to Orthopedic Patient-Reported Outcome Collection Tools

Similar documents
AJRR Registry Platform. System Workflow Training January 2017

American Joint Replacement Registry 2015 Updates Webinar The Joint Commission July 8, 2015

Orthopedic Service Line Optimization. How to Use Big Data for Your Value-Based Purchasing Decisions

Collecting Patient Reported Outcomes: Lessons from the California Joint Replacement Registry

Shifting from Volume to Value: The Future is Now

Introduction 2/8/2016. Selection of Shoulder Outcomes Scores and Where From Here to the Future Richard J. Hawkins, M.D.

A15/B15: Implementing and Collecting Patient Reported Measures

AJRR s Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Guide

Improving Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Collection Rate at Penn Orthopaedics. Joseph Pecha with Finnah Pio Mentor: Patricia Sullivan, Ph.

Total Joint Partnership Program Identifies Areas to Improve Care and Decrease Costs Joseph Tomaro, PhD

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Readiness Kit

JOINT REPLACEMENT & OUTPATIENT BUNDLED PAYMENTS. Chris Bishop, CEO Regent Surgical Health

OUTPATIENT JOINT REPLACEMENT & BUNDLED PAYMENTS. Chris Bishop, CEO Regent Surgical Health

Summary and Analysis of CMS Proposed and Final Rules versus AAOS Comments: Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model (CJR)

Evaluating and Implementing New Service in an ASC

The Changing Face of the Employer-Provider Relationship

September 11, RE: CY 2018 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems Proposed Rule

VALUE BASED ORTHOPEDIC CARE

4/26/2016. The future is not what it used to be. Driving Transformation for Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Understand Redesign Align

Issue Brief. Device Costs, Total Costs, and Other Characteristics of Knee ReplacementSurgery in California Hospitals, 2008

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

Physician Executive Council. Using the Perioperative Surgical Home to Improve Joint Replacement

Improving Hospital Performance Through Clinical Integration

Inova Joint Replacement Center 2014 Annual Report

SEVEN SEVEN. Credentialing tips designed to help keep costs down and ensure a healthier bottom line.

Why Focus on Perioperative Services?

The Cost of Unnecessary Hospital Days for Medicare Joint Replacement Patients Discharging to Skilled Nursing Facilities

Spine and joint solution: promoting quality outcomes and efficiency for all stakeholders

What s Wrong with Healthcare?

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

OUTPATIENT TOTAL JOINT

Payer s Perspective on Clinical Pathways and Value-based Care

Transforming Payment and Care Models for Total Joint Replacement. Stephen J. Zabinski, MD

COMPREHENSIVE CARE JOINT REPLACEMENT MODEL CONTRACTING TOOLKIT

Considerations for an Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty Program

Bundled Episode Payment & Gainsharing Demonstration

April 26, Ms. Seema Verma, MPH Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Dear Secretary Price and Administrator Verma:

October 3, Dear Dr. Conway:

The National ACO, Bundled Payment and MACRA Summit. Success in Physician Led Bundles

Care Redesign: An Essential Feature of Bundled Payment

MIPS, MACRA, & CJR: Medicare Payment Transformation. Presenter: Thomas Barber, M.D. May 31, 2016

Practice Management Strategies Among Members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons

Clinical Program Cost Leadership Improvement

10/20/2016. Working within the Value-Based World

Optum Anesthesia. Completely integrated anesthesia information management system

Agenda IVBAR IVBAR. Value based reimbursement in Sweden

How an Orthopedic Hospitalist Program Can Provide Value to Your Hospital

PBGH Response to CMMI Request for Information on Advanced Primary Care Model Concepts

Perioperative Surgical Home


Redesigning Post-Acute Care: Value Based Payment Models

Better Medical Device Data Yield Improved Care The benefits of a national evaluation system

ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT MODEL CONTRACTING GUIDE

Leveraging Shared Decision Making to Manage Population Health Partners HealthCare s Lessons Learned Gloria Stone Plottel, MS, MBA, Founder and CEO,

