The CMS Five Star Nursing Home Rating System An incomplete and inaccurate consumer tool

Similar documents
Improving Nursing Home Compare for Consumers. Five-Star Quality Rating System

Design for Nursing Home Compare 5-Star Rating System: Users Guide

CMS Announced Changes On Feb 12 th CMS s Open Door Forum conference call

SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES TO FIVE STAR ANNOUNCED BY CMS. Mark Parkinson AHCA/NCAL President & CEO All member call February 13 th, 2015

QIES Help Desk. Objectives. Nursing Home Quality Initiatives and Five-Star Quality Rating System

AHCA Requests to CMS

Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Ratings of Nursing Homes Provider Rating Report

Session Objectives. Long Term Care Luncheon: The CMS Five-Star Quality Rating System. Quality Ratings of U.S. Nursing Homes on Nursing Home Compare

Quality Outcomes and Data Collection

Long Term Care Briefing Virginia Health Care Association August 2009

Understanding the Five Star Quality Rating System Design For Nursing Home Compare

Quality Metrics in Post-Acute Care: FIVE-STAR QUALITY RATING SYSTEM

Understanding Your Quality Measures. Craig Bettles Data Visualization Manager Consonus Healthcare

PointRight: Your Partner in QAPI

Disclaimer. Learning Objectives

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Report to the General Assembly: Nursing Home Inspection and Enforcement Activities. A Report to the 105 th Tennessee General Assembly

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Why is the Five Star Rating Important in Today s LTPAC Reimbursement World?

New York State Department of Health 2016 Nursing Home Quality Initiative Methodology

MDS 3.0/RUG IV OVERVIEW

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide. February 2015

Reading the Stars: Nursing Home Quality Star Ratings, Nationally and by State

Five-Star Quality Rating System Technical Users Guide

LTC Five-Star Rating System

5D QAPI from an Operational Approach. Christine M. Osterberg RN BSN Senior Nursing Consultant Pathway Health Pathway Health 2013

Maximizing the Power of Your Data. Peggy Connorton, MS, LNFA AHCA Director, Quality and LTC Trend Tracker

Advancing Excellence Phase 2 Goals

Managing employees include: Organizational structures include: Note:

Special Open Door Forum Participation Instructions: Dial: Reference Conference ID#:

Leveraging Your Facility s 5 Star Analysis to Improve Quality

MDS 3.0/RUG IV Distance Learning Series January - May 2016

Maggie Turner RN RAC-CT Kara Schilling RN RAC-CT Lisa Gourley RN RAC-CT

FOR LEADINGAGE POST-ACUTE AND LONG TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS

The Center based its evaluation on the SFF list that was released by CMS on May 16, The list includes five categories of 191 SFFs:

What Story Is Your SNF Data Telling?

Introducing the Discharge to Community Quality Measure

Data Entry for the Advancing Excellence Campaign What you need to know

II. HOW NURSING FACILITIES ARE REGULATED

6/29/2015. Focused Survey for MDS Assessment. Objectives: Review the results of the MDS pilot study.

Troubleshooting Audio

SEP Memorandum Report: "Trends in Nursing Home Deficiencies and Complaints," OEI

MDS Accuracy and Compliance: Where There s Smoke

Nurse Staffing and Quality in Rural Nursing Homes

Methodology Report U.S. News & World Report Nursing Home Finder

New Quality Measures Will Soon Impact Nursing Home Compare and the 5-Star Rating System: What providers need to know

CMS s RAI Version 3.0 Manual October 2016

HSAG the QIN-QIO NHQCC II and CDI Initiative Kick-off

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

MEASURING POST ACUTE CARE OUTCOMES IN SNFS. David Gifford MD MPH American Health Care Association Atlantic City, NJ Mar 17 th, 2015

Advocacy Briefing. by Francesca Fierro O Reilly Senior Director, Legislative Affairs

Presented by: Arlene Maxim, RN-Founder A.D. Maxim Consulting, LLC.

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF HEATLH CARE FACILITIES MEDICAL DIRECTORS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. DATE: Saturday, July 23, :30 a.m.

7/1/2011 EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW TO SUCCEED WITH THIS NEW PROCESS ABOUT LEAH I FOCUS ON LEARNING, NOT TEACHING

All Medicaid-Enrolled Nursing Facilities. Minimum Data Set Audit and Rate Calculation Process

Health: Nursing. Administration. Services Maintenance. Dietary Housekeeping. Social. Activitiess. Laundry. Specialty. Facilities.

