Finnish STI Policy

Similar documents
Commercialising cleantech innovation, Finnish national support instruments

RYM Oy Innovation Ecosystem Platform

Stimulating Innovation and Entrepreneuship by Public R&D Financing. Christine Hagström-Näsi, Tekes

Regional innovation hubs and their role to international cooperation

Blue growth priorities, Smart Specialisation and implementation in Ireland

Research Programmes in Finland in the fields of sustainable energy, functional materials and learning solutions

Academic Entrepreneurship

ERAWATCH COUNTRY REPORTS 2010: Finland

ERAWATCH Country Report 2009 Analysis of policy mixes to foster R&D investment and to contribute to the ERA. Finland. Kimmo Viljamaa and Tarmo Lemola

Finland. Finland. % of GDP, industry 30 %, agriculture 3 %; exports. account for 39 % of GDP

Research Funding System in Latvia: Request for Specific Support

Swedish Research & Innovation Policy Perspectives on Policy Interaction

ENHANCEMENT OF THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IN THE SOUTHERN MEDITERRANEAN

VTT Organizations, Networks and Innovation Systems GROWTH IS IN THE EMERGING ECONOMIES

ECOSYSTEMS AND NEW TOOLS FOR FUTURE AT BUSINESS FINLAND TEIJA LAHTI-NUUTTILA

Building an Innovation Society Case of the Republic of Macedonia

INNOVATION POLICY FOR INCLUSIVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE ARAB REGION

Towards a RIS3 strategy for: Wallonia. Seville, 3 May 2012 Directorate For Economic Policy Mathieu Quintyn Florence Hennart

Belgium Published on Innovation Policy Platform (

Innovation in Support of National Strategies for Sustainable Development: the Case of Kazakhstan

Health Innovation in the Nordic countries

Innovation and Technology in Spain

Estonian RD&I policy new strategy in preparation. Dr. Indrek Reimand Deputy Secretary General for Research and Higher Education

Governance and Institutional Development for the Public Innovation System

Innovation Policies and Knowledge Transfer: Some Experiences from Ireland

TURKEY. Maximum benefit from off set agreements in enhancing technological capacity.

CLUSTERS Typology and Training Needs. Intelspace Innovation Technologies SA

Factors and policies affecting services innovation: some findings from OECD work

Ireland s Smart Specialisation Strategy for Research and Innovation Background Paper. S3 Platform Peer Review Workshop Dublin, 3-4 July 2014

Mini Country Report/former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

CHALLENGES FOR INDUSTRY-ACADEMIA COLLABORATION Workshop Sofia, November 2009

Funding for Research Collaboration between Finland and China. Dr Ritva Dammert Shanghai 9 April 2008

FSB Northern Ireland s response to Economy 2030: a consultation on an Industrial Strategy for Northern Ireland

TEKES ANNUAL REVIEW

ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Training Course on Entrepreneurship Statistics September 2017 TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE ASTANA, KAZAKHSTAN

November Dimitri CORPAKIS Head of Unit Research and Innovation DG Research and Innovation European Commission

CAPACITIES WORK PROGRAMME PART 3. (European Commission C (2011) 5023 of 19 July 2011) REGIONS OF KNOWLEDGE

Process for Establishing Regional Research Institutes

Business Plan Operating Year Update

Annex to the. Steps for the implementation

Urban Mill Innovation Platform

Focused. Turku Science Park joins together academic and business experts. Our key fi elds are biotechnology and ICT.

Action Plan

Local innovation ecosystems

INCENTIVES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS TO FOSTER PRIVATE SECTOR INNOVATION. Jerry Sheehan. Introduction

May 25, Prosperity and Growth Strategy for Northern Ontario

Start-up Latin America Promoting Innovation in the Region

Building synergies between Horizon 2020 and future Cohesion policy ( )

Latent Sources of Growth Dynamics in Hellas

EU Programme Landscape for Innovation & links to policy governance

Perspectives on e-business. Brussels, 18 June 2009

Innovation Union Flagship Initiative

Developing business together. ENGLISH

INNOVATIONS IN UKRAINE opportunities for cooperation. Ivan Kulchytskyy

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

R&D in Estonia. Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium. Mõningaid andmeid T&A kohta (2004) brief overview 2006

Business Incubator Initiatives in the Caribbean Region

ERAWATCH Country Report 2009 Analysis of policy mixes to foster R&D investment and to contribute to the ERA. Ireland. Tom Martin

Action Plan for Jobs An Island of Talent at the Centre of the World

Social Enterprises and the SDGs Policy options

2012/SMEMM/010 Agenda Item: 2.4. SMEWG Chair Report. Purpose: Information Submitted by: SMEWG Chair

Financial Instruments in Tourism Development

The Helsinki Manifesto We have to move fast, before it is too late.