Quality, Cost and Business Intelligence in Healthcare

The American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report It starts with you And ends with benefits for your patients

Clinical Integration The Changing Environment of Healthcare Delivery. Mark Ghilarducci, M.D. Ventura Orthopedic Medical Group Ventura, Ca

Introduction. Staffing to demand increases bottom line revenue for the facility through increased volume and throughput and elimination of waste.

ramping up for bundled payments fostering hospital-physician alignment

Clinical Operations. Kelvin A. Baggett, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A. SVP, Clinical Operations & Chief Medical Officer December 10, 2012

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR): Understanding the CMS Mandatory TJR Bundling Webinar

Reducing Readmissions: Potential Measurements

Toward the Electronic Patient Record:

National ACO Summit. Third Annual. June 6 8, Follow us on Twitter and use #ACOsummit.

POPULATION HEALTH PLAYBOOK. Mark Wendling, MD Executive Director LVPHO/Valley Preferred 1

Success Strategies for Managing Risk-Based Contracts

Quality Provisions in the EPM Final Rule. Matt Baker Scott Wetzel

Issue Brief. Volumes, Costs, and Reimbursement for Cervical Fusion Surgery in California Hospitals, 2008

HealthPartners and the Triple Aim. IHI Open School August 23, 2012 Beth Waterman, RN MBA Chief Improvement Officer HealthPartners

Webinar: Practical Approaches to Improving Patient Pre-Op Preparation

BUILDING THE PATIENT-CENTERED HOSPITAL HOME

Sharpen coding skills and reimbursement strategies during ICD-10 delay The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) once again has extended the

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

How to Optimize ASC Efficiency Through Design

510(k) Clinical Data Requirements: Current Status and Considerations for Clinical Studies

ACHIEVING PHYSICIAN INTEGRATION WITH THE CO-MANAGEMENT MODEL

ORTHOPEDIC CERTIFICATION. Pathways to excellence in patient care

Measuring Outcomes in Orthopedic Care J.C. Clark, M.D. ORA Orthopedics

Ensuring Your Surgical Service Line is Successful in an ACO Value-Based Purchasing and Bundled Payment Environment

What is Orthopedic Certification?

Patient Selection, Optimization and Disposition: Tools for Success in Orthopedic Bundles

Healthcare Solutions Nuance Clintegrity Quality Management Solutions. Quality. The Discipline to Win.

The Cleveland Clinic s Journey from Volume to Value in the Era of Healthcare Reform

BUNDLED PAYMENT PROGRAM

Core Item: Clinical Outcomes/Value

Registry General FAQs

Euclid Hospital CMS BPCI Episode

Proliance Surgeons 6/1/2011. Navigating an Orthopedic Practice and its ASCs through a Changing Healthcare Environment

04/03/2015. Quality Matters: How to Succeed with PQRS in A Short History of PQRS. Participate Or Else..

Hip Replacement Modern Total Hip Replacement in an Ambulatory Surgery Center. A Brief History of Total Hip Replacement

Learning from best Practice. Musculoskeletal conditions as a health priority. The role of clinical networks

Bundled Payments KEY CAPABILITIES. for working with the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model

TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT BASKET OF CARE SUBCOMMITTEE Report to: Minnesota Department of Health. June 22, 2009

New Models in Payment: Joint Replacements. Sharon Eloranta, MD February 18, 2016

Best Practices Contracting for Health IT Supporting Pay-for-Performance (P4P) Early Findings

The Pain or the Gain?

ESSENTIAL STRATEGIES IN MEDI-CAL PAYMENT REFORM. Richard Popper, Director, Medicaid & Duals Strategy August 3, 2017

Quality Payment Program: The future of reimbursement

Post-Acute Care. December 6, 2017 Webinar Louise Bryde and Doug Johnson

Value model in the new healthcare paradigm: Producing value at a single specialty center.

