The President s and Other Bipartisan Proposals to Reform Medicare: Post-Acute Care (PAC) Reform. Summary

Similar documents
January 10, Glenn M. Hackbarth, J.D Hunnell Road Bend, OR Dear Mr. Hackbarth:

Comparison of Bundled Payment Models. Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4. hospitals, physicians, and post-acute care where

Emerging Issues in Post Acute Care Trends

Summary of U.S. Senate Finance Committee Health Reform Bill

MEDICARE FFY 2017 PPS PROPOSED RULES OVERVIEW OHA Finance/PFS Webinar Series. May 10, 2016

Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014

HCCA South Central Regional Annual Conference November 21, 2014 Nashville, TN. Post Acute Provider Specific Sections from OIG Work Plans

Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM) and the MDS: A Total Evolution of the SNF Payment Model

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

Framework for Post-Acute Care: Current and Future Issues for Providers

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Partners in the Continuum of Care: Hospitals and Post-Acute Care Providers

LTCH Payment Reform & Patient Criteria

Questions and Answers on the CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model

The Pain or the Gain?

Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System

Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings

September 22, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Redesigning Post-Acute Care: Value Based Payment Models

Post-Acute Care. December 6, 2017 Webinar Louise Bryde and Doug Johnson

Health Reform and IRFs

Value Based Care in LTC: The Quality Connection- Phase 2

3/19/2013. Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary: The New Link Between Acute and Post Acute Providers

Medicare Part A SNF Payment System Reform: Introduction to Resident Classification System - I

4/9/2016. The changing health care market THE CHANGING HEALTH CARE MARKET. CPAs & ADVISORS

The Future of Healthcare Delivery; Are we ready?

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Data-Driven Strategy for New Payment Models. Objectives. Common Acronyms

Medicare Part A SNF Payment System Reform: Introduction to Resident Classification System - I ZIMMET HEALTHCARE 2018

MEDICARE UPDATES: VBP, SNF QRP, BUNDLING

HEALTH CARE REFORM IN THE U.S.

Division C: Increasing Choice, Access, and Quality in Health Care for Americans TITLE XV: Provisions Relating to Medicare Part A

SNF * Readmissions Bootcamp The SNF Readmission Penalty, Post-Acute Networks, and Community Collaboratives

Post-Acute Preferred Provider Arrangements Strategies for Partnership Transacting in the Post-Acute Care Space Crash Course November 28, 2017

September 6, RE: CY 2017 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems Proposed Rule

The Future of Post-Acute Care Under Value-Based Payment

H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act: Issues Affecting Long Term Care November 3, Changes to LTC-Related Funding

Succeeding in a New Era of Health Care Delivery

August 25, Dear Ms. Verma:

Delivery System Reform The ACA and Beyond: Challenges Strategies Successes Failures Future

HOT ISSUES FACING HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE AGENCIES. Luke James Chief Strategy Officer Encompass Home Health & Hospice

Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System

You re In or You re Out: Determining Winners and Losers Under a Global Payment System

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2016

Submission #1. Short Description: Medicare Payment to HOPDs, Section 603 of BiBA 2015

AGENDA. QUANTIFYING THE THREATS & OPPORTUNITIES UNDER HEALTHCARE REFORM NAHC Annual Meeting Phoenix AZ October 21, /21/2014

Public Policy and Health Care Quality. Readmissions: Taking Progress into the Future

CPAs & ADVISORS. experience support // ADVANCED PAYMENT MODELS: CJR

Managing Healthcare Payment Opportunity Fundamentals CENTER FOR INDUSTRY TRANSFORMATION

Beyond the Hospital Walls: Impact of a SNFist Practice Model

paymentbasics Defining the inpatient acute care products Medicare buys Under the IPPS, Medicare sets perdischarge

Healthcare Reimbursement Change VBP -The Future is Now

DRIVING VALUE-BASED POST-ACUTE COLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS. Amy Hancock, CEO Presented to: CPERI April 16, 2018

Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System Calendar Year 2015

CY 2018 Home Health PPS Proposed Rule

September 16, The Honorable Pat Tiberi. Chairman

Bundled Payment Primer

Uniform Data System. June 22, The Functional Assessment Specialists

PROPOSED POLICY AND PAYMENT CHANGES FOR INPATIENT STAYS IN ACUTE-CARE HOSPITALS AND LONG-TERM CARE HOSPITALS IN FY 2014

Distribution of Post-Acute Care under CJR Model of Lower Extremity Joint Replacements for MS-DRG 470

Piloting Bundled Medicare Payments for Hospital and Post-Hospital Care /

Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System (HHPPS) Calendar Year (CY) 2013 Final Rule

Understanding Risk Adjustment in Medicare Advantage

Chapter 6 Section 3. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (Basis Of Payment)

MedPAC June 2013 Report to Congress: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System

Medicare, Managed Care & Emerging Trends

CJR Final Rule: Policy Changes and Strategies for Bundled Payment Success

Transitions Through the Care Continuum: Discussions on Barriers to Patient Care, Communications, and Advocacy

RE: CMS-1622-P; Medicare Program - Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2016

Home Care and Hospice: Payment and Reimbursement Update: AHLA Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues

Outcomes Measurement in Long-Term Care (LTC)

CMS Proposed SNF Payment System -- Resident Classification System: Version I (RCS-1)

SNF proposed rule revisions to case-mix methodology

Troubleshooting Audio

Introduction 4/7/2015

MCOs Revealed: Strategies for Building Strong Hospital & Referral Relationships

Medicare Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System for Acute Care Hospitals Final 2016 Rates & Policies 1

HOSPITALS & HEALTH SYSTEMS: DATA-DRIVEN STRATEGY FOR BUNDLED PAYMENT SUCCESS 4/19/2016. April 20, 2016

Transitioning Care to Reduce Admissions and Readmissions. Sven T. Berg, MD, MPH Julie Mobayed RN, BSN, MPH

Facing the Post-Acute Care Acuity Challenge

The Impact of Health Care Reform on Long- Term Care

MEDICARE COMPREHENSIVE CARE FOR JOINT REPLACEMENT MODEL (CCJR) Preparing for Risk-Based Outcomes of Bundled Care 8/12/2015.

What s Next for CMS Innovation Center?

Passage of Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA): The Doc Fix

Health Care Reform Provisions Affecting Older Adults and Persons with Special Needs 3/30/10

Objectives. Assisted Living. O 2 : Opportunities & Outcomes in Assisted Living. Presented by: Chief Clinical Officer

PHCA Webinar January 30, Latsha Davis & McKenna, P.C. Kimber L. Latsha, Esq.

The Affordable Care Act

Reinventing Health Care: Health System Transformation

(202) or CMS Proposals to Improve Quality of Care during Hospital Inpatient Stays

Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC 440 Maple Avenue East, Suite 203, Vienna, VA

Regulatory Advisor Volume Eight

CY2019 Proposed Medicare Home Health Rate Rule and Much More

WELCOME. Kate Gainer, PharmD Executive Vice President and CEO Iowa Pharmacy Association

PREPARING FOR RISK-BASED OUTCOMES OF BUNDLED CARE

June 19, Submitted Electronically

Physician Compensation in an Era of New Reimbursement Models

Making CJR Work for You. A Roadmap for Successful Implementation of Medicare Bundles

MLN Matters Number: MM6699 Related Change Request (CR) #: 6699

Transcription:

