THE GLOBAL FUND TO FIGHT AIDS, TUBERCULOSIS AND MALARIA THIRD REPLENISHMENT ( ) UPDATE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW GRANT ARCHITECTURE

Similar documents
Audit Report. Global Fund Grant Making Processes Follow-up Review. GF-OIG May 2017 Geneva, Switzerland

Board Report Agreed Management Actions Status Update

Direct NGO Access to CERF Discussion Paper 11 May 2017

Fee Structure for Agencies: Part I

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Sixth Board Meeting Chiang Mai, October 2003

GEF-7 Policy Agenda. First Meeting for the 7 th Replenishment Paris, France March 30, 2017

GUIDE TO GLOBAL FUND POLICIES ON. Procurement and Supply Management of Health Products JUNE 2012

34th Board Meeting Mid-year 2015 Corporate KPI Results & 2016 Targets For Board Decision

Report of the Global Environment Facility to the Conference of the Parties. Progress report on the Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency

THE GLOBAL FUND to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria

The hallmarks of the Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund (GCERF) Core Funding Mechanism (CFM) are:

Audit of Engage Grants Program

REPORT OF THE TECHNICAL REVIEW PANEL AND THE SECRETARIAT ON THE TRANSITIONAL FUNDING MECHANISM JULY 2012

Audit Report. Monitoring Processes for Grant Implementation at the Global Fund. GF-OIG November 2017 Geneva, Switzerland

Background. 1.1 Purpose

HEALTH SYSTEMS FUNDING PLATFORM - WORK PLAN OCTOBER 2010 JUNE 2011 BACKGROUND

GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT POLICY

MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BODY IN PUBLIC 7 January 2014

Operational. Policy. Manual. Issue 2.15

Policy Discussion Paper 13/2007. Ensuring a Fit for Purpose Future Nursing Workforce

Frequently Asked Questions Funding Cycle

Fiduciary Arrangements for Grant Recipients

USE OF A PRIVATE SECTOR CO-PAYMENT MECHANISM TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO ACTs IN THE NEW FUNDING MODEL INFORMATION NOTE

Instructions for Matching Funds Requests

STDF MEDIUM-TERM STRATEGY ( )

Initial Proposal Approval Process, Including the Criteria for Programme and Project Funding (Progress Report)

The BASREC CCS NETWORK INITIATIVE

Working document QAS/ RESTRICTED September 2006

Follow-up of the report of the Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination

Harmonization for Health in Africa (HHA) An Action Framework

d. authorises the Executive Director (to be appointed) to:

Department of Defense

International NAMA Facility

SUDAC swissuniversities development and cooperation network 2 nd Call for proposals: COFER

Assurance at Country Level: External Audit of Grant Recipients. High Impact Asia Regional Report. GF-OIG August 2013

The Center for the Study of Education Policy Illinois State University. Request for Proposal (RFP) Announcement

Policy Brief: Review of the Initial GCF Proposal Approval Process and Simplified Approach

Audit Report Grant Closure Processes Follow-up Review

Technical paper on the sixth review of the Financial Mechanism

Clinical Advisory Forum DRAFT Terms of Reference

Guidance Paper: WHO support to countries in accessing and utilizing resources from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria

Assurance at Country Level: External Audit of Grant Recipients. High Impact Africa 2 Regional Report. GF-OIG August 2013

Melanie Craig NHS Great Yarmouth and Waveney CCG Chief Officer. Rebecca Driver, STP Communications and Jane Harper-Smith, STP Programme Director

Development of Erasmus+ in the second half of the programme period and the design of the subsequent programme generation ( )

Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons

ENVIRONMENT CANADA S ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY RESEARCH NETWORK CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Provisional agenda (annotated)

Primary Health Tasmania Primary Mental Health Care Activity Work Plan

NATO -1- NATO UNCLASSIFIED 29 September 2009 PO(2009)0141. Permanent Representatives (Council) Deputy Secretary General

PUBLIC HEALTH REFORM OVERSIGHT GROUP (Paper 1.6)

THE GLOBAL FUND CORPORATE WORK PLAN & BUDGET NARRATIVE 2014

Puketapapa Local Board Strategic Relationships Grant 2017/18 Terms of Reference

STEM Catalyst Grants 2019 Request for Proposals

WHO COUNTRY COOPERATION STRATEGY

Terms of Reference. Consultancy to support the Institutional Strengthening of the Frontier Counties Development Council (FCDC)

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST. AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Abidjan, Cote d Ivoire

PROJECT CHARTER. Primary Care Programme. Health Quality & Safety Commission

Memorandum of Understanding between the Higher Education Authority and Quality and Qualifications Ireland

Direct Commissioning Assurance Framework. England

Collaborative Commissioning in NHS Tayside

Guidelines for the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria

Health Board Report SOCIAL SERVICES AND WELL-BEING ACT (WALES) 2014: REVISED REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Global strategy and plan of action on public health, innovation and intellectual property

Dr Nata Menabde. Candidate for WHO Regional Director for Europe. Excellence for Health and Equity

PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GEF PROJECT CYCLE STREAMLINING AND HARMONIZATION PROCESS

Setting up a Managed Clinical Network in Children s Palliative Care. December Page 1 of 8

IMPROVING THE GEF PROJECT CYCLE

DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data

Public Health Reform Programme Leadership for Public Health Research & Innovation Commissioning Brief

Innovation and Improvement Fund

Response to the Department for Education Consultation on the Draft Degree Apprenticeship Registered Nurse September 2016 Background

Sustainable Funding for Healthy Communities Local Health Trusts: Structures to Support Local Coordination of Funds

Central City Line Kick-off and Tour

FIVE TESTS FOR THE NHS LONG-TERM PLAN

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria

Multilateral Development Banks

ACT Public Market The Global Fund Perspective. Sophie Logez Pharmaceutical Management Unit

Request for Proposals

Proposal for the establishment of a UN Road Safety Fund. Draft 16 November Introductory note

12 th Regional Coordination Mechanism (RCM) November Advocacy and Communication Cluster (ACC) Annual Progress Report

Kathy McLean, Executive Medical Director and Chief Operating Officer

Promote and strengthen international collaboration to reduce road traffic injuries. Preamble

Creating a World-Class Public Participation Process for Land Use and Zoning Decisions

IMDRF FINAL DOCUMENT. Title: Strategic Assessment of Electronic Submission Messaging Formats

ACT Alliance FUNDRAISING STRATEGY

Updated Proposal by Brazil and France as co-chairs of the REDD+ Partnership:

Economic and Social Council

PROGRESS REPORT ON THE CAPACITY-BUILDING INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPARENCY

The undertaking involves 4 NGOs/CSOs under separate contract as follows:

St George s Healthcare NHS Trust: the next decade. Research Strategy

UNESCO/Emir Jaber al-ahmad al-jaber al-sabah Prize for Digital Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities. Application Guidelines for 2018/2019

CaliforniaVolunteers Service Enterprise Initiative

Internationalization of MSMEs crucial to inclusive growth

CHALLENGE FACILITY FOR CIVIL SOCIETY ROUND 8. Application Guidelines

Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Biomedical Engineering

2018 Grants for Change REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Application Guide. Applying for Funding through the Women s Program. of Status of Women Canada CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Secretariat. United Nations ST/SGB/2006/10. Secretary-General s bulletin. Establishment and operation of the Central Emergency Response Fund

Transcription:

THE GLOBAL FUND TO FIGHT AIDS, TUBERCULOSIS AND MALARIA THIRD REPLENISHMENT (2011-2013) UPDATE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW GRANT ARCHITECTURE

This report was published in March 2010.

INTRODUCTION Following the Board s decision in November 2009 approving the design and policies for the new Global Fund grant architecture, implementation is well underway. The Secretariat has developed a comprehensive implementation work plan, allocated significant staff resources, and is currently on track to fully deliver against the outputs and timelines laid out in the Board s decision. CONTEXT FOR THE GRANT ARCHITECTURE REVIEW The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria was established in 2002 in response to an acknowledged need to increase global spending in the fight against the three diseases. Since then, much has changed in the field of global public health and international aid. The Paris Declaration, endorsed in March 2005, committed countries and aid agencies to increase efforts on alignment, harmonization and managing aid for results. In line with that declaration and the Accra Agenda for Action (September 2008), the world has increased its attention and resources towards sound national strategies, systems strengthening and country ownership. It is in recognition of these changes, and in the spirit of continuous improvement and innovation, that the grant architecture review was undertaken. The Global Fund s existing grant architecture was designed at its inception primarily to support new programs. This architecture has been added to piece by piece over time. Seven years on, the Global Fund supports programs for the three diseases and health systems in almost all eligible countries. Increasingly, the funding needs of applicants are not to start programs, but to expand or extend existing ones, and to ensure program and service sustainability. NEW GRANT ARCHITECTURE DESIGN The architecture review initially began as an attempt to address challenges in the implementation of the Rolling Continuation Channel and grant consolidation. It soon emerged that the underlying drivers of the problems were not the policies or intents of these initiatives themselves, but rather a broader mismatching of Global Fund-specific systems and timings to in-country realities. The new grant architecture will feature a Single Stream of Funding per Principal Recipient, per disease. Under this model, the Global Fund will maintain only one grant agreement for each Principal Recipient in a disease area, which will be updated each time a new proposal for funding is approved. This is in contrast to the current model, in which each newly approved proposal results in a separate grant agreement, budget and indicators. Where there are two or more Principal Recipients for a country disease program, a single stream of funding will be maintained for each Principal Recipient. 1

