Collected systematic reviews for the topic: Effects of telework on employee s well-being and health

Similar documents
OSH Evidence. Search Documentation Form. How can needlestick injuries in health workers be prevented?

Disposable, Non-Sterile Gloves for Minor Surgical Procedures: A Review of Clinical Evidence

PCNE WS 4 Fuengirola: Development of a COS for interventions to optimize the medication use of people discharged from hospital.

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews: An expanding resource

KNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS: Literature Searches and Beyond

TITLE: Double Gloves for Prevention of Transmission of Blood Borne Pathogens to Patients: A Review of the Clinical Evidence

Critical appraisal of systematic reviewsijn_1863

Downloaded from:

Online Data Supplement: Process and Methods Details

Standard methods for preparation of evidence reports

A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth

TITLE: Pill Splitting: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines

The cost and cost-effectiveness of electronic discharge communication tools A Systematic Review

Integrated approaches to worker health, safety and wellbeing: Review Update

Systematic Review Search Strategy

The influence of workplace culture on nurses learning experiences: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.

Assessing competence during professional experience placements for undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review

Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home: systematic review

Burden of MRSA Colonization in Elderly Residents of Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

1. Nurs* AND Filters: Meta-Analysis; Systematic Reviews 45

Building & Strengthening Your Evidence Based Practice Literature Searches

A Systematic Review of the Liaison Nurse Role on Patient s Outcomes after Intensive Care Unit Discharge

Systematic Review. Request for Proposal. Grant Funding Opportunity for DNP students at UMDNJ-SN

Clinical Development Process 2017

Systematic review of interventions to increase the delivery of preventive care by primary care nurses and allied health clinicians

The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review

Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool MMAT

Nursing skill mix and staffing levels for safe patient care

MA provision by pharmacy workers: Scale, quality and strategies to improve provision practices Katy Footman, Marie Stopes International

Rapid Review Evidence Summary: Manual Double Checking August 2017

Malnutrition Screening Pathway v.1.1

Preventable Patient Harm across Health Care Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This is a Brief Online Learning Tutorial (or BOLT) brought to you by the LISTEN project, a HRSA funded project focused on improving the information

Version 1.0 (posted Aug ) Aaron L. Leppin. Background. Introduction

The types and causes of prescribing errors generated from electronic prescribing systems: a systematic review

Improving the Use of Electronic Medical Records in Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evidence based practice: Colorectal cancer nursing perspective

Technology Overview. Issue 13 August A Clinical and Economic Review of Telephone Triage Services and Survey of Canadian Call Centre Programs

Searching the Nursing Research Literature. Created and Presented by: Ken Wright, MSLS Health Sciences Librarian

Carers experiences when the person they have been caring for enters a residential aged care facility permanently: A systematic review

The Australian Health Care Homes: Our Transformation Journey Dr Tina Janamian

Development of a framework for integrated primary/secondary health care governance in Australia

Washington State Council of Perioperative Nurses October 14, 2011 Janet G. Schnall, MS, AHIP HEAL-WA University of Washington Health Sciences

The Rx for Change database: a first-in-class tool for optimal prescribing and medicines use

Final scope for the systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness evidence for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)

The Experiences of Mental Health Professionals and. Patients in the use of Pro Re Nata Medication in Acute

Corporate Guidelines

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports 2013;11(12) 81-93

Discharge Planning in Chronic Conditions: An Evidence-Based Analysis

Low Molecular Weight Heparins

Essential Skills for Evidence-based Practice: Evidence Access Tools

Efficacy and experiences of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia (Review)

How to Find and Evaluate Pertinent Research. Levels and Types of Research Evidence

Objectives. Evidence Based Resources for Answering Clinical Questions: Only a Click Away. What is Evidence Based Practice?

Institute of Medicine Standards for Systematic Reviews

Templates for reporting pre-hospital major incident medical management: systematic literature review

Searching for Clinical Guidelines, Algorithms, and Mixed Methods Studies: What s Wrong with PICO?

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW METHODS. Unit 1

A systematic review of the literature: executive summary

Continuity of Care to Optimize Chronic Disease Management in the Community Setting: An Evidence- Based Analysis

TRANSITIONS OF CARE IN THE VETERAN POPULATION AND THE EFFECTS OF PATIENT EDUCATION ON PATIENT OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

COMPUS Procedure Evidence-Based Best Practice Recommendations

British Society for Surgery of the Hand. (BSSH) Evidence for Surgical

Effect of DNP & MSN Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Courses on Nursing Students Use of EBP

Summary HTA. Invasive home mechanical ventilation, mainly focused on neuromuscular disorders. HTA-Report Summary

Communication tools for end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

What evidence is there on the effectiveness of different models of delivering urgent care? A rapid review.