Current Law The President s and Other Bipartisan Proposals to Reform Medicare: Post-Acute Care (PAC) Reform Summary Home Health Agencies Under current law, beneficiaries who are generally restricted to their homes and need skilled care (from a nurse or physical or speech therapist) on a part-time or intermittent basis are eligible to receive certain medical services at home. Home health agency (HHA) personnel can provide skilled nursing care; physical, occupational, and speech therapy; medical social work; and home health aide services. Home health agencies are paid a pre-determined daily rate for each 60-day episode of care, based on patients conditions and service use, and then adjusted to reflect the level of market input prices in the geographical area where services are delivered. Medicare made home health payments totaling nearly $18.4 billion in 2011. Beneficiaries are not required to make any copayments for home health services. Skilled Nursing Facilities Under current law, beneficiaries who need short-term skilled care (nursing or rehabilitation services) on an inpatient basis following a hospital stay of at least three days are eligible to receive covered services in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). SNFs are the most commonly used post-acute care setting. Medicare pays SNFs a predetermined daily rate that is expected to cover operating and capital costs. In 2011, Medicare paid $31 billion for SNF stays. Beneficiaries have no cost-sharing for the first 20 days of skilled nursing care in each benefit period. However, they must pay $144.50 per day for days 21 100 and all costs for each day after day 100 for a spell of illness. Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities Under current law, beneficiaries who need intensive inpatient rehabilitation services, such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy are eligible for services in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). In order to receive IRF services, beneficiaries generally must be able to tolerate and benefit from 3 hours of therapy per day. IRFs are paid predetermined per-discharge rates based primarily on the patient s condition (diagnoses,

functional and cognitive statuses, and age) and market area wages. Medicare payments to IRFs were an estimated $6.5 billion in 2011. Long-term Care Hospitals (LTCHs) Under current law, beneficiaries who with clinically complex problems, such as multiple acute or chronic conditions, may need hospital care for relatively extended periods of time. Some are admitted to long-term care hospitals (LTCHs), which must have an average Medicare length of stay greater than 25 days. LTCHs are paid predetermined per-discharge rates based primarily on the patient s diagnoses and market area wages. Payments to LTCHs were an estimated $5.4 billion in 2011. Fiscal Year 2014 (FY14) President s Budget Provisions To address concerns with the sustainability of the Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund, the Obama Administration has identified several key policies to reform PAC within the Medicare program. In the President s FY14 budget, the Administration focused on five key PAC reform policies: 1) reducing market basket updates for home health agencies (HHAs), skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and long-term care hospitals (LTCHs); 2) creating site neutral payments between IRFs and SNFs for certain procedures; 3) modifying the criteria required for IRF status (the socalled 75 percent rule ); 4) establishing a SNF readmissions program; and 5) creating PAC bundled payments. Reducing Market Basket Updates for HHAs, SNFs, IRFs and LTCHs Every year the Secretary of the Health and Human Services (HHS) is required, by statute, to update the market basket in each Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) payment system. CMS determines an annual index for each market basket. The index estimates how much more or less it costs a health care provider to purchase the same mix of goods and services. The Office of the Actuary (OACT) within CMS is responsible for producing the CMS market baskets for each payment system. In his FY14 budget, President Obama proposed to realign costs by reducing the market basket updates annually for HHAs, SNFs, IRFs and LTCHs by 1.1 percent beginning in 2014 through 2023. President Obama based this proposal on recommendations from the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). The FY14 President s budget estimated that this policy would save $79 billion over 10 years. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that this policy would save $43.6 billion over 10 years. The majority of the difference between these two estimates comes from CBO s assumption that Congress will not act early enough to realize FY14 savings. Creating Site Neutral Payments Between IRFs and SNFs for Certain Procedures Unlike Medicare Advantage, there is generally much less coordination of care for beneficiaries in FFS Medicare. As a result, beneficiaries often do not receive posthospital care in the right setting, at the right time. Policy experts have argued that much

