The identification and realisation of benefits is crucial to the success of the 3Ts Programme.

Similar documents
We plan. We achieve.

Improving Healthcare Together : NHS Surrey Downs, Sutton and Merton clinical commissioning groups Issues Paper

Major Service Change. A report on NHS Lanarkshire s consultation on proposals for the development of a new healthcare strategy, Achieving Excellence

CT Scanner Replacement Nevill Hall Hospital Abergavenny. Business Justification

17. Dementia: John s Campaign

3Ts Hospital Redevelopment Programme Full Business Case. Strategic Case: Demand & Capacity

NHSLA Risk Management Standards

NICE Charter Who we are and what we do

MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY

8.1 NHS DORSET CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY MEETING CLINICAL SERVICES REVIEW CONSULTATION OPTIONS. Date of the meeting 18/05/2016

Guidance notes to accompany VTE risk assessment data collection

Full Business Case. County Hospital Outpatients (Executive Summary) May Contents

MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY IN PUBLIC 7 January 2014

National Cancer Patient Experience Survey National Results Summary

National Cancer Patient Experience Survey National Results Summary

Surrey Downs Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Part 1 Paper Acute Sustainability at Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

Whittington Health Quality Strategy

Implementing NHS Services Seven Days a Week

HERTFORDSHIRE COMMUNITY NHS TRUST INTERMEDIATE CARE SERVICE UPDATE WINDMILL HOUSE MAY 2011

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE August Provided to the Care Quality Commission to comply with The Health & Social Care Act (2008)

PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS FOR THE COMMISSIONING OF HEALTH, WELLBEING AND SOCIAL CARE SERVICES

SCOTTISH BORDERS HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE INTEGRATED JOINT BOARD UPDATE ON THE DRAFT COMMISSIONING & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

NHS. Challenges and improvements in diagnostic services across seven days. Improving Quality

Guidance on the Statement of Purpose for designated centres for Older People

THE VIRTUAL WARD MANAGING THE CARE OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC (LONG-TERM) CONDITIONS IN THE COMMUNITY

AUTHOR : HELEN BYARD - Lead Cancer Nurse Manager/Head of Nursing Diagnostic and Support Business Unit

Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPI/E) Strategy

NHS North West London

Yvonne Blucher, Managing Director Southend University Hospital. Michael Catling, Cancer Programme Director MSB

DELIVERING THE LONDON QUALITY STANDARDS AND 7 DAY SERVICES

CA1 Enhanced Supportive Care for Advanced Cancer Patients

Better Healthcare in Bucks Reconfiguring acute services

Register No: Status: Public on ratification

Annual Complaints Report 2014/15

Guidance on the Statement of Purpose for designated centres for Children and Adults with Disabilities

We plan. We achieve. Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust has a lot to tell you... l Our achievements of 2009/10 l Our plans for 2010/11

Vanguard Programme: Acute Care Collaboration Value Proposition

CLINICAL AND CARE GOVERNANCE STRATEGY

Royal College of Nursing Clinical Leadership Programme. Advancing Excellence in Clinical Leadership. Clinical Leader

Proposed modernisation of mental health inpatient services in South West London: for decision

A concern means any complaint, claim or reported patient safety incident.

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 29 November 2017 Agenda Item 5.4

Sussex Transforming Care Partnership Programme Recovery Plan: October 17 th 2017

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Operational Plan

RTT Assurance Paper. 1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Waiting List Management for Elective Care. a. Planning

Sussex and East Surrey STP narrative

National care of the dying audit for hospitals, England Executive summary May 2014

Transforming Mental Health Services Formal Consultation Process

Patient Experience Strategy

The non-executive director s guide to NHS data Part one: Hospital activity, data sets and performance

WAITING TIMES AND ACCESS TARGETS

This paper explains the way in which part of the system is changing to become clearer and more accessible, beginning with NHS 111.

Eastbourne, Hailsham and Seaford CCG Item Number: Formal Governing Body meeting Date of meeting: 13 November /13

Admiral Nurse Standards

abcdefghijklmnopqrstu

National Schedule of Reference Costs data: Community Care Services

REVIEW AND UPDATE OF THE COMMITTEE WORK PROGRAMME

Quality Assurance Framework Adults Services. Framework. Version: 1.2 Effective from: August 2016 Review date: June 2017

Health Board Report SOCIAL SERVICES AND WELL-BEING ACT (WALES) 2014: REVISED REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Relocating in-patient mental health services based at the York Clinic, Guy s Hospital Consultation document September 2009

National Cancer Action Team. National Cancer Peer Review Programme EVIDENCE GUIDE FOR: Colorectal MDT. Version 1

Evidence on the quality of medical note keeping: Guidance for use at appraisal and revalidation

Care of Critically Ill & Critically Injured Children in the West Midlands

2.1.6 In April 2011, the Trust assumed host status for the Kent, Surrey and Sussex Deanery from NHS South East Coast.

SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST

Nursing Strategy Nursing Stratergy PAGE 1

ORGANISATIONAL AUDIT

Mental Health Social Work: Community Support. Summary

Better Healthcare in Barnet, Enfield and Haringey

Detailed TB study session on 12 th September included full debate of FBC.