The new model of a single stream of funding, per Principal Recipient, per disease will more accurately reflect the long-term funding relationship that the Global Fund is maintaining with countries, enable a more holistic approach to managing the diseases and facilitate a move towards program-based financing. The new model will also place the Global Fund in a better position to support a national program approach, including alignment with national reporting cycles and planned surveys. Graphic representation of current vs. new grant architecture: Current New Round 1 Phase 1 Ph 2 Grant Closing Application Round 2 Process* Phase 1 Phase 2 Grant Closing Scale-up and continuation funding Continuation funding Round 4 Application Process* Phase 1 Phase 2 Grant Closing Round 5 Application Process* Phase 1 Phase 2 Grant Closing Round 7 Application Process* Phase 1 Phase 2 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Phase 2 Reviews Reviewcycle: Periodic Periodic Periodic reviews will continue to inform future funding commitments, but will reflect the progress of the entire Global Fund-financed portion of the disease program, rather than each individual grant separately. All Principal Recipients will be assessed at the same time, with reviews and reporting better aligned to national program cycles. This will enable the Global Fund to interact more meaningfully with and encourage robust in-country program reviews. The new grant architecture will also feature important changes to the Global Fund s access to funding (proposal) systems, which will streamline application processes and more explicitly encourage program-based resource planning. These reforms will simplify the Global Fund s operating model, improve alignment and harmonization and promote a more program-based approach in resource planning, performance management and funding decisions. IMPLEMENTATION SETUP At its Twentieth Meeting in Addis Ababa in November 2009, the Board approved the design and policies for the Global Fund s new grant architecture. 1 Implementing this decision is currently the highest operational priority for the Secretariat. The Secretariat has developed a comprehensive implementation work plan, organized around three primary workstreams, each of which is led by a responsible team within the Secretariat: Transition to single streams of funding per Principal Recipient, per disease (Country Programs) The new application system (Country Proposals) The new periodic reviews system (Monitoring and Evaluation) These workstreams all require a strong collaborative effort across the Secretariat. As such, significant additional capacity has been devoted to the project from all key teams. 1 GF/B20/DP1 2

Finally, a Project Management Team has been created, which is responsible for managing the work plan, communications, partnerships and governance elements of the grant architecture implementation. This team reports directly to the Deputy Executive Director, who has primary oversight over the project. Reflecting the intensely cross-functional nature of the architecture implementation, and in an effort to devote the appropriate level of resources to this high-priority initiative under current resource constraints, the Project Management Team has been formed entirely through special assignment secondments from different units throughout the Secretariat. PROGRESS UPDATE The Global Fund is fully on-track to deliver on the outcomes and timelines set out by the Board s decision: Transition to Single Streams of Funding: The Secretariat has mapped out possible opportunities for consolidating grants over the coming year. Approximately 60 consolidation opportunities are being explored at this time, on the basis of feasibility and country interest. These figures are still preliminary, and consolidation is voluntary at this time, but the high level of interest from implementers is an indication that there will likely be a significant number of countries transitioning their grants to single streams of funding per Principal Recipient, per disease within the first year of the grant architecture implementation. One of the highest-priority areas of work at this time is therefore providing the necessary training, guidance and country-tailored support for these consolidations. New access to funding systems: Under the new grant architecture, proposals will no longer be submitted on a grant-by-grant, Principal Recipient-by-Principal Recipient project basis. Instead, funding requests will be made through consolidated proposals, presenting the full picture of the country s funding needs across different Principal Recipients. This approach will encourage more program-based resource planning in countries, and will be the primary means by which single streams of funding will be maintained over the longer term. As per the Board s decision, the Secretariat will offer this approach on a voluntary basis for Round 10. The approach will be adopted as the default mode for applications in subsequent rounds, which will be further supported by a major redesign of the current application system. These changes will facilitate the consolidated approach for applications, simplify the proposal process for countries, and facilitate a more explicit link between past programming and performance and future funding requests. New periodic reviews: The Global Fund will begin to review grants under the new periodic reviews policy 2 in early 2011. These more program-based periodic reviews will begin to apply to country disease programs after they have completed the prerequisite alignment and consolidation steps. Communications and outreach is another area of work that the Secretariat is also currently pursuing with urgency, to ensure that all stakeholders are given the opportunity to understand the new grant architecture design, its intended benefits, the expected impact on stakeholders work, and the timing of the coming changes. Fund Portfolio Managers will continue to be the Global Fund s primary contact point with countries, and much effort is going into training Fund Portfolio Managers and ensuring that they are able to appropriately advise and guide countries on the new grant architecture. Beyond that, the Secretariat is implementing an extensive communications and outreach plan. A number of communications and materials and guidance documents have already been produced and placed on an architecture-specific page on the Global Fund website. Finally, an architecture inbox email address has been created (ARCinbox@theglobalfund.org), to which stakeholders can write with questions or requests for information on the new grant architecture. Further progress updates will continue to be provided to the Board and its committees. 2 Periodic Reviews and Commitments Policy, GF/B20/4 Annex 2a, Version 2 3

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Chemin de Blandonnet 8 1214 Vernier Geneva, Switzerland + 41 58 791 1700 (phone) + 41 58 791 1701 (fax) www.theglobalfund.org All rights reserved. This document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated, in part or in full, provided the source is acknowledged. The Global Fund accepts contributions from governments, corporations, foundations and individuals. To contribute, please visit our website or contact the External Relations team at info@theglobalfund.org. For more information and updates on the status of the Global Fund, visit www.theglobalfund.org The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria