Ontario is committed to supporting a strong, innovative economy that provides jobs, opportunities and prosperity for all Ontarians.

Similar documents
MEDG Business Support Funding

Eastern Ontario Development Fund. Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation

Rural Economic Development in Ontario. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Regional Economic Development Branch

May 25, Prosperity and Growth Strategy for Northern Ontario

Prosperity and Growth Strategy for Northern Ontario

Broadband Expansion Ontario s Digital Strategy. Northwestern Ontario Regional Conference September 30, 2010

MUNICIPALITY OF TRENT HILLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN

The Corporation of the City of Kawartha Lakes. Council Report

NOHFC Business Plan 2017/18 Through 2019/20

Miramichi Regional Economic Development and Innovation Fund

MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, EMPLOYMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE BUILDING ONTARIO UP DISCUSSION GUIDE FOR MOVING ONTARIO FORWARD OUTSIDE THE GTHA

OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL: A JOBS AND INVESTMENT PLAN FOR ONTARIO WHAT LEADERSHIP IS. KATHLEEN WYNNE S PLAN FOR ONTARIO

Applicant Guide to the Southwestern Ontario Development Fund (SWODF) Regional Stream

[DOCUMENT TITLE] [Document subtitle]

Youth Job Strategy. Questions & Answers

STRATEGIC COMMUNITY ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROJECTS (SCEP) October 23, 2013

General Qs and As for Applicants. Low-Carbon Building Skills Partnership Fund

Local Business Council Initiation Seminar. 28 November 2014

Municipal Stream. Community Transportation Grant Program. Application Guidelines and Requirements Issued: December 2017

The Community and Regional Economic Support (CARES) program is a two-year initiative under the Alberta Jobs Plan that runs from 2016 to 2018.

Case: Building on Economic Assets in Akron, Ohio after the Decline of the Tire Industry 1

PEOPLE INNOVATION CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE AGILITY. New Brunswick Growth Opportunity. Maple syrup sector

Economic Development Strategy

Economic Development Strategy

Durham Region Toronto Buffalo. Cleveland Pittsburgh

BC Rural Dividend Program Guide

Aboriginal Economic Development Fund (AEDF) Handbook

What does the Patients First Act mean for Rural Communities?

E m e rgency Health S e r v i c e s Syste m M o d e r n i zation

COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

4.07. Infrastructure Stimulus Spending. Chapter 4 Section. Background. Follow-up to VFM Section 3.07, 2010 Annual Report. Ministry of Infrastructure

INNOVATION SUPERCLUSTERS APPLICANT GUIDE

BC Rural Dividend Program Guide

Frequently Asked Questions about the Destination BC Co-operative Marketing Partnerships Program (Co-op Program)

Accountability Framework and Organizational Requirements

Developmental Services Housing Task Force EXPRESSION OF INTEREST: INNOVATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS

Northern College Business Plan

2017 Business Plan & Budget

Prosperity through Innovation and Sustainability

Federal Budget Firmly Establishes Manufacturing as Central to Innovation and Growth Closely Mirrors CME Member Recommendations to Federal Government

Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario

Blueprint for a Coordinated Ontario Life Sciences Strategy

Overview Cluster Development Seed Fund Objectives Eligible Activities Eligible Applicants Eligible Costs Evaluation of Applications Reporting

Investing in Canada - BC

2 VENTURELAB FUNDING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Nova Scotia Regional Enterprise Networks (RENs) Partners for Progress. Municipal Affairs Update

that a number of previously vacant industrial spaces found new life and became

In Review INVEST NORTH BAY

2.1.1 Business Attraction & Retention Economic Prosperity

Ontario s Entrepreneurship Network Strategy Review and Renewal AMO meeting Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Eastern Ontario Development Program

Economic Development Concept Plan

Health and Well-Being Grant Program Guidelines

Incentive Guidelines Innovative Start-ups Scheme

Township of Scugog Action Plan

Strengthening Ontario s Innovation System: The Role of Ontario s Innovation Agenda. Damian A. Dupuy, Ph.D. ISRN Meeting May 5 th 2010

Introducing the Canadian Agricultural Partnership

HANDBOOK FOR THE INDIGENOUS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND. January 2018

CENGN Summit December 7, 2017 Strategic Program Development and Delivery Office

^few[blm(llan(l Labrador

Canada-Ontario Job Grant Training

Submission to the Standing Committee on Finance in response to the Pre-Budget Consultations in advance of the 2018 budget

Guidelines. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Land Stewardship and Habitat Restoration Program (LSHRP) Ontario.