REVIEW PROTOCOL. Recommendation 3. A systematic review. Review protocol

Janet E Squires 1,2*, Katrina Sullivan 2, Martin P Eccles 3, Julia Worswick 4 and Jeremy M Grimshaw 2,5

Health Professionals Perceptions and Experiences of Open Disclosure: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.

A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification

The Determinants of Place of Death: An Evidence-Based Analysis

Yost et al. Implementation Science DOI /s Implementation Science

Continuity of Care: An Evidence- Based Analysis (DRAFT)

Evidence-based Practice (EBP) Robin Newhouse, PhD, RN, NEA-BC

GSTF Journal of Nursing and Health Care (JNHC) Vol.3 No.1, November Fen Zhou, Hong Guo, Yufang Hao, and Ling Tang

Current Challenges and Emerging Evidence in Infection Prevention in Adult and Pediatric Long-term Care Facilities

BMHI Internship Presentation. Saba Akbar UNC Chapel Hill Apr 11, 2018

DynaMed Presentation. PhD. of strategic management Medical Library MUMS. Sima Mohazzab Hosseinian

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

NORWICH UNIVERSITY TELECOMMUTING POLICY Reviewed and approved on April 30, 2012 OBJECTIVE

Master of Clinical Science

The contribution of Physician Assistants in primary care: a systematic review

Searching Your EBSCO Research Databases ASUM: September 2016

Intellectual Disability Services Research Report

Evidence-Based Nursing Practice. Day 1: Intro To EBNP

There is increasing recognition of the difficulty in

An evaluation of the role of the Admiral Nurse: a systematic evidence synthesis to inform service delivery and research

JBI Library of Systematic Reviews JBI ; 10(35):

AUTHOR GUIDELINES. Submission of the Manuscript. Ethical publishing principles. Review Process

Evidence Tables and References 6.4 Discharge Planning Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care Update

Final Accreditation Report

The effectiveness of educational programs in promoting nurses knowledge of pressure ulcers: a systematic review protocol

Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: A recipe for improving medication safety and handover of care Smeulers, Marian

Key Environmental Health Competencies for Rural Primary Care Providers

DRMC Medical Library ONLINE DATABASES

Job Stress Related to Job Satisfaction of Nurses. Allison Peters. University of Central Florida

Effectiveness and safety of intravenous therapy at home for children and adolescents with acute and chronic illnesses: a systematic review protocol


Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing

Transcription:

The PEROSH OSH Evidence Search Documentation Form Collected systematic reviews for the topic: Effects of telework on employee s well-being and health Reference 1. Crawford JO, MacCalman L, Jackson CA.: The health and well-being of remote and mobile workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2011 Sep;61(6):385-94. 2 Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007;92(6):1524-41. Study grading (sum of R-AMSTAR scores) 29/44 20/44 PubMed link PMID: 21921124 PMID: 18020794 PEROSH OSH Evidence Search Documentation Form Name: Annette Nold Institute/Organisation: IFA (Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance) Address and email: Alte Heerstraße 111, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Annette.nold@dguv.de 1 Objective: Overview of the effects of telework on (psychosocial) well-being and health 2 Question: What are the effects of telework on employee s well-being and health? Population: teleworkers Intervention/Exposure: telework related exposure Comparison (control): no telework Outcome: any health problems 1

3 Searched Databases: Database Time span Date searched (yyyy-mm-dd) Citations in Database Medline (PubMed) 2000-2014 2014-02-09 20 0 EMBASE 2000-2014 2014-02-17 21 2 PsychINFO/PSYNDEX 2000-2014 2014-02-17 62 3 Other sources OSH Cochrane IWH Canada NIOSHTIC TEMA/INSPEC ZIGUV 2000-2014 2014-02-07 0 (noise, no relevant hits, stepwise searching) Dublications Total (including Medline, EMBASE and other sources) 98 4 Search Strategy: Medline via PubMed # Searches Results 1 Search telework* OR telecommu* OR home office OR home work* 12879 OR mobile work* OR mobile office* OR remote work* OR telecommunic* OR e-work OR virtual work* OR virtual office* OR IT supported work* 2 Search (occupational diseases [MH] OR occupational exposure [MH] OR occupational medicine [MH] OR occupational risk [TW] OR occupational hazard [TW] OR (industry [MeSH Terms] mortality [SH]) OR occupational group* [TW] OR work-related OR working 180082 environment [TW]) OR (psychosocial[all Fields] AND ("Stress"[Journal] OR "stress"[all Fields])) 3 Search "meta-analysis as topic"[mesh Terms] OR meta-analysis[pt] OR meta-analysis[tiab] OR review[pt] OR review[tiab] NOT (letter[pt] 2080857 OR editorial[pt] OR comment[pt]) NOT ("animals"[mesh Terms:noexp] NOT "humans"[mesh Terms]) 4 Search #1 AND #2 AND #3 31 5 Search ("2000/01/01"[Date - Publication] : "3000"[Date - Publication]) 10198086 6 Search #4 AND #5 20 2

