APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED

Similar documents
Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

User Manual and Source Code for a LAMMPS Implementation of Constant Energy Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD-E)

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

US Army TARDEC Ground Vehicle Mobility: Dynamics Modeling, Simulation, & Research

Wildland Fire Assistance

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

at the Missile Defense Agency

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

U.S. Army Reserve Base Realignment & Closure (BRAC) Sustainable Design & Construction in Action

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Development of a Hover Test Bed at the National Hover Test Facility

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

US ARMY CENTER OF MILITARY HISTORY

M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round (EPR) Media Day

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Improving Safety of Demil Operations Through Automation. Mark M. Zaugg July 14, 2010

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Google Pilot / WEdge Viewer

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Drinking Water Operator Certification and Certificate to Operate Criteria/Requirements for US Navy Overseas Drinking Water Systems

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

Systems Engineering Capstone Marketplace Pilot

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Expeditionary Basecamp Passive


USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

DON Mentor-Protégé Program

The Effects of Outsourcing on C2

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

CRS prepared this memorandum for distribution to more than one congressional office.

AFCEA TECHNET LAND FORCES EAST

Technical Considerations for Alamo Lake Operation

2010 Fall/Winter 2011 Edition A army Space Journal

U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center Light Armor Range Complex

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

C-Band Working Group Update. Steve O'Neal AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 2/20/13

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

FUDS Military Munitions Response Program

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

BW Threat & Vulnerability

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

PEO Missiles and Space Overview Briefing for the 2010 Corrosion Summit February 2010 Huntsville, AL

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Transcription:

BRL TN-2 c.2a.. l \ i ( BALLISTIC RESE;f~!WII L1.TIOR":..TORIES rec:::ltical NOTE ljo. 2 8 J1:arch 1949 from i 'ITCEELL TBEODOLIT:S 03SEri.VL.TION of ~IIKE ::c. 30 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED -------- - ----- aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is e:otimat ed t o average 1 hour per re sp onse. including t he time for reviewing instruct ions, search ing existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the dat a needed, and completing and reviewing t he collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden es timate or any o t her aspect of this collect ion of mformation, including suggestions for reducing the burden. to Department of Defense, W ashington Headquarters Services. Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188). 1215 Jefferson Oav s H1ghway, Su1te 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aw are that notwit hstandin g any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply w ith a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE {DO-MM- YYYYJ 12. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 08-03-1949 Technical note 12 November 1948 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT :NUMBER Trajectory Data from M itchell Theodolite Observation of NIKE No. 30 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(St 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(St AND ADDRESS(ESt 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER ARMY BALLISTIC RESEARCH LAB ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD BRL-TN-2 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(St AND ADDRESS(ESt 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYMISt Army Ballistic Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground MD BRL 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR' S REPORT NUMBER(St 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ARL Security letter, dated 15 December 2003, changed distribution to Approved for Public Release. 14. ABSTRACT Presented arc trajectory data for NIKE 30 launched at White Sands Proving Ground, 12 November 1948, from launcher No. I. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Guided missile trajectories, flight paths, Nike 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE ABSTRACT U2 U2 U2 U2 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 9 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Tracy Landfried 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER 1/nclude area code! ( 41 0) 306-0626 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/981 Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18

AMSRD-ARL-CS-AP-EG-SI 15 December 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR Chief, ARL Technical Library, APG SUBJECT: Distribution Statement for Ballistic Research Laboratory Technical Note No. 2 1. Reference: Ballistic Research Laboratory Technical Note No. 2, "Trajectory Data from Mitchell Teodolite Observation of Nike No. 30", dated 8 March 1948, UNCLASSIFIED, enclosed. 2. The Security/CI Office and subject matter experts have reviewed the subject report and have determined that it may be released to the public. Please mark all of your copies of this document with the following distribution statement: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. 3. Please contact Douglas Kingsley at 36960 if you have any questions. Encl L-~~ 1 BENJI{MI-N-~E~ BRUSO Team Leader Security/CI Office

