.rtog.org

Amendment 5, Version Date: November 23, 2004 RTOG 0212, A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Doses (Phase III-Standard Vs. The Institut Gustave-Roussy, based on the recommendation of its Steering Committee, has revised the ineligibility criteria of PCI 01-EULINT1, the international cranial irradiation companion study to RTOG 0212. The Steering Committee s recommendation followed a serious adverse event (death) of a patient who had been receiving permanent oral medication for epilepsy and concerns regarding the use of thalidomide as an experimental drug in small cell lung cancer. The ineligibility criteria of RTOG 0212 have been amended to correspond to the revision of PCI 01-EULINT1: Patients with epilepsy requiring permanent oral medication are excluded; Planned concurrent chemotherapy or antitumoral agent during PCI is not permitted. The following sections were amended: Eligibility on the Schema page, page 1 of the Eligibility Checklist (Questions 12 and 16), and Sections 3.2.3 and 3.2.6. Other Changes Title page: The contact information for Dr. Movsas was updated. An amended protocol is available (no password required) on the RTOG Web site, http://www.rtog.org

Revision 4, Version Date: July 8, 2004 RTOG 0212, A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Doses (Phase III-Standard Vs. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) is participating in this study. The following changes were made for CALGB investigators: The CALGB study number and Co-Chair were added to the title page; Sections 5.5 and 12.5 were added; Sections 3.3, 6.1.7, 11.3.3,11.4.1, and Appendix VIII were revised; In Appendix I, under What About Confidentiality?, CALGB was added to the organizations that may inspect and/or copy patient records. Other changes: Title page: The 800 number was deleted as this number will change when RTOG Headquarters moves in the near future. Section 1.3.1: In the first sentence of the second paragraph, the phrase, from SCLC who did and did receive, was corrected to from SCLC who did and did not receive. Section 12.0: The RTOG Headquarters address was updated. A revised protocol is available (no password required) on the RTOG Web site, http://www.rtog.org

Update Date: January 27, 2004 RTOG 0212, A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Doses (Phase III-Standard Vs. High) and Two High Dose Schedules (Phase II-Once Vs. Twice Daily) For Delivering Study Chair: Aaron H. Wolfson, M.D., (305) 243-4210, RTOG 0212 has been updated as follows: Section 11.4.1 SWOG Institution contact updated to Lisa Headlee. NOTE: This is an editorial/administrative change to the protocol. NCI now requires that these changes be documented on the protocol title page with the date of the update noted as Update Date. An updated protocol is available (no password required) on the RTOG website: http://www.rtog.org/

Revision 3, Version Date: December 9, 2003 RTOG 0212, A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Doses (Phase III-Standard Vs. IRB Review Requirements: ( ) Full board review required (X) Expedited review allowed; however, site IRB requirements take precedence. ( ) No review required The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) are participating in this study. The following changes were made for SWOG investigators: The SWOG Co-Chair was added to the title page; Sections 3.3, 5.3, 6.1.7, 11.3.3, and 12.3 were added; Sections 6.5, 11.4.1, and Appendix VIII were revised; In Appendix I, under What About Confidentiality?, SWOG was added to the organizations that may inspect and/or copy patient records. The following changes were made for ECOG investigators: The ECOG Co-Chair was added to the title page; Sections 3.3, 5.4, 6.1.7, 11.3.3, 11.6.3, and 12.4 were added; Sections 11.4.1, 12.0, Appendix VI, and Appendix VIII were revised; In Appendix I, under What About Confidentiality?, ECOG was added to the organizations that may inspect and/or copy patient records. Other changes: Eligibility Checklist Question 5, page 2 was updated to RTOG standard. Section 12.0 Data submission instructions were updated to RTOG standard. Appendix I Under What About Confidentiality?, RTOG was added to the organizations that may inspect and/or copy patient records.' A revised protocol is available (no password required) on the RTOG Web site, http://www.rtog.org

Revision 2, Version Date: August 6, 2003 RTOG 0212, A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Doses (Phase III-Standard Vs. IRB Review Requirements: ( ) Full board review required (X) Expedited review allowed; however, site IRB requirements take precedence. ( ) No review required RTOG 0212 has been revised as follows: Eligibility Checklist Question 6 on page 1 was deleted, as patients may have started but are not required to have begun consolidative chest irradiation by study entry (subsequent questions were appropriately renumbered); in addition, Section 3.1.5 was revised from Patients may have at least started consolidative chest irradiation to Patients may have started consolidative chest irradiation. Appendix I, under What Is Involved In The Study, the first paragraph was revised to correctly correspond to Section 13.2; the number of treatment days under Treatment 1, Treatment 2, and Treatment 3 was revised to correctly correspond to the Schema and Section 6.0. A revised protocol is available (no password required) on the RTOG Web site, http://www.rtog.org

Revision 1, Version Date: April 3, 2003 RTOG 0212, A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Doses (Phase III-Standard Vs. IRB Review Requirements: ( ) Full board review required (X) Expedited review allowed; however, site IRB requirements take precedence. ( ) No review required RTOG 0212 has been revised as follows: Title page The title was revised for clarity; this change also was made to the title on the Schema page, on the first page of Appendix I (the sample consent form), and in Appendix VIII. Schema page In the stratification variable, Interval from induction therapy to randomization, number 3 was revised from > 180 days to 181-240 days to more clearly define patient eligibility; corresponding changes also was made in question 17, page 2 of the Eligibility Checklist, in Section 3.1.3, and in the last sentence of Section 13.2. In the Eligibility list on the Schema page, the third bullet was corrected to more closely correspond with the International Cranial Irradiation Trial protocol. Section 2.0 Parenthetical phrases were added to Sections 2.1 and 2.2 to clearly indicate which phase of the study correlates with the study objectives; this change also was made in Section 13.1. A revised protocol is available (no password required) on the RTOG website:http://www.rtog.org/

Update Date: February 19, 2003 RTOG 0212, A Phase II/III Randomized Trial Of Two Dose Schedules For Delivering Study Chair: Aaron H. Wolfson, M.D., (305) 243-4210, RTOG 0212 has been updated as follows: Eligibility Checklist, page 2 Questions 5 and 10 were updated to RTOG standard; question 16 was deleted from this operational/demographic portion of the checklist. NOTE: This is an editorial/administrative change to the protocol. NCI now requires that these changes be documented on the protocol title page with the date of the update noted as Update Date. An updated protocol is available (no password required) on the RTOG website: http://www.rtog.org/