REGIONAL UNIVERSITIES NETWORK (RUN) SUBMISSION ON INNOVATION AND SCIENCE AUSTRALIA 2030 STRATEGIC PLAN

City of Terrace Economic Development Strategy

TOURISM INVESTMENT ATTRACTION STRATEGY FOR NORTHERN ONTARIO. Final Report. PKF Consulting Canada. Prepared for: January 2015

ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS Ontario Budget

Update on HB2 Preparation. Presentation to FAMPO May, 2016

In the weeks and months ahead, the Chamber will be reaching out to various Provincial Ministers to focus more strategically on areas of alignment.

Minister's Expert Panel Report on Public Health in an Integrated Health System

City of Portsmouth Economic Development Commission 2011 Action Plan

Business Plan: Corporate Investments & Partnerships

Economic, Cultural, Tourism and Sustainability Grants Policy Program Goals, Categories, Criteria, and Requirements

Goal Macro Measures Objectives Tasks/Strategies Comments

STRATFORD ECONOMIC ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SEED CO.) ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ~ADVANCING STRATFORD S ECONOMIC FUTURE~

BUTTE COUNTY REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY UPDATE

City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number

Debi Durham Director Iowa Economic Development Authority

MEDC Strategic Plan Overview. October 26, 2011

Summary of Focus Groups Lycoming County 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update April May 2016

EUA Finance for the Regions: The economic benefits of retrofitting Victoria s building stock through Environmental Upgrade Agreements.

This coordinated Plan also fulfils an action item of the Integrated Community Sustainability Plan 2010.

The Patients First Act Backgrounder

Community Transportation Pilot Grant Program Application Guidelines and Requirements

Changes to Managed Entry

Grey Bruce Health Services. Executive Compensation Framework. January 2018

Municipal Infrastructure Funding A Provincial Perspective

Marble Zip Tours. Funding Programs. Business, Tourism, Culture and Rural Development t e. We rein.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & TOURISM STRATEGIC FOCUS. Council Workshop 2016

Governance and Institutional Development for the Public Innovation System

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 INTRODUCTION... 3 VISION, MISSION, GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 4 BUSINESS PLAN OUTLINE... 4 OVERVIEW OF STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS...

Sponsored Research Revenue: Research Funding at Alberta s Comprehensive Academic and Research Institutions

ONTARIO S FIRST CHIEF SCIENCE OFFICER

Incentives in Michigan An Introduction to the Community Revitalization and Business Development Programs

LOW-CARBON INNOVATION FUND (LCIF) Program Guidelines

Program Guidelines Accelerating Food Innovation in Alberta: Application of Research or Technology for New Product Development

Transformation through Tourism: Harnessing Tourism for Growth and Improved Livelihoods

A Profile of the Mississauga Information and Communications Technologies Sector. focus

Verde Valley Economic Development Strategy. Prepared for VVREO April 6, 2018

City of Loveland Incentive Policy. Adopted October 2017

Transcription:

Rural and Regional Business Support Integration And Program Review Consultation document Ontario is committed to supporting a strong, innovative economy that provides jobs, opportunities and prosperity for all Ontarians. Investing in regional economic development and strong rural economies is a vital part of the government s plan to build Ontario up and create a dynamic, innovative environment where private sector businesses thrive. Consistent with its Business Growth Initiative, the Ontario government delivers a range of programs, services and tools to help businesses invest, innovate and create jobs across the province, including the regions and in rural areas. Ontario s Regional Funds Ontario s regional and rural economic development funds can help local firms transform into innovative, productivity-focused businesses, positioned to expand their markets. These funds include the: Eastern Ontario Development Fund (EODF); Southwestern Ontario Development Fund (SWODF); Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation (NOHFC); Rural Economic Development (RED) program; and Indigenous Economic Development Fund. Why are we undertaking this consultation/review? The Ministry of Economic Development and Growth (MEDG) and the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) are engaging our economic and business development stakeholders for two reasons: (1) to improve coordination of business support programs in the regions and (2) to undertake a required five year review of EODF and SWODF. 1) Better Coordination: As outlined in the 2016 Ontario Budget, the Eastern Ontario Development Fund, the Southwestern Ontario Development Fund and the Rural Economic Development (RED) Program will be better integrated under the Jobs and Prosperity Fund to help improve the coordination of regional business support programs. This integration will better serve Ontario businesses, build strong rural and regional economies and create jobs across the province. OMAFRA will re-launch a community economic development program under the RED Program. Rural Regional Business Support Integration and Program Review Page 1

