FY 2013 PERFORMANCE PLAN Office of Human Rights 1

Similar documents
GAO. MILITARY PERSONNEL Considerations Related to Extending Demonstration Project on Servicemembers Employment Rights Claims

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

City of Boise. Civil Rights Title VI Plan. October 2014

U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. MSPB History. MSPB Mission 10/21/2010

j~i~ SAMUEL A. OREA VES fz.. ) J Lieutenant General, USAF Director

DOD DIRECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT

RESPONDING TO PATIENT COMPLAINTS AND OTHER PRIVACY-RELATED COMPLAINTS

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PROCEDURE DRAFT. Title: Incident Operations Center and Incident Review Procedures

McKinsey Recommendations for Code Compliance and Economic Development. Status Report. Dallas City Council Briefing April 20, 2005 DRAFT 1

Department of Human Services PROPOSED FY 2019 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS. County Board Work Session February 28, 2018

Managing employees include: Organizational structures include: Note:

4.10. Ontario Research Fund. Chapter 4 Section. Background. Follow-up on VFM Section 3.10, 2009 Annual Report. The Ministry of Research and Innovation

NHS Equality Delivery System for Isle of Wight NHS Trust. Interim baseline assessment against the

Follow-Up on VFM Section 3.01, 2014 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW

GAO. Testimony Before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, U.S. Senate

Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act (NoFEAR) Fiscal Year 2016 Report

Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registry (ASAR) Policy & Procedure 10 - Making Complaints about Accredited Sonography Courses

Child Care Program (Licensed Daycare)

Request for Proposals

Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. A Year of Accomplishments in OFCCP. Presented by: Theresa Lujan

Staffing Study of the Fort Worth Police Department. Presented to the City Council by Jeffrey W. Halstead, Chief of Police

CHIEF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU INSTRUCTION

Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Title VI Plan

Rob McKenna ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Consumer Protection Division 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 2000 MS TB 14 Seattle WA (206)

Judicial Proceedings Panel Recommendations

HIV CONSUMER RIGHTS. Rights in Accessing Service Delivery System

FAIR CHANCE ordinance 2017 report

Practice Review Guide

2018 Private Grants Application

UAS Title IX Compliance Scorecard Academic Year

Florida State Courts System Office of Inspector General. Annual Report Fiscal Year

Customer Success Story

The Physicians Foundation Strategic Plan

WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION Recommendation Follow-Up

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: NON-PROFIT GRANT WRITING SERVICES

Job Description JOB PURPOSE KEY JOB FUNCTIONS

Workplace Violence & Harassment Policy Final Draft August 3, 2016 Date Approved October 1, 2016

EL PASO COUNTY JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT. 1 st QUARTER FY 2018 (OCTOBER 1 DECEMBER 31, 2017)

Quality Improvement Plan (QIP): 2015/16 Progress Report

Final Rule for Veterans (VEVRAA)

How to Protect our Nation's Most Vulnerable Adults through Effective Guardianship Practices

Patient Relations: Complaints, Grievances and Appeals Process

Department of Code Compliance

APPROVED: Complainant: A person who submits a complaint to the Office of the Ombudsman.

Solent. NHS Trust. Patient Experience Strategy Ensuring patients are at the forefront of all we do

SOCIAL WORKER SUPERVISOR I

COMMISSION FOR FLORIDA LAW ENFORCEMENT ACCREDITATION, INC.

OVERVIEW - PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES FY

The Joint Legislative Audit Committee requested that we

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO OFFICE OF THE CITY AUDITOR. Audit of San Antonio Police Department. Crisis Response Team Operations. Project No.