Pain Management HRGs

Quality Assurance Committee Annual Report April 2017 March 2018

Patient Experience & Patient Information. Amy Sherman, Macmillan Project Manager, LCA

CENTRAL MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Cheryl Lenney, Chief Nurse

PATIENT EXPERIENCE AND INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes

Please indicate: For Decision For Information For Discussion X Executive Summary Summary

Clinical Skills and Simulation Strategy

MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY

REFERRAL TO SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH Report by Devon County Council Health and Wellbeing Scrutiny Committee Torrington Community Hospital

Contract Award Recommendation for NCL Direct Access Diagnostics Service Tim Deeprose/Leo Minnion

Cardigan Integrated Care Centre Full Business Case. March 2016

SOMERSET PARTNERSHIP NHS FOUNDATION TRUST QUALITY ACCOUNT PRIORITIES 2016/17. Report to the Trust Board 22 March 2016

Moving to 7 Day Services. Kerry Gant, Head of Finance Change Team/Debbie Freake, Executive Director of Strategy

MAKING THE MOST OF NHS BUILDINGS AND LAND

Collaborative Commissioning in NHS Tayside

An introduction to the multi-disciplinary team for bowel and anal cancer

The PCT Guide to Applying the 10 High Impact Changes. A guide from NatPaCT

Acute Medical Unit (AMU)

James Blythe, Director of Commissioning and Strategy. Agenda item: 09 Attachment: 04

Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Corporate Strategy

Shaping a healthier future Decision making business case

Delivering the Five Year Forward View Personalised Health and Care 2020

JOB DESCRIPTION DIRECTOR OF SCREENING. Author: Dr Quentin Sandifer, Executive Director of Public Health Services and Medical Director

Making the PMO the beating heart of the NHS Change Agenda:

Non-Executive Director (two roles)

SUBJECT: CLINICAL GOVERNANCE

Learning from Deaths Policy

More than my illness. Delivering quality care for children with cancer Executive Summary

Adults and Safeguarding Committee 19 March Implementing the Care Act 2014: Carers; Prevention; Information, Advice and Advocacy.

Transcription:

CHAPTER THIRTEEN - BENEFITS REALISATION 13.1 Introduction 13.1.1 The identification and realisation of benefits is crucial to the success of the 3Ts Programme. Who will reap the Benefits? 13.1.2 The table below sets out the key patient attendance numbers that will be directly affected by the development each year. All the patients in these categories will have access to modern, fit for purpose, state of the art facilities in which they will receive diagnosis and treatment services: 13.1.3 Figure 13.1 Key Patient Attendance Numbers Per Annum Patient Area Inpatients Day Cases Outpatients Total Barry/Jubilee Wards 8,749 7200 15,949 Neurosciences 2,609 1430 10,089 14,128 Trauma 374 374 Fracture Clinic 21,106 21,106 Cancer 1,068 11389 18,279 30,736 Rheumatology 7,468 Imaging 138,000 scans 138,000 ENT/Oral 32,909 32,909 13.1.4 In summary, the following patients will be directly affected by the 3Ts development: Over 13,000 inpatients; Around 13,000 day case patients; Almost 90,000 outpatients; 138,000 patients having diagnostic scans. 13.1.5 Many of these patients, and their carers, currently have to travel out of Sussex for their treatment and will now be in a position to have their treatment closer to where they live and work. 13.1.6 This is a substantial patient population and the impact will also be felt by visitor and carers. 13.1.7 In addition, the benefits of the programme will also be felt by the 1,000 staff who work in the services affected. Version 17 Chapter 13 Page 1 of 6 Date: January 2012

13.2 Trust Approach to Benefits Realisation 13.2.1 The Trust has already identified a series of high-level investment objectives for the programme, which are: Reprovision of the outdated pre-nightingale wards in the Barry and Jubilee Buildings into modern, fit for purpose accommodation that enhance patient privacy, dignity and safety; Transfer of the Regional Neurosciences Centre from Hurstwood Park onto the Royal Sussex County Hospital site and to provide additional capacity to accommodate Sussex patients who are currently treated outside the county; Expansion of the Sussex Cancer Centre to improve access for patients across Sussex, many of whom have to travel into London centres for radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatments; Development of a Major Trauma Centre to serve Sussex and the wider region; Enhancement of teaching and research facilities in partnership with Brighton & Sussex Medical School. Process of Defining Benefits 13.2.2 The Trust has used a series of workshops with patients, representatives of patient groups, clinical and non-clinical staff to identify key benefits that the programme should provide. This has been done through the medium of a series of workshops as shown below: 8 September 2008: workshop with patients and representatives of patient groups; 23 September 2008: workshop with clinical and non-clinical staff; 8-9 December 2008: series of workshops with patients, representatives of patient groups, clinical and non-clinical staff. 13.2.3 These workshops have generated hundreds of elements that the groups would like to see as part of the overall development. Many are not strictly benefits but are more easily categorised as detailed design points. The Trust team is currently continuing to sift through this and identify: What are genuine benefits that should be carried forward to the detailed benefits realisation plan which will form part of the Full Business Case (FBC); What are design points and can be delivered within the scheme; Version 17 Chapter 13 Page 2 of 6 Date: January 2012