of the care beneficiaries receive in IRFs could also be provided in SNFs with the same level of quality, at a lower level of cost. In his FY14 budget, President Obama proposed to adjust payments for three conditions involving hips, knees and pulmonary conditions, as well as other conditions selected by the Secretary. The President notes that although these conditions are commonly treated by both IRFs and SNFs, Medicare payments are significantly higher when services are provided in an IRF. The proposal further suggests that IRFs provide intensive inpatient rehabilitation that may not be appropriate for patients with relatively uncomplicated conditions that could be treated in a SNF. The FY14 President s budget estimated that this policy would save $2 billion over 10 years. CBO estimated that this policy would save $1.3 billion over 10 years. Modifying Criteria Required for IRF Status (the so-called 75 percent rule ) In 1983, Congress changed reimbursement for general acute hospitals from cost-based reimbursement to a prospective payment system (PPS), which pre-determines a rate for a bundle of care. This fundamental change in reimbursement did not apply to IRFs. Instead, IRFs were allowed to continue to receive cost-based reimbursement as long as they complied with a 75 percent rule. The 75 percent rule required IRFs to ensure that a minimum of 75 percent of its patients have a qualifying condition. In 2000, legislation transitioned IRF reimbursement from cost-based reimbursement to a PPS. During this transition, CMS suspended the 75 percent rule. In 2004, CMS reinstituted the 75 percent rule with a revised list of qualifying conditions (expanding the number of conditions from 10 to 13, and eliminating simple knee and hip replacement treatments). The 75 percent rule was to be phased in over a 4-year period. In 2007, with the 75 percent compliance threshold set at 65 percent (due to the phase-in), Congress overrode the 65 percent threshold and locked the threshold in permanently at 60 percent. In his FY14 budget, President Obama proposed to increase the 60 percent threshold to 75 percent. The FY14 President s budget estimated that this policy would save $2.5 billion over 10 years. CBO estimated that this policy would save $1 billion over 10 years. Establishing a SNF Readmissions Program ObamaCare established the first readmission penalty program for Medicare providers in the acute care hospital setting. The hospital readmissions program is currently focused around three conditions: (1) heart failure; (2) heart attack; and (3) pneumonia. The maximum penalty for a hospital in FY13 is one percent of the market basket. For FY15, CMS has intends to add two additional conditions: (a) chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder; and (b) hip and knee replacement, with maximum penalty of 3 percent of the market basket. In his FY14 budget, President Obama proposed a similar penalty program for SNF readmissions. The President cited a MedPAC analysis that nearly 14 percent of

Medicare patients are readmitted to the hospital for conditions that could potentially have been avoided, as the reason for the proposal. The SNF readmissions penalty would reduce the market basket up to 3 percent for SNFs with high rates of readmissions, beginning in 2017. The FY14 President s budget estimated that this policy would save $2.2 billion over 10 years. CBO estimated that this policy would save $1.3 billion over 10 years. Creating PAC Bundled Payments One of the fundamental flaws of FFS Medicare is that it encourages volume over value. Providers are incentivized to provide more services because they generate more revenue, while the full burden of risk is on the American taxpayer. Bundled payments, and other alternative payment mechanisms, have the potential to remove the volume incentive contained in the FFS Medicare program. In his FY14 budget, President Obama proposed to bundle PAC services (for HHAs, SNFs, IRFs and LTCHs) for at least half of the total payments for PAC providers. In 2018, rates would be based on patient characteristics and other factors and would be set to yield a permanent, cumulative adjustment of -2.85 percent by 2020. Under the President s proposal, beneficiary co-insurance would equal levels under current law. The FY14 President s budget estimated that this policy would save $8.2 billion over 10 years. CBO estimated that this policy would save $5.5 billion over 10 years. Assumptions With the exception of the PAC bundle proposal, staff did not make any policy assumptions in the interpretation of the FY14 President s budget proposals on modernizing beneficiary cost-sharing. Staff requested specifics from the Administration to enable the drafting of the policies. When possible, staff updated legislative language that was previously drafted by the Administration for purposes of negotiations during Joint Committee in 2011. PAC Bundle Assumptions The FY14 President s budget proposal would establish a transition period prior to a full prospective payment system (PPS), with a partial new PPS beginning no later than 2018 o Assumes 2018 is FY2018 (October 1, 2017) to begin the proposal Legislation text follows the construct, in part, from section 1115A of the Social Security Act, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation o Applicable conditions for bundles were suggested by CMS to reflect the conditions currently being considered under the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative (BPCI) o The Secretary is granted broad waiver authority under title XVIII and title XI for implementation of the PAC bundle Follows the construct, in part, from section 1886D of the Social Security Act

o Quality measure reporting will be required and performance data will be publicly reported o The Secretary shall pursue an evaluation o The Secretary shall submit two Reports to Congress The first provider of PAC services after a hospitalization is the provider who receives the bundled payment The Secretary would establish a PAC bundle market basket, which would be updated annually