June 22, Leah Binder President and CEO The Leapfrog Group 1660 L Street, N.W., Suite 308 Washington, D.C Dear Ms.

Pitch Perfect: Selling Your Services to LTC Facilities

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group

Quality Measures (QM) & Five Star Rating System. Objectives 4/18/2016 MDS CODING FOR QUALITY MEASURES

New Strategies for Managing Medicare Risk

Outcomes Reporting: Be Ready to Negotiate with a Hospital

MDS 3.0/RUG IV Distance Learning Series January-June 2014

LeadingAge New York Technology Solutions

AHCA NURSING HOME PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM STUDY

WHAT S IN THE STARS FOR YOUR FACILITY

Using Quality Data to Market to Referral Sources BUSINESS OF HEALTHCARE

PAC Waiver. eqhealth Solutions PAC Waiver Authorization Process

4/15/2018. Disclosure of Commercial Interests. Reducing Staff Vacancy in Senior Care Organizations

Design for Nursing Home Compare Five-Star Quality Rating System: Technical Users Guide

Agenda: Noon Overview of the regulatory sections affected by the Reform of RoP in Phase 2

MEDICARE APPEALS AND QUALITY OF CARE GRIEVANCES AvMed April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018

Kentucky Nursing Home Collaborative Action Period 1. Scott Gibson, Quality Improvement Advisor

Data Stewardship: Essential Skills for Long Term Care Facility Managers

Center for Medicaid and State Operations/Survey and Certification Group

Understanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network

Troubleshooting Audio

Best Practices: Access Case Management

HB 2201/Nursing Home Staffing

Center for Medicaid, CHIP, and Survey & Certification/Survey & Certification Group. Memorandum Summary

Richard Mollot, Esq. Executive Director Cynthia Rudder, PhD, Director of Special Projects Long Term Care Community Coalition

Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Series: HHVBP Model 101. Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

KEPRO The Beneficiary and Family Centered Care Quality Improvement Organization. Nancy Jobe

Optimizing Operational and Financial

MDS 3.0: What Leadership Needs to Know

US Health Health Policy

OASIS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORTS

FY 2015 IPF PPS Final Rule: USING THE WEBEX Q+A FEATURE

Focus on Excellence. Training Guide

Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System

QUALITY MEASURES FOR POST ACUTE CARE. David Gifford MD MPH American Health Care Association Worcester, MA Nov 13, 2014

CARELESS: How the Pennsylvania Department of Health has Risked the Lives of Elderly and Disabled Nursing Home Residents

Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

Any Willing Qualified Provider Appeal Request and Quality Performance Plan (QPP) Report Webinar

National Background Check Program for Long Term Care Opportunities & Challenges

Long-Term Care Community Diversion Pilot Project

Creating a Culture of Quality and Compliance

Transcription:

The CMS Five Star Nursing Home Rating System An incomplete and inaccurate consumer tool Myth: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 5 Star Nursing Home Quality rating system provides a useful consumer tool to help individuals choose a nursing facility for their loved one. Reality: The new CMS rating system utilizes a complex system to assign a star rating to every nursing home nationwide. It is likely that it will create more confusion for consumers. Because of inaccuracies in the data, and missing data sources including the inclusion of all caregivers, consumers may draw inappropriate conclusions as to the quality of a facility based upon the arbitrary star rating. Myth: In creating the 5 Star rating system, CMS was able to account for and address state-by-state differences in the Survey and Certification system. Reality: While CMS did recognize weaknesses and regional differences in the Survey and Certification system and limited comparisons within a state, they did not account for differences between survey regions within a state. Further, by not having a tool which allows consumers to compare facilities in different states or regions, it limits the usefulness to individuals looking for a nursing facility. Myth: The staffing component of the 5 Star rating accurately reflects all caregivers in a nursing facility. Reality: The staffing rating is characterized by CMS as including all caregivers, however it fails to account for many nurses, therapy services staff, and nurse practitioners all of whom play a critical role in the quality of care and services that the frail, elderly and disabled residents of our nation s nursing homes require. Myth: The 5 Star Nursing Home Quality Rating system is similar to quality programs CMS has unveiled for other provider types, such as Hospital Compare. Reality: Unlike the Hospital Compare program, CMS did not provide an adequate time period for facilities to view and dispute any inaccurate data before it was posted online. Hospitals are afforded a 30-day review period of data before it is posted to Hospital Compare. For the 5 Star program, many facilities nationwide were unable to view their star rating and facility data the evening before the program was rolled out on December 18, and had no opportunity to challenge or dispute inaccurate data. Myth: The 5 Star Nursing Home Quality Rating system represents the next step in transparency for our nation s nursing homes. Reality: AHCA and the nursing home profession have embraced the release of data in being more transparent. In fact, nursing facilities were the first providers to publicly report quality measures that were posted online. Unfortunately, CMS was not transparent in developing the 5 star rating system. In fact, CMS provided the rating for every nursing facility in the country to USA Today and the Gannett newspapers prior to providing individual facilities with their rating.