What are design points and cannot be delivered within the scheme. Some of these may be immediate operational priorities which can be delivered irrespective of the project s delivery, and others may just not be deliverable. 13.2.4 The Trust team has made a firm commitment to ensure that these three categories be fed back to the participants of the workshops to ensure that everyone has a clear understanding of what can and cannot be delivered and why. 13.2.5 Since 2008 several subsequent events took places which have further developed the approach to benefits realisation: A steering group was established with representation from BSMS as well as BSUH and HaCIRIC. This steering group agreed a simplified approach to the measurement of the benefits, This was presented at a workshop with the full design team in July 2009. 13.2.6 Members of 3Ts Core Team undertook further work in this during December 2009, where it was then agreed to align the benefits with the 5 strategic objectives. The table below demonstrates this approach: Version 17 Chapter 13 Page 3 of 6 Date: January 2012

Benefits categorisation 2008 HaCIRIC workshop 1.Strategic fit 2. Use of resources 3. Operational management 4.Clinical outcomes 5. Access to services 6. Appropriate facilities (and Facilities Management) 7. Teaching, training and research 8. Development and implementation 2009 3Ts July workshop 2010 January alignment with OBC objectives (as agreed at Core Team on 8 th January) 1. Strategic benefits 1.Introduction of integrated stroke and neurosciences centre 2. Clinical benefits 2. Introduction of Level 1 trauma service 3. Estates benefits 4.Improved ward environment 4. Consumer benefits (way finding, DDA access) 3.Development of non surgical cancer services through the expansion of the Sussex Cancer Centre 5. Environmental benefits (sustainability, energy efficient) 6. Staff benefits 7. Educational 5.Teaching, training and research opportunities Removed as not measurable as a benefit Version 17 Chapter 13 Page 4 of 6 Date: January 2012

Academic Engagement and Best Practice 13.2.7 As stated the Trust team has also engaged with researchers at HaCIRIC (the Health and Care Infrastructure Research and Innovation Centre) in the area of benefits realisation. HaCIRIC is an innovative joint venture between the Imperial College, London and the Universities of Salford, Loughborough and Reading. One of the key research projects that HaCIRIC is undertaking is in the field of benefits realisation and how benefits are captured, planned and delivered. 13.2.8 There are benefits for the Trust and the HaCIRIC team in this collaboration. For the Trust, the tools and techniques which are being developed by HaCIRIC can be used in the benefits identification and realisation process. For HaCIRIC, there is the opportunity to engage with a live project at a relatively early stage of development. 13.2.9 The HaCIRIC team facilitated and recorded the workshops undertaken on 8-9 December 2008 and have captured these and earlier discussions into a spreadsheet which can now be used to monitor the development of the benefits and design issues which have been identified. 13.2.10 The Trust team s objective was to use the benefits generated by these workshops to inform directly the process of moving from a long list of options to deliver the investment objectives down to a shortlist and then down to the preferred option. Obviously, with so many potential benefits identified, it would have been an unmanageable task to use the list of benefits/design issues in their entirety. 13.2.11 The Trust team worked with HaCIRIC to distil the essence of the hundreds of benefits and design issues down to a manageable number to use in the shortlisting and preferred option workshops, whilst reflecting the essence of the totality. 13.2.12 In July 2011, DH economists participated in a joint workshop with 3Ts staff in order to work through the process of monetising benefits; using evidence from epidemiological studies (including the use of QALYS) and DH publications. This became the basis for the robust calculations which have underpinned the benefits realisation plan which is included at Appendix 13A. This is considered an example of best practice nationally. 13.2.13 As part of the engagement with HaCIRIC, the Trust is part of the Benefits Realisation Advisory Group, which is made up of HaCIRIC researchers, Department of Health representatives, the National Audit Office and other NHS bodies to ensure that there is oversight and scrutiny of the work being undertaken. 13.3 Benefits Realisation Planning 13.3.1 The benefits, how they can be realised, who will be responsible for delivering the benefit and what success might look like in delivery are set out below. Version 17 Chapter 13 Page 5 of 6 Date: January 2012

13.3.2 This is still an outline plan, but will be refined with a more precise series of Key Performance Indicators and identifiable baseline data for the Full Business Case. 13.3.3 The benefits associated with the implementation of the potential scope in relation to business needs are detailed in the benefits realisation plan at Appendix 13A. 13.3.4 Work has take place to form a verifiable baseline of information against which the success of benefits realisation will be measured. Patient surveys have been undertaken and analysed which will form part of this baseline. These have been presented to Programme Board. Benefits Realisation Conclusions The Trust has put in place a robust process for the identification, definition and future management of benefits; A Benefits Realisation Group has been established to provide further rigour to this process during the move from OBC to FBC and into implementation; The Trust has engaged with an academic body HaCIRIC to ensure additional rigour in the process. BSUH is at the forefront of developing approach to benefits realisation at a national level. Version 17 Chapter 13 Page 6 of 6 Date: January 2012