Transcription:

to Orthopedic Patient-Reported Outcome Collection Tools A BUYER S GUIDE TO PATIENT-REPORTED Part of the OUTCOME Value-Driven COLLECTION Service TOOLS Line Series of E-Books

1 Introduction 2 The importance of collecting functional outcomes 3 Deciding what to measure 6 Meeting your data needs 7 Reporting capabilities 8 The right solution OrthoServiceLine would like to thank the following expert contributors: Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA, Chair of the Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, and Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, at the Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin Nina Whalen, RN, APN-C, manager of clinical outcomes at OrthoIndy Hospital Patricia D. Franklin, MD, MBA, MPH, Professor and Executive Director of Outcomes Research, Musculoskeletal Service at the University of Massachusetts Medical School

As a result of healthcare reform in the U.S., medical professionals face increasing pressure to track both quality and value in patient care. From physician reporting requirements to bundled payment plans, providers often find that there is money on the line when it comes to proving the value of care that they provide. Without the right tools, orthopedic programs may experience decreased reimbursement. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are an important resource that can help meet these requirements. PROs measure the function and pain that a patient experiences before and after surgery. Because the timing of orthopedic procedures are typically self-elected by patients to improve their quality of life, these metrics are especially important in determining whether surgery has successfully eliminated pain and restored range of motion. It may be difficult to discern which PRO measurement tools will serve your orthopedic program best. This guide is designed to help you understand why PROs support a healthy program, and identify what you will measure. A BUYER S GUIDE TO PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME COLLECTION TOOLS 1

The importance of collecting functional outcomes Collecting functional outcomes from your patients can provide a number of benefits to your orthopedic program. Clinical decision making: PROs quantify pain and functional limitations to support determining patient need and timing for joint replacement surgery. Reporting compliance: Providers must meet an increasing number of reporting requirements when providing care, including the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model (CJR), Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and others. When you collect functional outcomes, you have the evidence that you need to show for these programs. Without that data, you may have trouble receiving reimbursement for procedures. Data validity: In order to conduct research for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, or to conduct clinical trials, data must be collected systematically. PRO tools can ensure that the collected data is complete, accurate and relevant. Orthopaedic surgeons should measure PROs to facilitate appropriate clinical decision making based on patients own report of their pain, functional status, quality of life, preferences, and values. Dr. Kevin Bozic A BUYER S GUIDE TO PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME COLLECTION TOOLS 2

Quality improvement: Collecting PROs allows your healthcare facility to use the data to continuously improve quality over time. This is an important signal to payers and patients that a provider is committed to high-value care. Patient safety: When complications occur or an implant is recalled, health systems must to be able to track these issues. PRO tools will help give you additional information surrounding each occurrence. With the right system in place, patients with recalled implants can be identified within hours. Deciding what to measure When preparing to collect PROs, you need to make several important decisions to build your own outcomes collection workflow. First, it is critical to decide which questions are most appropriate for your patients. Surveys have varying lengths and complex scoring mechanisms, which could unnecessarily complicate the system for your patients. Choose the measurements that will A BUYER S GUIDE TO PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME COLLECTION TOOLS 3

For hip and knee conditions, health systems may consider clinical and functional outcome measures: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) Oxford Knee Score Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) For quality of life measures, choices such as the VR-12, SF-36, EQ- 5D or Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) may be wellsuited for your specific needs. provide the functional data that you need in a manner appropriate for your patients. Choose measures that are non-proprietary and consider the respondent burden. Computer Adapted Testing (CAT) version of the surveys allow similar validity as full length surveys with fewer questions. (See sidebar) The timeframes for these measurements should be the next consideration. Though healthcare facilities differ, it is typical in orthopedics for a survey to be taken at pre-surgery, as well as 30, 60, 90, 180 and/or 365 days after the operation. While there is some flexibility, pre-surgery and a one-year post-op are must-haves for your records. Be sure that your PRO tools are flexible enough to deliver the measurements that you need within the time periods that you need them. Finally, these patient outcome metrics can be collected in a variety of ways, most of which have their own benefits and disadvantages. Office waiting room: When patients are waiting for an appointment, the down time is a good opportunity to have them report outcomes on paper or through a computer. However, this method can be somewhat labor-intensive for staff and requires an in-person visit from the patient. Exam room: In the exam room, providers can collect data in the presence of a patient. While this may be helpful for patients who struggle with technology use on their own, it requires extra work on the part of the provider, and is another case where the patient must physically come into the office to report the outcomes. A BUYER S GUIDE TO PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME COLLECTION TOOLS 4