2) Program Review The Attracting Investment and Creating Jobs Act 2012 requires a 5 year review of the EODF and SWODF that considers: 1. The geographic areas within which the funds operate; 2. The types of financial assistance and incentives and their effectiveness; 3. The accountability measures in effect and options for strengthening them. What s In Scope and Out of Scope What s In Scope for the Consultation: Factors associated with the design and delivery of an integrated regional/rural direct-to-business support program. Feedback on EODF/SWODF geographic regions, effectiveness and accountability to inform the Program Review. What s Out of Scope for the Consultation: Anything not associated with the design and delivery of an integrated regional/rural direct-to-business support program (infrastructure, energy costs, regulations, taxes, etc.) or the Program Review. Input into the community economic development program under RED. Making Good Programs Better Integrating EODF, SWODF and the Business Stream of RED will help to make good programs even better, responding to opportunities in the targeted regions and in rural Ontario. It is important to acknowledge that these programs have undergone reviews in the past, and thanks to previous feedback from stakeholders we have been able to identify a number of key strengths and best practices in program design and delivery that we will want to preserve in the programs moving forward. Among those key learnings and best practices are: Collaborative program design and delivery that reflects regional and rural knowledge & priorities, and provides guidance to business through the application process. Continuous intake and a service commitment so that funding decisions are timely and meet the needs of business. The eligibility checklist serves as a good filtering process to make the best use of resources. Programs target eligible sectors that reflect the diversity of rural and regional economies. Rural Regional Business Support Integration and Program Review Page 2

Accountability for job creation and investments to ensure that the public gets value for their investments. Leverage rate that promotes responsible decision making by businesses and by government. Continuity/stability of the programs; stakeholders know that the programs will be available for the long term. Guiding Principles Please consider these guiding principles as you provide your comments: Program parameters should reflect best practices identified in previous consultation/review exercises Job retention and job creation will continue to be key outcomes Program parameters will need to reflect the unique circumstances of businesses operating in rural areas and the regions Program support should maximize the impact on the regions and rural areas within the regions Fiscal constraints limited program budget Results from the Current Business Support Programs Eastern Ontario Development Fund Since January 2013, the EODF has committed over $40 million* in 62 projects leveraging business investment of over $410 million, and helping to create and retain over 7,000 jobs. Southwestern Ontario Development Fund Since January 2013, SWODF has committed over $105 million* in 140 projects leveraging business investment of over $1.3 billion and helping to create and retain approximately 28,000 jobs. Approximately 80% of EODF and 60% of SWODF approved projects are in communities with fewer than 100,000 people. Rural Economic Development (RED) Program Since 2013, more than $32 million* has been invested in over 220 RED and REDrelated community and business projects generating over $177 million in new economic activity and supporting more than 3,000 jobs. *These are commitments for approved, contracted, and closed projects, not all of which have yet been announced. Rural Regional Business Support Integration and Program Review Page 3

For reference, the following table presents a comparison of key parameters of EODF/SWODF and RED, along with some observations and considerations related to similarities and differences between the programs. Parameter Program Objectives EODF/SWODF Promotion of regional economic development: Attracting and retaining investment Creating and retaining jobs. Promoting collaboration and cluster development Productivity, Innovation and Expanding markets Existing Program Criteria RED Business Development Stream Strengthen rural Ontario Building economic capacity Encouraging collaboration Economic competitiveness Productivity, Innovation and Expanding Markets Workforce Training Job creation and retention Observations and Considerations Goals are aligned to support economic development, productivity, innovation, expanded markets and job creation Geographic Regions Regions by defined counties. 15 counties in eastern Ontario 18 counties in southwestern Ontario Projects must benefit rural Ontario (municipalities with less than 100,000 people and/or with a population density of 100 people/km² or less) Program is available all across Ontario, including the north Significant overlap of eligible regions EODF and SWODF do not cover the north or the GTA Need to balance program design and funding allocation available Target/Eligible applicants (business stream) Existing businesses with 10 or more employees and 3 + years financials/operating history in an eligible sector Businesses, including corporations, individuals (e.g. sole proprietorship), and co-operatives EODF and SWODF have more specific eligibility criteria Rural Regional Business Support Integration and Program Review Page 4

Targeted Sectors Eligible projects Small Community Pilot - businesses with 5-9 employees in communities of <20,000 population or population density less than 100 people/km² Advanced manufacturing, Life sciences, ICT, Tourism, Processing Investments in new technologies/equipmen t to offer new products or to serve new markets Minimum job creation requirement Meet program objectives above Can fund all businesses except retail or commercial developments Plans/strategies Applied research and analysis to support planning and prioritysetting Business or sector development and diversification Marketing, promotional or branding activities Workforce attraction, retention and development Broad to reflect diverse regional economies however some sectors excluded in EODF/SWODF Projects should demonstrate alignment with government objectives Minimum investment and job creation commitment Application Process Minimum $500,000 in eligible project costs Exception: Small Community Pilot min investment is $200,000 Job creation requirement if fewer than 20 employees at start must create 50%; for companies larger than 20 must create 10 or more jobs Must create more than 50 jobs to qualify for loan Ongoing, open application 2 stage eligibility checklist, full No minimum investment Job creation/retention commitments not required to receive funding Intake rounds, open application Single stage application EODF and SWODF have specific accountability for investment and job creation RED can support smaller businesses Some differences, notably, open intake versus intake rounds Rural Regional Business Support Integration and Program Review Page 5