-\ TRAJECTORY DATA FROM MITCHELL THEODOLITE OBSERVATIONS OF NIKE 30 Deimel/mal ' ~ Presented are trajectory data for NIKE,30 launched at White Sands Proving Ground, 12 November 1948, from launcher No. 1. The data were obtained from observations of two Mitchell photo-theodolites at S;tations C and E. Station C is about three ( 3) miles south of the 1aunchi'ng site, and Station E is about six (6) miles west. On Station C record, the missile image becomes blurred and dim at about 28 seconds, and it was impractical to determine the missile 1 s position from this film :a~r 31.58 seconds. ~--,, ' -} Coordinates: Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) are used, with origin at the launching site; the (x, z) plane is tangent at the launcher to a sphere with surface- passing through the site and with center at the earth's center; x.:> 0 north of site; z>o east of site. Altitudes Yc and Ye are computed from elevation angles of Stations C and E respectively, and y is their average. Altitudes have had approximate corrections 9:pplied for earth 1 s curvature. Velocities in the table are average velocities over one-second intervals. Trajectory angle e is the angle between the path of the missile and the vert~ cal. Accelerations were read graphically from the velocity curve. Time zero is. the time of the Block House signal. Tabtl.lar va,lues of all quantities are un~moothed. graphically. Curves were fitted On Sta~ion E record, the missile was not visible from 1.58 through 4.08 seconds; from 4.83 through 7.08 seconds; at 24.08 seconds and from 25.08 through 26.08 seconds. Triangulation points in these intervals are based on interpolated values of azimuth angle for Station E. In the interval 24.08 to 27.08 seconds, the dial readings for site angles of Station C show thaeb reversals of direction, giving rise to possible backlash effects. I ~'.. Booster separation could not be seen on Station E film, and on Station C film, occurred at approximately 2.6 seconds. Missile burnout was observed on the film at approximately 19.8 seconds. Distribution - G. M. I"ist, Parts A, C, DA and DG )..:;.~-~\.. '"'t... --~~ _,_.,.,

.~"!""~~' ~ I - f I - TRAJECTORY OF YriY...E 30 ' Time X z Yc Ye y Yc-Ye V' Q Sec. Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Ft/Sec Deg..33 8-6 63 54 58 9.58 10-6.136 '132 134 4.83 14 -.4 268 259 264 9 595 2.1 1.08 16-1 440 432 436 8 803 3.0 L33 22 10 654 652 653 2 990 3.5 1.58 31 30 936 1207 4.1 1.83 * 40 51 1252 1416 4.0 2.08 >)< 52 77 1640 1574 3.9 2.33,;< 67 92 2065 1726 3.5 l 2.58 82 123 2506 1783 3.8 2.83 * 100 138 2975 1812 4.2 3.08 '* 121 l72 3419 1817 "' 4.0 3.33 '* 142 202 3872 1806 4.6 3.58 * 164 220 4319 1805 4.4 3.83 * 187 255 4774 1800. 4.3 4.. 08 Ill< 208 280 5219' 1817 4.8 4.33 236 300 5675 566'0 5667 15 1805 4.4 4.58 257 337 6134 6105 6120 29 1811 4.8 4o83.>'f 285 354 6574 1818 5.0 5.08 * 312 391 7023 1829 4.8 ' 5.33 ->1< 340 420 7478 1821 5.1 5.58 * 365 444 7942 1809 4.5 5.83 * 389 478 8388 1796 4.2 6.08 * 414 491 8827 1795 4.4 6~33 if 438 52'5 9270 1808 4.4 6.58 * 466 539 9732.1816 4.4 6.83 * 491 571 10190 7.08 * 515 587 10637 1829 4.6 7.58 568 643 11566 11545 11555 21 1826 4.3 8.08 612 685 12478 12438 12458 40 1820 4.0 8.58 658 733 13390 13351 13370 39 1864 4.4 9~08 706 793 14334 14299 14316 35 1881 4.0 9.58 740 837 15264 15229 15246 35 1875 3.5 10.08 775 884 16202 16175 16188 29 1891 3.6 10.58 822 923 17155 17112 17134 43 1904 4. 0,. 11.08 870. 980 18106 18068 18087 38 1932 4.,2 11.58 927 1018 19083 19037 19060 46 1964 4.0 12.08 981 1061 20057 20035 20046 22 1975 4.4 ' 12.58 1045 1117 ~; 21045 21013 21029 32 1978 4.6 ~3.08 1112 1154 22033 22003 22018 30 1988 4.2 13.58 1169 1195 23009 23015 23012-6 2009 4oO.14. 08 1242 1214 24037 24006 24022 31 2060 4.7 14.58 1319 1270 25074 25057 25065 17 2080 5.2 *Station E film could not be read. ' -!J..I 2

TRAJECTORY OF NIKE 30 Time X z Yc Ye y Yc-Ye v e Sec. Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Ft/Sec Deg. 15.08 1417 1286 26106 26079 26093 27 2094 5.6 15.58 1516 1324 27166 27132 27149 34 2134 5.8 16.08 1625 1352 28247 28183.28215 64 2157 '6.4 16.58 1755 1362 29332 29252 29292 80 2176 7.1 17.08 1892 1388 30415 30334 30374 81 2184 8.0, 17.58 2054 1403 31512 31442 31455 70 2219' 9.7 18.08 2228 1396 32623 32500 32562 123 2261 9.0 18.58 2406 1396 33735 33641 33688 94 2345 9.4 19.08 2610 1404 34874 34877!.34875-3 2319 10.8 :. 19.58 2839 1398 36040 35942 35966 98 2335 11.6 20.08 3078 1381 37212 37112 37162 100 2391 12.3 20.58 3343 1353 38362 38244 38303 118 2337 13.2 2lo08 3613 1344 39502 39372,39437 130 2258 1lo9 21.58 3810 1321 40553. 40472 40512 81 2263 15.2 22.08 4206 1302 41663 41577 41620 86 2302 18.3 22.58 4533 1284 42735 42659 42697 76 2250 17.8 23.08 4891 1251 43800 43726 43763 74 2211 18.8 23.58 5242 1214 44820 44760 44790 60 2127 19.5... 24.08 * 5600 1195 45768 2079 21.8 ~ ~,.,. 24.58 6010 1158 46702 46740 46721-38 2102 23.6 25.08 ';It 6435 1106 47694 2172 23.3... 25.58 6865 1065 48716.2132 24.0 26.08 * 7301 1038 49641 2019 26.1... 26.58 7752 999 50524 50532 50528-8 1985 28.0,j:;llc 27.08 8231 958 51385.51401 51393-16 1901 30.7 27.58 8717 903 52140 52186 52163-46 1895 32.. 1 28.08. 9239 854 52960 53035 5299.7-75 1936 32.8 28.58 9762 815 53761 53820 53790-59 1930 34.2 29.08 10319 761 54556 54633 54594-77 1915 35.6 29.58 10872 705 55319 55374 55346-55 1863 37.1 30.08 11436 948 56065 56096 56080-31 1846 38.9 30.58 1?026 581 56782 56782 56782 0 1785 4L7 31.08 12615 508 57386 57441 57414-55 1744 43.1 3lo58 13209 452 57991 58121 58056-130 E j \] * Station E film could not be read. **Station C dial readings for ~ite reversed direction.

]. -1 ~ ::r ±± L 1-t- W -t_±j+. tt IU..- l- + l- 1--1 t-t- _. l l I- ti rt-33 11-'+ + =t- H--j ~[±± 1-t =R -r-rt-ffrj.::r J -P- '+ H 1 te H } H + + H -l t-h-t-t--l-1--_l_ I~ w \,-

I. I I!,,, J,.,. ' ' '........ :. ". :"' -.::.'?r,

_._. "';': ' \.j -

( CONFIDENTIAL ATI- 52373. ' AUTHOR(S) : Cot known) ORIS AGENCY - Aberdeen Proving Ground, Ballistic Res. Lab., Md. PUBLISHED BY : u - s - Army Project Nike OAR March' 49 ABSTRACT: DOC OAS). Confd' 1 COUM1BV II.S. LAMGUAOt. English PAGES 6 IUU5THATIOM. frraphs (None) 02KJ. ACOXT NO. TN-2 rvzuuckq AOENCT HO. (None) Flight path data for the Nike 30 guided missile were obtained by means of Mitchell theodolite observations at two stations, one three miles south of the launching site, and the other about six miles west Cartesian coordinates were used with the origin at the launching site, the (x,z) plane being tangent at the launcher to a sphere with the surface passing through the site and with the center at the earth* s center, x>0 north of the site, and z;>0 east of the site. The average altitude was computed from elevation angles of the theodolite stations, and was corrected approximately for the earth 1 s curvature. Space coordinates and flight path angles were plotted vs time, and velocity and acceleration curves were plotted. DISTRIBUTION: Copies of this report obtainable from CAPO. (1) DIVISION: Guided Missiles (1) SUBJECT HEADINGS: Missiles, Guided - Flight path (62925); SECTION: Aerodynamics and Ballistics (4) Project Nike (75404) ATI SHEET NO.: C-l-4-50 Central Air Document* Ofiko Wright-Pottoroon Air Forco Data, Dayton, Ohio AIR TECHNICAL INDEX CONFIDENTIAL