Revised Federal Investigative Standards (FIS) Short

Similar documents
Personnel Clearances in the NISP

AskPSMO-I: Interim Determination Process

Navigating Federal Background Investigation Requirements in the VA

PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCES

Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility

DODEA ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION , VOLUME 1 DODEA PERSONNEL SECURITY AND SUITABILITY PROGRAM

Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility

NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL (NDIA)

SUITABILITY AND SECURITY PROCESSES REVIEW REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT FEBRUARY 2014

Department of Defense Suitability and Fitness Guide

DISS Overview. High level introduction to the Defense Information System for Security set to replace JPAS in 2017.

EXECUTIVE ORDER

Presented by: Personnel Security Management Office for Industry (PSMO-I)

Donald Mancuso Deputy Inspector General Department of Defense

Presented by: Ryan Dennis Personnel Security Management Office for Industry (PSMO-I)

Personnel Security Briefing NAWCAD Industry Day Larry Paxton

SECURITY EXECUTIVE AGENT DIRECTIVE 1

Annual Report to Congress on Personnel Security Investigations for Industry and the National Industrial Security Program

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 01. l E~D!NG IN TEL LI GE N CE J NTE G RATION

2016 RADAR Adjudication Quality Evaluation

Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection

PERSONNEL SECURITY CLEARANCES

Course No. S-3C-0001 Student Guide Lesson Topic 7.2 LESSON TOPIC 7.2. Personnel Security Investigations

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Information Security Program and Protection of Sensitive Compartmented Information

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

JOINT INTERAGENCY TASK FORCE SOUTH

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

AskPSMO-I Webinar: SF-312 Non-Disclosure Agreement

GAO. Testimony Before the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives

National Preparedness Goal Project

DoD Update Insider Threat and the NISP

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND **APPLICATIONS WILL ONLY BE ACCEPTED DURING THE CAREER FAIR**

JOINT INTERAGENCY TASK FORCE SOUTH

JOINT INTERAGENCY TASK FORCE SOUTH JOB FAIR ANNOUCEMENT

Introduction to the Department of the Navy Information and Personnel Security Program

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

Introduction to Personnel Security

DOD DIRECTIVE INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT

INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Implementation of the Joint Intelligence Community Duty Assignment (JDA) Program

Recent Developments. Security Clearance Changes and Confusion in the Intelligence Reform Act of Sheldon I. Cohen *

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER 501

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND **APPLICATIONS WILL ONLY BE ACCEPTED DURING THE CAREER FAIR**

2015 RADAR Adjudication Quality Evaluation

Department of Defense

REPORT ON COST ESTIMATES FOR SECURITY CLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES FOR 2005

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Security Policy Updates AIA/NDIA Edition

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

REPORT to the PRESIDENT. NATIONAL ARCHIVES and RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND **APPLICATIONS WILL ONLY BE ACCEPTED DURING THE CAREER FAIR**

SUMMARY FOR CONFORMING CHANGE #1 TO DoDM , National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

August Initial Security Briefing Job Aid

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR INTELLIGENCE AND SPECIAL PROGRAM ASSESSMETS

IS-700.a National Incident Management System (NIMS) An Introduction Final Exam

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

SUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #6: Streamlining the Contracting Process)

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (DON) PERSONNEL SECURITY PROGRAM (PSP) INSTRUCTION

~ 1( t ~ Intelligence Community Continuity Program A. PURPOSE

GAO. DOD Needs Complete. Civilian Strategic. Assessments to Improve Future. Workforce Plans GAO HUMAN CAPITAL

v. : 18 U.S.C. 371, 951 & 2 MICHAEL RAY AQUINO, : I N D I C T M E N T a/k/a "Ninoy" The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey,

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Question Distractors References Linked Competency

National Incident Management System (NIMS) & the Incident Command System (ICS)

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 377TH AIR BASE WING (AFGSC)

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATION At INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC 20511

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION

TRICARE Prime Remote Program

The Evolution of the Automated Continuous Evaluation System (ACES) for Personnel Security

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

VETERANS' AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT of

SECURITY FROM WITHIN * * Independent Review of the Washington Navy Yard Shooting NOVEMBER 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE Supplement