Russia s National System of Innovation: strengths and weaknesses Studying the business sector of Russia s NSI

Call for the expression of interest Selection of six model demonstrator regions to receive advisory support from the European Cluster Observatory

MENA Center for Investment -Next Steps BAHRAIN

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

SME Internationalisation: Characteristics, Barriers and Policy Options

FP6. Specific Programme: Structuring the European Research Area. Work Programme. Human Resources and Mobility

Entrepreneurship & innovation support ecosystems. Niki Naska, EUREKA Secretariat 14 September, Prague

Canada s Innovation and Skills Plan

Labour market situation, structural changes and change security in Finland. Outi Viljamaa June 20, 2011 A NET FOR EMPLOYMENT

Management of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Erkko Autio, Professor, Imperial College Business School

Finland, a land of solutions Mid-term review. Government Action Plan

Poland s s New Innovation Initiatives

Why Nordic Health and Welfare Innovation?

EU-CELAC Joint Initiative on Research and Innovation (JIRI) VI Senior Official Meeting (SOM) on Science and Technology. Brussels, 14 th March 2017

Programme for cluster development

COLLABORATION AND PARTNERSHIPS OF THE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CSIR-STEPRI), GHANA

Smart Specialisation in the Region of Attica

Driving Innovation in MSME s

H2020 Policy Support Facility Peer Review of the Moldovan Research & Innovation System

Heikki Salmi. Advisor to the Director General, Directorate General Enterprise & Industry

Centers of Compentence Programme Linking Science to Industry. Dr. Michael Stampfer - Technologie Impulse Gesellschaft, Vienna

Second Stakeholders Workshop Brussels, 12 th June China s STI Policies and Framework Conditions

Karim Dahou Executive Manager

UNIDO and the strategies to invest in Myanmar

The 10 billion euro question. How to most effectively support innovation in Poland. Marcin Piatkowski Senior Economist The World Bank, Warsaw

Denmark a nation of solutions. Enhanced cooperation and improved frameworks for innovation in enterprises

APPENDIX B: Organizational Profiles of International Digital Government Research Sponsors. New York, with offices in Geneva, Vienna, and Nairobi

Greek-German Cooperation for Research and Innovation. Theodore Tryfon Co-CEO ELPEN Group President, PanHellenic Union Of Pharmaceutical Industries

Summary of programmes

RIO Country Report 2015: Slovak Republic

Public/Private Partnerships for Innovation: Experiences and Perspectives from the U.S.

/RRNLQJDWWKHWKHPHRIWKLVZRUNVKRS 5HVWUXFWXULQJ5 'HIIRUW 5 'OLQNVZLWKRWKHUFRPSDQLHVXQLYHUVLWLHV 60(VWDUWXSUROHLQLQQRYDWLRQ *OREDOLVDWLRQRIEXVLQHVVDQG5 '

See the Sitra website for the most recent information: sitra.fi

Internationalisation Structural Fund period

Role of DIC, SISI, EDII, NIESBUD, NEDB.

Creating and Nurturing Startups That Can Contribute to the Development of New Key Industries

Research, Development & Innovation Support.

Transcription:

Finnish STI Policy 29-211 211 Continuous development of innovation dynamics through the recession INNO-Grips Workshop: Innovation policy in an anti-cyclical conjuncture 3.9.21, Köln Mr. Kai HUSSO Chief Planning Officer STI investments contribute positively to - Growth of GDP; promotion of welfare - Diversification of structure of the economy - Productivity growth, employment - Returns of public and private sector R&D - Additionality impact of public sector actions incl. leverage effect on other policies and policy measures with a focus on knowledge, expertise and innovation - Creating critical mass; excellence and relevance esp. in the fields that intensively create & apply new knowledge & expertise