From the American Health Care Association General Suggested Talking Points Quality & 5-Star Rating System Our first commitment always is to provide quality care to residents in a safe and secure environment. Delivering the highest quality of care and customer satisfaction is a top priority for those of us in the long term care profession and the vast majority of nursing homes nationwide provide the type of high quality, compassionate care that patients, residents and their families want and deserve. The facts speak for themselves quality is improving in our nation s nursing facilities a reality not reflected in the 5 Star program. The long term care profession has helped to lead the nation's healthcare sector in terms of quality improvement, and we are committed to continuing our work with CMS to advance a transparent survey process that recognizes quality, and provides the resources for facility improvement, which will enhance efforts to further improve quality long term care. We support a rating system that accurately reflects the quality of care in our nation s nursing facilities; however, we do not believe that a system based on the current survey system will provide consumers with accurate, up-to-date information. CMS claims that the survey component of its 5-Star Quality Rating System represents the most important dimension in determining a facility s overall quality rating. We disagree today s survey system does not measure quality, but rather assesses compliance with federal or state regulations. We believe that customer satisfaction how a resident and family members judge the care being provided in a particular facility is a better indicator of the quality of care and quality of life residents enjoy. Quality improvement is a dynamic ongoing process and its quantification must reflect the many variants that go into the delivery of care. We believe that consumer and staff satisfaction are two important components of quality care. In June, My InnerView, Inc. released its national report on customer satisfaction with nursing facilities. The report is based on surveys of more than 146,300 residents and family members and nearly 162,000 employees; 83% of the respondents rated overall satisfaction with their nursing home as excellent or good and fully 82% of the respondents said they would recommend the facility to others as excellent or good. Long term care providers are providing quality of care and quality of life for residents, and that the profession is clearly being part of the solution. We are helping lead the charge, changing the culture, turning a corner on quality care. AHCA is working closely in coalition with other long term care providers, quality improvement experts, medical professionals, and consumers on the Advancing Excellence in America s Nursing Homes campaign, which builds on our efforts with Quality First and seeks to coordinate and leverage the various quality improvement initiatives already underway in nursing homes nationwide (see www.nhqualitycampaign.org). 1

Government data indicates that quality is improving in several areas. A few examples include:: Nationally, direct care staffing levels (which include all levels of nursing care: Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs)) have increased 10.6 percent between 2000 and 2008 from 3.12 hours per patient day in 2000 to 3.45 hours in 2008; The Quality Measure tracking pain for long term stay residents vastly improved from a rate of 10.7 percent in 2002 to 4.1 percent in 2008 more than a 60 percent decrease; The Quality Measure tracking the use of physical restraints for long stay residents dropped by more than 50 percent over six years from 9.7 percent in 2002 to 4.5 percent in 2008; The Quality Measure tracking pressure ulcers for post-acute skilled nursing facility patients (many of whom are admitted to the nursing facility with a preexisting pressure ulcer) improved by nearly 22 percent over the course of five years, from 20.4 percent in 2003 to 16 percent in 2008; and Substandard Quality of Care Citations as tracked by CMS surveys were reduced by 35.5 percent over seven years from 4.5 percent in 2000 to 2.9 percent in 2007. We know that getting the appropriate care in the appropriate setting is critical. That s why we offer consumer-friendly information to help find a facility that will meet their specific needs like How to Choose a Nursing Home, which is available at www.longtermcareliving.com. 2