Online: Collecting PRO metrics through an email delivered to the patient s home can be convenient for patients and providers alike. However, if the patient is not compliant, a staff member will have to follow up by phone or other means. Two of the most effective ways of ensuring patients complete surveys, however, happen at the beginning of their experience. First, patients are most likely to complete post-operative surveys when they have completed a pre-operative survey. This was reported by the California Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) in a 2015 article. Second, when a surgeon explains to patients why surveys matter, they are much more likely to complete those surveys. These factors can boost patient compliance significantly, making data from PROs statistically valid more quickly. Additionally, collecting patient-reported outcomes in context of a larger patient engagement initiative across the episode can raise completion rates. Be sure you have a comprehensive plan to engage and prepare the patient pre-surgery as well as follow up and mitigate risks post-surgery. A staged approach of in-office collection, direct to home and phone call reminders can increase completion rates. Registries are beginning to collect the PRO quality of life measures as a way to show the need for the surgical intervention since joint replacement procedures are mostly elective. Nina Whalen, RN, APN-C A BUYER S GUIDE TO PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME COLLECTION TOOLS 5

Meeting your data needs Before you invest in a PRO collection tool, it is important to evaluate the specific data needs of your healthcare facility. Many important questions center on the system s internal use and require an in-depth conversation with the seller. Considerations include: Who owns the completed data after it is submitted by the patient: you or the vendor? Are reports produced by you or the vendor? Do you have unlimited access to reports? Can you query to view real-time results? Is the PRO collection tool capable of tracking complete data, presenting PROs in the context of an individual surgeon, surgical approach, implant, etc.? This context greatly improves the utility of your data. A BUYER S GUIDE TO PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME COLLECTION TOOLS 6

Do you need a robust implant manufacturer database included for intraoperative data collection? Can you benchmark against national standards? Does the system meet HIPAA requirements, and does it need to interface with your EMR? There are upsides and downsides to involving EMR integration. While these are key questions for your vendor, consider your health system s capabilities as well. Is your practice or health system prepared to dedicate a staff member to managing this collection tool, in order to facilitate reporting on-site with surgeons? And, is there a surgeon who will champion the effort and lead a team to act on the quality improvement opportunities you will identify via outcome collection? Reporting capabilities Think about national data sets you want to participate in, such as the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) or the Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement and Quality Improvement (FORCE-TJR), and make sure that your reporting tool will be compatible for meeting those needs. Being able to report quality metrics to Medicare and other payers is also critically important. If the tool that you use to collect the PROs does not allow you to report the information correctly, you will have to put extra time and resources into the process to ensure that the data is delivered. The right PRO tool should make the process simpler - not more complicated. A BUYER S GUIDE TO PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME COLLECTION TOOLS 7

The right solution Through determining the measures, timeframe and method of collection, and evaluating your data needs, your orthopedic program can make an informed decision when it comes to the right solution for your PRO collection needs. Based on the unique requirements of your program, this outcomes data can help you to meet reporting requirements, gather data for research, improve performance and track complications, creating a better experience for your staff and patients alike. 3 things to do now 1. Find your physician champion who will lead this effort. 2. Choose which functional measures you will use, timeframes and collection methods. 3. Determine your data needs. A BUYER S GUIDE TO PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME COLLECTION TOOLS 8

orthoserviceline.com ortho@wellbe.me