Reliability Information Analysis Center

Similar documents
DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Report Documentation Page

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System

PEO Missiles and Space Overview Briefing for the 2010 Corrosion Summit February 2010 Huntsville, AL

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Defense Threat Reduction Agency s. Defense Threat Reduction Information Analysis Center

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

at the Missile Defense Agency

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

Wildland Fire Assistance

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

AMCOM Corrosion Program

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

COTS Impact to RM&S from an ISEA Perspective

Dynamic Training Environments of the Future

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

DODIG March 9, Defense Contract Management Agency's Investigation and Control of Nonconforming Materials

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

Navy Ford (CVN-78) Class Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications: Update on DOD s Modernization

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Impact of Corrosion on Ground Vehicles: Program Review, Issues and Solutions

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

711 HPW COUNTERPROLIFERATION BRANCH

Defense Acquisition: Use of Lead System Integrators (LSIs) Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Incomplete Contract Files for Southwest Asia Task Orders on the Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract

AFCPCO Corrosion Program. Carl Perazzola AFCPCO, Chief Air Force Research Laboratory

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Defense Surplus Equipment Disposal: Background Information

Unexploded Ordnance Safety on Ranges a Draft DoD Instruction

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

Navy CVN-21 Aircraft Carrier Program: Background and Issues for Congress

Inside the Beltway ITEA Journal 2008; 29: Copyright 2008 by the International Test and Evaluation Association

Report No. DODIG December 5, TRICARE Managed Care Support Contractor Program Integrity Units Met Contract Requirements

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

Preliminary Observations on DOD Estimates of Contract Termination Liability

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Systems Engineering Capstone Marketplace Pilot

United States Joint Forces Command Comprehensive Approach Community of Interest

Perspectives on the Analysis M&S Community

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

US Army TARDEC Ground Vehicle Mobility: Dynamics Modeling, Simulation, & Research

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Modeling and Simulation Information Analysis Center

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Department of Defense Corrosion Policy and Oversight FY 2013 OCO

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Report No. D February 9, Internal Controls Over the United States Marine Corps Military Equipment Baseline Valuation Effort

Ballistic Protection for Expeditionary Shelters

The Army s Mission Command Battle Lab

A system overview of the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-based Epidemics

Air Force Science & Technology Strategy ~~~ AJ~_...c:..\G.~~ Norton A. Schwartz General, USAF Chief of Staff. Secretary of the Air Force

Transcription:

Reliability Information Analysis Center Joe Hazeltine, PE Director joseph.hazeltine@wyle.com 256-716-4390 Approved for Public Release U.S. Government Work (17 USC 105) Not copyrighted in the U.S.

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE NOV 2008 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Reliability Information Analysis Center 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Wyle Laboratories 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM202819. Acquisition and Life Cycle Management Symposium: Rapid Access to Technical Information Supporting Defense Acquisition held in Huntsville, Alabama on 18-19 November 2008, The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT SAR a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 19 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

What is the Reliability Information Analysis Center (RIAC)? RIAC is one of 10 DoD Information Analysis Centers (IACs) managed by the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). RIAC s charter includes Reliability, Maintainability, Quality, Supportability, and Interoperability (RMQSI). 2

RIAC Quick Facts 3 Attribute Technologies Library User Base >20,000 Products Training Research Projects Underway Staff Impact Metric Reliability, Maintainability, Quality, Supportability, and Interoperability (RMQSI) 120,000 Documents (~30,000 are electronic) 85 (15 new ones since 2006, 10 under development) 25 Off-the-Shelf Courses Regular Quarterly Open-Presentation Courses 6 new reliability engineering tools under development ~60 Subscription Accounts in process ~140 Technical Area Tasks in process ~2000 Staff Members (SMEs) Available Data, Tools, and Guidelines Used on International Level

RIAC Resources Team Member Testing Library Laboratories Wyle Laboratories UMD Center of Risk and Reliability PSU Applied Research Lab SUNY Institute of Technology Many Locations in CONUS Many at UMD Including CALCE Prognostics and Mechanical SUNY 64 Campus Network Company Major University Major University SUNY 64 Campus Network Failure Analysis Failure Analysis Failure Analysis Computer Related Supporting Centers Total Ownership Cost, RCM/Aging Systems, Life Sciences CALCE, Risk, SW Rel, Structures imast, Reptech, Supply Chain, Mgmt Nanotechnology, Electronics Packaging, Sensors 4

Some Accomplishments Major Product Releases : 217Plus software tool Handbook of 217Plus Reliability Models 15 New textbooks 16 New journals 5

New RIAC Product Initiatives MS Excel -Based Products On-Line and DVD-Based Interactive Training 6

RIAC Product Stalwarts RIAC Databooks RIAC Toolkits NPRD-95: 13 Years Old NPRD-08 in Progress 100,000 failure rates 10,000 failure mechanisms 2 billion test hours Thousands Distributed: SRKIT > 850 pages of HW, SW, Human & System Reliability Guidelines SRKIT Provided to Training Course Students Interoperability Guidebook just released 7

8 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 How RIAC is being used SOW TAT References (B) Interoperability (A) Sys Acquisition (F) Logistics (E) RCM (D) NDI & COTS (C) Integrated Supply Chain MGMT (I) Human Factors (H) Sustainment Mgmt. Planning (G) Root Cause Analysis (M) Quality Improvement (L) Environmental Characterization (K) Affordability & Life Cycle Cost (J) Integrated R&M Test Planning (O) Life Time Extention (N) Design Trade off Study