URGENT MEMORANDUM December 16, 2008 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ANHA Membership Louis E. Cottrell, Jr. Executive Director CMS 5 Star Quality Rating System As we reported last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will launch its 5 Star Quality Rating System, which will be posted to Nursing Home Compare as of December 18, 2008. This memo provides many details of the new ratings system, along with suggested talking points that you may find useful in responding to media and consumer inquiries. About 5 Star A facility s overall 5 Star rating incorporates ratings in three categories: survey results, Quality Measures (QMs), and staffing levels. The survey rating forms the base star rating with stars being added or subtracted depending upon a facility s star rating for QMs and staffing respectively. The overall rating for a facility cannot be greater than 5 Stars or less than 1 Star; however, new facilities where there is insufficient data could receive a rating of N/A. Here s how CMS will calculate a facility s 5 Star rating: 1. Survey Rating: CMS calculates the survey star rating based on points that a facility accrues based on health citations noted in the past 3 years of standard and substantiated complaint surveys and survey revisits. CMS assigns more points to facilities with deficiencies of greater scope or severity (i.e., facilities with less serious deficiencies or isolated incidents will receive fewer points) and recent surveys are weighted more heavily (i.e., most recent survey accounts for half of the points, the previous survey accounts for one-third of the points and the next most recent survey accounts for one-sixth of the points for the survey rating category). CMS takes each facility s overall point score (between 0 and 136) and ranks it by state not nationally a step that the agency hopes will help to balance out known discrepancies among survey regions. The top 10% of each state s facilities receive a 5 Star rating for Survey and the bottom 20% receive 1 Star ratings, while the remaining facilities within a state are assigned 2, 3 or 4 Stars for the survey component of 5 Star based on an even distribution of this middle 70% of facilities within a state.

2. QM Rating: CMS calculates the QM component of 5 Star by assigning points based on 10 of the 19 QMs that are currently posted to Nursing Home Compare including 7 long-stay and 3 short-stay measures (details for each of the 19 QMs remains posted to Nursing Home Compare). CMS averages the three most recent quarters worth of QM data. Performance related to the QMs for both ADL Decline and Mobility Decline accounts for 40% of a facility s QM rating on the long-stay measures (i.e., these 2 QMs are weighted 1.6667 times as high as other QMs). CMS compares these point totals according to a national average. The top 10% of facilities receive a 5 Star rating for QMs and the bottom 20% receive 1 Star ratings, while the remaining facilities are assigned 2, 3 or 4 Stars for the QM component of 5-Star based on an even distribution of this middle 70% of facilities nationwide. A QM rating of 5 Stars can bump up a facility s overall score by 1 Star, whereas a 1 Star rating in the QM category will downgrade the overall rating by subtracting 1 Star. 3. Staff Rating: CMS calculates the Staffing component of 5 Star by calculating the average number of hours and minutes of nursing care per resident per day (including registered nurses (RN), licensed practical nurses (LPN), and certified nurse aides (CNAs) and those under contract to a facility). This average will be case-mix adjusted to account for variations in residents Resource Utilization Group (RUG) categories within a facility. Then, CMS will assign Staff ratings for both total staffing and RN staffing. Facilities cannot receive a 5 Star rating for the Staffing component unless it meets the threshold of 4.08 per resident day total staffing to include a minimum of.55 RN hours. Overall Staffing rates of 4 or 5 stars can bump up a facility s overall score by 1 Star, whereas a 1 Star rating in the Staffing category will downgrade the overall rating by subtracting 1 Star. Because 5 Star uses state-based comparisons for the survey component, consumers will not be able to use this system to compare facilities across states. On December 18, USA Today will feature an exclusive day of story unveiling the new rating system. We anticipate that this high profile coverage and a CMS media call on Thursday will generate significant media coverage. In anticipation of questions and inquiries that ANHA members will receive from members of the media and consumer groups, we have developed the following suggested talking points. Should you require additional assistance in responding to the media, please contact John Matson at the Association office (334) 271-6214 or jmatson@anha.org. We understand that the American Health Care Association (AHCA) will be issuing a media statement on December 18 specifically addressing the program, and we will provide that statement to you.