A Guide for Students

MINNESOTA. Downloaded January 2011

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

NURSE CASE MANAGEMENT REDESIGN PROJECT: LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA CHILDREN S SERVICES (CCS)

Legal Services Program

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

HOME Investment Partnerships Program

State of New York Office of the State Comptroller Division of Management Audit

Department of Code Compliance

COMPLAINTS IN LONG-TERM CARE HOMES

2018 COLLABORATIVE RESOURCES ALLOCATION FOR NEBRASKA (CRANE) PROGRAM GUIDELINES & APPLICATION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Transportation Systems Plan (TSP)

Guidelines for Grant Applicants

Scioto Paint Valley Mental Health Center

Compliance Division Staff Report

FRENCH LANGUAGE HEALTH SERVICES STRATEGY

Health Information Privacy Policies and Procedures

Delayed Federal Grant Closeout: Issues and Impact

Job Creation Initiative Section 3. L. Marcela Vargas Monica Chevalier NC Commerce, Community Investment and Assistance NCCDA May 17, 2012

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY & ANTI DISCRIMINATION POLICY. Equal Opportunity & Anti Discrimination Policy Document Number: HR Ver 4

Annual Complaints Report 2014/15

GENERAL ATTORNEY GS SALLY MURDOCK 232 Robin Ct. Elk Grove, CA Contact Phone:

Community Health Centre Program

The Quality of Maryland and District of Columbia Medicaid Managed Care Plans: External Reviews Families USA Foundation December 1998

University of Alaska Southeast Title IX Compliance Scorecard Academic Year

AIRPORT CONCESSION DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (ACDBE)

Nursing Informatics and HealthCare Policy

FY2018 Special Conditions for Community Mediation Performance Grants

2016 Implementation Sites Project Call for Applications

Pollution Prevention Metrics Menu

Section 13. Complaints, Grievance and Appeals Process

Affirmative Action and Compliance Keeping Up with the OFCCP

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS PACIFIC-MCB CAMP BUTLER UNIT FPO AP

WRAPPING YOUR HEAD AROUND HIPAA PRIVACY REQUIREMENTS

MARATHON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAMS

ALTERNATE PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE

Agenda Item 6.7. Future PROGRAM. Proposed QA Program Models

Promoting and Protecting Civil and Human Rights

RJC Trainers Handbook

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

Refer to section 2.C. for more information on the evaluation criteria.

Transition of Care Plan

Request for Proposals

VIFM POSITION DESCRIPTION VPS

To provide clinical and case management support within a consumer directed framework to consumers receiving case management.

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF CERTIFIED CARE MANAGERS

Our Mission: To coordinate emergency preparedness and response capabilities, resources and outreach for the Arlington Community

City of Houston Office of Business Opportunity

Quality Management and Improvement 2016 Year-end Report

Transcription:

FY 2013 PERFORMANCE PLAN Office of Human Rights 1 MISSION The mission of the DC Office of Human Rights (OHR) is to eradicate discrimination, increase equal opportunity, and protect human rights in the city. SUMMARY OF SERVICES The DC OHR investigates and resolves complaints of discrimination in employment, housing, places of public accommodation, and educational institutions, pursuant to the DC Human Rights Act of 1977 and other numerous local and federal laws. OHR also prevents discrimination by providing training and educating DC government employees, private employers, workers, and the community at-large of their rights and responsibilities under the law. OHR monitors compliance with the Language Access Act of 2004 and investigates allegations of noncompliance with this Act by DC government agencies. The agency also investigates complaints and conditions causing community tension and conflict that can lead to breaches of the peace. The Commission on Human Rights is the adjudicatory body that decides private sector cases after OHR has found probable cause of discrimination. Workload Measure FY 2011 Actual FY 2012 YTD FY 2013 Proposed Number of discrimination complaints by OHR received weekly (average) Number of new docketed cases per week (average) Number of scheduled mediations per week (average) Number of discrimination complaints received by the Commission per year 10 13 15 8 8 9 10 12 15 6 5 5 1 This Performance Plan includes the Office of Human Rights and the Commission on Human Rights. 1