Impacts of public R&D funding Public innovation support has a positive impact on the growth of employment in companies. Public R&D funding increases companies own investment in R&D. 1 of public R&D funding increases private R&D investment by.4-1.. Thus, the overall additionality of public funding is 1.4-2.. Public R&D funding has a positive impact on: -the risk level and technological level of the project - networking, co-operation operation and diffusion of knowledge - commercialisation prospects. FINNISH EXPORTS BY INDUSTRIES 196-28 % of total exports 1 % 8 % 6 % 4 % 2 % % 16 15 8 5 4 27 24 14 31 3 22 4 16 42 24 18 24 31 17 4 7 11 13 15 2 6 11 8 9 1 4 7 9 5 15 15 15 9 12 16 196 197 198 199 2 28 Mechanical wood industries Pulp, paper and graphic industries Machine and transport equipment industries Electronic and electrical industries Basic metal industries Chemicals Other industries What next, after recession?

Finnish performance: some strengths - R&D intensity high (3. in the World: strong contributions from both public & private sector) - 4. largest producer of scientific articles (in OECD group) - High share of competitive R&D funding - High number of researchers and PhDs (in relative terms) - Volume of brain-drain comparatively low - Effectiveness of R&D measured by patents high - Close co-operation operation within NIS R&D expenditure in Finland Total 6.9 billion 4. percent of GDP in 29* Nokia approx. > 45% of all industrial R&D > 8% of telecom R&D Public sector 1.8 billion (27%) Enterprises 5. billion (73%) Competitive public funding 48% of total public R&D funding: * Tekes ~575 M mainly for business RDI * Academy of Finland ~31 M mainly for basic research * Figures for 29 are based on estimates.

STRUCTURE OF PUBLIC STI SYSTEM IN FINLAND RIC GOVERNMENT (R&D Financing 21: 2.55 bn)basic budget bn)basic budget Ministry of of Education (933 m ) ) Ministry of of Employment and and the the Economy (763 m ) ) Other Ministries (359 m ) ) Academy of Finland (384 m ) Finnish Funding Agency for T&I - TEKES (611 m ) VTT (86 m ) SITRA, Finnish Innovation Fund Universities: : 56 m Polytechnics: : >3 m Other Gov.. R&D institutes: : 21 m R&D expenditure 24-29 ( million) 24 25 26 27 28 29 (est.) HE sector 1 4 1 42 1 79 1 165 1 18 1 234 Public sector 53 555 574 564 589 595 BE sector 3 683 3 877 4 18 4 513 5 12* 5 22 TOTAL 5 253 5 474 5 761 6 243 6 871* 6 85 % of GDP 3.45% 3.48% 3.45% 3.47% 3.73%* 4.% Real growth (%) 3.8% 3.9% 5.3% ~7.%* -1.2% * Break in series Government R&D funding 25-21 ( million) 25 26 27 28 29 21 1 614 1 67 1 73 1 798 1 9 2 55 Growth (%), in real terms 2.5%.1% --1.1% 1.6% 6.2%

Government Programme 27-211 (19.4.27) Innovation policy is in the centre - Growth of productivity and employment require a better capacity for innovation, and more efficient policy measures - High-quality tuition-free education: cornerstone of the welfare society - R&D intensity target is set to 4% - Universities will be given the status of a legal person or a foundation in legislation. Gov supports the set-up of a new university: a so-called Aalto University (21) is composed of 3 universities - Entrepreneurial education at all levels of education will be expanded - Public procurement will be developed as a tool incentive for more & better R&D and innovation - The public innovation support system will be streamlined; better availability of venture capital for companies - Government promotes R&D and innovation in the fields of: 1) natural resources 2) transportation 3) renewable energy 4) environmental technology 5) service sector. CHAIRMAN: DEPUTY CHAIRMEN: OTHER MINISTERS: Research and Innovation Council Prime Minister Minister of Education and Science Minister of Economic Affairs Minister of Finance + - 4 other ministers 1 OTHER MEMBERS: Academy of Finland Tekes (Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation) Business and Industry Employees organisations Universities + other qualified members COUNCIL SECRETARIAT (3) Preparatory bodies: Science & Education section Technology & Innovation section

Meets 4-6 times a year Meets monthly Minister of Education & Science Permanent Secretary of MoE + 6 Council members + 3 Experts Council activities Research and Innovation Council Science & Education section Proposed statements initiatives studies Technology & Innovation section Meets monthly Minister of Economic Affairs Permanent Secretary of MEE + 6 Council members + 3 Experts Initiatives Study requests Comments Council Secreteriat SG CPO for S&E policy CPO for T&I policy Initiatives Study requests Comments The RIC is responsible for the strategic development and co-ordination ordination of the Finnish STI policy and the NIS as a whole. The RIC is not only a classical independent advisory body, but also a strategy-shaping shaping multi-stakeholder institution, where political decision-makers, administration, academics and industrial experts jointly design and formulate major development lines and actions for national STI policy. Objectives include systemic view in policy developments and cross-ministerial governance. Discussions on the reviews of the rules of procedure of Government are currently under way.