Department of Defense MANUAL

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE NUMBER! Policy Directive for Intelligence Community Leadership. (Effective: May 1, 2006)

UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD POLICY AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO SECURITY COOPERATION

Report No. D September 22, Kuwait Contractors Working in Sensitive Positions Without Security Clearances or CACs

Introduction to Industrial Security, v3

DEFENSE CLEARANCE AND INVESTIGATIONS INDEX DATABASE. Report No. D June 7, Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON

Adjudication Decision Support (ADS) System Automated Approval Estimates for NACLC Investigations

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

CHAPTER 1 General Provisions and Requirements

Acquisitions and Contracting Basics in the National Industrial Security Program (NISP)

DOD Insider Threat Management and Analysis Center COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AWARENESS WEBINAR SERIES

NUMBER (EFFECflVE: 02 OCTOBER 2008)

United States Department of Health & Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Transcription:

Revised Federal Investigative Standards (FIS) Short Introduction Imagine five employees. Objective Identify the revised Federal Investigative Standards (FIS) new tiered background investigations Estimated completion time: 10 min Frank works on an Army base and needs physical and logical access to his facility and information system, but he doesn t require access to classified information or occupy a sensitive position. Jennifer is about to start her job as a government program analyst. This is a nonsensitive position designated as moderate risk public trust and does not require access to classified information. Tom is about to start a job as a public affairs specialist for the Air Force. This is a designated non-critical sensitive position requiring secret eligibility. Sydney has been hired by a Federal agency as a financial analyst in a designated nonsensitive high risk public trust position not requiring access to classified information. And finally, Susan is a systems engineer who was just selected by her company to work on a DoD contract requiring Top Secret eligibility. In the past, there were several background investigations used for HSPD-12 credentialing for logical or physical access, Suitability and fitness determinations, and National Security eligibility determinations. The new revised Federal Investigative Standards, or FIS, will streamline these investigations across the Federal Government. Welcome to the Revised Federal Investigative Standards Short. This short will introduce you, at a high level, to the new 5-tiered investigative model, and will discuss why the revised standards are necessary, what investigations are covered by each tier, and how the new standards are currently being implemented in a phased manner. June 2015 Center for Development of Security Excellence Page 1

WHY are the new standards necessary? On June 30, 2008, President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13467. This executive order calls for an efficient, reciprocal, and aligned system to be used across the government to investigate and determine: eligibility for logical and/or physical access to federally controlled facilities and information systems, also known as Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12, or HSPD-12; suitability for federal employment and fitness to perform work on behalf of the Federal Government as a contractor employee; and eligibility for access to classified information, or to hold a sensitive position. The new investigative model will align and standardize background investigation requirements for HSPD-12, suitability and fitness, and national security, into 5 tiers. This new 5-tiered model will facilitate reciprocity, use a build upon, but not duplicate investigative principle, and facilitate the use of automation. These revised Federal Investigative Standards, or FIS, were approved in December 2012 by James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, or DNI, and John Berry, the former Director of the Office of Personnel Management, or OPM. June 2015 Center for Development of Security Excellence Page 2

WHAT are the new standards? As you just saw, the revised FIS will streamline and decrease the types of investigations used across the Federal Government, and will also improve cost, quality, and timeliness of background investigations used for HSPD-12 credentialing, suitability and fitness determinations, and National Security eligibility determinations. The positions covered and the corresponding investigative forms: Tier 1 Used for Suitability Adjudications and HSPD-12 Credentialing o Non-Sensitive positions o Low Risk positions o Physical and/or Logical Access (HSPD-12) Uses the Standard Form (SF) -85 Tier 2 Used for Suitability Adjudications o Non-Sensitive positions o Moderate Risk positions Uses the Standard Form (SF) -85P Tier 3 Used for National Security Adjudications o Non-Critical Sensitive positions and/or o Positions requiring Confidential, Secret or L (Department of Energy or DOE) Access Eligibility Uses the Standard Form (SF) -86 Tier 4 Used for Suitability Adjudications o Non-Sensitive positions o High Risk Public Trust Uses the Standard Form (SF) -85P Tier 5 Used for National Security Adjudications o Critical Sensitive positions and/or o Positions requiring Secret, Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI), or Q (Department of Energy or DOE) Access Eligibility Uses the Standard Form (SF) -86 June 2015 Center for Development of Security Excellence Page 3