OBJECTIVE 1: Improve the effectiveness of the agency s enforcement and functions by shortening response times and strengthening quality controls for all internal programs, including investigations, mediations, and Language Access compliance. INITIATIVE 1.1: Ensure top-tier investigation performance, as measured both by quality of case investigations and quantity and efficiency of output, by maintaining backlog below 25 cases and receiving at least 90% high quality investigation scores. In 2010, OHR achieved a significant milestone by reducing its overall backlog to zero. Backlogged employment, public accommodation and education cases are those cases for which an OHR decision is not reached after 210 days of being docketed. The timeframe for backlogged cases is currently 180 days, a response time by an additional one month, compared to 2011. The only exception to this initiative will be backlogged housing cases, which will remain at 90 days after being docketed. The backlog is computed every Friday and cases become aged every week. During the course of FY 2013, OHR will maintain the backlog below cases and will aim to keep it at zero. In 2012, OHR created a new case review rubric, which set very high standards for defining quality of a case investigation. Random case reviews are conducted quarterly by EEO-trained experts. In FY 2013, OHR will use areas in need of improvement as shown by trends in the case reviews as the areas on which the investigations team will focus their efforts in continual improvement. This initiative will ensure that, in the interest of justice, people living, working and visiting the District are expeditiously informed of a decision after alleging discrimination and/or other types of civil and human right violations. Completion date: September 30, 2013. INITIATIVE 1.2: Ensure highest quality mediation program to increase case closure and maintain high settlement rate. Aside from increasing numbers of scheduled mediations per week, the Mediation Program will revamp its volunteer mediator program by providing orientation and training for certified mediators to bolster the Office s roster of mediators. The Mediation Program will recruit volunteer mediators using OHR s social media tools, and contacts with the D.C. Bar. Completion date: December 31, 2013. Our mediation team currently has a 40% settlement rate 15 percentage points higher than the OHR s national counterpart, the EEOC. The newly revamped OHR Volunteer Mediator Program will train certified mediators, thereby increasing both the availability and quality of mediation. With this added initiative, the mediation team should aim to maintain the 40% settlement rate. Completion date: September 30, 2013. INITIATIVE 1.3: Improve government compliance with the Language Access Act by improving data collection and analysis methods. 2

In FY13, OHR will implement its new and improved rating methodology which includes statistical analysis of agency performance as well as more narrative and descriptive information regarding successes and failings regarding compliance. Agency performance will be rated based on work completed during FY13 as compared to agency goals outlined in annual plans, OHR interactions with agencies such as complaints, corrective actions, cooperation during mediation of cases, cooperation on fast-track resolution of cases and training, as well as secret shopper field testing scores. In FY13, OHR will ensure that 95% of covered entities adopt a language access policy that provides a blueprint for how agency personnel in public contact positions (including managers) provide information and services to LEP/NEP customers. OHR will also receive a very good rating on all instructor-led language access training which will be delivered to 90% of all senior managers at covered entities and at least 50% of personnel in public contact positions. 2 Completion date: September 30, 2013. OBJECTIVE 2: Prevent discrimination by promoting awareness of and compliance with local and federal antidiscrimination laws through increased outreach and awareness activities. INITIATIVE 2.1: Amplify innovative outreach efforts to increase housing case load by 20%. The DC OHR utilizes innovate outreach for multiple ends. The awareness and outreach campaigns that OHR has designed in FY 2012 work to both spread awareness about DC residents, visitors and employees rights, and also to eradicate discrimination from happening in the first place, by encouraging individuals to file discrimination complaints with the Office. In FY 2013, OHR will continue the outreach efforts it initiated in FY 2012, including an ambitious city-wide campaign focused on Fair Housing and housing discrimination. In FY 2013 specifically, the Office will narrowly focus on increasing filings of housing discrimination complaints. Through targeted city-wide outreach to tenant associations, establishment of OHR-founded Ward Working Groups, and partnerships with housing associations, the Office expects a 20% increase in housing discrimination cases. Completion date: September 30, 2013. INITIATIVE 2.2: Pilot original policy initiatives in the city involving human rights issues. A unique advancement that OHR undertook in FY 2012 was its reshaping as a reactive, case-processing agency to a proactive agency that possessed a clear voice in shaping human rights policy in the District. Specifically, in FY 2012, OHR was at the forefront of two significant human rights policy initiatives in the District: the origination of the Mayor s Anti-Bullying City-Wide Action Plan, and the establishment of a city-wide Fair Housing Task Force, which will roll out a series of recommendations to the Mayor s Office regarding best practices in eliminating impediments to fair housing in the district. 2 [Please note: Not all personnel in public contact positions will be required to take the training in FY13]. 3

