Statewide Bicycle System Plan Public Participation Plan Updated October 7, 2013 Page 1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

Similar documents
ODOT s Planning Program Public Involvement Process

Overview of Planning & Programming in Minnesota

State Non-motorized Transportation Committee Summary

2018 Regional Solicitation for Transportation Projects

Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Update. Council Committee of the Whole December 6, 2017

Project Selection Policy Update. Philip Schaffner June 20, 2018

Title VI: Public Participation Plan

Public Participation Process

The Public Participation Plan in Transportation Decision Making

Exhibit B. Plumas County Non-Motorized Transportation Plan SCOPE OF WORK

2014 Safe Routes to School Pilot Mini-Grants Solicitation. October 2014

Statewide Performance Program (SPP) Interstate and National Highway System (NHS) Pavement

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2015 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

FUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources

Director of Transportation Planning

Final Draft Region 16 Transportation Planning Work Program Current Update: May 15 th, 2014 Last Updated: May 23 rd, 2013

Public Participation Plan

Request for Proposals (RFP) City of Indianapolis/Marion County Pedestrian Plan

2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Technical Appendix L: Title VI/ Nondiscrimination Program

HIGH COUNTRY RURAL PLANNING ORGANIZATION (RPO) 2014 STIP PROJECT SOLICITATION AND RANKING PROCESS

APPENDIX H: PROGRAMMING POLICY STATEMENT

Year 3 Outcomes Tracker to Date

By Rmhermen at en.wikipedia (photo by rmhermen) [GFDL ( or CC-BY-SA-3.0

Public Involvement Plan

2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Technical Appendix L: Title VI/ Nondiscrimination Program

The Public Participation Plan for Transportation Planning

2016 Public Participation Plan. Florida-Alabama Transportation Planning Organization (TPO)

Planning Resources - Tribal. Kenneth Petty

Aquidneck Island Transportation Study Public Participation Work Plan. July 6, 2009

Regional Prioritization Priorities and Process

Regional Sustainable Infrastructure Planning Grant Program Cycle 1. FINAL Draft

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

Appendix B. Public Involvement

Community Engagement Plan

Northern Arizona Council of Governments Annual Work Program Amendment 1

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan

On Ramps to the Regional Trail System Three Rivers Park District TAP Funding Proposal

Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Advisory Group

30 urban and three rural fixed-route public transit systems, including six fixed guide way systems

In developing the program, as directed by the Board (Attachment A), staff used the following framework:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Transportation Alternatives Program 2016 Frequently Asked Questions

A Guide to Transportation Decision Making. In the Kansas City region

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Northeast Minnesota Workshop

A Minor Arterial System Evaluation Study Final Report

Michigan Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century

FLORIDA-ALABAMA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION 2017 PEDESTRIAN BICYCLE MASTER PLAN UPDATE Scope of Work

OF VIRGINIA S FY2018-FY2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Missoula Urban Transportation Planning Process Public Participation Plan Prepared by

BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

2016 Annual Report LOOKING AT THE FUTURE OF CAMBRIA COUNTY TOGETHER

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Summary of Study Outreach Efforts... 3 Figure No. Description Page

City of Edina, Minnesota GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner

WINSTON-SALEM URBAN AREA MPO EXPLAINED

I-15 Corridor System Master Plan San Diego, California to Utah/Idaho border

BOWLING GREEN - WARREN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Transportation Improvement Program. Mid-America Regional Council Transportation Department

Table to accompany Insight on the Issues 39: Policy Options to Improve Specialized Transportation

ATP-7 Operating Procedures/Policies

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS SCCOG REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Transit. State Management Plan

Transportation Planning in the Denver Region

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

Memorandum. Date: To: Prospective Project Sponsors From: Aprile Smith Senior Transportation Planner Through: Subject:

Memo. Office of State Aid Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN Date: April 24, METRO DISTRICT COUNTIES and CITIES

TITLE VI IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Mark A. Doctor, PE CAREER PATH

2012 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

Purpose. Funding. Eligible Projects

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

Transportation Improvement Program FY

Submission: House Bill2 Legislation and Implementation

Citizen Participation in the MPO Transportation Planning Process. Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization Pinellas County, Florida