SA Customer Base US Navy 1 2 5 2 1 2 1 US Air Force US Army NASA OSD DTIC National Park Service US Marines 12 9 35 US Coast Guard MDA 9

TAT Customer Base 1 3 5 1 1 2 3 1 Navy Army OSD AF 14 FAA NASA DTIC US EUCOM 2 7 48 USCG JCAA MDA USMC 10

11 RIAC RCM Projects

RIAC TAT Example Capability The Problem The Solution The Payoff The operations in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation and Operation Enduring Freedom encountered a new threat called the Improvised Explosive Device (IEDs). IEDs are specifically designed to destroy mobile vehicles. In response to this threat over 10,800 Mine Reinforce Armor Protected (MRAP) vehicles were designed, built and fielded in less than 18 months. Sustainment of the fleet was deferred until the threat was neutralized. RIAC Subject Matter Experts are being used in conjunction with the Original Equipment Suppliers (BAE, FPI, GDLS and Navistar), the in-theater field service representatives and engineers from the MRAP Joint Project Office to perform Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) evaluations on each variant on the fleet of vehicles, by system, to optimize the maintenance and sustainment of the fleet.. The MRAP RCM Plan has been written and the RCM evaluations are underway starting with the Cougar vehicles. Typically, RCM programs result in availability improvements of 5-10% and maintenance savings of $100K-1M per system per year for a fleet the size of MRAP. If these metrics hold true over the next 3 years, this program will result in savings of Billions of dollars a year in this $24B acquisition. 12

RIAC TAT Example Capability The Problem The Solution The mission effectiveness of the USAF AN/ALQ-184 (V) EA Pod is degraded due to the frequent failures of the Reprogrammable Low Band Standard Processor Printed Wire Assembly (RLB PWA). The RIAC performed a Causal and Failure Elimination and Control Analysis. The analysis included visual inspections, electrical circuit modeling, environmental & vibration testing and maintenance & training evaluations. The Payoff University of Maryland and Wyle engineers provided specific options for government to consider for root failure mitigation and long term sustainment of the system. Follow-on work is planned to either re-design the chip or the PWA to eliminate the failure. This will ensure that the USAF can continue to fly the AN/ALQ-184 Jammer Pods well into the next decade. 13

RIAC TAT Example Capability The Problem The Solution The US Navy was lubricating the jackscrew for the P3 Orion on a daily basis because the lubricant washed off during flights. Wyle engineers on the Aging Aircraft Integrated Product Team in conjunction with the JCAA Program Office analyzed the lubricant and determined that one used by the USAF had better lubrication and corrosion control characteristics. The Payoff Use of the new lubricant was implemented. The lubrication cycle was reduced to 28 days which increased availability and reduced maintenance costs while providing better corrosion control. 14

RIAC TAT Example Capability The Problem The Solution NAVAIR determined that EA-6B aircraft reliability was lower than required. The aircraft had long depot visits, a lower than acceptable availability and the overall condition of the aircraft was not right. Wyle utilized our versatile reliability centered maintenance system (VRCM) to perform a structured analytical process for the maintenance of the aircraft. The Payoff As a result of the VRCM analysis conducted and implementation of the new maintenance plan on the EA-6B: Availability was increased by 25% Maintenance man-hours were reduced by 30,000/yr/squadron A new software tool was developed that is now used by the USAF. 15

RIAC TAT Example Capability The Problem The Solution The Payoff MSFC is developing a design tool for nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) engine systems in order to generate conceptual designs and perform trade studies on one potential propulsion source for the Manned Mission to Mars. NASA required a detailed Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) on the NERVA Reactor. RIAC Subject Matter Experts were utilized to complete a detailed Failure Modes Effects and Analysis (FMEA) for the nuclear reactor and the associated sub-systems. This reactor, NERVA, has the largest thermal output of any nuclear system ever developed. The FMEA includes details on the component importance, failure prediction likelihood and the failure probability which will guide NASA in the design and construction of the advanced NERVA which will be a critical element in the first manned space flight to Mars. 16

RIAC TAT Example Capability The Problem The USAF was evaluating the scheduled maintenance on the F-15 Eagle fleet of aircraft. The Solution RIAC Subject Matter Experts were utilized to complete a detailed Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) evaluation of the aircraft. The Payoff The RCM analysis determined that the 200 hour phased maintenance could be extended to 400 hours without impacting safety or reliability. The reduced maintenance resulted in a 400,000 man-hour per year savings and a $70M per year cost avoidance. 17

RIAC TAT Example Capability The Problem Hellfire missiles returning from the OEF theater were experiencing a a higher failure rate than expected. The Solution RIAC Subject Matter Experts were utilized to complete a detailed Failure Analysis of the missile and found that the seeker unit stator was deforming causing the gyroscope armature to freeze. The Payoff The failure was apparently due to high temperature experienced on the tarmac and during storage. RIAC recommended the use of the missile covers which will allow the missile to avoid the radiant heat from the sun and keep the stator temperature within design limits. 18

For more information RIAC phone: (315) 351-4200 RIAC website: http://theriac.org IAC Program Office at DTIC website: http://iac.dtic.mil Contacts RIAC Director Joseph Hazeltine, PE, NCE (256) 716-4390 joseph.hazeltine@wyle.com RIAC Deputy Director Valerie Hayes (301) 863-4301 valerie.hayes@wyle.com RIAC COR @ AFRL Richard Hyle (315) 330-4857 richard.hyle@rl.af.mil RIAC CO @ 55 CONS Shawn Anderson (402) 232-5330 shawn.anderson@offutt.af.mil IAC Program Office Terry Heston (703) 767-9172 theston@dtic.mil 19