EMBASE via DIMDI # Searches Results 1 EM00 12581235 2 TELEWORK* OR TELECOMMUT* OR HOME OFFICE OR HOME 916 WORK* OR MOBILE WORK* OR MOBILE OFFICE* OR REMOTE WORK* OR E WORK OR VIRTUAL WORK* OR VIRTUAL OFFICE* OR IT SUPPORTED WORK* 3 MOBILE DEVICE* OR HANDHELD DEVICE* OR PROTABLE 1091 SYSTEM* 4 2 OR 3 2003 5 DT=REVIEW* 1268388 6 CT=META-ANALYSIS 66319 7 5 OR 6 1308032 8 4 AND 7 180 9 OCCUPATION* OR EC=35 169098 10 8 AND 9 21 11 10 AND PY>1999 21 PsychINFO/PSYCHLIT via DIMDI (supersearch modus) # Searches Results 1 PY81; PI67 3927394 2 TELEWORK* OR TELECOMMUT* OR HOME OFFICE OR HOME 1787 WORK* OR MOBILE WORK* OR MOBILE OFFICE* OR REMOTE WORK* OR E WORK OR VIRTUAL WORK* OR VIRTUAL OFFICE* OR IT SUPPORTED WORK* 3 MOBILE DEVICE* OR HANDHELD DEVICE* OR PROTABLE 749 SYSTEM* 4 2 OR 3 2529 5 REVIEW OR META-ANALYSIS OR METAANALYSIS 356311 6 4 AND 5 232 7 ct=(occupation*;work*) 167239 8 6 and 7 75 9 8 and py>1999 62 3

5 Selection process: 5.1 Inclusion criteria: A. According to PICO- question (see 2.) B. According to inclusion criteria for systematic reviews (see PEROSH OSH Evidence Inclusion and classification criteria for Occupational Health Reviews) C. According to inclusion criteria for Occupational Health and Safety topics (see PEROSH OSH Evidence Inclusion and classification Criteria for Occupational Health Reviews) 5.2 Selection: First step: Based on titles and abstract, two reviewers select the retrieved articles independently resolving discrepancies by discussions. Second step: Based on the pre-selected full texts, two reviewers apply the above mentioned inclusion criteria independently resolving discrepancies by discussions or by consensus conference. 4

6 Results: (Adapted from PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram) Included Eligibility Screening Identification Records identified through databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO/PSYCHLIT) (n = 103) Removed duplicates (n = 5) Records screened (titles/abstracts) (n = 33) Full text articles screened for eligibility (n = 15) Studies included in qualitative synthesis (n = 2) Additional records identified through other sources (e.g. hand searching) (n = 0) Records excluded (n = 18) Full text articles excluded with the following reasons: Language Duplications Full texts not available Other reasons (e.g. wrong PICO, did not fulfil the PEROSH criteria, narrative reviews that did not make a systematic search) 5

7 Grading of the Systematic Reviews: (Based on the R-AMSTAR Checklist) No I st author / Publication year 1. Crawford 2011 2. Gajendran 2007 Overall study assessment (sum of quality scores) Internal validity Comments 29/44 1. List of excluded studies should have been mentioned. 2. Quality of evidence on a rank based instrument should have been mentioned. 3. Publication bias should have been assessed. 20/44 1. No clear consensus procedure for study selection and data extraction. 2. Restrictions on selection of publications not clear. 3. List of included/excluded studies not provided. 4. Details of characteristics of used studies not provided. 5. Quality of used studies not provided. 6. Little conclusions delivered, but acceptable since focus was on correlations of telecommuting and different outcomes. 7. Little information on heterogeneity of used studies. Consent for use of personal data x I hereby authorize the PEROSH OSH Evidence Group to publish my personal data, as specified in this Search Documentation Form, on the PEROSH website including its database of Systematic Reviews of Occupational Safety and Health. I am aware that my authorized personal data can be consulted by anyone having access to the website using the Internet or any other dedicated network. 6