Prospectus & Organizational Bylaws

2018 Regional Project Evaluation Criteria For PSRC s FHWA Funds

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN. Tri County Regional Planning Commission. Serving Clinton, Eaton and Ingham Counties, Michigan

Module 2 Planning and Programming

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Workshop. Fall 2015 Call for Projects (updated )

AGENDA Rural Transportation Advisory Committee Tuesday, September 20 th, :00 p.m. Water Street Center, 401 East Water Street, Charlottesville

Capital District September 26, 2017 Transportation Committee. The Community and Transportation Linkage Planning Program for

Open House Round 2. State Rail Plan. A Collaborative Vision for Transportation

Developing the Tribal Transportation Improvement Program

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type:Informational Report

OahuMPO Transportation Alternatives Program

Corridor Investment Management Strategy Rochester Meeting Summary 5/22/2012

Engaging Diverse Audiences in Planning for Transportation and Improving Air Quality

Instructions to Reviewers

Transportation Alternatives Program Application For projects in the Tulsa Urbanized Area

PORT OF GREEN BAY PORT OF GREEN BAY SYMPOSIUM

8/9/2012. SWLRT Community Advisory Committee. Today s Agenda. CAC Issue Topics: Survey Results

SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION

METRO Orange Line Extension Planning and Implementation

Notice. Quality Assurance Statement

Implementation. Implementation through Programs and Services. Capital Improvements within Cambria County

2018 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR PSRC S FEDERAL FUNDS

1. Welcome and Introductions: Chairman Mitch Suprenant opened the meeting at 11:10.

Florence Area Transportation Study Public Participation Plan

Transcription:

Page 1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

CONTACT LIST Minnesota Department of Transportation Greta Alquist Bicycle and Pedestrian Section greta.alquist@statemn.us 651-366-4164 Gina Mitteco Metro District Planning gina.mitteco@state.mn.us 651-234-7878 Kathleen Mayell Bicycle and Pedestrian Section kathleen.mayell@state.mn.us 651-366-4179 Tim Mitchell Bicycle and Pedestrian Section tim.mitchell@statemn.us 651-366-4162 Liz Walton Bicycle and Pedestrian Section liz.walton@statemn.us 651-366-4186 612-616-0469 Toole Design Group Ciara Schlichting cschlichting@tooledesign.com Stantec Inc. Hongyi Duan hongyi.duan@stantec.com 651-967-4546 John Slack john.slack@stantec.com 651-967-4554 Alta Planning Dana Dickman Community Design Group Antonio Rosell Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota Nick Mason nick@bikemn.org 612-986-6096 Page 2

PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Member Mike Barnes (co-chair) Tim Henkel (co-chair Philip Schaffner Lisa Bigham Todd Campbell Chris Bower Tim Mitchell Ben Timerson/Gene Hicks Brad Estochen Melissa Barnes Ryan Wilson Scott Bradley Lynne Bly Laura Preus/Kim Lockwood Paul Hanson Steve Elmer Dorian Grilley Matthew Dyrdahl Josh Pearson Ellen Pillsbury Rose Ryan Kristie Billiar Representing Operations and Maintenance Modal Planning MnDOT - Office of Statewide Multimodal Planning MnDOT Planning Director (D7) MnDOT - District Project Manager (D1) MnDOT - District Project Manager (D7/Metro) MnDOT - Bicycle and Pedestrian Section MnDOT - Transportation Data and Analysis MnDOT - Office of Traffic Safety and Technology MnDOT - Office of Traffic Safety and Technology MnDOT - Office of Capital Programs and Performance Measures MnDOT - Complete Streets and Context Sensitive Solutions MnDOT Metro District Multimodal Planning DNR - Parks and Trails (Central Office) DNR - Parks and Trails (Southern Regional Office) Metropolitan Council Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota Minnesota Department of Health Regional Development Commission Region Nine Regional Development Commission - Arrowhead Hennepin County MnDOT - ADA Page 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTACT LIST p.2 PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPRESENTATION p.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS p.4 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND p.5 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES p.7 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS p.8 STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC OUTREACH p.9 OUTREACH TECHIQUES p.10 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SCHEDULE p.11 EVALUATION OF EFFORTS p.12 Appendices p.13 Page 4

PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND In 2012, the Minnesota Department of Transportation launched the Minnesota GO visioning process to better align the transportation system with what Minnesotans expect for their quality of life, economy and natural environment. The Minnesota GO vision extends to an entire family of plans that provide direction for different transportation modes including highways, transit, rail, bicycles, pedestrians, freight, and aviation. The Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan serves as the framework plan for MnDOT s family of plans, known as the modal plans. The Statewide Bicycle System Plan (SBSP) is a modal plan that falls within MnDOT s family of plans. In 2012, the Minnesota Department of Transportation conducted the Statewide Bicycle Planning Study (Study) in order to set direction for the Statewide Bicycle System Plan. The Study identified both existing and potential MnDOT practices that support the integration of bicycling into the transportation system in the future. The Study accomplished the following: Facilitated the development of a new State Bicycle Map which provides a statewide framework of bicycle accommodations in Minnesota to make it easier for people to plan longer distance bicycle trips in the state. The map was released in August 2013. Established a new process for continuous updating of the map. Recommended improvements to MnDOT s policies and practices in planning and project development in an effort to create a more proactive and uniform process for considering bicycle accommodations on MnDOT projects. Laid the analytical framework for the subsequent Statewide Bicycle System Plan. The results of the Study directly informed the scope of the Statewide Bicycle System Plan. The Statewide Bicycle System Plan will: Develop district bicycle system plans Identify a statewide priority bicycle network Provide overarching policy guidance and implementation tools to MnDOT districts Provide district staff with guidance for prioritizing investments on the state highway system to integrate bicycling Develop district wide and statewide bicycle maps of existing conditions as well as maps of network gaps and barriers Include educational workshops for district staff and local partners The purpose of this Public Participation Plan is to provide a framework for how public involvement activities will be conducted throughout the development of the Statewide Bicycle System Plan, including defining outreach goals, identifying key stakeholders and their roles and responsibilities, sharing available communication methods, and setting a schedule for Page 5

outreach activities. The Public Participation Plan is a dynamic document which may be updated periodically throughout the project, based on input from the public and results from other meetings. Page 6

GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES The overall goals and objectives of the public participation process are to: Create opportunities for public involvement, focusing on the specific stakeholder groups including residents, affected public agencies, non-metropolitan local officials, tribal agencies, and those traditionally underserved by existing transportation systems. Use the Outreach Techniques (below) to guide the development of MnDOT s Statewide Bicycle System Plan. Describe how and when outreach and input opportunities will occur. Detail communications strategies for informing stakeholders of opportunities for outreach. Integrate and coordinate public involvement with tasks and timelines. Facilitate compliance with Federal, State, and MnDOT requirements. The intended outcome is that the public has actively participated in the project process and assisted MnDOT in creating a plan that is truly reflective of the diverse and varied opinions of stakeholders throughout the state. Page 7

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS PROJECT TEAM The Statewide Bicycle System Plan project team consists of a Statewide Team and eight District Teams. Statewide Team The project is managed by staff from MnDOT Central Office in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Section. MnDOT staff is assisted by a team of consultants for technical work, outreach, and national experience. Districts Teams Each district planning director works with the staff from Central Office in order to guide the development of the district plans. The districts will assist with ensuring appropriate stakeholders are included and that the work conducted by the Project Team is appropriate for the district staff, the primary implementers of the Plan. PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PAC) The PAC guides the development of the Statewide Bicycle System Plan. This group is policy-focused and provides a statewide perspective. The PAC members will meet every few months and are expected to communicate with the group they represent and to assist in facilitating outreach to the group s stakeholders or partners. PAC member are also expected to provide technical support by reviewing drafts of various plan components throughout the project. Policy decision, plan elements, and results of public outreach will be influenced by the PAC. Members of the PAC represent functional and modal groups within MnDOT, as well as representatives of MnDOT Districts, other State agencies, other bicycle planning professionals, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and Regional Development Commissions (RDCs) who collaborate with MnDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on planning for transportation systems. PAC membership is listed on page 3 of this document. PLANNING MANAGEMENT GROUP (PMG) The PMG is comprised of senior MnDOT staff from the Modal Planning & Program Management and Operations Divisions, and planning directors from each MnDOT district. The primary purpose of PMG in the context of this plan is to review the SBSP work at key milestones throughout the planning process. Milestones include project initiation, completion of public outreach, completion of a draft for public review, and completion of the final draft document. PMG will also recommend advancement of the draft SBSP for public review to agency leadership for release for public comment and the final draft SBSP to agency leadership for final approval. Page 8

STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC OUTREACH MnDOT has a commitment to public and stakeholder participation. A stakeholder is generally defined as a person, group, or organization with a specific interest in a particular transportation mode or element of the plan (i.e. financial, economic, etc.). This outreach plan must communicate to a number of key stakeholders and audiences. Key audiences that will be involved in this process include both internal and external stakeholders. The organizations and groups listed in Tables 1 and 2 represent specific stakeholders that have initially been identified for the project. Additional stakeholders may be identified as the project evolves, and as needs for specific input are recognized. Internal Stakeholders Stakeholders internal to MnDOT are identified in Table 1. Table 1. MnDOT Internal Stakeholders Decision Makers Commissioner of Transportation Division Directors Senior Leadership Team Active SBSP Participants/Implementers District Engineers, Planners and Project Managers PMG and other Managers Groups (PCMG, CMG, etc.) Members of key expert groups, including District Planners PAC External Stakeholders External stakeholders include implementation partners, interest groups, and the general public. Some of these groups are specified in Table 2. Table 2. External Stakeholders Implementation Partners Minnesota Counties Minnesota Cities Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) Regional Development Commissions (RDCs) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Native American Tribes Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota General Public/Interest Groups MnDOT s Online Customer Community Residents Businesses Bicycle Coalitions Other interested parties (e.g. Community Health Boards, SHIP Active Living Coordinators, Green Step Cities, etc.) The PAC and PMG will continue to refine the list of stakeholders, and stakeholders will identify themselves through attending public outreach meetings, selecting to receive the project email updates, and following the plan development process through the media and social media. Page 9

OUTREACH TECHNIQUES The core public outreach techniques utilized for the Statewide Bicycle System Plan include the following: PUBLIC WORKSHOPS There will be interactive public workshops in each MnDOT district to engage stakeholders in identifying priorities for the bicycle system. DISTRICT STAFF TRAINING There will be educational workshops in each MnDOT district to train staff on 5 Es of Bicycling and aspects of SBSP implementation. PROJECT EMAIL LIST The project team will send emails to stakeholders on this list at key milestones during the project. When there are specific engagement opportunities, this list will also be notified. This list includes, but is not limited to USBRS coordinators, MPCA Green Steps program coordinator and others. RDC, MPO, AND PMG MEETINGS The project team will attend standing meetings of RDCs, MPOs, and the PMG in order to keep these groups informed of the project milestones and to solicit feedback. RDC, MPO AND DISTRICT EMAIL LISTS The project team will send emails to stakeholders on this list at key milestones during the project. When there are specific engagement opportunities, this list will also be notified and recipients will be asked to forward information to their stakeholders. PAC MEETINGS AND EMAILS The project team will meet with the PAC every few months throughout this project to update on project status and to receive guidance at key points throughout the project. ONLINE MAPPING There will be an online mapping tool so that people can share their priorities for origins, destinations, and routes. The project team will work with its stakeholder groups, the project email list and social media to share the link with stakeholders for input. SOCIAL MEDIA Minnesota GO and MnDOT Twitter and Facebook accounts will be used to announce engagement opportunities. WEBSITE Information about engagement opportunities and summaries of key milestones will be posted on the website: Page 10

http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bike/system-plan.html PUBLIC HEARING MnDOT will conduct a public hearing to formally present the plan prior to adoption. Page 11

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SCHEDULE June July 2013 June September 2013 July 2013 Project Team and District Meetings Project Team Meetings PAC Meeting (under development) Page 12

EVALUATION EFFORTS Specific techniques will be evaluated by staff periodically. Evaluation criteria includes: Number of attendees at public workshops/public hearing Comments from public workshops and electronically submitted comments Website hits Number of stakeholders on MnDOT project email list Participation rate in online map Positive/negative/neutral responses Challenges with participation Equity of engagement opportunities These measures will be summarized in meeting summaries, which will be drafted following each public meeting. Additional evaluation will occur periodically throughout the planning process, typically after major milestones. Page 13

APPENDICES (under development) Page 14