Level of Funding Support application Funding support up to 15% Grant - up to 15% to $1.5M max, OR Loan up to $5M for projects >$10M and 50+ jobs created (up to $1.5M of the loan forgivable) Stacking with other provincial funding not permitted Up to 20% of eligible costs Cap of $1M Stacking with other provincial funding not permitted Some differences grant/loan Leverage is somewhat aligned OMAFRA will re-launch a community economic development program under RED. Proposed Program Design: It is imagined that EODF, SWODF, and the Business Stream of RED will be integrated under a new stream of the Jobs and Prosperity Fund called the Rural and Regional Growth Fund. Under this model, EODF and SWODF would continue to operate under the Attracting Investment and Creating Jobs Act (2012). Feedback from this consultation/review exercise will help us evaluate options regarding the level of integration, while ensuring that the program design speaks to the government s desire to see greater coordination of regional business support programs. Key Questions for Consideration: Project Assessment Criteria EODF and SWODF operate under the Attracting Investment and Creating Jobs Act (2012). As per the name of the Act, the level of job creation and private sector Rural Regional Business Support Integration and Program Review Page 6

investment associated with a project are key factors taken into consideration when projects are assessed. Question #1: From a regional/rural perspective, in addition to new job creation and private sector investment, what are the most important criteria that need to be considered in assessing the merits of a project? (Growth, Productivity, Innovation, New Markets, Geographic Location, etc.) Thresholds Current EODF/SWODF Minimum Investment and Job Creation Commitment: Tier Initial Jobs New Jobs Required Minimum Investment $ 1* 5-9 Increase by 50% 200,000 2 10-19 Increase by 50% 500,000 3 20+ Increase by 10 500,000 * In order to qualify for consideration under Tier 1, a business must be located in a community with a population <20K or with a population density <100 persons/ km². This Tier was added to EODF and SWODF in 2012 in order to encourage projects from smaller companies in smaller communities. Prior to 2012, all companies needed to have a minimum of 10 jobs at the time of the application. Question # 2: Job creation is a key government priority. With this in mind, how would you modify the existing program thresholds (business size, job creation requirements, minimum investment, and population considerations for smaller businesses) to make the programs even more relevant to the regions and to rural Ontario, while retaining a focus on the government s job creation priority? Support Level A fundamental consideration of program design involves setting the maximum level of provincial support (i.e. cost-share) available to any one project and/or applicant. Multiple reviews of the Ministry of Economic Development and Growth s regional programs have suggested that a funding cap of 15% is enough to influence the nature of an investment (e.g. buying an enhanced version of a piece of equipment, accelerating the investment, accelerating the job creation, etc.), without incenting applicants to undertake projects that do not make sound business sense. Question # 3: Recognizing that resources are limited and that the maximum support level has an impact on the overall number of projects that can be supported, what should be the appropriate maximum support level of the Regional and Rural Growth Fund? What factors need to be taken into consideration in setting the maximum Rural Regional Business Support Integration and Program Review Page 7

provincial contribution level for the fund (e.g. size of business, nature of business, investment size, geographic location, eligible sectors, etc.)? Best Practices in Program Delivery/Administration Question # 4: Reflecting on your experience with EODF/SWODF/RED, and other business support programs, what best practices would you like to see preserved or adopted in the delivery of an integrated regional and rural program moving forward? Other Question # 5: As MEDG and OMAFRA work to integrate EODF, SWODF and RED, what are the key factors that the ministries need to keep top of mind in order to ensure that the integrated programs respond to the needs of businesses and the economic opportunities in rural communities and the regions? Question # 6: What role do the business streams of EODF, SWODF, and RED play in furthering regional economic development priorities? Are there ways that this can be strengthened even further? WAYS TO SHARE YOUR COMMENTS We want to hear your ideas on integrating business support programs to support rural Ontario and your feedback on EODF and SWODF tell us what s working and your innovative ideas for making good programs even better. There are a number of ways to share your feedback: Online survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ontario_regional_rural_business_support_programs The survey will be live from December 5, 2016 to January 15, 2017. E-mail: e-mail your comments to JPF@ontario.ca Mail: send a written submission to: Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Growth Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Funding Administration Branch 10th Floor, 77 Grenville Street Toronto, ON M7A 2C1 For questions on this consultation document, the EODF/SWODF review or the integration of RED/SWODF/EODF business supports, please contact us at JPF@ontario.ca. Rural Regional Business Support Integration and Program Review Page 8