In FY 2013, OHR will continue its leadership in both of these realms, including working with the Mayor s Bullying Prevention Task Force to draft the District-wide Anti-Bullying Policy. As elucidated in the Mayor s One City Action Plan, Action 3.1.5, the OHR will maintain its leadership of this initiative as the Chair of the Task Force and entity responsible for ensuring the initial implementation of the comprehensive city-wide policy written in 2013. The OHR will also work with local and national nonprofit organizations to undertake a new policy initiative focused on Human Trafficking in the District. Through these policy initiatives and other city-wide campaigns, including the Gender Identity and Expression Campaign, the OHR aims to increase its social media followers by at least 100%. Completion date: September 30, 2013. OBJECTIVE 3: Ensure most effective operational administration through establishing targeted throughput measures for optimal efficiency. INITIATIVE 3.1: New use of data/analytics. The Office of Human Rights occupies a large amount of data, stored in multiple interfaces and platforms. In FY 2012, OHR initiated a new database, QuickBase ( MATS as termed within the OHR offices), which enables the office to collect and analyze data of its caseload. However, the Office still relies on several diverse platforms (QuickBase, Teapots, IMS, Excel, I:// drive) for basic data analysis. In order to perform the most effective internal OHR policy decisions and ensure more efficient and expert analysis of discrimination and filing trends, it is necessary for OHR to discover a more synchronous use of the data. The OHR looks forward to developing a system that works with the data systems more effectively. This will enable the OHR to most effectively tailor policy initiatives to those issues with the greatest need, as demonstrated by internal data analysis. Completion date: September 30, 2013. INITIATIVE 3.2: Diagnostic analysis of throughput measures. DC OHR relies on its efficient and high quality discrimination complaint processing, investigation and mediation procedure to continually ensure the highest quality service provision to DC residents. Currently, on average, the OHR performs 60 intake appointments per month, and accepts approximately 30 new docketed cases per month. While the office operates on a six-month timeline to conclude each individual case, with six investigators, two full time mediators and two attorneys, this caseload keeps the OHR at its maximum capacity. In FY 2013, the OHR plans to undergo a unique diagnostic analysis to ensure its case processing is at optimal efficiency levels. Through benchmarking analysis against other comparable jurisdictions and human rights agencies and analysis of efficiency gaps and bottlenecks, OHR will be able to establish evidence-based operational/throughput targets 4

and optimal efficiency metrics. Completion dates: Review other jurisdictions by January 31, 2013; 2) Complete diagnostic analysis by June 2013; 3) Publish results and recommendations by September 30, 2013. 5

FY 2013 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Measure FY11 Actual FY12 YTD FY13 Proposed FY14 Proj FY15 Proj Median case review score 90 90 92 92 94 Number of backlogged cases at any point in time 49 30 25 10 0 Percent of OHR complainants satisfied with the agency s intake process (measured by post-intake customer satisfaction surveys) Percent of mediations that lead to settlement agreement Percent reduction in the total inventory of cases adjudicated at the Commission as of October 1, 2012 Percent of agencies who participated in Language Access (LA) or EEOC training with higher rates of LA or EEOC knowledge, two months after training, as measured by knowledge survey Percent of District agencies with very good score on new LA compliance rating Percent adherence to operational efficiency targets, based on diagnostic analysis (cases docketed/suggested # of cases docketed) Percent of peer survey respondents (law firms, partner organizations) with very good impression of OHR Number of months, on average, that is used as a guideline for completion of Commission cases 92% 92% 95% 95% 95% 32% 40% 40% 42% 44% N/A 50% 80% 85% 90% N/A N/A 80% 85% 90% N/A N/A 70% 75% 80% N/A N/A 95% 95% 98% N/A N/A 85% 90% 95% 18 16 15 15 15 6