HOW will the new standards be implemented? By now you should understand WHY the new standards are necessary, and WHAT they entail, but HOW will they be implemented? In order to develop an implementation strategy and timeline for the revised FIS, the Federal Investigative Standards Implementation Working Group, or FISIWG, was established in May 2012. The group is co-chaired by OPM and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, or ODNI, and includes investigative service provider agencies and other interested partners, including the DoD. The FISIWG: assessed gaps between current investigative processes and the new tiered investigations; identified community challenges and timelines for resolution; developed the FIS Implementation Plan; and continues to meet regularly to develop and refine FIS implementation. An output of the FISIWG, the FIS Implementation Plan, which was approved by the Security and Suitability executive agents in April 2014, outlines timelines and milestones for phased implementation of the FIS, provides guidance for the phased deployment of tiered investigations, and mandates departments and agencies responsible for meeting FIS deliverables, goals, and milestones. The FIS Implementation Plan specifies timelines for FIS Implementation, and utilizes a phased implementation approach for each tier to include Initial Operating Capability, or IOC, and Full Operating Capability, or FOC, phases. Tiers 1 and 2 were implemented at IOC on October 1, 2014. The implementation of the remaining tiers will follow in IOC and FOC phases, with full implementation for all tiers planned for 2017. June 2015 Center for Development of Security Excellence Page 4

Review Activity Now, check your understanding. See page 3 to review each tier. Question 1 of 5: James is about to start a new job as a DoD Operations Research Analyst. This is a critical-sensitive position requiring Top Secret access eligibility. Under the new FIS, what tier investigation will James need? Question 2 of 5: Ali is a DoD contractor who requires physical access to federally controlled facilities and logical access to DoD networks, but not classified information in order to perform her new job. What tier investigation will Ali need? Question 3 of 5: Zack is about to start work as an accountant for the Veterans Administration. He is in a non-sensitive, designated High Risk Public Trust position that does not require access to classified information. What tier investigation will Zack need? Question 4 of 5: Sally just accepted a job with the Federal Government. It is a nonsensitive position designated as moderate risk public trust. What tier investigation will Sally need? June 2015 Center for Development of Security Excellence Page 5

Question 5 of 5: Tia is starting work as a Navy contractor and will require eligibility for access to Secret information in order to perform her job as an executive assistant. What tier investigation will Tia need? Summary After taking this short you should now understand why the revised Federal Investigative Standards are necessary, what they entail, and how they are currently being implemented in a phased manner. June 2015 Center for Development of Security Excellence Page 6

Answer Key Question 1 of 5: James is about to start a new job as a DoD Operations Research Analyst. This is a critical-sensitive position requiring Top Secret access eligibility. Under the new FIS, what tier investigation will James need? Tier 5 Feedback: Critical Sensitive positions that require eligibility for access to Top Secret information will require a tier 5 investigation. Question 2 of 5: Ali is a DoD contractor who requires physical access to federally controlled facilities and logical access to DoD networks, but not classified information in order to perform her new job. What tier investigation will Ali need? Tier 1 Feedback: Positions that need physical/logical access (HSPD-12 Credentialing) will require a tier 1 investigation. Question 3 of 5: Zack is about to start work as an accountant for the Veterans Administration. He is in a non-sensitive, designated High Risk Public Trust position that does not require access to classified information. What tier investigation will Zack need? Tier 4 Feedback: Non-sensitive, High Risk Public Trust positions will require a tier 4 investigation. June 2015 Center for Development of Security Excellence Page 7

Question 4 of 5: Sally just accepted a job with the Federal Government. It is a nonsensitive position designated as moderate risk public trust. What tier investigation will Sally need? Tier 2 Feedback: Non-sensitive, Moderate Risk Public Trust positions will require a tier 2 investigation. Question 5 of 5: Tia is starting work as a Navy contractor and will require eligibility for access to Secret information in order to perform her job as an executive assistant. What tier investigation will Tia need? Tier 3 Feedback: Positions requiring eligibility for access to Secret information will require a tier 3 investigation. June 2015 Center for Development of Security Excellence Page 8