Suggested Talking Points Our first commitment always is to provide quality care to residents in a safe and secure environment. Delivering the highest quality of care and customer satisfaction is a top priority for those of us in the long term care profession and the vast majority of nursing homes nationwide provide the type of high quality, compassionate care that patients, residents and their families want and deserve. The facts speak for themselves quality is improving in our nation s nursing facilities a reality not reflected in the 5 Star program. The long term care profession has helped to lead the nation's health care sector in terms of quality improvement, and we are committed to continuing our work with CMS to advance a transparent survey process that recognizes quality, and provides the resources for facility improvement, which will enhance efforts to further improve quality long term care. We support a rating system that accurately reflects the quality of care in our nation s nursing facilities; however, we do not believe that a system based on the current survey system will provide consumers with accurate, up-to-date information. CMS claims that the survey component of its 5-Star Quality Rating System represents the most important dimension in determining a facility s overall quality rating. We disagree. Today s survey system does not measure quality, but rather assesses compliance with federal or state regulations. We believe that customer satisfaction how a resident and family members judge the care being provided in a particular facility is a better indicator of the quality of care and quality of life residents enjoy. Quality improvement is a dynamic ongoing process and its quantification must reflect the many variants that go into the delivery of care. We believe that consumer and staff satisfaction are two important components of quality care. In June, My InnerView, Inc. released its national report on customer satisfaction with nursing facilities. The report is based on surveys of more than 146,300 residents and family members and nearly 162,000 employees; 83% of the respondents rated overall satisfaction with their nursing home as excellent or good and fully 82% of the respondents said they would recommend the facility to others as excellent or good. Long term care providers are providing quality of care and quality of life for residents, and that the profession is clearly being part of the solution. We are helping lead the charge, changing the culture, turning a corner on quality care.

AHCA is working closely in coalition with other long term care providers, quality improvement experts, medical professionals, and consumers on the Advancing Excellence in America s Nursing Homes campaign, which builds on our efforts with Quality First and seeks to coordinate and leverage the various quality improvement initiatives already underway in nursing homes nationwide (see www.nhqualitycampaign.org). Government data indicates that quality is improving in several areas. A few examples include:: Nationally, direct care staffing levels (which include all levels of nursing care: Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs)) have increased 10.6 percent between 2000 and 2008 from 3.12 hours per patient day in 2000 to 3.45 hours in 2008; The Quality Measure tracking pain for long term stay residents vastly improved from a rate of 10.7 percent in 2002 to 4.1 percent in 2008 more than a 60 percent decrease; The Quality Measure tracking the use of physical restraints for long stay residents dropped by more than 50 percent over the past six years from 9.7 percent in 2002 to 4.5 percent in 2008. According to the latest information from CMS, Alabama has moved from 4.3% to 2.1% on this measure. Alabama leads our Region IV states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee) regarding the percentage of long-stay residents in restraints; The Quality Measure tracking pressure ulcers for post-acute skilled nursing facility patients (many of whom are admitted to the nursing facility with a pre-existing pressure ulcer) improved by nearly 22 percent over the course of five years, from 20.4 percent in 2003 to 16 percent in 2008. According to the latest information from CMS, Alabama has moved from 7.4% to 6.6% on this measure. Alabama leads our Region IV states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee) regarding the percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers; and Substandard Quality of Care Citations as tracked by CMS surveys were reduced by 35.5 percent over seven years from 4.5 percent in 2000 to 2.9 percent in 2007. We know that getting the appropriate care in the appropriate setting is critical. That s why we offer consumer-friendly information to help find a facility that will

meet their specific needs like How to Choose a Nursing Home, which is available at www.longtermcareliving.com. Key Dates Related to 5 Star Last week, CMS hosted a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Open Door Forum to address some of the issues with this new program (see details below); other key dates related to the launch of 5-Star are listed below. December 15 18 Available December 15 ENCORE Audio Recording of SNF Open Door Forum DIAL: 800.642.1687 REFERENCE: Conference ID # 58378933. Individual Facilities Notified of Star Ratings CMS will notify each facility of its individual 5 Star rating via notification sent to the facility s QIES or MDS mailbox. CMS notes that this notification could take up to 3 days; so, a facility may learn its star rating as early as December 15, but no later than December 17, 2008. Along with the facility s individual rating of 1 to 5 stars, CMS is providing a 3-page summary of this new rating system that is based on how a facility scores in terms of surveys, Quality Measures (QMs), and staffing. December 16 CMS 5-Star Helpline Opens, 800.839.9290 CMS is opening a helpline that providers may call with technical questions about the 5 Star Quality Rating System. CMS has emphasized that this helpline is intended for questions about the system, not for appeals regarding a facility s particular star rating. December 18 5 Star Quality Rating System Goes Live on CMS Nursing Home Compare including a Technical User s Guide) USA Today To Run Day of Article on 5 Star CMS Acting Administrator Kerry Weems also will host media conference call announcing the new program.