How to survive as a technological petroleum institute, in a global technological climate of international competitors May Britt Myhr Petroleumsforskning AS 1
Organisation Private Independent Non-profit 2003 turnover: NOK 1.7 billion 1750 employees ICT Materials and Chemistry Technology and Society Health Research Marine Oil and Energy Gross income 2002 [mill NOK] 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Oil & and Gas gas R&D R&D in Norwegian R&D Institutes MARINTEK Fisheries and Aquaculture Petroleum Research Energy gruppen RF CMR IFE 2
Organisation Basin modelling Seismics Formation Physics Well and Production Technology Drilling and Well Construction Multiphase Flow Technology Reservoir Technology Solutions Oil and Gas Houston Trondheim Bergen Stavanger 1969 IKU established in Oslo 1975 Moved to Trondheim 1985 IKU Petroleum Research Privatised. (100%) Shareholder 1999 Changed name to Petroleum Research 3
sources of income in 2003 Projects from The Research Council of Norway 9% Basic grants from The Research Council of Norway 4% Strategic programs from The Research Council of Norway 8% Industry contracts 79% 33% International contracts 4
IFP (France) Sources of income 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40 % 30 % 20 % 10 % 0 % 5 VTT (Finland) Share of turnover [%] CSIRO (Australia) CSIR (South Africa) ENEA (Italy) FhG (Germany) NIST (USA) NRC (Canada) NPL (UK) foundation Petroleum TNO (The Netherlands) ORNL (USA) Direct governmental funding Research Council Projects Public sector National industry International industry Other All data from 2002 (except for IFP where no recent data are available)
Improve public recognition of R&D Aim for an OECD level RCN does a great job to increase the funding for Petromaks Unconventional methods necessary?? 6
Long term R&D focus funds own strategic research projects In agreement with areas pointed out by OG21 Long term industry projects, with initial funding from RCN LEDA, 9 year multiphase flow R&D program ConocoPhillips and TOTAL Budget phase 1 (2002-2004) 51 mill NOK Saturn, cold multiphase transport R&D program 2000 (CONWYP) 2007 (FMC, Norsk Hydro) bp 7
International activities 2003 Barent sea Norwegian sea North sea Gulf of Mexico UK Belgium France Denmark The Netherlands Italy Iran Venezuela Brazil 8
Entering into new business cultures Danan Dehloran Sarkan Malekuh Ongoing contract in IRAN MDPs for 7 fields Kabud West Paydar Paydar 9
Improve business culture It is necessary for a non-profit R&D institute to earn money! More heavily integrated projects Educate project managers for big and challenging projects 10
Adapt technology to new areas of application Exploration Production Drilling Basin scale Province scale Field scale Well scale 11
s Co-operation The SMIFF-project and its spin-offs 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 SMIFF Pilot PhD study at NTNU The SMIFF project The SMIFF2 project PhD study at UiB Pressim Case Studies 2 PhD studies at UiO Commercialization study Partly funded by NFR Financed by the industry 12
How to survive as a technological petroleum institute, in a global technological climate of international competitors Important elements Long term R&D focus is necessary Increase governmental R&D funding like Petromaks Internal funding to initiate strategic research is important Learning to operating under new business cultures Improve internal business culture Develop technology to fit new market areas Co-operation, nationally and internationally 13