The Council has been a useful forum for creating and enhancing partnerships between: - decision-makers and experts - basic research, development work and innovation communities - universities and enterprises - Ministry of Education, Ministry of Employment and the Economy, and other ministeries - employers and employees PERMANENT MAJOR TASKS OF THE COUNCIL: 1. Direction and steering of STI policies (incl. compatibility and governance issues) 2. Development of STI financing, its impacts and effectiveness 3. Development of sectoral research (i.e. gov. R&D institutes) and inter-sectoral co- operation 4. International STI co-operation operation 5. Other issues: Human resources in STI, PhD education, evaluation

STI policy principles and challenges 29-211 211 STI policy: Basic principles and objectives - Prioritisation of STI activities: strategic choices, better focus on resources, objectives, measures, and impacts - Specialisation in the fields of strength: sharper profiles for R&D organisations - Selective decision-making based on intelligent use of evaluation and foresight - More intense industry-academia co-operation operation (PPPs) - Front-runner runner policy practices: experimentation, risk-taking, incentives (for growth, commercialisation of R&D etc.)

STI Challenges - Further increase in (public) financing of STI - Productivity of both service sector and public sector is low (growth potential through use of ICT) - Number of growth-oriented oriented entrepreneurs and innovative firms is low (by international standards) - Volume of inward FDIs and numbers of foreign experts, researchers and students are low - Fragmented activities: resources allocated to a large number of small units -> prioritised pooling of limited resources is needed - More efficient exploitation of R&D results The entire innovation environment is on the move - Status of universities will be changed (21) - Structural development of HEIs is in progress - Implementation of the national innovation policy - Internationalisation of education, research and innovation - Other issues: development of a genuine researcher career system; graduate schools; ; R&D infrastructures,, streamlining of the public innovation support system; ; Strategic Centres of Excellence in STI (SHOK( SHOK); ); the Centres of Expertise Programme (OSKE( OSKE).

New RIC initiative: Strategic Centres of Excellence in STI A new approach to: strengthen strategic areas of S&T development stimulate cross-disciplinarily in R&D and innovation focus resources and increase international visibility Industry-academia joint venture: Cluster Ltd Medium term focus (applications in markets within the next 5-1 yrs) Strong support by public R&D funders (Tekes, Academy of Finland) 1. Forest cluster (started in 27) 2. Energy and environment (28) 3. Metal products and mechanical engineering (28) 4. Health and well-being (29) 5. Information and communication industry and services (28) 6. Built environment (29) Number and type of shareholders of SHOKs Universities Polytechnics Gov. R&D institutes Enterprises others total FimECC Ltd 1 2 1 16 1 3 RYM-SHOK Ltd 3 2 2 37 5 49 CLEEN Ltd 1 5 28 43 TIVIT Ltd 1 4 1 22 3 4 Forest Cluster Ltd 4 2 9 15 Health and well-being 8 4 16 28 total 45 8 15 128 9 25

Innovation policy expanding into new territory from Competence-based policy Knowledge push traditional (scientific) research (done in public R&D orgs), and promotion of R&D and technology programmes more towards Demand-based policy Demand pull * public procurements * working life developments * user communities * innovative public services * regulatory framework Demand driven driven innovation policy Improves the ability to adopt innovations Facilitates demand for innovative products, services and solutions Enhances the capability to interpret market needs and demand potential Demanding and innovation friendly regulation Awareness and knowledge development Standardisation supporting innovativeness Innovative public procurement Innovation friendly markets Demand, competition and innovation culture as drivers of innovation User driven innovation activities More systematic collaboration with users Utilisation of advanced methods in analysis of user needs and trends Developing innovation policy and measures for promoting user driven innovations User driven innovation policy